Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kapanadze and other FE discussion  (Read 859632 times)

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3316
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1350 on: April 02, 2019, 05:58:25 PM »
Some of them  list here but I do not know yet what it is.

Material presented herein may relate to and/or be implemented in conjunction with multilevel correlated magnetic systems and methods for producing a multilevel correlated magnetic system such as described in
U.S. Pat. No. 7,982,568 issued Jul. 19, 2011 which is all incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Material presented herein may relate to and/or be implemented in conjunction with energy generation
systems and methods such as described in
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/184,543 filed Jul. 17, 2011, which is all incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Such systems and methods described in
U.S. Pat. No. 7,681,256 issued Mar. 23, 2010,
U.S. Pat. No. 7,750,781 issued Jul. 6, 2010,
U.S. Pat. No. 7,755,462 issued Jul. 13, 2010,
U.S. Pat. No. 7,812,698 issued Oct. 12, 2010,
U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,817,002, 7,817,003, 7,817,004, 7,817,005, and 7,817,006 issued Oct. 19, 2010,
U.S. Pat. No. 7,821,367 issued Oct. 26, 2010,
U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,823,300 and 7,824,083 issued Nov. 2, 2011,
U.S. Pat. No. 7,834,729 issued Nov. 16, 2011,
U.S. Pat. No. 7,839,247 issued Nov. 23, 2010,
U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,843,295, 7,843,296, and 7,843,297 issued Nov. 30, 2010,
U.S. Pat. No. 7,893,803 issued Feb. 22, 2011,
U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,956,711 and 7,956,712 issued Jun. 7, 2011,
U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,958,575, 7,961,068 and 7,961,069 issued Jun. 14, 2011,
U.S. Pat. No. 7,963,818 issued Jun. 21, 2011, and
U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,015,752 and 8,016,330 issued Sep. 13, 2011 are all incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
 
Wesley
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 05:29:17 PM by stivep »

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1351 on: April 02, 2019, 08:31:59 PM »
I know how to make the fixtures and how to operate the Walker magnetizing equipment.

Here's a commercial example of a motor using sector magnetization. This is an AC-Delco brand automotive radiator fan motor designed to run on 12 VDC. All you magnet motor folks should really think about this DC motor and try to figure out how it actually works. It produces a good amount of torque, yet when unpowered spins freely without cogging.


But to make the kind of magnets used in the IEC motor you don't need sector magnetization. All you need is to stick the strong magnet to a thick piece of mu-metal, and then you too can duplicate the "razor blade" trick shown in the IEC demonstrations.



Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5010
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1352 on: April 02, 2019, 09:14:17 PM »
To reply #2460 " patent abandonation" it is to remark that this   application
 is now integrated in https://patents.google.com/patent/US10204727B2/en and active. !
   
      Caution not to abuse their commercial U. S. -market rights  !
Impressive how many improvements as new applications -prioritynumbers- are integrated in this one :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?CC=US&NR=10204727B2&KC=B2&FT=D#
Question : why only U.S. patent application and not WO  ?

Edit: have to correct me,
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Larry+w.++Fullerton&IN=&CPC=&IC=
and here the WO but EP Register information : " deemed to be withdrawn"
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=7&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20130502&CC=WO&NR=2013063273A1&KC=A1#

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_W._Fullerton     R.I.P.  24.11.2016

About "magnetizer" : walkerscientific,  Walker Magnetic Group

https://web.archive.org/web/20061110112451/http://www.walkerscientific.com/Products/magnetizing_conditioning_index.html

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3316
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1353 on: April 03, 2019, 06:11:54 PM »
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 05:30:27 PM by stivep »

Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1252
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1354 on: April 03, 2019, 09:21:30 PM »
was made by me, it does not work like an oscillator. and can not work, the direct current is broken.
??? >:(

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3316
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1355 on: April 03, 2019, 10:34:05 PM »
did you  wind coils  of magnetostructive rod  -(points  1 to 5)
for each given material permeability is given.
http://www.free-energy-info.com/Smith.pdf
go to right page.

Quote
Magnetostriction (cf. electrostriction) is a property of ferromagnetic materials
that causes them to change their shape or dimensions during the process of magnetization.
The variation of materials' magnetization due to the applied magnetic field changes the
magnetostrictive strain until reaching its saturation value, λ.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetostriction

Wesley
« Last Edit: April 04, 2019, 03:19:00 AM by stivep »

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5010
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1356 on: April 03, 2019, 11:17:55 PM »
We  are living in a "design"- world : https://newatlas.com/gold-melt-room-temperature/57327/
Fullerton worked with 200.000 Ampere bursts to change " conventional structure".
             sentire( to sense), fuehlen( to feel) power density :

https://contest.techbriefs.com/2016/entries/sustainable-technologies/6390

2 shoeboxes total ( battery + controler) , but net the generator only 1 shoebox-dimension for xxxxxx KW output.

One cube, 1 cm x 1 cm x 1 cm : 2 KW output, by related cycle process frequency.

It is time to make this " generator" 3d-printable.


1 cm x 1 cm x 1 cm : 2 KW x 24hpeak= 48 KWhp per day

human individual body cooling / heating energy need. : 12 W
MDI Dome,112 sqm : 2400 W heat peak by 400 W electric heat pump ( -20 °C ambient condition )
Electric multimotor-gear car 1 KWh/ 100 Km , 150 Kmpeak velocity( 130 Kmpeak street legality)
Electric intelligent household power need per day : 3 KWh ( /24 : 125 W )


Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1252
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1357 on: April 04, 2019, 09:47:09 AM »
There are only ferrite rods. :'(
But what is (positive dc input)?
 if there is no way for it. is a capacitor in the path? :)

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5010
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1358 on: April 04, 2019, 09:51:12 AM »
There are only ferrite rods. :'(
But what is (positive dc input)?
 if there is no way for it. is a capacitor in the path? :)
Can you, kolbacict, define -by eye - in " solar ink dots" the capacitor/condensator ?!  ;)
1 cm x 1 cm x 1 cm compact " solar ink dots" -cube output compared with 2 KW 1 ccm cube  !?
Goldbaum device : " coating" ! Material,physical emf effect !?
« Last Edit: April 04, 2019, 04:03:05 PM by lancaIV »

Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1252
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1359 on: April 04, 2019, 06:17:24 PM »
this circled in red. if it were not there, a cascade with a common base would result.

Offline gyulasun

  • without_ads
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4145
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1360 on: April 04, 2019, 10:16:21 PM »
was made by me, it does not work like an oscillator. and can not work, the direct current is broken.
 ??? >:(
There are only ferrite rods. :'(
But what is (positive dc input)?
 if there is no way for it. is a capacitor in the path? :)
this circled in red. if it were not there, a cascade with a common base would result.

Hi kolbacict,
I have edited the schematic you uploaded, at least to make the circuit work as a kind of blocking oscillator. 
I agree that the original schematic cannot work: "the direct current (to the emitter) is broken" as you said.
If you attempt to build this modified schematic, and you are not getting any pulse at the output where it is indicated originally, flip the ends of either the feed back coil to the base or the main coil at the collector, ok? (i.e. only the wires of any one of the coils) 

For your information: 
--the positive DC input is the supply voltage input with respect to the ground (which is the negative polarity),
--try to use a variable power supply, starting from a few volts to as high as 12 or 15 V, to find the best operating point for the oscillator, this also depends on your transistor specifications--the indicated output is via a coupling capacitor from the collector of the transistor, use here a capacitor whose capacitive reactance is but a few Ohms at the pulse frequency

I do not know where you can get a "negative magnetorestrictive rod" though... and I do not think its high price (if true) is worth the trouble to purchase such.

Gyula

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3316
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1361 on: April 05, 2019, 01:12:14 AM »
gyulasun I do thank you very much  for your contribution
good work
======================================

I think application is a part of the problem:
https://fas.org/man/dod-101/navy/docs/es310/asw_sys/asw_sys.htm
Figure 17. Bi-static sonar.
Material must be as listed in green color.
the system acts as  mechanical transducer
look at link below and the lower picture marked as figure1 system Block diagram
https://www.ijert.org/research/sonar-fish-detection-and-measurement-system-with-pic16f873-IJERTV4IS060453.pdf

So the unfortunate was that  book http://www.free-energy-info.com/Smith.pdf
was trying to refer to something that was  wrongly  explained.
but the idea is quite fascinating.
If you compare Tx configuration  from the lower picture and Rx configuration, it looks like both  use transducer .
and Smith assumption is that process of receiving is just reverse action  .

Note: I should  make schematic more easy to understand
but let it stay this way for now.
All that is important is to make Base able to open  emitter/collector junction  at first.
Than you can chose what you want to send  between collector and emitter.
And for how long. There is no output in the schematic.
So you can exclude this part.
The amplification can be done from the same + impulse.
but if you want to have train  of impulses send than you can use terminal marked output as external impulse delivery.
Would that be as long as  saturation of the capacitor?
-or you want to  cut  power to Base before that.
Wesley
literature: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaHD7665NeM
 
« Last Edit: April 05, 2019, 03:22:00 AM by stivep »

Offline stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3316
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1362 on: April 05, 2019, 03:03:16 AM »
 

Wesley
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 05:33:51 PM by stivep »

Offline mkjekyll

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1363 on: April 05, 2019, 04:31:53 AM »
Wesley perhaps I am a bot off topic now but a very solid RF guy turned me onto this VNA, looks interesting have to find out more such as is tracking gen limited like in the Chinese box.

https://www.arraysolutions.com/antenna-analyzers%20/vna-uhf-dx

Looks as though the coupler is inside the unit similar to many antenna analyzers, I do not know the downside of this config.

I don't participate on these forums much but have watched presentations and I highly respect the stuff Tinselkoala presents, thank you for participating in Wesleys tech circus!

Mick

Offline mkjekyll

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1364 on: April 05, 2019, 08:28:31 AM »
$1300 I think,  they have a single port unit for about $500.   The frequency response looks good but so did the Siglent until one gets to the lowside of the tracking gen which did not match lowside of the spectrum analyzer.  Not o mention the crazy software pricing.

Still looking for a you tube or video of performance.  Likely CPU-Ram related if code is not bloated DLL files that choke the puter.

The pci card unit you mentioned did not go low enough and the HP Vxi card unit that does go low enough

https://www.ebay.com/itm/HP-Agilent-89640A-VXI-Based-2-7-GHz-RF-Vector-Signal-Analyzer-PRICE-DROP/232488518625?hash=item36216543e1:g:PBkAAOSwo-RZuuSv

https://www.keysight.com/us/en/software/application-sw/89600-vsa-software.html#Bundles

 the software is very costly and may not have the scattering or smith charting.  I cant find the software free from Keysite except the 30day trial  Maybe I should sell the HP 89411 I got working and get the little computer based one, lower S/N ratio but more functionality.  Although that HP can go super low so may be worth hanging onto even without the S parameters.

Most of the cheap puter ones do not work below a few hundred MHz so I think the unit I posted is different in that it is based on a lower freq unit and uses freq multiplication for higher frequencies, this would explain the lower dynamic range on the higher frequencies.