Comparing the power density from a " nuclear power to heat to electric plant" with Harry Goldbaums device
https://contest.techbriefs.com/2016/entries/sustainable-technologies/6390A nominal generator, approximately the volume of two men's shoe boxes, including the battery and control module, can supply extraordinary output.. Even operating at a low frequency of 400 hertz, the net induced voltage is +/- 8.4Kva/sec, (which is an hourly rating of 30.2Mva/hr (40,500Hp)). For comparison, power plants generate from 375 to 758 Mva; a wind turbine generates 2-3 Mva; a large heliostat may generate 280Mva..
show us how powerfull 10 cm x 10 cm x 10 cm [ dividing with 2 men' s shoebox volume and multiplicate with f.e. 29767 KW (~ 40500 hp by 400 Hz propulsion)] " EMP POWER CUBES " could become !
In this power range motor controler ,inverter and battery charger are in the 1 $cent/W production costs level.
From Euro-currency view and for comparison : $, Hongkong or U.S. ?
1 shoebox dimension : 35 cm x 20 cm x 10 cm = 7000 ccm
2 " : = 7000 ccm x 2 = 14000 ccm
EMP POWER CUBE 10 cm x 10 cm x 10 cm = 1000 ccm
29767 KW ( 400 Hz): 14 = more than 2 MW per " EMP POWER CUBE"
I think that 1/100 from 2 MW is for the common household sufficient :
" MICRO EMP POWER CUBE" ( POWER STICK )
like
https://www.logistik-xtra.de/polysteel-600Taking oeko-energie.de and mtbest.net their " intelligent household" consume numbers,1/1000 from 2 MW is enough :
a theoretical 1 cm x 1 cm x 1 cm cube with 2 KW output( 400 Hz)
Negative "sink" Voltage energy
1 Wh = 3600 Wsec and by 400 Hz cycling : 3600 x 400 x 2 = 2880000 Wpulse( average, Wpulse peak?)