Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84193
  • *Latest: eirik

  • *Total Posts: 897200
  • *Total Topics: 15809
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 16
  • *Total: 19

Author Topic: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum  (Read 500087 times)

Offline SolarLab

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 190
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1275 on: December 09, 2018, 08:55:39 PM »
F.Y.I.
 Thanks tysb3...

Andrey Melnichenko - last seen today at 1:43 am [time now is 19:06Z - 09 Dec 18]

Posts by Andrey from VK.COM ( https://vk.com/id285085326 ):  Please go here andread the posts from
Andrey Melnichenko starting at 30 Nov at 8:30 pm (top post)  FREE GENERATION VS FELOFLOGONS CHARLATANES.
Follow on down and read the rest.

  {{{  Andrey M. is pissed ! }}}

The entire thread is a very good read! Some technical stuff up to about 01 Nov. 

A few brief quotes from his latest (30 Nov) VK post: 

"... And in 2019, many in the world will be able to buy a set for experiments themselves and personally receive
all the results on their desk. Here the main simplicity and killer efficiency ofgeneration. ..." 

"... In December, right here in VC, I will lay out another ten more experiments of the most visual
100-300W or more watts and which will blow up all the world's uninterruptible power electronics.
You do not need any powerful BTG right away that you need to demolish all the wretched old energy. ..." 

"... Let them build their nuclear power plants and wind turbines there and all these solar panels. And for
the introduction of power plants, the time will come as the arctic fox imperceptibly and unexpectedly with
a powerful blow at once by millions of small devices. There are large world electronics manufacturers who
are already in the subject and who just need time to bring everything to the finished product. ..." 

From a 28 Nov at 2:35 am post: 

"... Already, 2019 will be a powerful beginning of my Super-Project FREE GENERATION and at the same time
my well-deserved triumph as its creator and inventor, and here you just need to calmly and everything without
any fuss. And what then when it will be too late to rush and not to occupy a queue in the window of the patent
institute applying for his own invention. ..."

"... There are no jokes and no toys. This is all a serious global business. The volume of all only open (this is without
taking into account sales of know-how and technical secrets without any official registration of patents) licensed
patent payments of concessions and contracts and all transactions in the world for more than a trillion dollars
and there are no concessions to the country and the inventor's citizenship. All that time is not protected zahapat
others and forced to pay as for their own. ..." 

--- could it just be part of "The Great Awakening" ?  Q

--- Lesson IMHO: Move beyond this myopic bubble - there's a whole wide world out there just waiting for discovery! 

FIN

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1275 on: December 09, 2018, 08:55:39 PM »

Offline r2fpl

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 481
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1276 on: December 10, 2018, 04:04:44 PM »
I would like to say that one of my ideas is HV.
There are two magnets and we create a spark between them. The question: do we combine the magnetic fluxes of both magnets in this way?

That would be great :)

Would it be so simple ?!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7oziZUJy5Q
« Last Edit: December 10, 2018, 06:23:17 PM by r2fpl »

Offline Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2446
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1277 on: December 10, 2018, 09:57:55 PM »
Bits and bytes on a web page can only go so far, which is usually
not very far in regards to this topic. If someone really has something concrete to demonstrate that
shows something unusual, then they will have no problem demonstrating it.
Either they really have
built something and can demonstrate it, or they have nothing. Not willing to do demonstrations?
Then don't expect too many people to take any claims very seriously at all.  There is a mountain of such
non-demonstrated claims here at ou.com already that have gone nowhere. :)


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1277 on: December 10, 2018, 09:57:55 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline gyulasun

  • without_ads
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4078
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1278 on: December 11, 2018, 12:06:07 AM »
Hi Wesley,

In his patent US9742252 (but also in his earlier applications) Ted mentioned a Bulgarian inventor, Valerij Ivanov
who has had "electrical means of implementing a reluctance switch". This method was discussed in 2008 here in
this forum (besides a Bulgarian forum which was later changed to another named forum).  Here is the topic on this
forum, from Page 2 where a replication attempt was also shown by a Bulgarian member:
https://overunity.com/4300/a-truly-overunity-transformer-meg/msg134122/#msg134122

Also a personal visit to the inventor was made, see these two posts:
https://overunity.com/4300/a-truly-overunity-transformer-meg/msg134280/#msg134280   and
https://overunity.com/4300/a-truly-overunity-transformer-meg/msg134670/#msg134670 

And here is a demonstration setup by the inventor, from 2015, with a measured COP of 4.5 (with English subtitles)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4bMgDUpuWI 

The reason I mention all this is that I could accept COP>1 with the reluctance switch principle if and when the
following thing is correct (and no NMR should neccessarily be involved):
The input power to saturate or nearly saturate a certain part of a first magnetic circuit is less then the output power
acquired (as result of the changing reluctance) by an output coil in the second magnetic circuit where magnetic flux
is provided by permanent magnets.
This seems to be correct in the Bulgarian setup, at least this is what is made to believe by the shown measurements
if I give the benefit of the doubt. 

An interesting question on the reluctance switch principle: how a square shaped B-H curve of a specific core changes
(or gets distorted if it does) when this core is inserted into a magnetic circuit with relatively strong magnetic flux from
permanant magnets and no input power is involved yet?
We would need to accept that the square shape curve changes only a little from the permanent
bias so that an acceptably low input power would be needed to switch this core towards saturation.  This would be
good to check and measure with a square shaped B-H curve core.

For those wishing to know what happened to this invention, here is the old site of the Bulgarian inventor with the help
of the internet wayback machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20170807105029/http://www.inkomp-delta.com/page2.html 
so he sold licenses to interested companies only (and not to individuals) and the companies had to sign agreements
not to disclose the device.
and here is his new site:  http://www.dvenergy.eu/ 

On his youtube channel the latest videos were uploaded about 3 years ago
https://www.youtube.com/user/Waleri1021/videos?view=0&shelf_id=0&sort=dd 

 Gyula

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2894
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1279 on: December 11, 2018, 12:30:20 AM »
OK, I'll play your silly reindeer game, but only just this once!
Ad1. irrelevant  ignorant answer provided

ad 2. How many  individual papers  of Ted did you examine.?
SolarLab: Over 3 million. Subject overall total.
SolarLab provided  ignorant answer not even reading the question.
but please provide me with link to  these 3M Ted's papers.
I examined  filed papers that are listed in point 4a

ad3. How many different  options he had listed for flux switching?
Solar Lab :Unlimited, based on the developers inginuety.
No  these information are  not proprietary and they are in public access.
He listed 5 different options out of listed 8 switching methods
 
ad3a.How many pages of  documents  in total of Ted did you examine.?
Solar Lab :Those are company proprieaty technical and business information.
No. You have no idea, no knowledge and you provide uneducated ignorant answer.
I examined 236 pages of  Ted documents all of them available to the public.

ad4. How the  invention in question  applies   in each  and every  concept - self looping.?
Solar Lab : Self looping will not work; must be a split, open, configuration (see all FE devices).
I did not ask you if it works but how it applies.
 By Ted concept it applies by means of  providing connection of separate coil  or dedicated section of the coil  to  the controller and is than used to power the reluctance switches

ad4a. Please   list one by one self looping with corresponding  unique  number issued by institution affirming the paper.?
SolarLab :Provide a reference Node. Void of scientific basis nothing more.
You have no idea , no knowledge and no intention to look at it. And you provide  wrong answer to the question.
Papers  falling to that description  are:
2015/0364979
60/977757
10118/29
60792602
60792506
60792504
60792594
60792595
60792505
2007/0242406A1
2006/0096219A1
2009/0096219A1
11735476
60792596
60977757
ad5.  What is the role of Ground wire in the device?
SolarLab Provide a reference Node. Void of scientific basis nothing more.
Your point of view is recorded.

ad5a. What  is taking place between earth and the device when 1kHz signal is applied to the device at 1A and 1V?
Solar Lab. You can not "see"  most/any forms of electron migration.
Your point of view is recorded.

ad6. What is the   shape of signal delivered to the device?
Solar Lab. TBD, a fourier analysis with MOM or Tine Domain analysis (w/edge dependant).
there is no such thing as TBD analysis that applies to this device
Some search results:
neural or TBD's  responsible for giving fat women a false sense of confidence
I do not know how much fat you talking  about SolarLab and how it applies to Flux reluctance switch.
"TBD" - To Be Decided'  is misleading and should  not be used in front of the sentence.


ad7.  What is the sequence of mechanical domain switching in  each and every listed by Ted switching concept by Ted?
SolarLab :There appears to be NO mechanical switching.
Wrong Answer Ted  decribed precisely mechanical domain switching including drawings .

8.   Explain  the role of the slope  and angle of the slope of the signal sequence causing flux  switching
SolarLab.See 6. above.
You have  send me to  your nonsense answer.
Ted precisely showed shape and angle of slope in his figure 9A of 2014/00911890
He also pointed at relation of two signals in switches 1&4
and in 9A   pointed at relation of two signals in switches 2&3

ad8a. Explain what is  taking place in this particular magnetizable  core, when two signals collides by means of  sharp rise edge  in one set of 2 switches and 3 times  slower falling edge.
SolarLab ----------------------- not even one word-----------
SolarLab did not provide any answer.
 the secret of switching is in rapid violent and  partially colliding switching  where phase  and/or frequency difference plays primary role in energy "extraction" process of square hysteresis magnet.
Such as the one used in  computer logic to act as 0-1 switch. please refer to answer in ad21

ad9.  What is permeability  of the material  suggested  to be used   by Ted for   magnetizable member?
SolarLab: Use CAE material parameter analysis to determine optimum.
Wrong ignorant  answer.  You did not even read  the question.,
You have no idea what  CAE parameter is and how it applies.
We are not dealing with  rate-dependent, and viscoelastic models;elastic, plasticity, hyperelastic,  models, viscosity, PVT, and shrinkage data, Crash and drop,Testing of foams,modeling of rubber,Creep, Fatigue.
The answer to that  question is : permeability of 2000 and permeability of 1000 in two different  applications.
   
ad10. What rapid switching in Ted device has to do with   ferroresonance?
SolarLab : Material dependant - wide band ferrite material (http://overunity.com/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
I did not ask you if it is material  depended, but what it has to do  with Ferroresonance or nonlinear resonance in that particular electric circuit .
The right answer is  frequency of resonance and  consequences of that resonance,when a circuit containing a nonlinear inductance is fed from a source that has series capacitance, and the circuit is subjected to a disturbance such as opening of a switch. And we are  talking  about switches here.
But how could you know it if you have no idea how many  different option of switching
Ted proposed as working concept.

ad11. What do you think  Ted's  device has to do with Lithuania Experiment ?
SolarLab : Flux control possibly, but TBD
You right in that answer Flux control  at frequency  of highly nonlinear resonance.  .
Thank you for not using abreviation of "TBD" - To Be Decided'  in front of the sentence.


ad12. Can bifilar winding be used in  Ted's magnetic  flux switches?
 Solar Lab Where is it used, which coil - trick question - bifilar!
I did formulate precise question and expected precise answer. Yes it can  it was listed in one of Ted papers  and is listed  as one of known methods of switching
Quote
type in  browser : bifilar drives contain bifilar windings.
ad12a.Please provide - the List all switching method applicable to Ted's device  and explain why?   
Solarlab: these are company proprieaty technical and business information.
No these are not company  proprietary information , these are published and accessible information  from Ted's invention, but you did not bother  to read it.
Switching methods listed by Ted:
- manual
- airgap
-rotary  airgap
-stationary airgap/ magnetic
-reluctance path switch
- airgap rotary with inserts
- piezoelectric stationary switching
-Microwave remote switching by means of  interacting with dipoles of the magnetic  domains

ad13. What is the suggested  schematic for  Ted's  device (not the block diagram)
Solarab: Those are company proprieaty technical and business information.
The schematic was listed in my video https://youtu.be/DNxob3yY4LE?t=204 here.
However controller  can be made based on concepts  of reluctance  switching that will be published later.
Or ready to use  form of generator is  listed in 9742252b2 in this case  there is a  need for two of them.

ad13a What is your   own suggested  schematic for  Ted's  device (not the block diagram)  and explain why?
Solarlab-------- no answer- --------------
No  suggestion provided, not even the sentence " I do not have one..."


ad14.Does NMR apply to arrangement of the coils and orientation of the coils in Ted Device?
SolarLab: No.
 Your answer is recorded.

ad15. if answer to question 14 was no than question 15 can be excluded.
However fundamental requirement is to have interacting   coils at 90  degrees.
or magnetic domains of separate pieces of the interacting materials in within the same magnetic loop at 90 degrees. but that is my suggestion and  because of exclusion  of  question 15 does not require further answer nor discussion.


ad16. If the claim of Ted is  1V, 1A at input and  output   of 1500V  ( current is not questioned  now)and F=1kHz than:
a- what is the relation between   current and  voltage  in  core that has geometrical shape of figure 8              in time frame of 100ms  and frequency 1kHz
b- what is the relation between   current and  voltage  in  core that has geometrical shape  listed in  sandwich  in time frame of 100ms  and frequency 1kHz
c- please provide me with  explanation  why voltage  ratio 1V to 1500V is present between input and output of Ted Device  by method of exclusion and what rate of change has to do with it( if any)
d- do we see at output the difference  in first 10ms and last 10ms of that 100ms sequence?
e- please provide me with  explanation of what   is happening to crystalline of  every listed by Ted  permeability value, listed mechanical size of domain, ( in every single  paper published   using word "preferred")
SolarLab: a. b. c.  d. e.  See CAE results.
Wrong ignorant  answer. you do not even know what I'm asking you for.
But instead of me  answering to the question I ask you for answer to that  question again  since now you have listed literature to look at.


ad17.  If you where  to  look at  factor of transmutation  would you exclude such as impossible .
Solar Lab: Yes. The device does not appear to change molecular form.
your answer was recorded.

ad18.  because question 17 was excluded by SolarLab, than there is no need to answer to question 18.
ad19. because question 17 was excluded by SolarLab, than there is no need to answer to question 19.

ad20. Is it better to use two generators of signal or just one in Ted's device
SolarLab: TBD.
 The answer provided in form of acronym is ignorant restricting any  exercise of your position in this area.
 The answer is:  Two generators or one with two independent outputs are applicable.
Ready to use  form of generator is  listed in 9742252b2 in this case  there is a  need for two of them.


ad21. would you decide to use two generators instead of one  and two outputs?
SolarLab.See CAE analysis.
Wrong answer. in questions 20 and 21 I did ask you for your conceptual preference and not for range of
optional outlooks  or general attitude to life. 
The answer is that two independent generators  usually allows for independent adjustment of parameters of square signal and  signal relation between two in time frame.
The whole mechanism of Lithuania experiment to achieve  unexpected but unprecedented  output was 
relation between two identical 1W output generators where one operated at frequency close to 60Hz and the other  at the highest frequency of "ferroresponse" of yoke from old Russian TV Rubin.
The point where energy was extracted was the overlapping area  of  two signals sightly colliding between themselves right before the maximum of amplitude of the signal delivered from lower frequency generator.
During the test  I found that harmonic of Schumann frequency close to 60Hz  gives us the best response .
 
ad22.  Would you apply the same frequency to two signals operating flux  switching in the same frequency or in different frequency
SolarLab.How would two signals affect a single coil? Think fourier (smoke and mirrors stuff)!
It looks like you have problem with response. And that is good as long as you indicate need to interact .
Rapid and violent collision in switching of square hysteresis  magnet gives the best results and is indicated by Ted as method of proper energy "extraction."
The very specific  kind of such  magnet is the magnet that allows switched polarity to remind in domains memory .
Such magnets have been used in 1960 computer logic.


ad23.  The entire question 23 related to Schumann frequency was explained  by me briefly in 21
more answer can be provided in  separate  comment.
since Ted indicated frequency of 1khz than suggestion is to use one of higher harmonics of Schumann frequency and provide ground to the device magnetizable member!!

===========================================
There is number of photographs, schematics, drawings and quotes in  papers  considered to be unpublished but still accessible in public domain.
I'm in process of verifying legal requirement if any  in area of publishing such material.
=============================================
Dear SolarLab I'm not guru.
I'm nobody special, just regular man walking on the street interested is some devices and some phenomena behind them.
I might be  wrong in some evaluation, but I do not intentionally mislead people nor provide paid by some eastern  government action to create chaos and disorientation.
You dear SolarLab  point at Melnichenko in relation to Ted  having no idea what exactly Ted is talking  about, and you are trying to show supremacy or superiority of Melnichenko over Ted technology.


I found Solar lab response  offensive, ignorant, arrogant, and far below level of good spirit of team
members who share opposite view on the  subject matter.
I do respect freedom of speech, however this post of Solarlab raises serious  questions  as to what kind of agenda he represents and why.... if any..
 
Wesley
« Last Edit: December 11, 2018, 04:11:54 AM by stivep »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1279 on: December 11, 2018, 12:30:20 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2894
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1280 on: December 11, 2018, 01:40:11 AM »
Bits and bytes on a web page can only go so far, which is usually
not very far in regards to this topic. If someone really has something concrete to demonstrate that
shows something unusual, then they will have no problem demonstrating it.
Either they really have
built something and can demonstrate it, or they have nothing. Not willing to do demonstrations?
Then don't expect too many people to take any claims very seriously at all.  There is a mountain of such
non-demonstrated claims here at ou.com already that have gone nowhere. :)
My dear friend.
I have to be very cautious, when dealing with patents and patent application.
There is requirement to understand  regulations in this area.
Presentations are considered  as possible patent infringement.
However not in all situation and not always.
So there is room for movement but must be consulted with patent professional.
There is quite easy  way to do the same for non US citizens with regards to "US patents and patent applications.
They are usually  not limited in their rights to provide  the demonstration.
By  case of  Apple you do not have requirement to search if given technology was patented or filed  if the patent  was not  issued in your country.
or even if it was issued in your country  the patents rights holder must first  notify you  of such violation  ,so by that you have chance to prove that you did not gain from his invention.
In many countries presentation is considered   a public  form of evaluation since   data is already in public domain. 

Wesley

Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2894

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1281 on: December 11, 2018, 02:01:14 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline stivep

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2894

Offline NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4972
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1283 on: December 11, 2018, 02:51:02 AM »
Dear Nick Z
I accept your judgement.
this is your right to do it.
I do not fight with Solar lab over difference of opinion but accuracy of response to the  question.
If the question is about  papers of pages of related documents  issued by Ted , and SolarLab says 3 millions than I have rights to ask him  about the link to these documents.
or call him ignorant and if he proves existence of these 3million documents I will  apologize.
That is the civilized way to respond I assume .

I believe you too did not read  the questions and correctness of SolarLab answers in regards to specific  questions.
As far as my credibility I do very much appreciate  the fact that anyone is  interested in my comments despite his opinion about me.

Wesley

   Wesley, that is my opinion and I'm not a newby here. And, no it's not OK to call someone ignorant. Even if you later apologize.    If you want to be respected,  show some respect, yourself.
   I am not interested in just your opinion, I am interested in your tests. If there is nothing forth coming. Well... I guess I'm getting bored of all this empty discussion, as well. 
   If this guy Ted has sold his ideas and invention, and has told the corporate buyers not to disclose the actual mode of operation of his device, then what the puck are we going to gain from all this? No need to answer.
    Sorry.
   

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1283 on: December 11, 2018, 02:51:02 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3513
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1284 on: December 11, 2018, 09:46:16 AM »
Hmm! well |I have a few things to say.
If an inventor develops something where the inventor has copied an idea or concept from another inventer and he wants
a none disclosure and a greed contract in law commonly known as a 'patent' then the DIY enthusiast should be allowed
to use the device for his own use, we are all sick of being used by these people who use the psychological advertising technique
Ted has used here 'The carrot in front of the donkey.

As far as I can see, why does 'it' look and appear like 'Simon :o 8) Marks 'Torroid'.

Out of interest what Kabal has bought it?  The point here is we all have a conscience here and yet we allow these demiurges
(Entities in control) to get away with this injustice where they are allowed to enslave us over energy that exists everywhere and even if
the universe was frozen over at absolute zero energy would still be as dark matter just like them. ;D ;D
« Last Edit: December 11, 2018, 03:25:41 PM by AlienGrey »

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7467
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1285 on: December 11, 2018, 05:20:41 PM »
Lots of water here has gone under the MEG bridge ,I noticed In Guyala's link member Groundloop in 2008// he posted his sad story of time and effort with an MEG.
This is extra sad for some of us here who adored Groundloop ,every year he did something around Christmas time ..at the forum here for members .
if anybody has heard from GL please send a note ?I truly hope he is still on the planet [had a very bad medical issue a few years back ]
I suppose I will try to call his Brother [GL's numbers were disconnected last time I tried]

Note to SolarLab// tell the Kid its not all Games here ,even tho that seems the path for many younger folks ...
//respectfully//
Chet

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1285 on: December 11, 2018, 05:20:41 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4972
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1286 on: December 12, 2018, 03:29:41 PM »
   Stivep:
   What we need now is not to hear you repeat more of what you've already mentioned, several times.    What we need is verification of a working system. Not more boring discussion with unproven validity.
   More and more of these empty discussion are bringing us no closer to finding a true self running device.
 
    The Lithuania tests that you were sleeping through are a joke. Nor can you nor anyone else replicate the same simple device to prove the point. What is the point then. To repeat and repeat the same stuff. Is that all that you have?
    You mentioned about having a bomb shell of a device. Was that a joke, as well...  Have you now forgotten about that???We are still waiting to hear about it.  At least I am.  Really Wesley, you are losing all credibility.   
Or perhaps you are now just trolling, to try to keep us all in the dark, with your long essays about nothing of any practical use.  Ted has not shown anything working in the last 3 years, unlike Kapanadze, who has at least provided us with some new videos, of some amazing self runners, all of which are shown to work.  That is what we should be discussing, and at least trying to verify their workings by hands on tests.

   

Offline NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4972
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1287 on: December 12, 2018, 04:58:23 PM »
   Stivep:
   To analyze a device by only talking about what you have read or seen, then repeating only that, is not to analyze, but to guess, instead.
   You are not impressing anyone by putting on a white lab coat, and showing a house full of old equipment, that you don't use.
   The comments and questions provided by us, have not been answered, at all. You are just beating around the bush, my friend.   If you have a need to communicate, please do so in a way that can add to our knowledge of this subject. As most of us here are not uneducated morons, as you seam to think.   The "I do not see", "I do not find", is the result of actual investigation. And is what we are ALL not seeing, nor finding.

Offline Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4324
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1288 on: December 12, 2018, 05:01:57 PM »
   
    You mentioned about having a bomb shell of a device. Was that a joke, as well...  Have you now forgotten about that???We are still waiting to hear about it.  At least I am.  Really Wesley, you are losing all credibility.   
 
I had assumed that Wesley had identified the 'bombshell' device as the 'Ted' device, although I must admit, I see it more as a damp squid device, given a lack of credible technical explanation applied to its modus-operandi. More interesting to me is Wesley's latest breaking news about a simple transformer that could be at the the heart of a 'bombshell' device. A humble transformer as the engine of a self-running device at least seems to fit better as the engine of a Kapanadze 'box' device given the 'so simple you'll laugh' mantra.

Offline NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4972
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #1289 on: December 12, 2018, 05:19:08 PM »
   Hoppy:   Agreed.   If the news about that simple transformer is a clue to the Kapanadze "so simple you laugh device". We need to build it up, and test it. Or, IF it is similar the MEG device, which has not been proven to work through replications, then we need to forget about it, and move on.   I feel that time is running out. Does anyone feel as I do???  And that we are all on the verge of being exterminated, big time.   Those are my thoughts, which I need to communicate.

 

OneLink