It is customary in science when someone is submitting a scientific paper for peer review that readers
will respond back with frank and sometimes harsh criticisms. Sometimes the criticisms are
valid and sometimes the criticisms are not valid at all, but if that which is being submitted for review
has real merit it should be able to stand up to close examination. No one ever gets to the truth by
pussyfooting around it. I don't think harsh criticisms are really ever necessary however, but being frank
I think is necessary if a person really is interested in getting to the truth, so I try to be frank when
giving people feedback.
I don't think that it has been convincingly demonstrated by anyone in the several posted videos here where LED lights are being
lit up due to a strong HV EM field, that some unusual wave type or form of energy is being generated in those demonstrations.
Not saying it is necessarily not the case. I am saying I don't think it has been convincingly shown so far, IMO.
If someone thinks there is good reason to think that an unusual type of wave is being generated in those demonstrations,
then I would suggest that they consider taking a step back and try to think of ways to conduct tests that show that those
special waves or unusual form of energy they think they are generating really does have unusual properties that
differ from 'normal' EM fields and transverse EM waves. Think of ways that those unusual properties can be tested and
demonstrated in a test setup, would be my suggestion.
It is known that sparkgaps and corona discharge in general will generate high frequency radiation in the range of UV thru X-rays
and even higher in the range of gamma radiation, but the X-Rays and other radiation such as gamma radiation are typically
not at a high enough level to be dangerous unless the corona discharge itself is really high energy. If you think a setup similar
to what Wesley has described is producing very high frequency radiation of some kind, you could possibly employ a
spectrum analyzer that goes well into the GHz range and/or a radiation detector to detect alpha/beta/gamma radiation levels.
A really good high frequency range spectrum analyzer is probably quite expensive however.
I have already commented previously that I have seen some potentially promising results in the past in
some of my tests regarding combining two waveforms at different phase angles to each other (such as at 90 degrees).
In one of my test setups I was able to see the same sort of unusual extra 90 degree phase shift occur
in the output waveform when the two input waves were combined that Ruslan had demonstrated in one of his early demonstrations.
What I found is that there is one extra 'feature' I needed to employ to see that effect at the output. I have not heard anyone
mention that extra 'requirement' so far in terms of how to apply it to this particular type of arrangement. I have been hesitant to mention that openly
so far because there is often so much mudslinging and BS flying here, and also times in the past when I have pointed out some other experimental observations
I thought were interesting here it is either completely ignored or one or more people make some braying donkey comments in response.
I can fully understand why people hold back on sharing some stuff like that when so many are just here to troll and bray. Ha ha.
My testing so far (in the last couple of years) was done at too low a power level to be able to draw any definite
conclusions at all about whether what I was seeing could produce anything along the lines of OU, but it seems
to at least hold some possible potential. Because of those tests I have done, what Wesley has detailed about
combining two waveforms at ninety degrees seems to me to very possibly hold some real potential, since I have
seen some interesting things as well when experimenting along the same lines. I think Wesley may very possibly be
on the right track in regards to that, but the surface wave stuff and requirement for a special dielectric
arrangement I am not convinced about yet.
I am currently working on a unrelated concept I have of my own
design, not related to this stuff, which so far is not producing even near OU, but it should be increasing efficiency at
least compared to a more conventional approach, but still need to do a lot of testing and think of ways to try to improve
the setup to have any chance at OU. No one ever said this kind of research should be easy going. Ha ha. Stick with it guys.
I think you may be closing in more on Mr. Kapanadze. Just maybe need to put the pieces together now in the right way. So easy, right? Ha ha.
Maybe your lucky day is coming soon...