Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kapanadze and other FE discussion  (Read 1146921 times)

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #420 on: August 24, 2018, 11:27:17 AM »
I think there is slight connection between this topic and Figura discovery . Both need very strong Field. This is the secret which lies on fundiation of every ou

DreamThinkBuild

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 574
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #421 on: August 24, 2018, 02:56:46 PM »
"How does the Tesla Transformer and associated, so called, Antenna helical coil interact with (influence) the Grenade Coil?"

Maybe there is a way to create a solid state flux/charge compression generator without the one shot energetic effect while minimizing the loss mechanisms.

Quote
"An investigation aimed at optimizing the integration between a capacitor based prime power source and flux-trapping helical flux compression generator (FT-HFCG) is presented. An FT-HFCG simulation code, previously benchmarked with single and multi-pitch generators, was employed to study the kilo-joule class explosive system for this purpose. The details of this effort, which include the optimization of the field coil and stator coupling, as well as an examination of the effect of field coil parameters on the system performance, will be described in this document. For the simulated parameter space, the choice of field coil configuration caused the system energy gain to vary by 300%, and the optimum field coil configuration was found to be a single Litz wire conductor that had an axial length which was approximately 60% of the stator axial length."

source: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Design-considerations-for-flux-trapping-helical-by-Young-Neuber/cce87fe5decead8c8ca43f35d785d378deb2ea32
Note: The zip file contains a pdf on flux compression generators it was 7k over the limit  ::) so I had to compress it.

Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 534
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #422 on: August 25, 2018, 11:23:12 AM »
”Driving a conductive surface already containing a magnetic field” sounds like small antennas being driven with small power to make them appear electronically bigger.

Read this in one paper that described how to make small antennas appear bigger than they  physically appear

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #423 on: August 25, 2018, 12:10:18 PM »
”Driving a conductive surface already containing a magnetic field” sounds like small antennas being driven with small power to make them appear electronically bigger.

Read this in one paper that described how to make small antennas appear bigger than they  physically appear
Why would any one want to faff about with cultivating a magnetic field out side the ARadio field ???????
radio waves and magnetics < light speed  and Lenny baby's law :( :( :( :( :(
that's the difference in Radiant energy field.

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #424 on: August 25, 2018, 12:21:43 PM »
"How does the Tesla Transformer and associated, so called, Antenna helical coil interact with (influence) the Grenade Coil?"

Maybe there is a way to create a solid state flux/charge compression generator without the one shot energetic effect while minimizing the loss mechanisms.

source: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Design-considerations-for-flux-trapping-helical-by-Young-Neuber/cce87fe5decead8c8ca43f35d785d378deb2ea32
Note: The zip file contains a pdf on flux compression generators it was 7k over the limit  ::) so I had to compress it.
try winding the thick wind the other way! and dump the mechanical switch  ;D

SolarLab

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #425 on: August 26, 2018, 04:19:46 AM »
F.Y.I.

The GROUNDING question is explained well by Gorchilin at  http://gorchilin.com/articles/coil/?lang=en

See Fig. 1.4 attached below - Left is the RLC coil model, Eqn (1); Right is the Long Line coil model, Eqn (2).
Now, with respect to the Grounding question;
 
compare the Right and Left models and the answer to grounding will become quite clear!


Quotes from Gorchilin's page: 
 
Note: *math equations shown in MathJax Equation Source - primitive but it's the only way
to even show equations here.

The lumped and distributed resonances in the inductor

 Hams and seekers of free energy, there are questions about the different types of resonance that we are here and will try to illuminate. The problem is what it is. Everyone knows that an inductor (hereinafter, simply coil) can be considered as concentrated, and as a long line. In the first case, the formula for determining the resonance will be performing classical Thompson formula:

              f = 1/2\pi\sqrt{L\,(C_l + C)}  (1)

where L  is the inductance of the coil,   C  is its own capacity, and  l is the external capacitance connected parallel to the coil.
In the second case, we consider the coil as a long line, where the wave takes some time to get from one end to the other. If this time is equal to the oscillation period of the oscillator, in a coil set the mode of the standing wave. In this case, the simplified formula would be:

             f = {c\,k \over l} (2)

where c  is the speed of light, k  is the deceleration rate, which, in General, depends on the material of the dielectric, and l  is the length of the winding wire in the coil. This formula is greatly simplified, since   is actually nonlinearly dependent on the length and winding pitch, coil diameter and material of the dielectric. A more accurate formula can be found in [1]. The differences in these two approaches are already visible at this stage, and we will demonstrate that there are many more.

     |   Since the real processes that occur in the coil, is little known, and we shall not stop.
     |  Consider the mathematical model which with sufficient accuracy describe these processes,
     |  and the results of such calculations can be seen on real devices.

Two models

Consider the direct asymmetric long line DL in figure 1.1, which is excited from a sinusoidal voltage source E1, through the inductor L1. Take her private for the case where DL fits in exactly half the wavelength. Thus, on its edges, we get the maximum current, and in the center of the maximum voltage. All measurements will be carried out at a load resistance R1, the value of which will choose a lot less the wave resistance of the line. For the manifestation of two independent processes it is also important that DL was as far away from earth.

For the mathematical model this means that if DL is to roll into a coil, its diameter will be much smaller this distance. In this case, the calculation of the line is about to produce by the formula (2), since the parasitic capacitance is practically nonexistent and work well with the classical formula of Telegraph equations.

  SEE ATTACHED DIAGRAM
 
If DL put in parallel to the capacitor C1 (Fig. 1.2), it will begin to work one process, almost do not affect the wave. It is obvious that in this case we are dealing with an oscillatory circuit, the inductance which is the inductance of the line segment DL. I.e. a second, independent model, which can be easily calculated by the classic formula of Thompson (1).

Now it is easy to imagine what happens if we turn this long line in a coil — slightly changes its own capacitance and inductance, and two of the process and will work almost independently from each other. By the way, in this case, the wave model is better to rely on more precise formula, presented in [1].

Why are these processes, and thus their models, are independent? Look at figure 1.4, which shows their equivalent circuits. DL is in the standing wave, and since R1 is much less than the wave resistance, wave — almost no losses (right). On the wave process capacity C1 does not render almost any influence, but it forms with the inductance DL RLC circuit, which in turn also works independently (left figure). Changing C1 also has no effect on the wave process, but completely changes the picture of the LC resonance.

According to the author, the independence of the processes due to their work in different reference systems. The assemblage point, or point of combining these two systems is the load R1.

For skeptics who believe that in the coil (or in a long line) can't go two independent processes at the same time, a simplified model (Fig. 1.3), which added another DC power source E2. It is bridged by a capacitor C2 to a lower internal resistance at high frequency. As you can see on R1 we get the constant offset from E2, and independent of the antinode of the current standing wave from E1.

The combination of the two models

 Next, we will focus on the DL of a rolled coil. This option is currently the best studied. Our great experimenters provided the data, which suggests that when combining two models, the resistance of R1 increases dramatically the amplitude of the signal that rightly can be compared with the increase of the quality factor. This becomes very clear if we consider two independent models: if the processes are combined, it really will be the addition of the amplitudes. Also, researchers say about "the toe" — the phenomenon in which the increasing amplitude is kept even if there is some frequency deviation oscillator. But we'll talk about it another time, but for now imagine a calculator that can find points of combining the two models. http://gorchilin.com/calculator/reactor?lang=en

In fairness it should be noted that for combining standing wave and LC resonance, working on the harmonics, all the same it is better to use a non-inductive winding DL. Then the wave process is almost unchanged, and focused resonance is easier. This type of winding the researchers called a "grenade" or "dumbbell".

*** See Gorchilin's page for a proper layout, diagram and notation of the equations.

FIN

onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #426 on: August 26, 2018, 06:17:49 AM »
Solarlab
good post... good to see some have not given up.

Quote
Ruslan K 1 year ago (edited) - "In that setup, I use Tesla's patent on the removal of radiant energy!
Charging capacitors radiant dumped through the transformer in the load. The primary is a lot of turns,
the secondary is short for creating a current in the transformer. The ring should be with good magnetic
permeability !!! Otherwise, there will be little return. There I got only 150 watts to take off.

In this quote is a clue most people miss and for the few that do see it generally makes absolutely no sense. One can have a primary with many turns and a secondary with fewer turns however the secondary induced voltage can be equal or greater than the primary voltage. I think Ruslan knows this and the fact he understands that a Tesla coil is not required and other geometries may be superior is significant in my opinion. I came to the same conclusion, Tesla coils are simply too long and this takes away from the desired effect.

It's kind of like a puzzle and nothing makes sense until first we recognize what the piece is and then later where it fits in the bigger picture. Think about that... what looks just like a transformer but obviously is not entirely a transformer? , a transformer which has turns of conductor but does not always follow the turns ratio rule?. How can this be?, it makes no sense and then the piece fell into place and I felt silly that it took so long to understand something so simple, so fundamental in every aspect of nature. It is not for everyone.

This is what I absolutely fucking love about this field of technology... it never gives you an inch. Intellectually it's always an uphill battle and nothing is ever as it seems because everything is always fluid, dynamic and always changing. I have this simple rule... if I have not learned something new today which has completely changed my mind about something I thought I knew yesterday then I have learned nothing.

To "learn", ie."Gain or acquire knowledge of or skill in (something) by study, experience, or being taught"
To be "taught"?, but what if the people who presume to teach me are fucking half-wits... what then?. what if a majority of society is degenerate and prone to false beliefs what then?. Thus true learning must always rely on logic, reason, reality and above all else proof and not marginalized by mere populists beliefs.

So there you have it my friend and if you want to move forward there is only one question which should occupy your thoughts from this moment on... how, when and why does the standard transformer turns ratio rule or action between two coils not apply?. Any fool can read a textbook or google the question and tell me why it must apply but that is not the question I am asking... I am asking when it does not apply? and that is a very different question which apparently few have the intelligence to answer.


AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #427 on: August 26, 2018, 01:07:48 PM »
@Onepower
Solarlab
good post... good to see some have not given up.
==================================

why would any one bow to such disrespect on this tread ?

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #428 on: August 27, 2018, 04:49:59 PM »
As has been stated by Wesley & others, OU is not achievable.It has nothing to do with the basics being wrong.


People state all sorts of things, but it doesn't mean they are correct. :)
'Over unity' is just a term which indicates that you measure more power out
across a load than the measured input power. In my opinion there is nothing
at all wrong with the term, since its meaning is clear. Using the term COP > 1
may be a more acceptable term to some people, but both indicate the same type of result.

Neither term alone indicates or limits where exactly the excess energy is coming from, only that excess energy
is apparent. Most people probably accept that the excess energy would have to be coming from somewhere however,
such as possibly 'outside the system', but if you are talking about energy coming from outside a system, in such a case you first
need to define the boundaries of your system.  Anyway, for me, it is not a big deal at all, since the meaning is clear in both cases.
You measure more output power than input power. Where the excess energy comes from would be dependent on each individual case.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #429 on: August 27, 2018, 04:59:40 PM »
Does the system include the honking great FM radio station's transmitting antenna in Ruslan's backyard?

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #430 on: August 27, 2018, 05:07:19 PM »
Does the system include the honking great FM radio station's transmitting antenna in Ruslan's backyard?

Ha ha. What evidence do you have of such a thing?
I think Ruslan at least used to, and may still live in an apartment building.
His station has multiple transmitters covering large areas of the country, so I think the antennas would
not likely be in anyone's back yard (high power transmitters). :)

Belfior

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 534
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #431 on: August 27, 2018, 05:12:50 PM »
Does the system include the honking great FM radio station's transmitting antenna in Ruslan's backyard?

Or the generator in the bushes where ”the grouund is moist enough for good earthing”...

Also what I think Wesley is saying that you can produce usable electricity without paying taxes or companies from telluric currents. That is also fine by me. That would also mean these are produced by radiation from space to ionosphere and ground being the other plate.

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #432 on: August 27, 2018, 05:21:50 PM »
Ha ha Tinsel, you know very well that thats Ruslans daytime job!
There were no FM stations in the 30-40's
But Henry Moray used only  the desert, so now where do you stand, cactus land ?

Morey's notes describe other strange phenomenon like listening to remote conversations and an ad on device
that could suck energy from a focused point that he demonstrated using rats and mice that just left
a carbon carcass, thats telling us the device sucked energy from the environment.
That's how it worked what it did

onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #433 on: August 27, 2018, 05:28:23 PM »
Belfior
Quote
I agree Ruslan might be throwing people off deliberately. I think if the device is henuine the egfect is trivial to achieve. He wants to cash in before everybody has it.

From what I have seen and read Ruslan has not deliberately thrown anyone off and only provided as much information as he is willing to give. If we expect to be paid for our work then so should everyone else otherwise we are hypocrites by definition. Does Ruslan deserve to cash in on all his hard work?... well yes, obviously. No one else anywhere would expect any less.

Quote
People point me towards websites to go read i the basics. I think the reason we are still having trouble with OU is that it is the basics that we have that are wrong.

I don't think the basics are wrong only that we do not fully understand them and how they relate to one another. Logically, everything we do not understand cannot be inherently right or wrong... because we do not understand it.

Quote
My current bet is still resonant tank (so the cap charges instantly) and high farads. Then you got charge that rquals amps/s

A resonant tank circuit is simply an electron current sloshing back and forth between a coil and capacitor and all the laws which apply to every electron current are still in force. So the moment we try to conduct or induce energy away from the source we lose something as we all know. Force is the impetus which drives all motion and if there is more motion or energy present in the system then an extra force must also have been present. Otherwise we return back to the dark ages thinking something must have been created from nothing which is hardly an option in my opinion.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Wesley's Kapanadze and other FE discussion forum
« Reply #434 on: August 28, 2018, 04:39:09 AM »
An analysis of single wire earth return (SWER)system for rural electrificationhttp://scholarsmine.mst.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6061&context=masters_theses
When I went to grounding system  i was shocked to rediscover , again and again,  mistake made  even by very experienced electricians.
Most of us is looking  for  electrical properties of the ground and that is resistance
how  limited ..


So if your ***WBSA at  low low frequencies  1:200Hz ( or in Kapanadze 1kHz :20kHz)
 is placed right  next to  your far  away  grounding rod, and your ground  rod  has increased  LC than useful  voltage  at desired shape and frequency is
delivered  after 300ft ( 100m) at ratio explained     right  here.
 
1.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJXVVD8IiQc&t=13s
   Please look  at very first 30 seconds of this video .
2. https://youtu.be/EH9VhcDZYKg?t=64

 Wesley
« Last Edit: March 09, 2023, 01:04:54 AM by stivep »