Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kapanadze and other FE discussion  (Read 1120046 times)

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3120 on: November 09, 2023, 01:46:04 PM »
Photon energy is directly proportional to frequencyGamma rays > 300 000 000 000 000 MHz
In your Colman experiments it was only 400 megahertz, which is a trillion times less than the energy of any gamma quantum.
This very low energy is insufficient to interact with neutrons. With this frequency your can//heat the substance inside the tube.
You are absolutely right. :)

Wesley

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3121 on: November 09, 2023, 04:43:59 PM »
In regards to my previous set of comments  about single  water drop energy release mostly in form of an  explosion.
Arc-liberated chemical energy exceeds electrical input energy
Cambridge University.

Quote
Experimental observations leave little doubt that internal water energy is being liberated by the sudden electrodynamic conversion of about one-third of the water to dense fog. High-speed photography reveals that the fog expels itself from the water at supersonic velocities. The loss of intermolecular bond energy in the conversion from liquid to fog must be the source of the explosion energy.


Quote
Another report of electrically induced explosions in water came from Kansas State University. Johnson (1992)
claimed that the loudness was distinctly greater than that obtained with an equivalent amount of gunpowder.
He found that the remaining water droplets were cool to the touch and that apparently no steam had been produced.
Johnson suggested that the explosions may have been due to longitudinal Ampere forces,
and were tapping a new source of energy.
In 1994, the present authors took the first high-speed photographs of water ejected from an arc accelerator, and discovered
that the leading high-speed component was not a coherent liquid, but actually very dense fog, which
finally expanded in the air under the laboratory ceiling.
By trapping the fog in a balsa-wood absorber and measuring its temperature, it was found that
the fog was still cold – at most a few degrees above ambient temperature.
The discovery of cold fog explosions changed our scientific outlook on the remarkable behavior..
Yes this is remarkable  effect but  it  appears to be  manifested not only with water  or salt water.
Conductivity here is playing its role in the process and current can be quite low.
It is volume and amount of matter exposed and interacting  in the process that   in the small scale
behaves  as it would  behave in the large scale.
The example of it is small charge in the ordinance  interacting with the larger  one.
We may also  look at any compound reaction like role of  piezoelectric crystalline structure  in the lighter often  in its  sub nm form. :)
Wesley

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3122 on: November 09, 2023, 06:07:28 PM »
Photon energy is directly proportional to frequency.
Gamma rays > 300 000 000 000 000 MHz

How do you know that the gamma energy quantum has a frequency of 300,000,000,000 MHz ? We measure radio frequency by direct counting. This would be obvious. However doesn't that direct meter device  exist.
 Измерялка такая не выросла.  :)What if this isn't true? It's an illusion.  :o
p.s.   Or measurement  of wavelength .

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3123 on: November 09, 2023, 07:24:25 PM »
We may express  entire spectrum of Gamma as:
The frequency of gamma radiation ranges from 3X 10 18 Hz to 5X10 22 Hz.
frequency of gamma is 1020Hz .
However gamma is  a spectrum from - to. So the average  calculated from that spectrum represents 1020Hz .
Quote
electromagnetic waves covers  frequencies ranging from below one hertz to above 1025hertz,
corresponding to wavelengths from thousands of kilometers down to a fraction of the size of an atomic nucleus.
This range is divided into separate bands, and the electromagnetic waves within each band
are called by different names;
beginning at the low-frequency (long-wavelength) end of the spectrum these are:
radio waves, microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, X-rays, and gamma rays
at the high-frequency (short wavelength) end.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_spectrum

for easier understanding:
1THz  = One terahertz is 1012Hz or 1000 GHz.
Frequency of your Wi Fi is in average 2.4 GHz and 5GHz.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terahertz_radiation


Wesley

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3124 on: November 10, 2023, 07:58:00 AM »
I meant direct measurement that frequency,but it impossible.
We can judge the frequency only indirectly, by the energy during interaction.
Using formula E=hv.

kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3125 on: November 10, 2023, 07:46:06 PM »
I'm afraid to assume that even the almighty Wesley does not have an instrument that measures the frequency of ultraviolet radiation using the direct counting method.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Kapanadze and other FE discussion
« Reply #3126 on: November 10, 2023, 08:53:56 PM »
no I do not have
or to be correct I have some equipment in  ultraviolet region but not much.
Wesley