Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Pierre's 170W in 1600W out Looped Very impressive Build continued & moderated  (Read 279067 times)

Offline e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1881
Re: Pierre's 170W in 1600W out Looped Very impressive Build continued & moderated
« Reply #1395 on: November 24, 2021, 08:25:49 PM »
Not sure what went wrong but I'll try again in a minute


This should work:   https://www.sendspace.com/file/6pnbkj

Offline lota

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Pierre's 170W in 1600W out Looped Very impressive Build continued & moderated
« Reply #1396 on: November 25, 2021, 07:58:31 PM »

Hello
I have read many of the pages. But it probably won't work that way. In such a generator, the field is generated by the rotor. not through the rotating field of the stator. In order to generate OU in the actual excitation coil, the field must be far too strong. Just as an impulse if someone else is building. As an additional field energy it could get better. The inner coil must build up an additional field.
Greeting
Lota

Online ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7510
Re: Pierre's 170W in 1600W out Looped Very impressive Build continued & moderated
« Reply #1397 on: November 25, 2021, 10:48:06 PM »
Well last time this question came up
I called a few people who were working on it


Nothing yet ?
Some had stopped altogether ( after years)
And others were still “poking it “but also mostly at standstill?


But ?
I’ll ring a bit this week to see ??
I will comment then …


Respectfully
Chet
Ps
A fellow here did post a link to what he felt was overlooked
In magnet etc techs


Alan
Quote

Your best bet is the udt of Raymond Paul Jensen and the flux diode to give Lenz a different path and more room, aka asymmetric flux linking. He gave it away but people apparently don't want to find.And this https://patents.google.com/patent/US6707208B2/en


End quote
Going to ask a few fellows about this ? ( just noticed today while looking someone up )

The above quote was buried behind much text ??