Ok Cloxxki, you said it many, many times. I think all the people in this forum understanded it: for you this machine is not OU. But, where's the problem if people reasons on 2SO again? If you look on the left of the page you could see this is a "overunity forum". Nothing wrong if in this place people talk about machines that could (or not) be overunity, I suppose...  Maybe it's you that are in the wrong place. 
Some considerations:
1) You speak about "fraud", well, remember that mr. Milkovic and mr. Marjanovic have never asked money or sold anything about the theory of 2SO. Do you know what it means to "respect" for those who put their own face in the game for free?
2) I have tried by myself to build this machine, starting in 2010. You could see my attempts in my youtube page, Babarlizia. Well, today (5-2-2012) I have not a response, I can't say if this machine is OU or not. I only know that it's very harder to build in all is parts, and I only know that if you have a pivot point's movement of ten or more cm the machine surely can't work. But it's very, very difficult reduce the displacement of this part.
3) A very interesting paper (distributed freely....) try to explain the maths of this machine. It doesn't say that this is always OU. It just assumes that the machine could be OU, given certain conditions. No one today has tried to realize a machine based on this formulas. Well, if you think that this is a very unprofessional claims, please read it and demonstrate that the formulas are wrong. Otherwise, please stop your posting "This is a unprofessional claim, this is a fraud, this is not OU". We all have understanded your concept, it's clear.

Ciao a tutti.

1) You don't need to ask money to make something a fraud. The motive of money can also be reached via a detour. If I would offer a service of keeping the world's foremost scientists busy to research claims of devices I'd device specifcally for that purpose, I would know where to look for buyers of my service. Don't dream that we live in a world where misinformation isn't worth money. Or at least accept that others will spot frauds where you see good humanity at work.


2) The numbers of centimeters doesn't matter. You can't loop it woith movement restricted to 0.1mm either. Less is returned that taken out. I think I saw your vid, but can't get it to show on my computer now. The 2SO is presented as a 12x OU device. Oh no, it's 3.75x now. But not even 1.01 can be shown. It's an unsubstantiated claim, and it doesn't deserve the attention of anyone with a workshop, let alone replication. The long-standing OU claim with more and more press brought out without solution, is VERY BAD.


3)
In their pretty document, they immediate use the word overunity just for a weight that moves lower due to the CF pull on it. As well-educated as they are with the device, that's borderline criminal. It undermines the whole FE community join and makes such rookie statements. The signing scientist, after contact with Neptune, now apparently says that likely there is no OU to be had, just maybe.
All the nice math is beyond me (I can disprove it decently with my own kindergarten math though), and my attention spam doesn't allow for pages full of empty words. This now doc shows much smaller claims than their early where, where they basically gave the reader a spoon to scoop up all the OU flowing off it.

  @Andrea,
 I diagrammed a single pendulum with one counter weight.
What I realized is that leveraging does allow for one possible way.
Another may be possible, but will consider this way first. The weights
will be given a mass of 1 kg for the purposes of analysis.
 With both the counter weight and the fulcrum for the pendulum 1.3 meters
from the pivot point (A) of the lever, and with the weight of the pendul
1 meter from the center of it's fulcrum, I gave it a swing of 30 degrees to
each side for a total lateral movement of 1 meter.
 When the weight of the pendulum swings towards it's counter weight, it is
then .8 meters from the point A. This would give the counter weight the extra
energy equal to 1kg @ .5 meters. How this could work is if the weight of the
pendulum were caught by something that is suspended from the lever above it.
 This would change it's physical interaction within the system. When the lever
rotates in the direction of the counter weight (clockwise), the extra
energy could be used used to lift the weight of the pendulum. If the system performs
other work, then it is possible only a time delay might be suffered. Back to the
mechanics of the system.
 When the lever rotates to it's stopping point, the weight of the fulcrum could be
released allowing it to swing freely. As we know, it will cause the lever to rotate in it's
direction (counter clockwise). If the lever is held in this rotated position, it would allow
I think a better chance of the mechanics working. This is because there would be 2
control points for shifting the lever and utilizing it's potential.
 
@Cloxxki, it has been realized that gravity can violate the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.
In the U.S. space administration, they have used a principle discovered by a Russian scientist
who in the 1950's believed that a planet could accelerate another body. The deep space probes
use this principle to extend their lives and return more information of the outer reaches of our
solar system to scientists who might benefit from such information.
 
                                                                                                      Jim

related research

Libella With Inertial Propulsion Engine - Antigravity Effect - Stereoscopic format
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3dg47m94jg

It is not directly related to this topic, but it is interesting to mention here

Modified FM Chalkalis Energy Multiplier - 1330% Efficiency
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61-C0x6xtL4

  He should try wiring up a generator like Thane Heins did and see what power output is.

   Andrea,
 This is with a 15 degree tilt. It lifts the weight on the pendulum about 20 cm's.
The catch and release mechanism would be the tricky part.
 I think realistically speaking, something like this does not need so much tilt.

johnne874 / Jim Lindgaard

 Quick sending me PMs with your strange words. I have asked before but you just can't leave me alone can you.

Magnetic Pendulum - 3DS MAX Reactor Simulation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opMhVKK5_iU
 
Magnetic Pendulum Motor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RJF4OBa6eI

LOL yea I flubbed it up, 103 temp does make someone a bit cross eyed. still sick so I am not going to write any more just in case I do it again.  LOL Real sick for it sounds like you are saying nice things. I think.

  well Alan, it's like I told you in the pm, one reason I got badly screwed was by trying t help a couple of my brothers who were sexually molested. Most people like that never recover and and are usually quite self destructive.

edited to add;  since I do have a place to build, really have nothing to discuss. Would have been nice working with other people but as they say over at besslerwheel.com where you are a respected member, there is a reason why people like me are voted out. Building isn't credible.

bedini powered milkovic two stage oscillator
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3_DKdiN1w4

"This video shows the machine I showed in a previous video. I have changed the weight of the pendulum to 125lbs with the same Bedini coil with the ssg circuit"