Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?  (Read 565436 times)

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?
« Reply #1410 on: February 15, 2007, 06:49:03 AM »
I just posted a cross reference here about Alfred Hubbard GENERATOR:
http://forum.ctglabs.com/index.php?topic=40.15

Maybe someone can repost the information here for those of us that are not members on ctglabs.

Thanks
http://atl2.netfirms.com/engy/mutch/matrixlaw/hubbard.htm
http://rexresearch.com/hubbard/hubbard.htm
http://amasci.com/freenrg/hubbard1.txt
http://www.linux-host.org/energy/shubbard.html
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1761.1450.html
http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2206

Now its over here!

--giantkiller. To serve is the greatest reward!

As can be seen from here:

http://rexresearch.com/hubbard/hubbard.htm#usp1

Hubbard had used radium to enhance spark plugs,
so I now know, that he also used this technology in his coils
if he used spark gap contacts coated with radium the coils
get much more oscillation from the excited radioactive decay.

The same way worked the Morray device, just as a negative
resistor through excited radioactive decay in his radioactively
doped tubes ( diodes),
where the contact points were out of uranium doped materials.

Radiactive doped diodes can work as real negative resistors,
if RF bursts are applied.
The energy is extracted from the excited beta decay, which are
free electrons, which are added to the electrical circuit from the
radioactive decay. So it works as a real negative resistor= passive amplifier
without batteries !

Regards, Stefan.

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?
« Reply #1411 on: February 15, 2007, 11:00:20 AM »
Hello Marcel,

yes, I need money but I will NOT SELL MYSELF!!!!

This TPU is from Steven Mark and Im only a little guy working very hard on my TPU and thats all!!!

Otto

aki21

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?
« Reply #1412 on: February 27, 2007, 06:10:43 AM »
HI, Im new in this forum, and new on this type projects, im so darn curious!! can i ask for parts/components? coz i cant catch up on those beatings..... about the Magnet, could i use a speaker magnet for these?? sorry for being dumb, need some alot of info 1st. thnx

libra_spirit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?
« Reply #1413 on: March 29, 2007, 03:43:15 AM »
Perhaps I wasn't clear!

I agree with what you are saying, like phase motors, the TPU doesnt have a real rotating field.  You can only get that by rotating a real magnet!

All we are doing is turning certain coils on and off at different times and compass can ride this effect making it appear to have a rotating field, but thats just a visual illusion.

So, I am not sure how this gyroscopic effect can appear, something unknown must be going on, which can only be a good sign?!


D.

On rotating magnetic fields and mass rotation:

I believe you are missing a valuble quality of the nature of Copper which may shed light on this concept. The major weight of the copper atom lies in the nucleus. The nucleus of a copper atom is magnetic, but its electron shell is not magnetic but electric.

If you place copper in a rotating magnetic field one of two outcomes will happen. The copper will be physically dragged along with the moving magnetic field, or if the angle intersects wire at 90 degrees you will produce an electric flow. You get torsion or EM and the two are not the same.

The mass of the copper can thus be rotated without physically moving the copper device at the electron or matter bonding point.

As the moving magnetic field intersects a wire at 90 degrees the familiar kick will emerge. If you stretch this pulse out on your scope you will notice it is a series of sine waves at the NMR frequency. Maybe about 6 sine pulses at approximastly 5 Mhz.

Copper will act like a magnet at the Proton layer and it will follow a moving magnetic field, precessing around the polar alignment. These NMR pulses were discovered in the 50's by a nobel prize winner, and then abruptly forgotten, where down to now we still believe the myth that induction and diamagnetic fields happen only on the electron shell. Not true, the Proton is very much involved in this process.

Because the Proton will lag the turn of the magnetic field due to its higher mass we get a dragging effect from that layer that pulls the electron shell into a negative or dragged state. Induction lags in time frame, and the NMR rate is the factor by which it lags.

The TPU would seem to be turning the magnetic field in the copper atoms, using 90 degree pulsing coils. To make it turn completely over takes only a syncronized pulsing scheme. The magnetic field will rotate its poles through the collector wire loop. As the poles cross the wire no current will flow and energy will move into the torsion field, as the magnetic field moves past the 90 degree angle with the collector wire the energy will shoot into the electric field and the series of very high pulses will be shot down the wire as it crosses.

The TPU is embedded in cork to stop it from vibrating to pieces. Each time the magnetic field moves between the torsion state and the Electric state it creates a small jerk and makes a physical motion of the wires.

The TPU exhibits an inertial momentum, or gyro effect because its Proton layer is in a spinning motion of its magnetic poles, this creates a "forced precession". Best guess.

The entire mass of the copper is in rotation at the nucleus, this is one quality of copper making it an AG metal.

Dave L




supersam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
lords of the ring
« Reply #1414 on: March 30, 2007, 06:03:26 AM »
Perhaps I wasn't clear!

I agree with what you are saying, like phase motors, the TPU doesnt have a real rotating field.  You can only get that by rotating a real magnet!

All we are doing is turning certain coils on and off at different times and compass can ride this effect making it appear to have a rotating field, but thats just a visual illusion.

So, I am not sure how this gyroscopic effect can appear, something unknown must be going on, which can only be a good sign?!


D.

On rotating magnetic fields and mass rotation:

I believe you are missing a valuble quality of the nature of Copper which may shed light on this concept. The major weight of the copper atom lies in the nucleus. The nucleus of a copper atom is magnetic, but its electron shell is not magnetic but electric.

If you place copper in a rotating magnetic field one of two outcomes will happen. The copper will be physically dragged along with the moving magnetic field, or if the angle intersects wire at 90 degrees you will produce an electric flow. You get torsion or EM and the two are not the same.

The mass of the copper can thus be rotated without physically moving the copper device at the electron or matter bonding point.

As the moving magnetic field intersects a wire at 90 degrees the familiar kick will emerge. If you stretch this pulse out on your scope you will notice it is a series of sine waves at the NMR frequency. Maybe about 6 sine pulses at approximastly 5 Mhz.

Copper will act like a magnet at the Proton layer and it will follow a moving magnetic field, precessing around the polar alignment. These NMR pulses were discovered in the 50's by a nobel prize winner, and then abruptly forgotten, where down to now we still believe the myth that induction and diamagnetic fields happen only on the electron shell. Not true, the Proton is very much involved in this process.

Because the Proton will lag the turn of the magnetic field due to its higher mass we get a dragging effect from that layer that pulls the electron shell into a negative or dragged state. Induction lags in time frame, and the NMR rate is the factor by which it lags.

The TPU would seem to be turning the magnetic field in the copper atoms, using 90 degree pulsing coils. To make it turn completely over takes only a syncronized pulsing scheme. The magnetic field will rotate its poles through the collector wire loop. As the poles cross the wire no current will flow and energy will move into the torsion field, as the magnetic field moves past the 90 degree angle with the collector wire the energy will shoot into the electric field and the series of very high pulses will be shot down the wire as it crosses.

The TPU is embedded in cork to stop it from vibrating to pieces. Each time the magnetic field moves between the torsion state and the Electric state it creates a small jerk and makes a physical motion of the wires.

The TPU exhibits an inertial momentum, or gyro effect because its Proton layer is in a spinning motion of its magnetic poles, this creates a "forced precession". Best guess.

The entire mass of the copper is in rotation at the nucleus, this is one quality of copper making it an AG metal.

Dave L





Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?
« Reply #1415 on: April 09, 2007, 11:50:33 PM »

Earl

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 435
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #1416 on: May 24, 2007, 03:19:16 PM »
I also like the 4046 oscillator, but your schmatic has an error in it.
The clock input of the flip-flop is wrong.
Regards, Earl

hello guy's
i read the post for a wile and i think i have a nice and cheap solution.
it is a square wave from 0 to 1.5mhz
look at the schematics
drive it with a totempole and drive a fet
i tested the circuit and it is working perfect
so lo cost and built many as needed

greets
ernst muntinga
the netherlands

supersam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?
« Reply #1417 on: June 23, 2007, 04:47:28 AM »
marco,

bak up one click, and read my last post!!!  i know i didn't say a single word.  but it is still worth backing up and re-reading dave's post.  if there was anything i could add i would. 

i still have a great reverence for your work from the early days!!  thanks for all of the research!!  i bet it still has something to do with the radient energy experiments that you pursued, when no-one else was even looking.  Tesla's, experiments are documented in his patents, it is only a matter of time before they are duplicated.  i think the one you duplicated is now being touted, by someone else, in the bbc! 

don't give up because of the ignorance of others, like me.  we all know you can find the answers!  if we just allow you.

lol
sam

rupal

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?
« Reply #1418 on: July 06, 2007, 06:06:28 AM »
removed

doctoreast

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?
« Reply #1419 on: July 16, 2007, 05:23:48 AM »
Quote
As can be seen from here:
http://rexresearch.com/hubbard/hubbard.htm#usp1
Radiactive doped diodes can work as real negative resistors,
if RF bursts are applied.
The energy is extracted from the excited beta decay, which are
free electrons, which are added to the electrical circuit from the
radioactive decay. So it works as a real negative resistor= passive amplifier
without batteries !
Regards, Stefan.

Is this the latest theory for the Turbo TPU? 
Had me thinking that maybe his computer monitor
that was  on the table was generating static electricity
to power overunity and the oscillator?  Is this possible?
Either that or maybe precharged capacitor overunity?
I"m clueless, but that's how Tesla began.
Doc
« Last Edit: July 16, 2007, 06:10:21 AM by doctoreast »

sirmikey1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 244
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?
« Reply #1420 on: August 18, 2008, 05:28:14 AM »
FWD:

  Dave L had previously posted this article, and I am reposting it as a reference to this thread.
I don't know exactly why it was deleted earlier, but here it is again:

# paste ##

The Peculiar Nature of Copper:
On rotating magnetic fields and mass rotation:

I believe you are missing a valuble quality of the nature of Copper which may shed light on this concept. The major weight of the copper atom lies in the nucleus. The nucleus of a copper atom is magnetic, but its electron shell is not magnetic but electric.

If you place copper in a rotating magnetic field one of two outcomes will happen. The copper will be physically dragged along with the moving magnetic field, or if the angle intersects wire at 90 degrees you will produce an electric flow. You get torsion or EM and the two are not the same.

The mass of the copper can thus be rotated without physically moving the copper device at the electron or matter bonding point.

As the moving magnetic field intersects a wire at 90 degrees the familiar kick will emerge. If you stretch this pulse out on your scope you will notice it is a series of sine waves at the NMR frequency. Maybe about 6 sine pulses at approximastly 5 Mhz.

Copper will act like a magnet at the Proton layer and it will follow a moving magnetic field, precessing around the polar alignment. These NMR pulses were discovered in the 50's by a nobel prize winner, and then abruptly forgotten, where down to now we still believe the myth that induction and diamagnetic fields happen only on the electron shell. Not true, the Proton is very much involved in this process.

Because the Proton will lag the turn of the magnetic field due to its higher mass we get a dragging effect from that layer that pulls the electron shell into a negative or dragged state. Induction lags in time frame, and the NMR rate is the factor by which it lags.

The TPU would seem to be turning the magnetic field in the copper atoms, using 90 degree pulsing coils. To make it turn completely over takes only a syncronized pulsing scheme. The magnetic field will rotate its poles through the collector wire loop. As the poles cross the wire no current will flow and energy will move into the torsion field, as the magnetic field moves past the 90 degree angle with the collector wire the energy will shoot into the electric field and the series of very high pulses will be shot down the wire as it crosses.

The TPU is embedded in cork to stop it from vibrating to pieces. Each time the magnetic field moves between the torsion state and the Electric state it creates a small jerk and makes a physical motion of the wires.

The TPU exhibits an inertial momentum, or gyro effect because its Proton layer is in a spinning motion of its magnetic poles, this creates a "forced precession". Best guess.

The entire mass of the copper is in rotation at the nucleus, this is one quality of copper making it an AG metal.

Dave L



Mannix

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 564
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?
« Reply #1421 on: August 18, 2008, 11:47:37 AM »
Nice post!

I had not seen this before...

Lindsay

sirmikey1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 244
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?
« Reply #1422 on: August 18, 2008, 12:21:46 PM »
Here is another which is very hard to keep up with, keeps vanishing:

Over Unity in Copper
http://magnetism.otc.co.nz/Overunity.htm

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?
« Reply #1423 on: August 18, 2008, 12:38:11 PM »
Hello all,

remember a year ago?

I mentioned the magnetism fateback site. Its the same.

Otto

sirmikey1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 244
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?
« Reply #1424 on: August 18, 2008, 12:56:11 PM »
Otto,
  I just uploaded the two to archive.org; and please keep this in mind. 
Keyword will be steven mark tpu overunity, of coarse
Mike