Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?  (Read 565464 times)

djancak

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #90 on: December 01, 2006, 09:16:24 AM »
Hello guys,
There is nothing strange in the video from Turbo. I could do that since I was a kid. Try to calculate the work done in the show. A 40W light bulb worked for 10 seconds is 400 joules. A 9V battery 170mA work done at least 1 hour could provide:
9 * 0.17 * 3600 = 5508 joules. Therefore any simple step up converter can be used to show that magic.
I heard a new movie about Tesla helped a magician to do magic, there are too many magic. The unit (Joule) is a good drug to cure mental disease.
thanks for clarifying this

archon79

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #91 on: December 01, 2006, 10:26:35 AM »
One of the main arguements against the 'conspiracy' to supress free energy devices is that people can not believe governments, corporations and the powerful people behind them would be willing to deny such knowledge to the public.

This forum, on a small scale, is a perfect example of that arguement being false.

A small group of users, ctglabs, marco e.t.c have replicated the device and now they are playing a game of witholding information.

Think about it. If your fellow forum members are willing to act in such a way once getting a taste of the forbidden knowledge, what do you thing your government/military/corporations would do?

I sincerely hope that they are just biding there time and will release some plans for easy replication.

archon79

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #92 on: December 01, 2006, 10:35:20 AM »
For those that do not know, the PDF file is the patent application of Steve Marks and Ross D Schlueter for what looks exactly like the TPU.
Patent was filed in Feb 5 1998 and granted in Jan 18 2000 to Applied Materials, Inc.

The patent gives detailed cross section diagrams of the winding of the coils, sizes, what gauge wire to use, basically everything people have been obsessing over when trying to replicate the device. It's all there. What is missing is the control circuitry.

virus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #93 on: December 01, 2006, 11:05:04 AM »
@archon79

Please post a link to the patent you just mentioned, SM etc.

Virus ;D

virus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #94 on: December 01, 2006, 11:14:53 AM »

@ giantkiller


Also in regards to a dc to dc convertor: I have a bunch of these around. They are used to take (2) n-cells and pump up the wattage to drive the Otto Bock myoelectric controller and robotic hand. As you can see they fit into a two  9volt package like what had been posted about a lump on one of SM's coil.

--giantkiller.


GK

Can you please post the circuit for this DC - DC device.

Virus ;D

archon79

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #95 on: December 01, 2006, 11:19:41 AM »
@archon79

Please post a link to the patent you just mentioned, SM etc.

Virus ;D

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=6VC0S5DW

www.overunity.com/stevenmark/TPU.rar

The patent pdf is found in either of the above links. The patent is exactly like Steve Marks TPU device, but Turbo's device is quite different.

dean_mcgowan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #96 on: December 01, 2006, 11:24:31 AM »
aint this just a giggle now ..

the lads are back for the last gaffaw ... cheesy boys very cheesy


AhuraMazda

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 564
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #97 on: December 01, 2006, 11:39:32 AM »
Stefan,
I have recently joined Overunity and keep coming across people deleting their posts. This is like starting to read a book with pages missing and I find it very annoying. As the administrator can you not stop that?

Regards

AM

virus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #98 on: December 01, 2006, 11:52:03 AM »
Here are the files that Mr.X has deleted:

4 videos, 1 picture, 1 pdf-file

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=6VC0S5DW

Greetz, Pontifex

Pontifex

Can you help with the, "4 videos, 1 picture, 1 pdf-file", as a zip or rar file, please !

Virus ;D

dean_mcgowan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #99 on: December 01, 2006, 12:08:05 PM »
i would have deleted those files before posting them fellas ... much less   embarressing than being exposed as petulant, incompetant and not having the common decency to leave shit enough alone .. surprised you were allowed to post at all ..

stefan,
i request for the integrity of this forum and its members these shite for brains be run out of town, tarred and feathered and left to drown in the stench of "the ranch" where they belong with the other nut jobs that think they can transport themselves through time portals and provide fake videos to accompany said claims .. yep i have your numbers you jerks and if you want me to drag the whole heavens gate club into the clear day of light for all to see  .. you just keep it up !!!  yes i have all the videos etc .. and will post to this forum for all to see just what you guys are tied up in...

enough is enough !!


ps .. in case i am totally wrong here .. just post your circuits and diagrams and lets see one person here replicate it and all will be forgiven  .. otherwise .. just naff off


dean_mcgowan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #100 on: December 01, 2006, 12:10:03 PM »
or beam me over to the ranch where you can beat me up ... lol

archon79

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #101 on: December 01, 2006, 12:14:55 PM »
What exactly do you mean by this dean? Start from the beginning

pese

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1597
    • Freie Energie und mehr ... Free energy and more ...
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #102 on: December 01, 2006, 12:23:00 PM »
@ wattsup.
the contact sparks make on any induction ,trafo of chockes
procuce HIGH voltage (very short) sparks   (. Which  say your circuit analyzer ishown incorrect! .
Accept take 4 pcs 240 V of Bulbs (7-15 Watts) (of  refrigerator-lamps enz)  and connect this  to your 960-1000 V "special circuit". If this does not shine", YOU  becomes AN LIGTH up that really only short peak voltages without energy are produced ind with this circuit
Pese

dean_mcgowan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #103 on: December 01, 2006, 12:43:56 PM »
I am saying that these guys had a god damn good run in this forum and now after declaring everyone here to be less than worthy underlings as though they were some protectors of the great information gospel , and running to set up their own little enclave, to which .. lets be honest here .. no one in their right mind would have subscribed to as it is against our open source forum nature, have come back wearing nothing more than clumsy black hankies over their faces and striving for one more grasp at the notoriety that they believe they deserve .. god knows why, when they have very little to offer in terms of ingenuity or integrity. So i say scamper away you little rats to the crevices you inhabit, afraid of the light as you are, you cellar dwellers.

In a nutshell archon, these guys shared in the open spirit of this forum and when they felt, like all good blood suckers, that they had had their fill they scurried of believing they had filled their bellies with all the information they desired and that some willing deciphals would follow to keep them entertained. Obviously it did not work out as planned so the side show has ensued so that they will either run a song and dance epic like the puppet masters they believe themselves to be, or fall on the floor laughing that no one here has the integrity to kick the tires of their claims and hence they can suffice themselves with the assumption that we are all fools and it was better that we did not follow them.

these are just sad desperate individuals who if ignored long enough would set themselve on fire just to get some attention.

QED


dean_mcgowan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #104 on: December 01, 2006, 12:55:22 PM »
@all

please return to your former program and my apologies for interupting the good spirited well intentioned amongst the forum members.

My comments are not a reflection on the concepts or ideas presented in this thread either I always aim to keep an open mind on these topics until someone can conclusively prove or disprove and the jury is totally out on this one.

Dean (the Hulk .. you won't like me when i am angry) McGowan