Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?  (Read 565487 times)

Spherenot

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 90
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #135 on: December 01, 2006, 11:06:49 PM »
Nothing technical added.  Deleted by Spherenot.
« Last Edit: December 05, 2006, 01:36:57 PM by Spherenot »

archon79

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #136 on: December 01, 2006, 11:12:37 PM »
If I was really concerned about my safety and wanted to release the details of a free energy device, the best way to do it is not with some cryptic video's and hiding in the shadows.

I would make some easy to follow plans step by step. Make sure they are replicatable. Then I would upload the file to a dozen different ftp servers. Then I would register amongst many forums and over the course of about 10 minutes post details and links so many people can download. Also seed the file onto bitorrent and post the links in bitorrent forums.

There would be no stopping the spread of information then. The best cure for this is sunlight.

Dansway

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 186
removed
« Reply #137 on: December 01, 2006, 11:13:38 PM »
removed
« Last Edit: February 09, 2007, 08:27:22 AM by Dansway »

mflynn44

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #138 on: December 01, 2006, 11:22:06 PM »
@Mannix

I hope you're right about there being every intention to make this public. Let's just wait a few days and see how things play out.

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #139 on: December 01, 2006, 11:27:44 PM »
I have now merged the thread about the locked topic to over here
to this thread.

I also think, that Marco?s device is no fake,
but his email address was wrong and bouncing and I could
not ask him, what was going on and because he also did
not reply in 1 and 1/2 day to the forum, I thought it would be better
to reveal his identity..
He also did not post in his first post, if he will reveal
any details...
and then there was all this sudden database problem,
so I was going paranoid and thought, someone was
hacking the database and was deleting postings..
Sorry for revealing identities, I will not do this next time...

I hope Marco and Dave will come back and tell us all
about their success now.

Regards, Stefan.

Dingus Mungus

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 859
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #140 on: December 01, 2006, 11:42:20 PM »
...Some people have some good results. That does not put the burden of proof on them...

It does actually! We all want to know this not some scam to sell
some books or a investment hoax of some sort. You must admit
investigation is vital to confirmation, and nay sayers will never be
convinced with words, only data. So you could kill three birds with
one stone right now: Prove the device as OU, silence naysayers,
make it open source. This can be accomplished with a single post,
but no one seems to be truely interested in accomplishing any of
those 3 goals
. If those are SM's, turbo's, and x's goals or plans, I
don't understand why they believe dragging out the process should
not create disbelief... If anything dragging it out like this will ONLY
create disbelief.

So in essence these games are a catch 22 of sorts.

Seriously though... Why wait a year? a month? a day? or an hour?
Why not just get it done and then further your own research?

~Dingus

abassign

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 57
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #141 on: December 01, 2006, 11:48:29 PM »
The lamp resumption in the sended movie from “Turbo” is one common lamp to attack Edison.
I have noticed the typical inner bulb during the switch off

Ciao

Superman

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #142 on: December 01, 2006, 11:54:34 PM »
Do they look like they're trying to sell you a book or asking you for your money...

I think people here expect everything to be given to them. I've read the threads about steven mark's device, and while I have not personally tried to build it, the answers seem to be there, all the steps

I too would love to have a drawing that explains it all, but unfortunately things don't work that way. Even if they confirmed it by giving you the information you seek, you would only ask more questions, more proof, give us the diagrams and the schematics... You all know that is what would happen, you'll never be satisfied until you've built it. If you want to build it, do it... but don't expect favours

I don't think I've read anywhere yet that this is open source, so why should they release it, why not consider it more proof that it can be done, and done in different ways.

As for releasing the information about the poster, there must've been a reason in the first place as to why the poster didn't say "Hi... i'm ____"

Pathetic

Dansway

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 186
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #143 on: December 02, 2006, 12:01:56 AM »
If you frame capture the vids from UEC Steven Mark vids you will get the same effect with the light bulbs.  Common sense right....

It proves NOTHING....

~D

CLaNZeR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1059
    • Overunity.org.uk
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #144 on: December 02, 2006, 12:08:37 AM »
If I had 110V or 240Volts coming out of that coil, I would be a little more carefull that using just my hands to push those wires against that lamp.

raburgeson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 705
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #145 on: December 02, 2006, 12:16:06 AM »
Jason,

Sorry it takes so long to reply, magnetic spherical fields. look at each sectional control wrap individually. Envision the field it makes and rotate it around the ring mentally. Now envision a coil section with a stationary field produced by pure dc wraped over one of the sections. As the rotating field passes through the stationary one something strange happens. My equipement is not good enough to tell you exactly what, but what ever it is, it seems to happen when the centers of the fields line up. Power is transferred to the stationary field.

Turbo you have a bifieler arrangement is your stationary field all the way around the collector. If it is could you try a quick short one instead too see if you get more or less power? To give you my reson for asking. If you run this inside a single continuous field it will never pass the center of the stationary field and may not be giving off all the energy it could.

I've been reading strange things for a bit about circuits we aren't supposed to know about. I'll set that aside and get back in the fray with the rest of you again. After we crack this we can maybe take a look at this bend and accelerate light thing.

Dingus Mungus

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 859
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #146 on: December 02, 2006, 12:27:50 AM »
Do they look like they're trying to sell you a book or asking you for your money...
No... they don't seem to be selling anything, but they don't seem to be spreading useful knowledge either... So then the question is why are they doing this?

I think people here expect everything to be given to them. I've read the threads about steven mark's device, and while I have not personally tried to build it, the answers seem to be there, all the steps
If it was all there (like it seems to you) the device would have been replicated and schematics shared. The problem is there is no real data there only assumptions and theories.

I too would love to have a drawing that explains it all, but unfortunately things don't work that way. Even if they confirmed it by giving you the information you seek, you would only ask more questions, more proof, give us the diagrams and the schematics... You all know that is what would happen, you'll never be satisfied until you've built it. If you want to build it, do it... but don't expect favours
If there was a full realse to Open source there would be no more questions to ask... Thats the whole idea... Open source = no secrets

I don't think I've read anywhere yet that this is open source, so why should they release it, why not consider it more proof that it can be done, and done in different ways.
Yeah that makes sense... Why release working technologies? No one wants to really use technology right? They just want to know its possible via grainy videos without explanations.

As for releasing the information about the poster, there must've been a reason in the first place as to why the poster didn't say "Hi... i'm ____"

Pathetic
This I really do agree with... It was a BAD move and the users responsible have removed the personal details, but anyone can get access to those same details quite easily. If you want to be truely anonymous don't use your home IP... Common sense people.

Sharing is caring,
~Dingus

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #147 on: December 02, 2006, 12:27:43 AM »
I have now merged the other thread "...TPU replication 2"
into this thread, cause it is not locked anymore.

Regards, Stefan.

mrd10

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #148 on: December 02, 2006, 12:34:00 AM »
Guys guys guys, what is wrong with your eyes, Has anyone gone into there sexy lab, with there rudimentary setup and tried this?

stop slamming these guys, even if they gave you photos and schematics youd end up asking more questions, and then some.

look what Mr X has done, I figured it out, with the help of another who really should take the credit, because its only by getting your hands dirty that you can work this out.

look at the unit with all the wires hanging out, the color code spills the beans, his wound 3 sets of wires , example notice the 3 green wires, its 3 wires wound together and pokes out 180 degrees from where it started, same with red and the blue, now look at the smaller unit, notice theres blue cable underneath, well this is his white wire thats coming out. which runs around it, under all the other wires. 

He gave us clues, your  not seeing it, look harder.

Dom

Y :-)

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU
« Reply #149 on: December 02, 2006, 12:41:04 AM »
The frequency used in this device seems 2Khz  ;D