Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Successfully looped SMOT  (Read 54415 times)

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Magnetic aluminum.
« Reply #90 on: February 15, 2018, 12:57:11 AM »
https://youtu.be/pkD2qD3xOTA


https://youtu.be/pkD2qD3xOTA


Any questions?


This was 10 yrs ago, since then we have magnetized
everything under the sun
(solids anyways, I have plans for liquids but not sure yet how to go about it)

@smOky2,

How long does the aluminum remain magnetic? Is that a permanent effect? I'm deeply impressed! Lo and behold!

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #91 on: February 15, 2018, 01:25:50 AM »

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #92 on: February 15, 2018, 04:11:24 AM »
https://youtu.be/pkD2qD3xOTA


https://youtu.be/pkD2qD3xOTA



Any questions?


Yeah... why did you post two links to the same video?    ::)

Quote



This was 10 yrs ago, since then we have magnetized
everything under the sun
(solids anyways, I have plans for liquids but not sure yet how to go about it)


Well, finally you've shown me something interesting! I was able to "magnetize" some bits of AL foil just by sandwiching them together with some strong N56 magnets, no PMH required. A control piece from the same foil, but not treated, was not attracted at all. The treated pieces are attracted, and also appear to have "n" and "s" polarities.
The fact that the control piece wasn't attracted, appears to disprove the idea that impurities in the aluminum are responsible, and also knocks out the "eddy current" explanation.  At the moment I have no good explanation, so for that I thank you. It's good to be stumped, as that is how holes are opened through which new knowledge can leak in.
Now--- can you demonstrate magnetizing a wooden toothpick? That would really be something, I think.

vineet_kiran

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 382
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #93 on: February 15, 2018, 04:59:43 AM »

Actually reverse of that experiment is also possible.   A very small piece of magnet attracting towards a big aluminum strip.   When I was playing with magnets,  once I hammered a magnet into pieces and made it like a paste.  That time I observed that  very small chips (may be less than one mm)  of magnet get attracted to aluminum and other metals and sticks to them.

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #94 on: February 15, 2018, 05:25:33 AM »
@TK


Sorry I meant to link two videos
One aluminum the other was lead
Made by different people




@Synchro1


I’m not really sure. Sometimes it lasts longer than others, I think the strength of the inducing magnetic field has a lot to do with the time.
But the general consensus is that it does fade over time.
I’ve had things stay magnetic for years
But for example, a steel ball i tampered with a few weeks ago has mostly reverted
While the other balls from the same experiment still hold some magnetism.




sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #95 on: February 15, 2018, 05:29:13 AM »
Here’s dave’s Lead video


https://youtu.be/oLlvri6UNKw


Seems he’s taken down the wood and paper videos from way back
When Vinny and I replicated it we were both using flat thin pieces of wood


I’m surprised that N52’s are strong enough to do it without a flux loop
I have some older neos, but they’re not that strong


I want to try and structure water, using magnetic fields
my mind tells me it should work, but fluid convection is a recipe for insanity
so I didn’t run the numbers on that one.


Wasn’t sure how to form the loop with water in a the gap
But now that I know that we can do it with just magnets, maybe I’ll give it a go

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #96 on: February 15, 2018, 06:29:15 AM »
Permanent magnets have been one of the last remaining
“scientific frontiers” in my lifetime.


That’s why I study them so much.


There are a multitude of books on theories of every other subject.
But when it comes to magnets,
we didn’t have enough to fill one page, with pictures.


I could write a book about them today, but there’s still so much to learn.

blueplanet

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 414
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #97 on: February 15, 2018, 09:34:10 AM »
Permanent magnets have been one of the last remaining
“scientific frontiers” in my lifetime.


That’s why I study them so much.


There are a multitude of books on theories of every other subject.
But when it comes to magnets,
we didn’t have enough to fill one page, with pictures.


I could write a book about them today, but there’s still so much to learn.

Publishing a book or a scientific paper or patenting your work is always a good idea.
It would save a lot of unnecessary arguments.
In the United Kingdom, a granted patent costs only 400 pounds.

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #98 on: February 15, 2018, 01:53:27 PM »
Publishing a book or a scientific paper or patenting your work is always a good idea.
It would save a lot of unnecessary arguments.
In the United Kingdom, a granted patent costs only 400 pounds.


when it comes to permanent magnets
I think there’s still more questions than answers.
anything more advanced than a children’s book
is probably still decades away.


As we see in the short videos I presented, even when we simplifiy
Greg Watson’s simplified version of Howard Johnson’s linear gate
forming a single magnet 1/4 gate and a steel ball
There are still quite a few complications, and things that aren’t
fully explainable.


sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #99 on: February 15, 2018, 02:00:44 PM »
suppose we had an iron meteor traveling through space
and it passes through the magnetic field of a star
or the field from a magnetized meteor


There can be situations that result in acceleration and subsequent
energy increases, that aren’t viable under the current scientific regimes.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Impulse magnetization
« Reply #100 on: February 15, 2018, 10:07:18 PM »
Watching these videos of the PMH magnetization of non-magnetic materials reminded me of the lenghty struggle I had on this site trying to explain how I managed to lift twice the paper clips with the bifilar coil and Iron nail core. The interesting aspect is that magnetization pulse doesn't work with the single wire coil of equal Ohmic resistance. I concluded this is "Flyback" related.

Here's the original video from nearly five years ago:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mxtwS2OsaA&list=PUGj-eKaG5_tMGNr_yuLePkA&index=16

It appears now that replacing the bifilar iron nail core with an aluminum one and pulsing it, would transmute the aluminum into a magnetic material, Lo and behold!
« Last Edit: February 16, 2018, 01:56:04 AM by synchro1 »

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #101 on: February 16, 2018, 02:24:16 AM »
as far as magnets are concerned, the effect has little “usefulness”
it is not likely that we will make a stronger magnet from a non-magnetic material


but it may have some value in atomic and molecular physics.
and in helping  us learn the true nature of matter.


synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #102 on: February 16, 2018, 03:21:29 AM »
This excerpt from the "Tesla Patent" explains why the Tesla series connected bifilar coil magnetizes by impulse. "Neutralization of Self Inductance". This feature eliminates any "Flyback Current" from reversing the effect of the initial pulse. The Leedskalnin PMH shares a similar kind of winding:

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #103 on: February 16, 2018, 03:56:33 AM »
Tinselkoala ran endless banal tests comparing the Tesla bifilar to the single wire coil and determined there was no difference between the magnetic fields. He stubbornly ignored the correct purpose and function of the "Tesla series bifilar coil" for years. He's probably still blind to it.

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Successfully looped SMOT
« Reply #104 on: February 16, 2018, 07:39:40 AM »