It is Not my property
Intellectual or otherwise


I didn’t invent this
I spent a lifetime learning it from those that came before me


It’s a long list and they were all treated like scammers


But they all proved the same basic magnetic functions
that I have shown you.


Howard Johnson
John Searl
David Hamel (pay no attention to the ufos)
Greg Watson


It’s all the same thing

You are right. John Searl is definitely not a scammers.

You have just lost any credibility you may once have had. Go ahead and build your SMOT according to what you have "learned" from the Great Genius Buddhist Ken Wheeler. It will keep you occupied, and is less dangerous than playing in the street -- but will accomplish much the same thing.

I can’t use Ken’s terminology, because he tries to coin things as his own proprietary
language. And I’m not willing to re-write physics just to incorporate his small changes
to magnetic theory.
 (He is a pompous ass, self-diluted, and tries to claim everything as his own)


 I do sometimes make use of his description of the magnetic meridian,
or center of magnetism, or “dielectric inertial plane”.
His mathematics are solid and do not conflict with Maxwell’s equations.
(except for one part which is not relevant here, and even then he proves it visually
     using a magnetic viewing tool invented by an unrelated person)
I don’t care about “who he is” or what his religion is.


None of that matters in science.
Not many of the great scientists of history are what I would
consider “good people”.
Most do their work for the wrong reasons, personal greed, nationalism, or pure destruction.


The only thing that matters here is what the magnetic field is/does and what WE can do with it.


Discredit the sources of knowledge if you choose to.
Einstein was a lazy slacker, a plagiarist, and had other people do a lot of his math for him.
But Einstein was (mostly) correct, and in science that is more important than personal idealism.


Who has the answer is not important
What the answer Is, is important.
There is evidence that indicates Ken didn’t come up with this stuff himself
(though he claims to have)
But the work he has done as a magnitician, is invaluable to his field.
He mathematically identified the 3rd field aspect, and gives a more accurate
depiction of the 3 dimensional magnetic field than anyone before him.
Science cannot accept his theories in their current form,
and unless or until he is willing to bridge that gap,
it will probably never happen.
He just wants to sell his book, and take out his anger on the acedemics that shunned him
like a teenage schoolgirl seeking vengeance.


But that has no bearing on the actual knowledge he shares,
a lot of which he released for free, long before he ever wrote his book.
If you don’t like the guy, don’t buy his stuff.
You can learn what you need from his YouTube channel
or d/l a pirate copy or completely ignore him.
eventually a ‘real scientist’ will come along and give us a better description of
the 3rd aspect of magnetism that lies perpendicular to the magnetic polarity.


This same aspect of the meridian that I have shown you here in this thread.

Heated and threatening discussions here are a thing of the past.

attempts at rebooting will not go well.

Smoky2
The person you mention made claims here that many could not reproduce [with true caloric measurement ]
and he would not discuss this disparity when I called him NOR later admit he made an error with his new camera [an artifact of the imaging gave him false readings which did not prove out under scrutiny.[which was pointed out by a member presently posting in this thread ...

the claim being... a strong magnet in the  presence of Bismuth made heat due to his spinning field claims.

there were a lot of happy Bismuth and magnet salesmen...but many experimenters with lighter  wallets and sad faces...
--------------------------------------

Been a lotta bumps in this road...would be better to take a smoother friendlier path...


respectfully
Chet K

This next video is an inverse-SMOT, (center-attractive smot)
and I have implemented the Howard Johnson pole-reversal.
“pole-flipping”, “metamagnetism” caused by field compression.


https://youtu.be/NzBuKGlvxf8

In this set-up, gravity is employed along the 2nd track portion
The 2nd track is declining away from the field, to free the ball.
The magnets are very weak (SmCo), and wasn’t quite enough kick
So, rather than continuing to make adjustments, I took a shortcut
and gave the exit ramp ~2-degree decline to allow a gravity assist.

What is the magnetic field of a piece of ionized iron?

The point of referencing the magneticians in my previous post
Was not to make people go follow Ken like the guru he would be.
But to show everyone that all of the people on that list
Say exactly the same things, in their own perspectives,
That I have shown here, in a language a 3rd grader should be able
to understand.


The problem isn’t HJ’s technology
It’s people’s inability to comprehend it.
That’s what I’m trying to fix here.


Greg Watson learned from Howard Johnson, just like the rest of us.
But it’s confusing, because it is different from the way magnetic theory is explained.




What science admits to “knowing” about magnetics, exists in the same 3 paragraphs
in textbooks that have been there for generations, copied from book to book.


The magnetic field is invisible, untastable, unfeelable, unsmellable, unhearable.


It is bipolar, having a north and a south


North repels north, south repels south.


North and south attract each other.


Some people can be satisfied and content with this pebble of knowledge.
The rest of us become magniticians.


When we stop learning, science has no use for us.

This SMOT is made using a very large steel ball.


This sphere is hollow, and was originally a non-magnetic 305 stainless steel.
I have restructured the crystalline structure
From Austenite to martensite
By placing it in a Leedskalnin PMH loop.


What’s important here, is the large diameter of the sphere
And the effects the accelerating outer surface have on rotational momentum.
In relation to the linear displacement of the ball, through the field.


https://youtu.be/Owkz6w4AhRM


Don’t worry, I’m not going to loop a smot of giant balls,
But I wanted to show you this in exaggerated form to demonstrate
the effects of changing the size of sphere in your particular design.

No, you didn't change any crystalline structure by putting your balls into a Leedskalnin PMH.

I have those balls too, and without any treatment by me, I can see that they are slightly ferromagnetic around the seam where the two hemispheres are joined together (call this the equator) and less so the further away from the equator you get. It's easy to reproduce your demonstration with my sphere, which has not been subjected to any Leedskalnin fantasy treatment.

https://youtu.be/pkD2qD3xOTA


https://youtu.be/pkD2qD3xOTA


Any questions?


This was 10 yrs ago, since then we have magnetized
everything under the sun
(solids anyways, I have plans for liquids but not sure yet how to go about it)