Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy  (Read 234641 times)

nix85

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
Re: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy
« Reply #405 on: May 23, 2019, 07:15:55 PM »
nix85
I agree about it. There is even Figuera patent statement about coils "properly placed". While it can be anything I think it's bout the balance between N and S poles strength. Thankfully we have now strong neodymium magnets to test ideas ;-)

If magnets on each side of the secondary are 180° out of phase, it means the respective backemfs are too, and should accordingly cancel out, at least it seems so.


WhatIsIt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 651
    • At The End It Will Matter!
Re: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy
« Reply #406 on: May 30, 2019, 02:45:09 AM »
Maybe this will sound crazy, and not acceptable for most Figuera fans.

In the time when he lives, the production of physical generator was very expensive and time consuming.
Maybe Figuera intentions were not to produce OU, but to make solid state generator which is less expensive and easier to make.

Just try to imagine time when he lived!
Did he have shops for electrical parts or special lathe to make one with big shaft and coils wound on that rotor? Electric brushes?
How much Iron is spent to make that kind of rotor with windings generator?
How hard was to make large physical rotational generator? Easy? They had welding machines like today of course or lathe for steel?
Even today it is not easy to make large one rotational generator. Try it, you will see for yourself ! How much parts and and special shape for rotor you must do. Not to mention winding the rotor! And electric brushes needed for transfer of current. And how much efficiency it had in Figuera time.?

What I am trying to say, maybe Figuera just wanted to make generator much simpler with fewer parts.
Of course, it rejects idea of OU, which is against Figuera fans.

Maybe his generator was more efficient than big rotational one and that's it. Maybe!
Just a thought, do not dismiss OU because this thought.

Cheers!


rakarskiy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
    • Free Energy Systems (UA)
Re: Kapanadze, Stepanov, Barbosa-Leal and the Secret of Free Energy
« Reply #407 on: May 30, 2019, 10:02:38 AM »
Maybe this will sound crazy, and not acceptable for most Figuera fans.

In the time when he lives, the production of physical generator was very expensive and time consuming.
Maybe Figuera intentions were not to produce OU, but to make solid state generator which is less expensive and easier to make.

Just try to imagine time when he lived!
Did he have shops for electrical parts or special lathe to make one with big shaft and coils wound on that rotor? Electric brushes?
How much Iron is spent to make that kind of rotor with windings generator?
How hard was to make large physical rotational generator? Easy? They had welding machines like today of course or lathe for steel?
Even today it is not easy to make large one rotational generator. Try it, you will see for yourself ! How much parts and and special shape for rotor you must do. Not to mention winding the rotor! And electric brushes needed for transfer of current. And how much efficiency it had in Figuera time.?

What I am trying to say, maybe Figuera just wanted to make generator much simpler with fewer parts.
Of course, it rejects idea of OU, which is against Figuera fans.

Maybe his generator was more efficient than big rotational one and that's it. Maybe!
Just a thought, do not dismiss OU because this thought.

Cheers!

https://overunity.com/18075/self-poweredgenerators-motors-part-34/msg527893/topicseen/#new   
Everything is there, minor inaccuracies in the scheme in accordance with the description will be eliminated when calculating the design to meet the conditions of the patent.   I don't want to convince anyone. The solution is more than you can imagine. I do not know why no one answered this topic with the device of Karl Lutter