GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 82686
  • *Latest: zeikeafk

  • *Total Posts: 499870
  • *Total Topics: 14808
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 10
  • *Guests: 37
  • *Total: 47

Author Topic: Background radiation reciever  (Read 6766 times)

Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3002
Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #30 on: December 22, 2017, 02:46:38 PM »
Yes


The higher the energy state of electron orbitals, the more pronounced
the perturbations caused by nucleic activity.


In this manner, we can use atoms as energy amplifiers.
Semiconductors operate by this function.


The problem with receiving stellar energies is the frequency and
the size of the atom.


Photons affect atoms by direct impact.


The change in total energy is equal to the energy of the photons
impacting the material.


But the change in amplitude of the atoms natural frequency is
a function of the orbital radii.


Relativity plays a major role in this. The smaller the orbitals the
closer to c the electrons travel.
Therefore their change in amplitude of the atomic frequency is
less than at larger orbitals.
This frequency, however, still persists in the ground state.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #30 on: December 22, 2017, 02:46:38 PM »

Offline telecom

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #31 on: December 24, 2017, 07:23:04 PM »
But when LeBon was shining light on steel, he was discovering the ionizing radiation.
Probably some gamma rays.

Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3002
Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #32 on: December 25, 2017, 05:51:48 PM »
But when LeBon was shining light on steel, he was discovering the ionizing radiation.
Probably some gamma rays.


Any light over 90-92Thz will ionize steel
Just like rubbing it with wool


E=uf


Go past blue and it’s dangerous.
Why some people have to wear sunscreen


Each element responds differently, so it requires different freq.
of light (or radiation) to ionize it.


HV electricity, and white light both contain these frequencies
for most of the lighter elements. (I mean lighter molecularly, not density)






Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #32 on: December 25, 2017, 05:51:48 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3002
Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #33 on: December 25, 2017, 05:53:29 PM »
This is the basis for electro-nuclear chemistry.
First is ionization, then a controlled frequency reassembly
to bond atoms into molecules.




Offline blueplanet

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 364
Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #34 on: January 17, 2018, 07:25:22 AM »
I have 1 suggestion.

GREEN HOUSE EFFECT

This suggestion is not intended for the American.
You will not like it if you are oil lovers.
You will like it if you are oil haters.


EDIT: remove thrumptards and libtards, sincerely bluetard
« Last Edit: January 17, 2018, 10:14:50 AM by blueplanet »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #34 on: January 17, 2018, 07:25:22 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5740
Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #35 on: January 17, 2018, 08:30:27 AM »
I have 1 suggestion.

GREEN HOUSE EFFECT

This suggestion is not intended for the American.
You will not like it if you are trumptard.
You will like it if you are libtard.

Ya know what I think Bluetard? You are an annoying Isawit.
Mags

Offline blueplanet

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 364

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #36 on: January 17, 2018, 10:15:14 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6240
Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #37 on: January 17, 2018, 10:28:19 AM »
GOOD NEWS

here we work to diminish the carbon footprint and try to make the planet Cleaner and less wasteful of her resources.

To the last man we all agree on this and sharing open source [or should not be at this forum]

maybe we should focus on solutions to our agreed goal [a cleaner better planet]

instead of ???

fighting about ...holes in a sinking boat ...while its sinking!

the fix is the same ...the holes will go away if we do what we came here to do ..which is definitely NOT to fight.

just one mans opinion

I hate seeing good people get into frustrated Tussels

respectfully
Chet K

PS here    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSenorAkK_E at about the 12:15 Min mark

Kator01 shared
a discussion of a Device for harvesting ambient energy [inline with the thread topic here] was mentioned and the TREMENDOUS advances that have been made
as well as Kator giving a bit of a secret away.[household glue was used  ]

thread here
http://overunity.com/10682/petrovoltaic-cells/#.Wl8bMbmWxdg..post       post # 12 [I think} the posts numbers can vary here with advertising [don't know why]


Offline blueplanet

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 364
Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #38 on: January 17, 2018, 12:38:59 PM »
GOOD NEWS

......

respectfully
Chet K

PS here    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSenorAkK_E at about the 12:15 Min mark

Kator01 shared
a discussion of a Device for harvesting ambient energy [inline with the thread topic here] was mentioned and the TREMENDOUS advances that have been made
as well as Kator giving a bit of a secret away.[household glue was used  ]

thread here
http://overunity.com/10682/petrovoltaic-cells/#.Wl8bMbmWxdg..post       post # 12 [I think} the posts numbers can vary here with advertising [don't know why]


Very interesting. I hope we can replicate this experiment.
We certainly need a lot of this kind of information.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #38 on: January 17, 2018, 12:38:59 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3002
Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #39 on: January 17, 2018, 02:22:54 PM »
He claims that his technology is the tech developed by Tesla
Used in his electric Pierce Arrow car.


At the same time he dodges the efficiency questions
Claiming 10% efficiency at harvesting this “free energy”.
And with lots of r&d $ he may be able to increase to 20-30%
But I guess that’s not far off from where photovoltaics started.


I’m not sure that I gained anything useful from his discussion
All I saw was him put a pencil in the microwave...


We can assume that little thing is 1kw or smaller
20 secs gives something like 0.006kW-hrs
And we have no idea what energy gain or loss occurred in the oven.
Nor how he plans to get it out.


Is this supposed to generate heat to run a steam engine?
By putting metal into a chamber with microwaves?


We could redirect the air-duct of a cheap microwave to pump into
a ceramic heat chamber. Place our metal dust in there,
and use a surface of the chamber for heat transfer
this way the whole machine can be shielded without worry of
damaging the oven.


This would allow for testing,




as what to do with the magnetic carbon?
Samples could be used for experiments with an unknown
carbon structure.
That’s about all I got.....
We would have to dispose of or find a way to recycle it.


The other side of that issue- he claims trace amounts of
platinum group metals. If this is true, that means he tested
the output samples, and he would be able to substantiate his
claims of transmutation of carbon to iron
 (I remain skeptical of this)










Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6240
Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #40 on: January 17, 2018, 02:52:43 PM »
EDIT for clarity and below comment by Blueplanet

Regarding ambient harvesting claim

a better close up of simple components below [identify circuit bits would be a good start.
----------------------------------------------------


Regarding separate  transmutation claim
easy enuff to test [I believe its in the works

the open source works

again Egely Vid here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSenorAkK_E

12 min 19 sec mark for ambient claim
18 min [about] for transmutation claim

« Last Edit: January 17, 2018, 05:18:40 PM by ramset »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #40 on: January 17, 2018, 02:52:43 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline blueplanet

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 364
Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #41 on: January 17, 2018, 05:02:31 PM »
I thought this process has nothing to do with electronics. The transmutation process usually involves a chain of nuclear reactions. Nuclear reactions in turns involve a mini mass change. By E=mc^2,it should release a lot energy.

Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3002
Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #42 on: January 18, 2018, 01:38:11 AM »
I thought this process has nothing to do with electronics. The transmutation process usually involves a chain of nuclear reactions. Nuclear reactions in turns involve a mini mass change. By E=mc^2,it should release a lot energy.


When the mass is increasing there requires a lot of energy input.
In return there is heat (and some electricity) released,
it is theorized that the radioactivity is not the driving function,
and that the reactions will result in stable (cold) fusion byproducts.


Cold fusion is most likely to involve thermal, electrical or rf effects,
Which gives claims like this, plausibility for investigation.
The microwave spectrum envelopes the set of atomic frequencies,
so it is logical to speculate along this route.
My reservation lies in the limited discrete frequency of the water molecule.
Which is a longer wavelength than carbon or iron.
This makes one of my eyebrows sit higher than the other for some reason....
I am doubtful that this would be the solution to the fusion problems.
especially since water-microwaves have been in the public hands since 1947,
and we have heard nothing either from the military side, who has been developing
weapons out of the entire spectrum of microwaves since 1945.


yet we still use dangerous fissile elements.

Offline blueplanet

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 364
Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #43 on: January 18, 2018, 07:23:40 AM »

Inside the microwave chamber, which is in essence a 1/4-lambda waveguide, it is possible for the higher odd-order modes to exist. This higher order modes can come from differences in phrase velocities in difference dielectric mediums.


The frequencies which actively transmute carbon into iron could be the harmonics of 2.4 GHz.


If 2.4GHz is exactly what we need, he wouldn't need to use resonators or additional electronics to achieve this transmutation process.





...
My reservation lies in the limited discrete frequency of the water molecule.
Which is a longer wavelength than carbon or iron.
This makes one of my eyebrows sit higher than the other for some reason....
I am doubtful that this would be the solution to the fusion problems.
especially since water-microwaves have been in the public hands since 1947,
and we have heard nothing either from the military side, who has been developing
weapons out of the entire spectrum of microwaves since 1945.


yet we still use dangerous fissile elements.

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6240
Re: Background radiation reciever
« Reply #44 on: January 20, 2018, 06:00:21 PM »
a wonderful discussion!!


a very nice fellow shared some info from his recent investigations into Dr. Egely's work

http://infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue130/EgelyIE130.pdf

IMO
experienced eyes and hands need to check these claims with the proper equipment [besides a magnet....
so as to be certain there are no other unseen hazards besides the obvious.

respectfully
Chet

 

OneLink