2nd "law" violations > Heat to mechanical energy conversion

David Jones' Bicycle Wheel

(1/3) > >>

blueplanet:
I am aware of any serious discussion about this bicycle wheel.
This bicycle wheel is almost as old as this website.
Unfortunately, it is still spinning.
Does anyone know how to debunk this one?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dpmP_H1LBM

Paul-R:
It looks to me as if it runs on atmospheric heat, like the sterling cycle engine.

If placed in a small sealed and insulated container, does the temperature of that enclosure drop?

blueplanet:
Could be..... I honestly have no idea.

Here is another version of his bicycle wheel that has been spinning for more than 36 years:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-england-tyne-41638926/the-unsolved-secret-of-david-jones-perpetual-motion-machine

sm0ky2:
3 sterling engines and an electrophorus.
The bicycle wheel acts as the displacer/timing mechanism.


Why is it “unfortunate” that this is still spinning?
And why do you feel it needs to be “debunked”?

sm0ky2:
My questions are rhetorical, and do not need answered.
But are merely asked to inspire thought.




First, what gives us the idea that motion cannot be perpetuated?
Many of the more stable atomic and molecular constructs, are believed
to remain in perfect symbiotic motion for millions of years.
The planets and stars are found in similar states.


This notion that “we can’t do this” has been tossed around for centuries.
The latest culmination is what we know at thermodynamic theory.
A theory which clearly described theoretical conditions we cannot create.
Nowhere on earth, in space, or in any laboratory, have humans been able to
create a “closed system”. Yet these theories are the driving force of impossible
mechanisms.


Naturally, if we cannot create these theoretical conditions, any such system of motion
must therefore NOT fall under the pretense of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 0th laws.
These laws merely serve as guidelines by which we engineer our Consumption.


Consumption is the bane of our energy crisis.


So, when we observe a system in a state of (relatively) endless motion,
we are not searching for an ‘impossible’ perpetuant.
But rather, the unclosed elements of the system that allows energy transfer.


Why do we consume? Because we are told we have to.
But when we observe natural systems, we find that consumption is shadowed
by absorption almost unequivocally across the board.
Why then are our systems not designed in this manner?


Because our ‘brute force’ approach to mechanics is ingrained in our theology
from the very foundations of our branch of technology.
Certainly our form of technology is not the only form that exists, or that can exist.
And this is a point that David Jones understood very well.
He writes about this.


Under David Jones’ philosophy, Consumption is reduced by all means.
This is achieved by identifying the points of Consumption and reducing them in
ways which are synonymous to Nature.


Balance, friction, and wind resistance are three of the major elements which he
strives to reduce this Consumption, by internalizing their effects.
Similar to cellular biology.


Next, he overpowers all remaining forms of Consumption, by absorption.
This is, to allow natural sources of energy to enter the system.
Notice I said “enter”, which means the systems are NOT closed, and by
definition, are NOT perpetual motion systems.
They are defined as systems of motion that are conserved.
And it is the laws of conservation that govern these types of systems,
NOT the laws of thermodynamics.


It is important to note that it is the same thermodynamic theories that describe
how the energy enters into these systems, and in this manner, thermodynamics
describes what IS possible, rather than the mis-interpretation of what is NOT possible.


He built his machines as a practical joke to the proponents of thermodynamic theory.
He clearly states this in his earlier writings. Nothing is hidden, except by those that
display his work under the guise of mystery, or the guise of hoax, by misrepresenting
the machines as violations of scientific law, rather than the demonstrations of those very
same laws, as David intended them to be.




It is this duality of theology that keeps us trapped.
On the one hand we present an impossible situation.
On the other we claim that all things in this category must therefore be impossible.


The first law of Anti-Thermodynamics:


1) A closed system cannot exist.
     The energy emanating from our universe, and the galaxies and stars within, are far
greater in magnitude than the energies that bond our atoms and molecules.
Physical matter cannot be shielded from the forces of nature which created it.
Physical matter emanates it’s own energy, and therefore, matter itself cannot be considered a
‘closed system’. For the very atoms and molecules which we would use to shield such a system,
input and output energies of their own.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page