Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

News announcements and other topics => News => Topic started by: isawit on November 19, 2017, 07:33:40 AM

Title: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 19, 2017, 07:33:40 AM
I don't have the equips, but I know the theory is correct. Light is not particle nor wave in vacuum space. Light is electrons vibration force.

All light double slit experiments were done in the air, light travels in air/medium as wave form. If you do a new double slit experiment in a vacuum chamber, you can proof the old theory is wrong. You will find two light lines on the screen instead of interferentce.

set up like this

the light source/laser can be in the air, a square glass bottle, on the 2 parallel inside walls are the slits and the screen. connect the bottle to a vacuum pump.

show the light wave interference on the screen first, then pump the air out.

as the air pressure gets lower and lower, the light pattern on the screen should be changing.

until a hard vacuum, it should be only 2 bright lines left on the screen right behind the slits.

Please give it a shot, you may help improve science and win us some $.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 19, 2017, 07:48:24 AM
a good way to prove quantum mechanic is total bs

start science revolution

i already told you why maxwell em theory is bs

there is no transverse wave carrier in vacuum space.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: profitis on November 19, 2017, 10:07:44 AM
"until a hard vacuum, it should be only 2 bright lines
left on the screen right behind the slits."

Might appear as three if u wear sunglasses
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 19, 2017, 11:55:06 AM
https://youtu.be/iphcyNWFD10
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 19, 2017, 06:34:50 PM
https://youtu.be/iphcyNWFD10

detected gravity wave from 1.3 billion years ago?

total bs. gravity and all forces are instantaneous.

forces are coexisting with matters at all the times.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 19, 2017, 06:43:40 PM



 Isatwit,
     you missed the point totally, loverly experiment
employing a high vacuum.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 19, 2017, 07:43:50 PM
the double slit is the most famous experiment so far.

quantum physics is based on its false result in the air, wave-particle duality is an illusion. light is vibrating electric force carrier by vibrating electrons. f=Ke x e1e2/rr is the carrier of light energy. that's why energy density decay at 1/rr.

golden opportunity in human history, hope you be the first.

 



Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 19, 2017, 07:49:36 PM


 Isatwit,
     you missed the point totally, loverly experiment
employing a high vacuum.

the whole idea of gravity wave is bs

gravity is instantaneous. end story.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 19, 2017, 08:13:49 PM
 If you're after a prize you sure ought to be awarded
one for naivety!!!!
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 19, 2017, 08:46:24 PM
i said a lot of science mistakes, can you debunk any?

why not?
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 19, 2017, 11:12:38 PM
https://youtu.be/nYDokJ2A_vU
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 19, 2017, 11:40:16 PM
quantum anything is bs

truth can be simple as truth

all atomic structure theories, standard or bohr model, are total bs.

the attraction force between opposite charges is the strongest force in the universe, there is no possibility that electrons able to circle/wave/cloud around the protons, to form stable atom.

all science based on that model is false.

we can hardly separate two strong magnets, how nature makes electrons not stick to protons all the times?
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 20, 2017, 12:51:42 AM



   It's taken me almost 70 years to get a bit of an idea about relativity.
One of the most exciting things to happen during my life is when I
came across electromagnetic induction and how its purported to work.
To me it's a mechanism of sheer beauty.
   You've certainly got your work cut out as you'll have to rewrite the
whole story.  Good luck, youll be one of the most famous people in
history!!!!!
         Kind regards. John.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 20, 2017, 01:28:48 AM
John, relativity is all bs.

The theory of relativity usually encompasses two interrelated theories by Albert Einstein: special relativity and general relativity.[1] Special relativity applies to elementary particles and their interactions, describing all their physical phenomena except gravity. General relativity explains the law of gravitation and its relation to other forces of nature.[2] It applies to the cosmological and astrophysical realm, including astronomy.[3]

photoelectric effect is bs, no photons knock out electrons.

gravity has nothing to do with space or time. space cannot be curved, time cannot be dilated. nothing can travel at light speed to observe the world. einstein theories are all mistakes.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 20, 2017, 08:58:46 AM
https://youtu.be/DeHCV7pmMZw
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 20, 2017, 09:42:02 AM
John, are you kidding me? Photon?

it is bs from the start to the end. those people are full of it.

they should be locked up.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 20, 2017, 09:52:54 AM


   It's taken me almost 70 years to get a bit of an idea about relativity.
One of the most exciting things to happen during my life is when I
came across electromagnetic induction and how its purported to work.
To me it's a mechanism of sheer beauty.
   You've certainly got your work cut out as you'll have to rewrite the
whole story.  Good luck, youll be one of the most famous people in
history!!!!!
         Kind regards. John.

faraday's em induction law is description, not explanation, they don't know the mechanism of magnetism yet. they don't even know the mechanism of light.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 20, 2017, 07:46:52 PM
every time i hear scientists talk about photon, feel like to puke.

what is photon? no mass, no charge, travels in vacuum at light speed. carries energy, has wave length, has frequency, has polarity, can knock out electrons from atoms, can heat up matters.

is it true? not at all.

All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?'
Nowadays every Tom, D i c k and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. -Albert Einstein

He won nobel for photoelectric effect theory. godfather of qm, why scientists take his own words as shit?

there is NO such thing as photon, quanta, quantum, black hole and dark matter exist, but science lies ruled the world.

i am really pissed, monkeys, liars, control the world.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 20, 2017, 10:47:13 PM



  You silly person.
  Of course photons exist, so do phonons too!
  You just don't understand, maybe you'll catch up one day? ???
   The thng that doesn't exist, from a photon's point of view is TIME.
        John.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 21, 2017, 01:41:24 AM


  You silly person.
  Of course photons exist, so do phonons too!
  You just don't understand, maybe you'll catch up one day? ???
   The thng that doesn't exist, from a photon's point of view is TIME.
        John.

do you understand? what is photon? you know better than einstein?
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 21, 2017, 03:05:04 AM
all scientists think light is photon/em wave/particle that travels at light speed in the vacuum space.

they don't know light speed is infinite in space. because they don't know the cause/mechanism of light.

2 electrons at distance r, repel each other with a force f=Ke x ee/rr.

that force acts like a physical rod between the two electrons, if 1 electron is moving, the emf force will instantly transfer to the other electron at opposite direction, this is the true mechanism of light/em wave/radiant energy.

the sun is not an active nuclear reactor, the sun is not shooting out energy to space, it only shares energy with matters surround. sun's energy is from star formation.

energy cannot leak/vanish into space, energy can only exist within matter.

matter and energy are both immortal, space has no boundary, time has no beginning or end, existence is immortal.

but who we are? what we become?

phono? read and believe? true science is follow the precise mechanism, don't be fool.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 21, 2017, 09:33:49 AM



You'll get there one day. The. Sun loses mass.
Hydrogen to helium, neutrinos and pure energy.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 21, 2017, 10:01:10 AM


You'll get there one day. The. Sun loses mass.
Hydrogen to helium, neutrinos and pure energy.

bs. read and believe. what is energy? do you really understand? e=mcc is total bs. but you won't believe me. never mind. it is all good.

just ask yourself 1 question, if the earth is as hot as the sun, will all nuclear fuel ignite at once?
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 21, 2017, 10:13:26 AM
in fact, if you believe atoms are as science told you, 1 electron and 1 proton able to form a hydrogen atom, you are a fool.

you know opposite charges attract each other, but you don't ask why ?  how? the cause and precise mechanism of the structure.

you follow others, worship big names, listen to teachers, read books. smart enough to not question. you are a sheeple.

Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 21, 2017, 10:45:39 AM



 We've got a 40kw. solar pv. and a Tesla car and it works.
 Please explain.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: gravityblock on November 21, 2017, 11:10:42 AM

Pilot-wave theory makes all the same predictions as the probabilistic formulation of quantum mechanics (which wouldn’t be referred to as the “Copenhagen” interpretation until the 1950s), but without the ghostliness or mysterious collapse.  The old, deterministic alternative of QM is not mentioned in most textbooks and most people in the field haven’t heard of it. Sheldon Goldstein, a professor of mathematics, physics, and philosophy at Rutgers University and a supporter of pilot-wave theory, blames the “preposterous” neglect of the theory on “decades of indoctrination.”  At this stage, Goldstein and several other noted researchers risk their careers by questioning quantum orthodoxy.  The physicist David Bohm resurrected pilot-wave theory in a modified form in 1952, with Einstein’s encouragement, and made clear that it did work, but it never caught on.  The theory is also known as de Broglie-Bohm theory, or Bohmian mechanics.

By 1932, when the Hungarian-American mathematician John von Neumann claimed to have proven that the probabilistic wave equation in quantum mechanics could have no “hidden variables” (that is, missing components, such as de Broglie’s particle with its well-defined trajectory), pilot-wave theory was so poorly regarded that most physicists believed von Neumann’s proof without even reading a translation.  More than 30 years would pass before von Neumann’s proof was shown to be false, but by then the damage was done.  Later, the Northern Irish physicist John Stewart Bell went on to prove a seminal theorem that many physicists today misinterpret as rendering hidden variables impossible.  But Bell supported pilot-wave theory. He was the one who pointed out the flaws in von Neumann’s original proof.  And in 1986 he wrote that pilot-wave theory “seems to me so natural and simple, to resolve the wave-particle dilemma in such a clear and ordinary way, that it is a great mystery to me that it was so generally ignored.”  The neglect continues to this day.....

Now at last, pilot-wave theory may be experiencing a minor comeback — at least, among fluid dynamicists. “I wish that the people who were developing quantum mechanics at the beginning of last century had access to these experiments,” Milewski said. “Because then the whole history of quantum mechanics might be different.”  The experiments began a decade ago, when Yves Couder and colleagues at Paris Diderot University discovered that vibrating a silicon oil bath up and down at a particular frequency can induce a droplet to bounce along the surface. The droplet’s path, they found, was guided by the slanted contours of the liquid’s surface generated from the droplet’s own bounces — a mutual particle-wave interaction analogous to de Broglie’s pilot-wave concept.

The photon carries momentum. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle states that it is not possible to measure location and momentum at the same time. If the momentum is distributed throughout the entire volume, if one measures the entire momentum, the whole volume must be considered. Since the volume spreads all over creation, it is impossible to say that it is located at a point.  It seems that the meaning of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be reinterpreted to support the present conclusion of the nature of the photon. If it has aperture and length, the momentum is not located at a single point. If a single point is assumed for the structure, no momentum can be measured. It seems that the significance of the uncertainty principle has been highly overrated.  The Heisenberg uncertainty principle simply says that the photon has volume.  Calculation shows that the energy and thus the mass is distributed uniformly throughout the structure. The same fact applies to the distribution of momentum.  Quantum indeterminacy and a probabilistic universe based on the wrong assumptions of the Copenhagen interpretation has been proven false!

Reference:  Fluid Experiments Support Deterministic “Pilot-Wave” Quantum Theory (http://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20140624-fluid-tests-hint-at-concrete-quantum-reality/) (<----- Dead Link - Snapshots shown below)

Gravock
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: gravityblock on November 21, 2017, 11:50:26 AM


   It's taken me almost 70 years to get a bit of an idea about relativity.
One of the most exciting things to happen during my life is when I
came across electromagnetic induction and how its purported to work.
To me it's a mechanism of sheer beauty.
   You've certainly got your work cut out as you'll have to rewrite the
whole story.  Good luck, youll be one of the most famous people in
history!!!!!
         Kind regards. John.

Quantum indeterminacy and a probabilistic universe based on the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics has been proven false!  It's been proven false, John!  Why do you so dearly hold onto an interpretation that has been proven false?  The whole story has already been rewritten!  However, you John, have been indoctrinated by this system of things.

Gravock
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: profitis on November 21, 2017, 01:32:19 PM
"there is NO such thing as photon, quanta, quantum,
black hole and dark matter exist, but science lies
ruled the world."

Fear not my fran,its all relative
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: profitis on November 21, 2017, 01:39:16 PM
"Quantum indeterminacy and a probabilistic universe
based on the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum
Mechanics has been proven false!  It's been proven
false, John!  Why do you so dearly hold onto an
interpretation that has been proven false?'

What does it matter how john sees the world.how does
the world see the world is all that matters
 
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 21, 2017, 01:47:40 PM



 I'll see if I can find my Hanbury Brown and Twiss.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: profitis on November 21, 2017, 02:42:31 PM
"The thng that doesn't exist, from a photon's point of
view is TIME."

effect is time   
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: profitis on November 21, 2017, 03:15:58 PM
"Quantum indeterminacy and a probabilistic universe
based on the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum
Mechanics has been proven false!  It's been proven
false, John!"

Tell me something,has it ever been proven that matter or energy appear from utter nothing.if time can convert to energy then this might not be so false as you think
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: profitis on November 21, 2017, 03:24:57 PM
"Tell me something,has it ever been proven that
matter or energy appear from utter nothing.if time
can convert to energy then this might not be so false
as you think"

Which brings us to the question,"what came first,time or energy"
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 21, 2017, 03:29:01 PM
the photons carry momentum?

how? what mechanism? does a photon has mass? charge? what is photon made of? virtual particle? what is it?

how electrons emit photons? fart? how electrons change energy level? what is energy level? what is energy?

why electrons do not stick to protons under attraction force?

how photons pass glass? reflect from metal?

do you understand the mechanism of light now?

Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 21, 2017, 08:26:57 PM
faraday's em induction law is description, not explanation, they don't know the mechanism of magnetism yet. they don't even know the mechanism of light.

MAGNETISM

2 parallel wires at r distance, the free electrons in the 2 wires repel each other with force f=Ke x q1q2/rr, that force is the carrier of energy/moving electric force/emf. that force act as a class 1 lever with the fulcrum at the center, the mechanical advantage is equal to 1.

if electrons move in wire 1, electrons in wire 2 will instantly have opposite direction emf. the true mechanism of electromagnetic induction. same as momentum conservation.

every magnetic atom/magton contains 2 atoms. 2 atoms of a ferromagnetic matter before magnetize, we put it as 00. if 1 electron moved from 1 atom to the other atom and stays there as -11, the 2 atoms become a magton, it carries a special property now, we call it magnetic force.

-11, -22, -33...-nn are all magton, but carry different magnetic force strength.

2 magtons attract each other in the direction -11><-11, and repel each other in the direction -11<>1-1 or 1-1<>-11.

use copper wire winding around an iron core, put a current, the electrons in the wire move in circles around the core, make atoms in the core arrange into -11-11 directions all the way. on the pole plane area, magtons are arranged as clockwise concentric circles of -11-11 directions, north pole.

reverse the current direction, the pole plane area magtons are arranged as counterclockwise concentric circles of -11-11 directions, south pole.

so, a magnet north pole stored clockwise electric force, south pole stored the counterclockwise electric force. the same poles always repel, different poles always attract.

the earth magnetic field is a mistake. there is no field but the force in the universe. sunlight moves electrons moving westward causing earth magnetic force interact with compasses.

there is only 1 force exists, coulomb force f=Ke x q1q2/rr. gravity and magnetic force are both different configurations of electric force.

without matters, there is no force. a single matter has no force. force can only exist between matters.

without a test body, where is the electric or magnetic field? where is gravity field?

the mysteries of the universe are within 2 equations.

f=Ke x e1e1/rr and f=G x m1m2/rr.

those 2 forces rule everything existing.

the mechanism of quantum entanglement is simple. the force between any 2 charged particles f=Ke x qp/rr is the carrier of energy/information/moving electric force. it is an invisible physical rod with zero mass that always connected 2 particles as 1. if 1 particle is energized, that energy instantly transferred to another. from f=ma, m=0, so energy instantly moved from 1 particle to another. we call it QE.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 22, 2017, 04:18:23 AM
in fact, if you believe atoms are as science told you, 1 electron and 1 proton able to form a hydrogen atom, you are a fool.

you know opposite charges attract each other, but you don't ask why ?  how? the cause and precise mechanism of the structure.

you follow others, worship big names, listen to teachers, read books. smart enough to not question. you are a sheeple.

another example, common science lie. escape velocity.

science told you that if a rock is moving at 7 m/c=25,000 m/h away from earth, it will never return, it will fly away forever.

you believe it is true, never had a doubt. right?

let me ask you, is the rock always attracted by earth gravity at all the times?

is the rock decelerating all the time under gravity?

is the rock slowing down by time?

will the rock slow down to zero speed some day?

after that day, which way the rock moves?

will the rock soon or later come back to earth?

is science lied?

are you honest?
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 22, 2017, 04:48:17 AM
no 1 is honest?

dark matter will eat that rock at some point, so it will not return.

take my word, i have multiple virtual phds.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 22, 2017, 10:09:25 AM
https://youtu.be/WIyTZDHuarQ
This is about my level.
 It raises many questions.
 I don't think anybody really knows!
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 22, 2017, 10:45:10 AM
https://youtu.be/WIyTZDHuarQ
This is about my level.
 It raises many questions.
 I don't think anybody really knows!

that dude is a top bster

ask what is the mechanism of light, how 1 electron and 1 proton able to from stable atom.

see if you agree with his science.

he is a joke, younger neil degress tyson.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 22, 2017, 10:50:37 AM
those monkeys are professors at cambridge

bs fake math, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-I6XTVZXww

do you understand?
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 22, 2017, 12:07:52 PM



 Isatwit, a hydrogen atom is like your head, 99.9999999 empty space!
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 22, 2017, 01:29:38 PM



   What's happening in the little film?
   There is a frequency allotted to the oil by the speaker.
    There's momentum imparted to the droplet by the frequency of
     the oil which in turn is returned somewhat to the oil causing a
     standing wave.  The wave reacts somewhat to the local environment
     and in a roundabout fashion the droplet is steered along a possible path.
      I just need to see similar ingredients to be able to visualise how
      photons do it..... but I can't.
           John
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 22, 2017, 01:50:18 PM



   I've come to a sort of a gravityblock,  I badly need some aether!!!!!
      John.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 22, 2017, 09:08:51 PM
I don't have the equips, but I know the theory is correct. Light is not particle nor wave in vacuum space. Light is electrons vibration force.

All light double slit experiments were done in the air, light travels in air/medium as wave form. If you do a new double slit experiment in a vacuum chamber, you can proof the old theory is wrong. You will find two light lines on the screen instead of interferentce.

set up like this

the light source/laser can be in the air, a square glass bottle, on the 2 parallel inside walls are the slits and the screen. connect the bottle to a vacuum pump.

show the light wave interference on the screen first, then pump the air out.

as the air pressure gets lower and lower, the light pattern on the screen should be changing.

until a hard vacuum, it should be only 2 bright lines left on the screen right behind the slits.

Please give it a shot, you may help improve science and win us some $.

there is no free energy. don't waste your time. do this experiment, please. 
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 23, 2017, 03:53:34 PM
Quantum indeterminacy and a probabilistic universe based on the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics has been proven false!  It's been proven false, John!  Why do you so dearly hold onto an interpretation that has been proven false?  The whole story has already been rewritten!  However, you John, have been indoctrinated by this system of things.

Gravock


I hate things like this, I haven't been indoctrinated, I like to see everthing that's out there.
Nearly all scientist would love to find fatal flaws in whats thought to be fact.
Remember the day they thought something exceeded the speed of light?
There was real excitement for a brief time.
As for Einstein, the seeds were there and it wouldn't have been that long before
someone else had twigged.
       John.

Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 23, 2017, 06:02:30 PM
Nearly all scientist would love to find fatal flaws in whats thought to be fact. 

not true at all.

any scientists asked why 1 electron and 1 proton able to form stable atom? what the exact mechanism?

any scientists gave a fuck to elinstein admitted that he knows nothing about what are light quanta?

any scientists asked how gravity able to curve space?
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 23, 2017, 07:03:12 PM
the double slit is the most famous experiment in history.

the first one to renew it will rewrite history.

unless you have no equips and basic knowledge, don't miss the opportunity in a lifetime.

i am serious, my dear friends. after you got a nobel for physics, every college will bag you to be a professor.

young pretty smart college girls will want to fuck you.

bet?
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 23, 2017, 07:41:11 PM
https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=41858.20


How about this?
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 23, 2017, 08:38:51 PM
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/92902/does-double-slit-in-a-vacuum-have-any-effect


 What is a light wave?
     John.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 23, 2017, 08:46:26 PM
The second main type,electromagnetic waves (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_wave), do not require a medium. Instead, they consist of periodic oscillations of electrical and magnetic fields originally generated by charged particles, and can therefore travel through a]vacuum (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum)]. These types vary in wavelength (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavelength), and include radio waves (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_wave)]microwaves (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave), ]infrared radiation (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_radiation)]visible lig (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_light)ht ultraviolet radiatio (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultraviolet_radiation)n X-rays (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray) gamma ray (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_ray)s

   With pilot wave,  what is the medium?
             John.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: gravityblock on November 24, 2017, 06:01:27 AM
The second main type,electromagnetic waves (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_wave), do not require a medium. Instead, they consist of periodic oscillations of electrical and magnetic fields originally generated by charged particles, and can therefore travel through a]vacuum (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum)]. These types vary in wavelength (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavelength), and include radio waves (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_wave)]microwaves (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave), ]infrared radiation (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_radiation)]visible lig (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_light)ht ultraviolet radiatio (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultraviolet_radiation)n X-rays (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray) gamma ray (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_ray)s

   With pilot wave,  what is the medium?
             John.

The best current pilot-wave models use fields for bosons (ex. photons) and particles for fermions (ex. electrons).

Gravock
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: gravityblock on November 24, 2017, 06:16:41 AM

I hate things like this, I haven't been indoctrinated, I like to see everthing that's out there.
Nearly all scientist would love to find fatal flaws in whats thought to be fact.
Remember the day they thought something exceeded the speed of light?
There was real excitement for a brief time.
As for Einstein, the seeds were there and it wouldn't have been that long before
someone else had twigged.
       John.

John,

Relax, observe your frickin head off, and enjoy a beer...
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 26, 2017, 07:03:38 PM
the double slit is the most famous experiment in history.

the first one to renew it will rewrite history.

unless you have no equips and basic knowledge, don't miss the opportunity in a lifetime.

i am serious, my dear friends. after you got a nobel for physics, every college will bag you to be a professor.

young pretty smart college girls will want to fuck you.

bet?
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 26, 2017, 09:33:09 PM



https://www.forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2015/07/20/three-experiments-that-show-quantum-physics-is-real/2/#e7ffdfe1ec5a
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 26, 2017, 11:46:24 PM


https://www.forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2015/07/20/three-experiments-that-show-quantum-physics-is-real/2/#e7ffdfe1ec5a

total bs. standard model is bs. see that picture of photon? those scientists are jokers.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 28, 2017, 12:39:24 AM
total bs. standard model is bs. see that picture of photon? those scientists are jokers.

pretty colorful picture of a single photon. and they can split a photon nowadays.

how they took that picture? they don't even have a picture of electron yet. how fast is a photon? what frequency? how electron gets exited? how electron change energy level and emit photon? what is energy level? what is energy? the capacity to do work?

what work is electron doing? how?

the whole thing is a story.

how can you believe it?
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 28, 2017, 01:40:26 PM
https://cosmosmagazine.com/physics/what-shape-is-a-photon
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 28, 2017, 05:03:37 PM
https://cosmosmagazine.com/physics/what-shape-is-a-photon

Now, Polish physicists have created the first ever hologram of a single light particle.

hologram of a photon?  holo sciernce?
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 29, 2017, 10:06:10 PM



  There's obviously plenty to solve!!!!
   https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_physics
        John.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on November 30, 2017, 11:21:58 AM



   There are obviously a good few unanswered questions.
    I don't know why because Gravityblock and Theoria Apophasis
   know all the answers.
       John
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 30, 2017, 06:33:50 PM
i don't think so. they don't even know how hydrogen atoms are formed.

they don't know the mechanism of light. gravity and magnetic force.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on November 30, 2017, 07:18:48 PM
no one ever point out that the force f+ke x pq/rr is the carrier of all em phenomena.

no one says energy is electromotive force carrier by moving matter/charge.

gravity is simply induced electrostatic attraction force between neutrally charged matters/masses.

magnetic force is circular electric force.

energy cannot only exist with/within matter. light speed in space is infinite.

i say it all.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on December 10, 2017, 08:51:44 PM
coulomb, newrton, einstein, maxwell and tesla, they read this thread in heaven.

everyone is cried.

they want to kiss me but they can't yet.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on December 10, 2017, 08:52:36 PM
kiss my hand
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on December 10, 2017, 09:19:48 PM
in their hearts

they want to kiss my shoe
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on December 11, 2017, 04:29:07 AM
no wonder all science forums call me amoeba, crackpot, pest, sedo-science, ban me like a goat.  ;D
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: sm0ky2 on December 11, 2017, 04:50:23 AM
They did this a long time ago...


http://https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0212103 (http://https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0212103)


There are three (3) forces.


1)The gravitational (time-dependent mass constant acceleration)
Not instantaneous


2)The Electric (assumed to have a maximum of c)
If we can get around these stupid Ohm things....
Not instantaneous


3) The magnetic - (exponential acceleration Independent of time)
while this one IS instantaneous,
The effects the magnetic field has on mass incurs
the anti force of momentum.
Or “moment on inertia”, basically the Ohm equivalent
to accelerating a given mass.


Each are 90-degrees to one another, and they are all part of the same force.
one cannot exist without the others.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: sm0ky2 on December 11, 2017, 04:56:29 AM
Look at the thing NASA uses to teach gravity to the astronauts
(Or rather, how to fly under 6 G’s)


Or imagine 3 rings inside one another.
And all turned 90-degrees apart.


If you take a ring magnet and magnetize it Axially
(and by that I mean the axis of its perimeter,
Not the center of its radius)
You create all 3 rings
And you can detect all 3, 90-degrees apart
Proportional to the strength of the inducing field
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on December 11, 2017, 05:50:40 AM
that link is not working

all forces are coexist with matter, it cannot miss connection at all the times, therefore instantaneous.

matter, has mass, can never move at infinite speed. 

Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on December 12, 2017, 12:54:44 AM
the force between lines of sight matters is instantaneous, such as gravity between stars, the force between lines of sight charged particles.

the force passes through matter/medium have limited speed, such as oscillating electric force/light passes through air or water producing em wave.

without a medium, there is no wave. sunlight instantly transfer energy to electrons on earth outer atmosphere, becomes light wave passing through the atmosphere to reach us.

put a magnet in each hand, the same pole faces each other, feel the tension? what's its speed?

if you move one hand, what do you feel the other hand?  is emf instantly transferred in opposite direction? replace magnets with electrons, that is the mechanism of all em phenomena.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: sm0ky2 on December 12, 2017, 11:39:35 AM
Only the magnetic force can be instantaneous


It exists in one dimension (each of the 360 dimensions)
and propagates instantly, across infinite distance
decreasing in strength with the square of the distance.
(slightly variant not a perfect square for multiple reasons)
The first dimension has no time.


The electric is manifested by the magnetic.
This exists in 2-dimensional space, in each of the 360
degrees perpendicular to the magnetic.
This is the creation of Time, as we measure it.
This cannot be instant.


Gravitational force is manifest by both the magnetic and the electric
It exists in the 3rd dimension.
In each of the 360 dimensions perpendicular to both
the magnetic and the electric.
This is the creation of space and volume.
Derived from time, it also cannot be instant.





Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on December 12, 2017, 04:16:00 PM
are the sun and earth missing gravity at any moment in the past?

no, gravity is always there, connected the 2 masses as 1.  gravity is an immortal force.

same as forces between charged particles.

gravity, electric force, and light, strength decay at 1/rr, magnetic force decay at 1/rrr, do you know why?

Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on December 13, 2017, 01:23:19 AM
if there are only 2 electrons in space, according to physics laws, f=Ke x ee/rr, f=ma, they will repel each other with force f, they will move away from each other in a straight line, keep accelerating. they will never come close again.

are they still connected by a force? are they still attract each other? since they have no clock, what time is now for them? what is past? what is future in their minds? what is time to them?

if there are only 1 electron and 1 proton in space, no matter how far apart, according to same laws, what should happen? the attraction force will accelerate them toward each other in a straight line.

how can the electron and proton not collide together soon or later?

quantum magic bs theory. orbit, cloud, wave function collapse, uncertainty principle, wave-particle duality. energy level, quantum state.

science fiction on drugs.

do you agree? 

 
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: sm0ky2 on December 13, 2017, 01:50:39 AM
Two electrons will only accelerate to a distance
at which the acceleration force has dropped below
the moment of inertia of an electron mass.


At which point they would continue at a constant velocity.


A proton and electron will only attract each other within
a similar distance constraint, at the point which the acceleration
force exceeds the moment of inertia (of electron, not proton)


And the path is a curved one, not straight when they are attracting.
the rate of acceleration increases with shortening distance
This causes the path to take on elliptical properties.


When otherwise unobstructed, and allowed to reach velocity
approaching c, the path will follow pi spiral round the center of
protonic mass.





Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on December 13, 2017, 02:19:02 AM
what is space? void, emptiness, nothingness, therefore, no property, no boundary, anything can fit in it.

how can space be curved by gravity or anything? can gravity curve an apple on the tree or a bird in the air? no, gravity is a vector force between apart masses. gravity can only accelerate mass in a straight line.

how can gravity slow down light, so light cannot escape from big mass/star so it becomes a black hole? if gravity can slow down light, why sunlight and flashlight have the same speed?

they took a pic of stars behind of the sun at that solar eclipse, proved gravity bends light path?

misinterpretation, hot plasma on the sun deflected star lights. our atmosphere deflects star lights the same principle. 

how do you think?

Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on December 13, 2017, 02:28:27 AM
Two electrons will only accelerate to a distance
at which the acceleration force has dropped below
the moment of inertia of an electron mass.


At which point they would continue at a constant velocity.


A proton and electron will only attract each other within
a similar distance constraint, at the point which the acceleration
force exceeds the moment of inertia (of electron, not proton)


And the path is a curved one, not straight when they are attracting.
the rate of acceleration increases with shortening distance
This causes the path to take on elliptical properties.


When otherwise unobstructed, and allowed to reach velocity
approaching c, the path will follow pi spiral round the center of
protonic mass.

f=ma, if f>0, a>0, no matter electron mass.


force is a vector, force line is a straight line.


orbits are on a 2d plane, the atom is a 3d sphere.


are those your ideas or in the book?
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on December 13, 2017, 03:37:36 AM
Force is a measure of the interactions between objects. It has both a magnitude and a direction, and so it is a vector quantity.

newton's laws of motion are universal. micro or macro matter/mass. quantum anything is illusion/bs. admit it already.

 
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on December 13, 2017, 07:05:48 AM
the force has no speed, forces act upon matters constantly at any distance. forces coexist with the matter. if 2 electrons move away at light speed, are they still attract each other? what's the speed of pressure or tension?   

only moving matter/force carrier has speed. time has no speed, timer's movement has speed.

only matter can be moved, curved, compressed or expend. time and space cannot. both have no physical existence.

einstein theories are all based on false assumptions and misinterpretations.

 
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on December 14, 2017, 03:43:01 PM
The much theoretical nonsense being portrayed as science. em theory, qm, relativity, tbb, black hole, photon, time travel, dark matter, simulation.

Computer simulation can only produce digital signals, the real world is based on matter and energy.

Time is not a place, the time has no location, where to travel? How to travel to nowhere?

Simple facts, can you see it?

NASA faked moon landing, some shadows are right under the object, means they made the video at noontime, which is not morning time as they said/should.

NASA, China, Japan all fake news about solar sails work in space, photons able to transfer momentum to solar sail to accelerate spaceship.

They lied right in front your eyes.

If light/photon has momentum, why is laser beam cannot bend a flame? why is light mill not moving in a hard vacuum?

All space missions are fake, cuz they faked the time delay for space radio transmission.

Light/em waves travel in vacuum space at an infinite speed, only within mediums at a limited speed.

So any communication takes more than 1/100 second is faked.

All scientists think light speed is c in the vacuum, they all wrong.

If light speed is limited in vacuum space, all-stars, galaxies we see are from the past, how can scientists map the universe and measure the total mass?

It is all bs, all lies.

There is no solar wind. what mechanism? why protons and electrons on the way to earth do not attract each other and form into hydrogen atoms? why does gravity not pull them back into the sun?

Van Allen Belts? what's mechanism? the sun's energy/radiation/light strength decay at 1/rr, the only way to find stronger radiation is to get closer.

Near around earth, radiation strength is the same, within the atmosphere, it decreases.

So between earth and the moon, the radiation strength is about the same, less within our atmosphere.

EM drive? powered by quantum vacuum virtual plasma. it is voodoo science. quantum anything is bs.

LIGO detected gravity wave from 1.3 billion years ago? you wave hand will produce more detectable gravity wave than far away stars explode. why can't LIGO detect CME or earthquake?

Gravity wave speed is infinite, gravity has to be instantaneous, otherwise, no planets can stay in orbit.

Voyager is fake, gravity is decelerating it at all the times, how can it escape from the solar system?

Iss is fake, AC systems cannot work in vacuum space, heat cannot radiate into space but matter.

If heat can radiate into space, the earth will be as hot as the sun, the whole universe will be at the same temperature, thermal equilibrium.

Einstein is wrong about time dilation.

Put same atomic clocks in the sun, earth, mars, flying air plan, for 1 day.

Each clock will have a different reading.

Which time is dilated? which clock has correct time?

Time dilation is a misinterpretation of timer's moving rate/reading affected by gravity/acceleration/force upon it.

Time is not a thing, the time has no location, cannot be touched, what is dilating what? how?

All things happening is at now, all existence is at now, time is forever ongoing now, all past became now, all future will become now.

What is space? void, emptiness, nothingness, therefore, no property, no boundary, anything can fit in it.

How can space be curved by gravity or anything? can gravity curve an apple on the tree or a bird in the air? no, gravity is a vector force between apart masses. gravity can only accelerate mass in a straight line.

How can gravity slow down light, so light cannot escape from big mass/star so it becomes a black hole? if gravity can slow down light, why sunlight and flashlight have the same speed?

They took a picture of stars behind of the sun at that solar eclipse, to proved gravity bends light path?

It is another misinterpretation, hot plasma on the sun deflected star lights. our atmosphere deflects star lights the same principle.

The most famous equation e=mcc is BS

Mass is condensed charged particles. energy is emf matter carried. totally different, cannot equivalent.

A 1 kg gold bar at rest has no energy but thermal energy, for it to carry 1kgcc energy, it must move at 1.414 c speed. how fast can we move a bullet?

Nuclear energy? 1 kg best fuel, how many % of it can produce heat?

The most famous experiment double slit is a misinterpretation, all waves are within a medium/matter waves, there is no light/wave in space.

Light is not wave nor particle, but electron's vibration force. try double slit experiment in a vacuum chamber, wave property will disappear.


how do you think? agree much?

have great day!


Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: isawit on December 14, 2017, 09:13:13 PM
The fabric of space-time? Ripples of gravity wave? Distortion?

What is the compound of the fabric or ripples? What is distorting what? What is the mechanism?

Why did all scientists fall for such nonsense and made it mainstream?

Why did you believe everything in science?

What if everything I said is in the books, everything book said is my word?

Will you think I am crazy, retarded?




Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: minnie on December 27, 2017, 12:03:56 AM



   The "Bell test" has been done to a standard where there's no reasonable doubt.
 This doesn't mean there is absolutely no doubt but it's pretty much there.
  This would imply that Einstein himself was wrong on this one.
Title: Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
Post by: sm0ky2 on December 27, 2017, 03:29:38 AM
f=ma, if f>0, a>0, no matter electron mass.


force is a vector, force line is a straight line.



0.0000000000000000000000000x???
At what distance does f< moment of inertia ?
Acceleration is NOT going on for infinity.