Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment  (Read 26757 times)

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #30 on: November 21, 2017, 02:42:31 PM »
"The thng that doesn't exist, from a photon's point of
view is TIME."

effect is time   

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #31 on: November 21, 2017, 03:15:58 PM »
"Quantum indeterminacy and a probabilistic universe
based on the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum
Mechanics has been proven false!  It's been proven
false, John!"

Tell me something,has it ever been proven that matter or energy appear from utter nothing.if time can convert to energy then this might not be so false as you think

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #32 on: November 21, 2017, 03:24:57 PM »
"Tell me something,has it ever been proven that
matter or energy appear from utter nothing.if time
can convert to energy then this might not be so false
as you think"

Which brings us to the question,"what came first,time or energy"

isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 229
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #33 on: November 21, 2017, 03:29:01 PM »
the photons carry momentum?

how? what mechanism? does a photon has mass? charge? what is photon made of? virtual particle? what is it?

how electrons emit photons? fart? how electrons change energy level? what is energy level? what is energy?

why electrons do not stick to protons under attraction force?

how photons pass glass? reflect from metal?

do you understand the mechanism of light now?


isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 229
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #34 on: November 21, 2017, 08:26:57 PM »
faraday's em induction law is description, not explanation, they don't know the mechanism of magnetism yet. they don't even know the mechanism of light.

MAGNETISM

2 parallel wires at r distance, the free electrons in the 2 wires repel each other with force f=Ke x q1q2/rr, that force is the carrier of energy/moving electric force/emf. that force act as a class 1 lever with the fulcrum at the center, the mechanical advantage is equal to 1.

if electrons move in wire 1, electrons in wire 2 will instantly have opposite direction emf. the true mechanism of electromagnetic induction. same as momentum conservation.

every magnetic atom/magton contains 2 atoms. 2 atoms of a ferromagnetic matter before magnetize, we put it as 00. if 1 electron moved from 1 atom to the other atom and stays there as -11, the 2 atoms become a magton, it carries a special property now, we call it magnetic force.

-11, -22, -33...-nn are all magton, but carry different magnetic force strength.

2 magtons attract each other in the direction -11><-11, and repel each other in the direction -11<>1-1 or 1-1<>-11.

use copper wire winding around an iron core, put a current, the electrons in the wire move in circles around the core, make atoms in the core arrange into -11-11 directions all the way. on the pole plane area, magtons are arranged as clockwise concentric circles of -11-11 directions, north pole.

reverse the current direction, the pole plane area magtons are arranged as counterclockwise concentric circles of -11-11 directions, south pole.

so, a magnet north pole stored clockwise electric force, south pole stored the counterclockwise electric force. the same poles always repel, different poles always attract.

the earth magnetic field is a mistake. there is no field but the force in the universe. sunlight moves electrons moving westward causing earth magnetic force interact with compasses.

there is only 1 force exists, coulomb force f=Ke x q1q2/rr. gravity and magnetic force are both different configurations of electric force.

without matters, there is no force. a single matter has no force. force can only exist between matters.

without a test body, where is the electric or magnetic field? where is gravity field?

the mysteries of the universe are within 2 equations.

f=Ke x e1e1/rr and f=G x m1m2/rr.

those 2 forces rule everything existing.

the mechanism of quantum entanglement is simple. the force between any 2 charged particles f=Ke x qp/rr is the carrier of energy/information/moving electric force. it is an invisible physical rod with zero mass that always connected 2 particles as 1. if 1 particle is energized, that energy instantly transferred to another. from f=ma, m=0, so energy instantly moved from 1 particle to another. we call it QE.

isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 229
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #35 on: November 22, 2017, 04:18:23 AM »
in fact, if you believe atoms are as science told you, 1 electron and 1 proton able to form a hydrogen atom, you are a fool.

you know opposite charges attract each other, but you don't ask why ?  how? the cause and precise mechanism of the structure.

you follow others, worship big names, listen to teachers, read books. smart enough to not question. you are a sheeple.

another example, common science lie. escape velocity.

science told you that if a rock is moving at 7 m/c=25,000 m/h away from earth, it will never return, it will fly away forever.

you believe it is true, never had a doubt. right?

let me ask you, is the rock always attracted by earth gravity at all the times?

is the rock decelerating all the time under gravity?

is the rock slowing down by time?

will the rock slow down to zero speed some day?

after that day, which way the rock moves?

will the rock soon or later come back to earth?

is science lied?

are you honest?

isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 229
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #36 on: November 22, 2017, 04:48:17 AM »
no 1 is honest?

dark matter will eat that rock at some point, so it will not return.

take my word, i have multiple virtual phds.

minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #37 on: November 22, 2017, 10:09:25 AM »
https://youtu.be/WIyTZDHuarQ
This is about my level.
 It raises many questions.
 I don't think anybody really knows!

isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 229
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #38 on: November 22, 2017, 10:45:10 AM »
https://youtu.be/WIyTZDHuarQ
This is about my level.
 It raises many questions.
 I don't think anybody really knows!

that dude is a top bster

ask what is the mechanism of light, how 1 electron and 1 proton able to from stable atom.

see if you agree with his science.

he is a joke, younger neil degress tyson.

isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 229
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #39 on: November 22, 2017, 10:50:37 AM »
those monkeys are professors at cambridge

bs fake math, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-I6XTVZXww

do you understand?

minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #40 on: November 22, 2017, 12:07:52 PM »



 Isatwit, a hydrogen atom is like your head, 99.9999999 empty space!

minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #41 on: November 22, 2017, 01:29:38 PM »



   What's happening in the little film?
   There is a frequency allotted to the oil by the speaker.
    There's momentum imparted to the droplet by the frequency of
     the oil which in turn is returned somewhat to the oil causing a
     standing wave.  The wave reacts somewhat to the local environment
     and in a roundabout fashion the droplet is steered along a possible path.
      I just need to see similar ingredients to be able to visualise how
      photons do it..... but I can't.
           John

minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #42 on: November 22, 2017, 01:50:18 PM »



   I've come to a sort of a gravityblock,  I badly need some aether!!!!!
      John.

isawit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 229
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #43 on: November 22, 2017, 09:08:51 PM »
I don't have the equips, but I know the theory is correct. Light is not particle nor wave in vacuum space. Light is electrons vibration force.

All light double slit experiments were done in the air, light travels in air/medium as wave form. If you do a new double slit experiment in a vacuum chamber, you can proof the old theory is wrong. You will find two light lines on the screen instead of interferentce.

set up like this

the light source/laser can be in the air, a square glass bottle, on the 2 parallel inside walls are the slits and the screen. connect the bottle to a vacuum pump.

show the light wave interference on the screen first, then pump the air out.

as the air pressure gets lower and lower, the light pattern on the screen should be changing.

until a hard vacuum, it should be only 2 bright lines left on the screen right behind the slits.

Please give it a shot, you may help improve science and win us some $.

there is no free energy. don't waste your time. do this experiment, please. 

minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Win Nobel Prize by doing new double slit experiment
« Reply #44 on: November 23, 2017, 03:53:34 PM »
Quantum indeterminacy and a probabilistic universe based on the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics has been proven false!  It's been proven false, John!  Why do you so dearly hold onto an interpretation that has been proven false?  The whole story has already been rewritten!  However, you John, have been indoctrinated by this system of things.

Gravock


I hate things like this, I haven't been indoctrinated, I like to see everthing that's out there.
Nearly all scientist would love to find fatal flaws in whats thought to be fact.
Remember the day they thought something exceeded the speed of light?
There was real excitement for a brief time.
As for Einstein, the seeds were there and it wouldn't have been that long before
someone else had twigged.
       John.