GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 82511
  • *Latest: Danmish

  • *Total Posts: 497734
  • *Total Topics: 14729
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 23
  • *Total: 26

Author Topic: 2020  (Read 15469 times)

Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2999
Re: 2020
« Reply #15 on: January 02, 2018, 11:05:44 PM »
Come on. Let's not insult the intelligence of people. I've lost count how many circuits & designs that have been posted over the decades that people have tried to replicate, of which none so far have ended up being self-runners. There have been a lot of scams, hoaxes, dreamers, and a lot of people who simply don't know how to take proper measurements.


Let us also not underestimate the adversity


If I showed people 3 overunity system right now
I would be met with proclaimations of fraud, mismeasurement,
and outright denial.
Not to mention a lot of unwanted attention.
Thermodynamic theory has a lot of religious believers
who are unwilling to admit the exceptions to their “laws”.


People are driven into the shadows
Some fight the battle their entire lives
Only to die with their knowledge.
Others are refuted and belittled
While the industries pilfers their technology
and uses it to perpetuate capitalism.


For every Eric Jacqmain or Archer Quinn
There are 1000 skeptics ready and willing to
fight them to the bitter end without giving a glance
at the truth. Some even to this day spreading the
lies and misinformation. Despite the advancements
that provide power to millions.
All the while, our electric bills stay high.




Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: 2020
« Reply #15 on: January 02, 2018, 11:05:44 PM »

Offline Theoretical Research

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 181
Re: 2020
« Reply #16 on: January 02, 2018, 11:31:37 PM »
I know there are self-runners. The problem is nobody has been able or willing to publish a design that people can replicate. Maybe they were greedy and died with their secret. Maybe they just couldn't publish it for philosophical reasons for fear that humanity would eventually use the science & technology to build weapons. Or maybe they couldn't figured out how to replicate it every time, the magic, the secret sauce that makes it work, taking a lot of tweaking and guess work to get it to work.

Regardless, it's not in public hands, yet. Not in this timeline.

Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2999
Re: 2020
« Reply #17 on: January 03, 2018, 03:11:06 AM »
There are ou systems here on this forum


Inventors often use non-technical terms to describe the effects they experience
Replicators often ad-hok the tech and build in manners which cannot succeed
Skeptics defer attention away from things that should be looked at


Sometimes the effects themselves are so obscure, that only a few of many replications
are able to achieve similar results.


Others still are confined to localities, or material specific properties
that go unnoticed


The AQ magnetic device was replicated by no less than 50 people
Some of them are very good at mechanical engineering
But to date, only 3 people report success.
I built 20 of them myself. Only one worked as presented
And it destroyed itself. I wasn’t able to do it again, even though
I consider myself the most well educated on the subject, having spent
a great deal of time corresponding with the inventor, and countless hours of experimentation.
and that’s just one example.


If free energy was ‘easy’, none of us would be here.


——————————————————————————-


The Archimedes device resurrected by Eric Jacqmain proved OU, compared to refractive
lenses of the same area.
It is used currently by electric companies in 28 countries.


———————————————————————————-


there are other devices that have associated threads on this forum
that are still wound in controversy, but display anomalous behavior


Also mentionable are entire categories of devices which are not “ou”,
but close enough that they defy current knowledge of system losses.


For whatever reasons, these techniques are not used to reduce energy
consumption, but rather sit on the shelves of forums. Played with by tinkerers
as funny tricks or oddities.


Truth is, any success we achieve here, is a direct threat to the global economy.
And the corporations that pillage us would stop at nothing to prevent their forthcoming.
The interests of many of these corporations are held by people in positions of power.


Only a small few of governments show interest in bringing this stuff to a reality.
And caution must be taken when we work with them, so as not to commit any diplomatic crimes.


Most governments still hold the thermodynamic viewpoint.
Even though we know this to be incorrect, the collegiate accreditation system prevents
alternative theories from being taught in schools.
Which perpetuates the problem.
Creating more religious anti-energy fanatics we must contend with.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: 2020
« Reply #17 on: January 03, 2018, 03:11:06 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2999
Re: 2020
« Reply #18 on: January 03, 2018, 03:53:00 AM »
There are overunity situations embedded in our scientific theories
in almost every area of science.


constructive Interference as it pertains to light, sound, and emf


Gravitational Fluid pressure and jet nozzle physics


Electrolysis of Water is overunity, when one considers bouyancy
within the gravitational field and the pressure differential of the
liquid-to-gas phase change.
Even further demonstrated by stoichiatric combustion
Even with the 50% loses associated with the Carnot cycle,
And ICE can power an alternator to perpetuate the separation of gasses
as well as provide rotational force to power external devices such as a
drive shaft or hydraulic pump.




The capillary effect is overunity.


Books have been written about this stuff, yet thermodynamic extremists
still argue against it to their death.


The only thing that will change our lives is us changing the way we live them.

Offline blueplanet

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 364
Re: 2020
« Reply #19 on: January 03, 2018, 08:14:39 AM »

That's not true. Many "crazy scientists" have been trying to publish their findings in so-called indexed journals but no many of these journals accept their contributions.


Prof Peter Mansfield was an example. He was the original inventor of MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging). During the early stage of his career, his proposed idea was almost invisible in the scientific community. He had tried to publish his initial findings in a few journals, almost all his papers were rejected. Even now, I doubt if anyone knows the original inventor of MRI.


Nowadays, even an undergraduate student can be allowed to review a high impact journal paper.



I know there are self-runners. The problem is nobody has been able or willing to publish a design that people can replicate. Maybe they were greedy and died with their secret. Maybe they just couldn't publish it for philosophical reasons for fear that humanity would eventually use the science & technology to build weapons. Or maybe they couldn't figured out how to replicate it every time, the magic, the secret sauce that makes it work, taking a lot of tweaking and guess work to get it to work.

Regardless, it's not in public hands, yet. Not in this timeline.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: 2020
« Reply #19 on: January 03, 2018, 08:14:39 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2999
Re: 2020
« Reply #20 on: January 03, 2018, 12:16:31 PM »
Yes let’s not forget the overunity MRI that uses superconductors
To create a magnetic field that draws no consumption
Yet is powerful enough to throw a truck acros the room


Although technically thermodynamics requires heat
Or the equations break down

Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2999
Re: 2020
« Reply #21 on: January 03, 2018, 01:58:02 PM »
Sometime in the 1940-50’s it became common knowledge
that when a new theory triumphs over the existing one,
the incumbent scientist is ridiculed, and then forgotten.


The immortality the worked their lives for is destroyed
and if they are still alive, their thesis may be overturned.
Which affects their careers, as well as their social status.


These are the same people that make the decisions on
the new proposed theories.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: 2020
« Reply #21 on: January 03, 2018, 01:58:02 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline LabDeSyn

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: 2020
« Reply #22 on: January 03, 2018, 02:55:32 PM »
This may sound ridiculous but I think that life itself exists in a state of overunity.
We try to find it in a mechanical or technical sense, but in my opinion it is more likely to be found in biological organisms.
When we see how organisms have managed to survive through millions of years; it seems that overunity is at the basis.
Perhaps that some people see the hand of god in this miracle. It sounds controversial on this forum but that is what I think.
This said I wish you all a happy 2018.

Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2999
Re: 2020
« Reply #23 on: January 03, 2018, 03:19:59 PM »
This may sound ridiculous but I think that life itself exists in a state of overunity.
We try to find it in a mechanical or technical sense, but in my opinion it is more likely to be found in biological organisms.
When we see how organisms have managed to survive through millions of years; it seems that overunity is at the basis.
Perhaps that some people see the hand of god in this miracle. It sounds controversial on this forum but that is what I think.
This said I wish you all a happy 2018.


Most life forms operate as arguably overunity.
A tall tree for instance, pumps more water than allowed for by the caloric intake of its minerals.
Muscular and neurological activity of higher animals also outperforms their caloric intake.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: 2020
« Reply #23 on: January 03, 2018, 03:19:59 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline LabDeSyn

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: 2020
« Reply #24 on: January 03, 2018, 03:54:47 PM »

Most life forms operate as arguably overunity.
A tall tree for instance, pumps more water than allowed for by the caloric intake of its minerals.
Muscular and neurological activity of higher animals also outperforms their caloric intake.
This is exactly what I mean. We make energy conversions (from food, wind, sun, waves etc.)
but conversion is not procreating. Maybe we have to free our mind from in-output thinking.
Life is not a matter of (the right) math. There is a secret behind self-sustaining systems.

Offline Theoretical Research

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 181
Re: 2020
« Reply #25 on: January 03, 2018, 05:07:19 PM »
Replicators can only do what the inventor says. Replicators don't need to adhoc unless the inventor's instructions are vague or doesn't specify exact part #s.

A few months ago I was told in PM that within a week a self-runner was going to be verified. It never happened.

The public does not have a self-runner, yet.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: 2020
« Reply #25 on: January 03, 2018, 05:07:19 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3250
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: 2020
« Reply #26 on: January 04, 2018, 07:07:57 AM »
Oh? I applaud your optimism but I confess that I do not share it.

So... would you like to make a small wager? I'll bet you a double cheezburger to a box of Krispy Kreme donuts that none of the above will occur before the end of 2020.

First however you should define your terms precisely so we know just what we are betting on and who decides whether the criteria are met.

How about a small wager with me?  I can prove, without a shadow of a doubt, that at least one of the above is already true!

Gravock

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13711
Re: 2020
« Reply #27 on: January 04, 2018, 07:16:13 AM »
How about a small wager with me?  I can prove, without a shadow of a doubt, that at least one of the above is already true!

Gravock

Quote from: me
First however you should define your terms precisely so we know just what we are betting on and who decides whether the criteria are met.

But I believe that you are insane, a Flat Earther, and you have already shown in discussions on that topic that you are immune to scientific evidence and that you believe all kinds of whacky shit. So I ask you this: Why do you need a "wager" to demonstrate the proof of your contention that "at least one of the above is already true"? Just do it.

Offline gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3250
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: 2020
« Reply #28 on: January 04, 2018, 07:51:43 AM »
Why do you need a "wager" to demonstrate the proof of your contention that "at least one of the above is already true"? Just do it.

You should be asking yourself that question!  It is you who needed and offered a wager, and not me.  You have already shown yourself to be irrational in your thinking by asking me that question. 

However, I am now going to take full advantage of you offering a small wager.  If I can prove that at least one of the above is already true, without a shadow of a doubt, then you agree to no longer post on this forum.  Do you accept or not?

Gravock

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13711
Re: 2020
« Reply #29 on: January 04, 2018, 09:04:32 AM »
No, of course not. You have already demonstrated over and over that you are insane. You are likely to assert that you have "won" any such wager, just as you have asserted literally crazy shit about the nature of the Earth, in spite of all evidence to the contrary. I'd have to be as crazy as you are, to accept such a deal. You are nuts!

You can take your imaginary "without a shadow of a doubt" and go sit on it.


 

OneLink