Why Brad, you already know what it is. Since you said it was around 50% then that MUST be the truth. Like I said, the owner said it was 94%. It really doesn't matter to me as I have used these fans for years and rotated the batteries back and forth. It wouldn't matter if it was 30% or 80% or 94%.
You always avoid the actual point at hand, that the input was reduced and there was added output. In this simple modification we have gain because the coil has a dual purpose which is suppressed by people like you and mainstream theory and practice. Instead of saying, that's cool Rick, you just attack.
If you can't follow instructions then I can't help you. I did a longer video before with the whole process. But you guys just insult me for showing a long video.

Well first up,you only have to look at my youtube channel to see what i do,and the test equipment i have.

But i'll tell you what Rick,i'll just build a small one tonight,as i have a few of them brushless DC fans lying around. They are only the small cooling fans for computers,but you did state in your video that any brushless DC motor will work,and give us free energy.

At least from this you will be able to see how accurate testing is carried out,instead of your style of testing and measurements you try to make in your video's,where no output energy was measured at all other than a batteries voltage rising slowly,and where your input power shown by the display on your power supply was jumping all over the place. That is just pure junk,and shows nothing at all,but still you claim free energy--just like your friend JB did for many years.


Brad

Well first up,you only have to look at my youtube channel to see what i do,and the test equipment i have.

But i'll tell you what Rick,i'll just build a small one tonight,as i have a few of them brushless DC fans lying around. They are only the small cooling fans for computers,but you did state in your video that any brushless DC motor will work,and give us free energy.

At least from this you will be able to see how accurate testing is carried out,instead of your style of testing and measurements you try to make in your video's,where no output energy was measured at all other than a batteries voltage rising slowly,and where your input power shown by the display on your power supply was jumping all over the place. That is just pure junk,and shows nothing at all,but still you claim free energy--just like your friend JB did for many years.


Brad

Brad,
I'm not doing any of this for you, nor will I do what you demand. While I do things for other people who are not so hostile I find you fairly predictable in your arrogant hostility.

The efficiency of the motor is not the point. You keep committing the ignoration elenchi fallacy and divert to something else that is really related to the subject. If we were focusing on efficiency here, or more importantly COP then I would be doing a different circuit than merely the diode modification. I would also use another motor. You are looking for me to be proving something else here. You fail to take the time to even read what I have written or listen to what I have said.

If the motor was 10% efficient, and the world used it that way, then if I make it more efficient while also resulting in battery charging (say 10% extra work on top) than that is a useful gain. I know that this is not what you want, but I don't care about what you want me to be doing here. We are not addressing the same thing. You are missing the point as always. You have committed yourself to attacking me about your own misunderstanding of what I am doing here. It doesn't matter what the efficiency of the fan is so long as the result has a gain over normal setup. This is just a tiny step in the right direction. The first step is for people to realize that things are not as good as they could be. Can you not agree with that? You would say we should be using more efficient motors. And I agree. You would say we should be using more efficient circuits. I agree. I have shown a simple way to make such widely used fans more efficient while allowing for a small electrical load in addition to that (while the motor has the same CFMs (with less input energy). We obviously disagree with the why and how of this and that is the point of debate. You have made the efficiency of the motor to be the debate because you refuse to consider what I have been saying.

Now I know that if I had presented a self-runner system here that it would be easier for you to see this. But I didn't actually make that video for this forum or to satisfy that desire. It was again mentioned here by someone else. But it still makes a point that needs to be considered: why is no one doing this when these motors have been around since the 70s? Well I am doing that, but always much better (I never use just a diode, and just show it here as an easy thing to do). The bigger point other than making things more useful or efficient, is the fact that I am showing a many-body asymmetrical circuit that uses a floating ground. This is just a tool to begin considering these things. It would like a practical application to what Walter Lewin was showing merely with the reverse volt meter in his lectures about Kirchhoff's loop rule being a special case of Faraday. Can you understand that even if you don't agree with me or Lewin?

I didn't by that from the owner of that company, I bought it from Digikey. Maybe you've heard of that US company. It has the "world's largest selection of electronic components." Maybe that isn't good enough for you. IDK. Again, I decided to call the company and the owner actually called me back and looked up their testing for that fan and they determined it was 94%. It doesn't matter to me if it is less than that or more as I can make the fan run continuously with the other circuits anyway. But it is a nice off-the-shelf practical fan that I have used for many years now.

Now you will divert from the subject and make a big deal about all your skills and tools to try and save face here. You have made many blunders so far and now you are desperate to prove your value on this forum. You recently said you were thinking about giving up because of your many blunders in similar discussions. So now you are desperate to put me down as a tool to show how superior you are to me. That is really sad to see. I have several friends who have watched you from the first days and have actually liked your videos. They are watching you do this and are really disappointed with your hostile attitudes and closemindedness. We all agree that you are a highly reactionary person. You hate Aaron and Bedini so much that you automatically reject anything they mentioned. And that is just immature. Now you are doing the same against me. You stated yesterday that you are on a mission to destroy. That doesn't sound like science but revenge for being embarrassed. But that was your own doing. You made this into a war from the start. You admittedly were prejudiced against me because of former associations with Bedini. Then you apologized for doing that. Then you eventually just went with the tide of attackers and said a whole bunch of foolish things against me again. Then I responded again in great length and you were in the dust and ashes and wrote that you were thinking about giving up all of this. Then you flip flopped again and started saying that I was misrepresenting Tesla when I was actually quoting him. Then you started all over again and said yesterday that I am just Bedini just because I recognized that he said some truth about some matters. I mean really, bedini believed transistors were switching devices, so I guess because you believe that that means you must be Bedini and should be rejected, etc.  You have no dialogue skills and are just a reactionary person. You want to control me but that's not going to happen. I am not reactionary but always benefit from any discussion, even if you heap abuse on me. I can learn from you as well Brad, even if it is what not to do. A mature person can realize where warning parties agree with each other. An unreasonable person just assumes that the other party is wrong in everything (which is actually impossible). You are right in many things. All I'm saying is that what you have experience and believe is limited. The same is true for me. I know very little. Electrodynamics is still in relative infancy because of the prejudices and corporate/institutional greed. But I do know that there is a vast difference between mainstream limited electromagnetism theory and practice and advanced electromagnetism that is used in special systems (like Tesla used) not well known to the general public. Some of that is within many products all around the world for many years. But most of the time these kinds of processes are in anything but energy generation applications.