Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83885
  • *Latest: geovat

  • *Total Posts: 522969
  • *Total Topics: 15572
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 1
  • *Guests: 6
  • *Total: 7

Author Topic: Confirmation of OU devices and claims  (Read 249179 times)

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1935 on: August 07, 2019, 03:33:46 PM »
Well somewhere in the real world  ::)
Hmm, I was expecting that since you said your device can run loads other than batteries, that surely you had a video demonstrating this.


If you don't, that's fine. I'm not surprised.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1935 on: August 07, 2019, 03:33:46 PM »

Offline tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5231
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1936 on: August 07, 2019, 03:57:08 PM »

Brad said that one of  Rick's devices was 50% efficient.  A blatant lie.  He is the one pushing false claims against Rick.


Ok Mr a.king21
It is now up to you to show the efficiency of that fan motor,and prove your claim i am a liar.
First you must measure the actual air flow for a given amount of P/in to that fan motor.
Then you have to find out how much energy is within that flow of air-->what is the actual energy value of that flowing air the fan is moving.

Once you have done that,and you have the energy value of the flowing air,and the actual value of electrical energy the fan is consuming,then you can come back and show us all exactly how efficient that fan motor is.

This time,some bullshit efficiency claim by Rick will not cut it.
This time you are going to back up your claims against me with hard data and accurate measurements.

Knowing you and the way you work,you will not deliver any sort of accurate data or measurements,as it has become apparent that you are no different than Rick,where you just make false claims and accuse others of lying without having anything at all to back up those claims and accusations.

So,enough with the bullshit a.king--time to back up your claim's and accusations,although i really believe that any sort of accurate power/energy calculations from you is far above your pay grade.

It's all well and good to call me a liar,but lets see you back it up.


Brad

Offline rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1937 on: August 07, 2019, 04:09:32 PM »
Yeah I have many videos before YouTube, on YouTube, and also not online.
I'm not going to bother posting links for all you want to do is attack me one way or the other. You guys are not in control of me here and I will post and/or make videos when I want and never for you. If I do a video about anything it will be for nice people who actually appreciate me for giving information. Your attitude is obvious Darren, you always assume the worst and like a troll you attempt to insult to get information. Obviously if a battery can be charged up then other loads can be run instead.

Hmm, I was expecting that since you said your device can run loads other than batteries, that surely you had a video demonstrating this.


If you don't, that's fine. I'm not surprised.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1937 on: August 07, 2019, 04:09:32 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline seaad

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1938 on: August 07, 2019, 04:19:50 PM »
it will be for nice people who actually appreciate me for giving information.

Folks you have got information.

Offline seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 671
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1939 on: August 07, 2019, 05:31:20 PM »
Seriously my epididymis is getting sour of all these banging around. Please
who can sponsor me one of these i promise to give you free energy before Christmas..

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1939 on: August 07, 2019, 05:31:20 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 671
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1940 on: August 07, 2019, 05:35:58 PM »
IF I DO NOT DELIVER I WILL PAY BACK IN FULL OR OFFER MY SPONSOR A FREE
RESIDENTIAL ON THE BEAUTIFUL SEYCHELLES.

Offline rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1941 on: August 07, 2019, 05:49:56 PM »
Brad,
Nice way to completely ignore every point and make this into something else. You keep making things worse for yourself. Attacking me is not going to change the fact that you keep blundering. You have admitted your mistakes already two times now. I was wondering if there was going to be a third. Now you are out for blood it seems. At what point did you become a troll Brad? What are you getting to do this here? I mean really, if what you write is true then you all would just laugh and move on. But you all refuse to answer all of my points and yet I answer all of your points. And that is getting old now.  Again, you would only get so worked up if I was hitting a real nerve with you.

No, if I could influence Stefan I would have all rudeness moderated. No forum will ever work that allows hostilities. I have no idea what Stefan is doing with moderation on this forum.

Brad, it is not that you haven't tried things, it is that you don't understand what you are doing. You don't appear to have much of a foundation to be able to understand OU. That's fine as we should all be here to learn. The point is that you guys are so assuming as to what is possible and what is not. It ends up really being a constant argument amounting to saying OU is impossible because you say so. I have repeated asked people to give their basis for believing in OU. Why do you think it is possible. You guys don't want to answer that because it exposes you personally. It shows everyone just what I have been saying, that you are only here to disprove OU. You are especially upset because I have busted the game of showing not only that you can't prove OU claims over the internet, but that you also can't disprove it in the same way. And that is where all the anger comes from here. How dare I take away all your fun. I am ruining people's jobs apparently.

Did I claim to show online anything new? Do I have to have something new? That is not important to me. I don't claim to be anything special. I am merely a backyard mechanic armature historian philosopher. There is so much good that others have shared already in the history of science that there really is no need to do anything new anyway. I have spent many years studying the history of patents and am amazed at what has been shown and done. I really don't find evidence that you know very much electrical history as I mentioned yesterday. And today you show this again when you point out the loving paths point. That is actually a Benitez system. But really it goes back to Tesla in various ways. It is the Tesla Shuttle Circuits as Barrett pointed out in 91 and even referred to in his very important patent. Of course all you can do is divert from the points and try and attack me. But each time you do you only show the points I am making and make yourself silly. It almost seems like you are trying to push these points home. Is that your way of supporting OU claims here?

Yeah, you are just saying what I have said years ago about Bedini. So you are trying to make it out like you are telling me something new. I have done the patent history research on Bedini and have exposed him enough to show everyone that he really wasn't the inventor he made himself to be. I actually show that 1974 patent printed out along with the top spinner running at my meetings while I am speaking and always make that point. So you don't know much about me.

As for the Loving paths idea, I did come up with the term. And it is very important. It is a very effective way of illustrating a fundamental idea. And that is what is needed for people I have come to learn. Just like you use the SSG and everyone knows what that means, so the Loving Paths is now known and is much more fundamental than even the SSG. So even if that was my only contribution, which it isn't, that would be a very good thing. You actually represent the selfish circuit Brad. You argue for it. You suppress the Loving paths. You say it is impossible. You mock it. You illustrate it in your character. You are a case in point. But if you open up your mind you may find that there is more to life than the selfish circuit.

I'm not dazzling and I'm not brilliant. I'm just a realist that takes the time to help people. I don't engage in the sophistry that people are demonstrating here, but I expose it. And that is very important for someone to do. I get many people calling and emailing me who are watching this thread and thanking me for doing this and that is why I have done this. They appreciate someone exposing you bullies.

All you can do is repeat the same thing over and over, you can't do this because you can't. Wow that is very revealing Brad. Again, why don't you just focus on something positive? Surely there is more to do on an OU forum than just make baseless accusations? After all these years don't you have anything constructive to share? Are you just all about trying to disprove OU? And have you failed to experience OU after all these years trying? Wow, maybe it is time to get on with life then. Or maybe you already have it but are forced to take this path??

No Brad, it appears that you guys know this is true and are using every trick in the book to try and suppress it. I only address you according to your words, but it appears that your words are not true. This is common with most people in life that they don't tell you what they really believe and know. I'm not fooled by your words. I have watched you enough over the years to have know that you know more than you are admitting here. I have several friends that have downloaded all of your videos, like the ones you have removed to know that there is more going one with you than you let on here.

Like I keep saying, I reveal OU in the real world. I have shown it for 15 years to over 100,000 people. This includes the general public, hobbyists, professors, PhDs, and scientists and engineers at all levels. People suggested that I need to work with a Lab to confirm these things, but I already worked with that Lab and they used one of my motors to power all their electrical needs while building a big house. There are many more Labs than that. There are thousands of systems being used all over the world. Your ignorance of all this doesn't change that fact. You are just upset because you want some proof to be given over the internet. But you actually don't want that. You just want to attack people that show useful information. The fan modification was showing useful information. You admit that it was an improvement but you will never give me credit for showing that.

So why are you admittedly so obsessed with me Brad. If I am so obviously wrong like you imply and directly say, then why would you have to put forth all that energy? You have thus disproven your own claims. If basic linear theory is the end of the matter, wouldn't it be enough to just show everyone that it is the universal and everything else is just impossible? That is essentially the way most are arguing here. So all that arguing is just hype then if you have to go to the trouble of trying to show something that you already have said is obviously impossible. It's like going to the trouble to try and prove the earth is not flat by flying high enough to see the curvature. Is it really necessary if what you are saying is true? Why all the fuss Brad?

The point is, that not one person here will be able to know the conditions of your parts and environment. Just as you can't prove an OU claim over video and the internet, so you can't disprove such claims either. You guys have made such a big deal about having some Lab prove these things out. Then when you suggested it, I already had proved it with that Lab. Naturally, you are in a panic to find someone else to try and counter act that massive blow to your argument. Just when you think you have me beat, I show something you don't know and you look even worse. You will never admit one thing like this. You really think I am going to tell you everything all in one shot when my goal has been to expose the fallacies of the trolls? While sharing useful information for the sincere I have also set you up for a fall just as predicted. It was not a bad thing to do. I counted on your prejudices. You assumed a lot more than you ought to have assumed. And now you look silly. So now you are trying to save face. Last time I exposed your complete hypocrisy you said that you should just give up. But here you are back at it again. Seems very bipolar. Or are there two different people using the same account here Tinman? Maybe the old Tinman is still there somewhere?

Whatever Stefan does to moderate rudeness on his forum will be commendable. I will help by organizing all the fallacies and attacks you all have made. Then everyone can see how you trolls work to attack this research and drive people off the forums.

Now this is cute: "So Rick,as i said--it is not us that is living in a fantasy land--it is you." This after you demand I prove something over the internet. Who is living in fantasy Brad? I mean, I could understand an 8 year old kid thinking that way. This is derangement.

So you want a dictatorship here? "So Stefan,i now ask that Rick be made to supply OU.com with the relevant data to back up his claims of overunity," Should you be made to back up all of your claims? What about saying the fan is 50% efficient? What about saying here that I have never shown anything ever and I can't? Should you be made to prove that? I mean you would have to have been with me my whole life to be able to prove that. But is this list about forcing people to share information? Especially when they have already shared it. Brad, you always over-argue your point. Your appeals prove too much. They would then apply to you as well. This I exposed on the OUR forum. All disproof claims would require the same evidence. But you do not accept that.

 I have made thousands of claims, I suppose I need to be made to give you all the details. Of course you are worthy of all information aren't you! On the one had you say you know everything about me to know I have never shown anything and am unable to do anything. But on the other hand you demand that I be made to show things that I supposedly am not showing. Which is it Brad? This is desperation again from you. Why are you resorting to such madness? Seems like you are under pressure to do this.

Are you going to go running off to Stefan and have me moderated as well?,as it seems that all the long term members here who disagree with you keep getting moderated.

In fact,i have never seen so many members moderated here at one time for telling it as it is. Most of those have been doing this sort of stuff for far longer than you Rick,including myself.
So to say that i should try your setups for myself is laughable,as i have been doing this very thing longer than you have.

You have nothing new Rick--even your !loving path! circuit is Bedini's ssg circuit,which was designed by some one else back in the early 70s.

So Rick,you only make your self look stupid when you think that most of us have never experimented with your setup's. And to call people like Poynt liars is a true example of your stupidity.

You might be able to baffle some with your bullshit,but you will never dazzle most with your brilliance.

You continually claim OU and free energy,but you have never shown it. The reason you can't show it,is because you do not have it-and you never have. Nothing you have Rick is OU or free energy.

So i dont know what you got going on with Stefan to have all these long term-well educated members moderated,but i have decided to get to the bottom of it.
In fact,you and your systems are now my top priority,and i will be testing all of your setup's,and disclosing all my findings on the forums and my youtube channel. But mine will also have accurate power measurements and battery analysis with each test-unlike yours. And i will also be discussing things that have been taking place here at OU.com,regarding the moderation of all these long term members. So if you read this Stefan,you might like to give an explanation as to why the top guys on this forum are being moderated for doing nothing more than telling the truth.

So Rick,as i said--it is not us that is living in a fantasy land--it is you.

So Stefan,i now ask that Rick be made to supply OU.com with the relevant data to back up his claims of overunity,and prove that all the members that objected to his claims were justifiably placed on moderation.


Brad

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1941 on: August 07, 2019, 05:49:56 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1942 on: August 07, 2019, 06:03:02 PM »
So the fan taking less energy to run while putting out an electrical output is not useful? I guess you can fool yourself with just always stating the opposite.
I have no interest in showing you people anything. I am here to show sincere people information. Obviously some people appreciate it. I have shared a lot of very useful things here. And all you guys can do is ignore all of it while attacking me personally. All you can do is type out fallacies like this and that exactly the work of a troll. You may as well have said: "I was really hoping he had some" video "to show us." Or, "I was really hoping he had some" pictures "to show us." Or, "I was really hoping he had some" words "to show us." Acting like something doesn't exist only makes you look silly Carroll.

I agree with all that Brad has posted.  I am sad to say I have lost all respect for Rick.  I was really hoping he had something useful to show us.

Offline rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1943 on: August 07, 2019, 07:16:16 PM »
Brad,
Repeating your ignorance only makes you look worse. Saying you are not a troll doesn't change the fact that you are.

You don't know what evidence is. You are confusing evidence with proof because you don't know what you are even talking about. Evidence is revealing information. You are an ignorant and confused person Bard.
Back then I invited people to come to see the evidence in the real world. Brad wants to confuse the real world with cyberworld because he is deranged.

Like I said, I make accurate power measurements and so have many people who use the technology.

It appears you don't even know the basics of the SSG Brad.

You are just overly simplistic and can only resort to such 'nothing-buttery' claims.

"Neither seem to understand that the energy of the flyback came from the source in the first place".
You don't even know where all energy comes from Brad. Tell where the energy from a dipole comes from? You just insult away the facts of the matter. You just argue in a circle. Prove to us your claim here. If this claim was true, and was so obvious, then there would be no debate about it. I wouldn't be able to get any extra energy out by adding a load. If it was so simple as you want it to be then any extra output would demand more input. I mean, we are just moving one diode! If current was just being cycled to a battery instead of back to the coil or input then we would see something different here. The motor would not draw less energy producing the same CFMs and charging a battery. The redirected current would result in less motor action and less CFMs. This is a useful improvement and a real gain. A smaller gain compared to rotating batteries around with an improved circuit, but it shows you are wrong here.

Yesterday you said that the coil became a "source". Now you equivocate. The input is a source. You want to insult and just avoid everything about where the energy is really coming from because you are ignorant about electrodynamics and basic history and theory. It is fine to be ignorant, but you look foolish to trash people for your own ignorance. The input is a source charge, and the coil becomes an additional source charge out of phase with the input. They are not the same thing as you assume. You think you can just sweep everything under the carpet that easy? That is why I wrote to you right away, before you just repeated on youtube comments what I wrote. I wrote that you need to get a highly efficient pulse motor in the mid to high nineties. You assumed the fan was 50% efficient so I called the owner of this big company and he said it was 94% efficient. Regardless, if you actually can be confident that a motor is around there then you can see how foolish you are. But I did say that you will probably never agree to the efficiency of a motor because you don't ever want to expose your ignorance and these things to be true. You even revealed that you don't even know how fans could be determined to be efficient at all. Yet "you are the man, and wisdom will die with you!" Somehow you are the expert on these things because you are old and have been trolling for a long time.

Again, if you have a motor that is properly rated for mid 90s% efficiency at a given RPM to produce a definite amount of work in a specific environment, then all of the input energy is being used to power that motor and the few percent pertains to the losses in the line and circuit. That is very little loss to work with. But if the work is still the same, the input is reduced, the losses still are there, and there exists an additional load, then your are absolutely wrong in your claim here. You cannot account for the reduced input at that high efficiency when the motor runs the same. You also cannot account for extra work being doing with your linear theory Brad. The second phase is not part of the Kirchhoff loop unity. Any extra work done is free energy and OU because more TOTAL work is being done than what is input from the primary source. You can't ever admit to this because you are arguing against OU. It's not really about this example either. I gave you just enough to tease you with this. To bring out your ignorant claim here. You were just hoping that by merely saying something that it would cover over the obvious facts of the matter. You have to actually justify your statement that is admittedly self-contradictory. You mock the Loving paths idea, but it is justified and proven here. When you have such an independent addition to a reactive element (that which was clamped normally to make for an under unity experience) you can have an additional gain. I mean, this is old news Brad. This is the most basic point in OU research. It's not about personalities Brad. These are just more fallacies to divert from the obvious. Yeah, after skeptics realized this years ago they gave up on that and then demanded more free energy, or systems without batteries. There really hasn't been a need to show the basics. But you few people needed to be shown this again. You know this already and are just playing games here.

Actually it is you who resembles Bedini here. You are using the same attacks as he used. You both distorted history as well. You both expect to be believed with no basis for your words. I don't expect people to believe me. That is the big difference Brad. I aggressively push for people to prove things to themselves. That is why you hate me so much, because I urge people to be realistic, sound, and scientific. You two wanted to bully people into believing you. You don't teach you pontificate and insult. You teach people what not to do by your example. And I have documented such things here. And everyone will see these words unless you again retract them as you keep doing. Flip flop, flip flop, flip flop  :o Abusively ignorant and unstable.

Indeed,as i stated earlier in this thread.
But Rick was here years ago,doing the very same thing--big claim's ,and not one shred of evidence to back up those claim's.
https://overunity.com/15366/new-free-energy-conferences-in-hamburg-and-chicago/
Thanks to another member at OUR for the above thread link.
In that thread,you will hear Rick moaning about all the troll's (trolls are now those that ask for accurate power measurements from claimants of OU devices)in this forum,and how bad this forum is-->and yet,here he is again  ::)
Rick's !loving path! circuit is just John Bedini's SSG circuit--nothing more.
But it isn't even JB's circuit,as that very circuit was designed back in the early 70's.
Both are nothing more than an inductor being switched on and off,and the flyback sent to a load.
Neither John or Rick actually know what they are looking at,or how to understand the simplicity of what they are doing. Neither seem to understand that the energy of the flyback came from the source in the first place,but rather call it some bullshit like energy from the vacuum,or negative energy. Yes,this is the extent of there understanding.
It is funny to watch--
JB takes some one else's circuit,and calls it his own,and then Rick takes JB's circuit,and calls it his own  ::)
So just remember guy's-->trolls are those that seek truth, ask technical questions,and ask for data that can verifi the claimants claim of having an OU device.
Trolls are also those who replicate said OU device,but where the OU just dose not show up after careful analysis and power measurements-->you are now a troll and a disinformationist.
You have all witnessed in this thread that John Bedini's blood still flows strong through Rick's veins,and the very same tactics are still being used today by Rick as he used when in a business partnership with the Bedini camp-->a tigers stripe's never change. Brad

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1943 on: August 07, 2019, 07:16:16 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1944 on: August 07, 2019, 08:24:32 PM »
Brad,
You have proven that yourself. You just don't want to admit this. You keep contradicting yourself. You railed on me on the OUR forum for violating policy while you were violating almost all the policies there. That is dishonest is it not? Then you were in the dust and ashes and talked about giving up. Then a little time later you reappear and start back up by saying I misrepresent Tesla. Did you justify that claim? I have quoted Tesla for my claims. I have demonstrated those claims. And I have shown people how to do that. I have quoted a leading authority on the subject so that my claims about Tesla could be justified historically, theoretically and practically from real Lab testing with established institutions. You feel justified to spout off anything without justification and with insult and hatred. Somehow you think that you are not required to prove your claims while you demand others to. That is self-contradiction and derangement. You need help. Go back to school and learn basic logic. It doesn't require brilliance to learn basic logic.

You said many things like this, but then you claim to know that my fan was not much more than 50% efficient. This claim is a lie because you have no reason for saying that. It is a dishonest practice that you have that ruins such forums. It is bar talk level. For all the demands about proof you are the worst example.

It isn't about how efficient the fan is either. I said, find a motor that is mid 90s efficient and then see these things. You are diverting from the point at hand. I called the owner of the company yesterday and he looked it up and said the fan I mentioned was 94% efficient. It is true that we need to properly evaluate any claim for ourselves and not go by what someone else says, especially someone like Brad who just speaks from ignorance. This is why it is about people showing themselves.

Brad has tried to oversimplify the debate in order argue in a circle while ignoring the practical dynamics in electrical engineering. The Loving Path loop is out of phase and also independent. It still all comes down to if more work can be done than what the input allows for under conventional theory. On the one hand they insist that there is no real work that can be done in a charging battery or load in that phase/loop, but on the other hand, at a different point, they will say it is just a buck boost circuit. So which is it? Complete contradiction. But you don't see people driving a motor with a buck boost do you? Well unless you call what I am doing that. The problem is that conventionally people only use one type of energy for their loads. They either use the magnetic to drive a motor or the electric to do the buck boost or transformer. But I do both. So if I run the motor still the same, but also have the so-called buck boost, then I have two equal forms of energy and the normal work times 2! And that is the dirty little secret that my Loving Paths teaching exposes.

Just because basic conventional engineering has single purpose uses for the part used, does not mean other types of work can't result from the same parts at the same time (or out of phase). The reason why we are used to single purpose parts is because that ensured under unity work results. For if it takes 100 watts to create such and such mechanical work, then those who control the world and sell us energy do not want us to have products, or be aware of the fact that such products can also produce additional work on top of that. Do I hear fan modification? Input went down, additional output while same mechanical output. The mechanical output is independent from the electrical output. They are not divided, but two different outputs. Symmetrical systems are made to be under unity and to ignore all the possibilities in the local environment. There are strictly monolithic circuits. Brad is perpetuating that mass deception that has been put upon the masses. This is only a partial truth. Under the circumstances you can ignore and hinder part of the possible work that can be done. You can go to work with one arm tied behind your back and say that is all that is possible under the circumstances. But if you say that is all that is actually possible then that is not honest. Now people don't know such things so it isn't dishonest to think that way. But you can cross that line when you deliberately tie your arm behind your back and say it can't do any work. Linear electrical systems are just like that when people insist upon them as universal.

Again, this is old news. You guys don't actually think otherwise, you just want a lot MORE free energy and without batteries. That is understandable. I get that. But attacking me is not going to expedite the learning process. Trying to beat things out of me doesn't work. I'm not going to be controlled by you. Besides, you have to start at the beginning if you want to eventually get to advanced levels. It's all the same loving paths from beginning to end. I actually find it hard to believe that some of you don't already know that because it is just old news.

Ok Mr a.king21
It is now up to you to show the efficiency of that fan motor,and prove your claim i am a liar.
First you must measure the actual air flow for a given amount of P/in to that fan motor.
Then you have to find out how much energy is within that flow of air-->what is the actual energy value of that flowing air the fan is moving.
Once you have done that,and you have the energy value of the flowing air,and the actual value of electrical energy the fan is consuming,then you can come back and show us all exactly how efficient that fan motor is.
This time,some bullshit efficiency claim by Rick will not cut it.
This time you are going to back up your claims against me with hard data and accurate measurements.
Knowing you and the way you work,you will not deliver any sort of accurate data or measurements,as it has become apparent that you are no different than Rick,where you just make false claims and accuse others of lying without having anything at all to back up those claims and accusations.
So,enough with the bullshit a.king--time to back up your claim's and accusations,although i really believe that any sort of accurate power/energy calculations from you is far above your pay grade.
It's all well and good to call me a liar,but lets see you back it up.
Brad

Offline AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3177
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1945 on: August 07, 2019, 08:27:02 PM »
Ok Mr a.king21
It is now up to you to show the efficiency of that fan motor,and prove your claim i am a liar.
First you must measure the actual air flow for a given amount of P/in to that fan motor.
Then you have to find out how much energy is within that flow of air-->what is the actual energy value of that flowing air the fan is moving.

Once you have done that,and you have the energy value of the flowing air,and the actual value of electrical energy the fan is consuming,then you can come back and show us all exactly how efficient that fan motor is.

This time,some bullshit efficiency claim by Rick will not cut it.
This time you are going to back up your claims against me with hard data and accurate measurements.

Knowing you and the way you work,you will not deliver any sort of accurate data or measurements,as it has become apparent that you are no different than Rick,where you just make false claims and accuse others of lying without having anything at all to back up those claims and accusations.

So,enough with the bullshit a.king--time to back up your claim's and accusations,although i really believe that any sort of accurate power/energy calculations from you is far above your pay grade.

It's all well and good to call me a liar,but lets see you back it up.


Brad
Ain't calling someone a liar a bit strong not to mention what looks like verbal humiliation, what's wrong with a more gentleman's approach like 'mistaken' come on lads lets cool it from back street street wise agresion, all this rudeness! many thanks the verbal moderator! :o you all need to observe the correct code of acceptable code of practice or you will be reported.
« Last Edit: August 07, 2019, 11:11:29 PM by AlienGrey »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1945 on: August 07, 2019, 08:27:02 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7217
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1946 on: August 07, 2019, 09:07:53 PM »
 Just a note to the screaming fisherman in Seychelles
 Your plea has been heard


 Making no promises but ??
Perhaps put the post on your other topic?






Offline a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1613
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1947 on: August 07, 2019, 11:10:54 PM »
Void has posted a circuit which is not overunity. He demonstrates that a battery under load exhibits no visible voltage drop for a whole hour.  Which I suppose we all know.  (I mean I test my circuits 24/7 for weeks lol)
Nonetheless comments would be welcome.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI1ZS_2wYR8


Offline baudirenergie

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1948 on: August 07, 2019, 11:38:05 PM »
Void has posted a circuit which is not overunity. He demonstrates that a battery under load exhibits no visible voltage drop for a whole hour.  Which I suppose we all know.  (I mean I test my circuits 24/7 for weeks lol)
Nonetheless comments would be welcome.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI1ZS_2wYR8
Interesting, why are the cables go underneath and not in the box? :)
Will he proof overunity over the Internet? Will the "experts" now also ask for exact measurements, Scope Shots and calculations?

Offline seaad

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1949 on: August 08, 2019, 12:02:29 AM »
This is a very important point he makes which reveals how these forums are usually worse than useless. What is the bases for any of you making conclusions from pictures, videos, or words presented by other people? There is no way to demonstrate that anyone else is really doing what they claim they are. Even video of people saying something cannot be trusted that the person is really the person you think it is as inexpensive 20 year old tech exists that mask so. . . . . . . .   
. . . .  . .
So it is true that there is no way for anyone to trust any claim from anyone on this forum. So what is the point of this forum? What use is it? I will continue this next post...

 

OneLink