Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Confirmation of OU devices and claims  (Read 536297 times)

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1800 on: August 01, 2019, 01:55:53 AM »
Seaad made a claim of anomalous energy [post 1770 in this topic] ,it got bypassed here and I am bumping the spot where it first got posted ,seems a Thane Heinz derivative ,and if I am not mistaken
Seaad wrote here somewhere he has filed for a patent on this claim. [if I am wrong please correct me]
topic here https://overunity.com/17279/split-flux-transformer/msg537900/#msg537900
  Chet K
 

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1801 on: August 01, 2019, 02:19:30 AM »
About
Here I got som tip's from lancaIV once:

https://overunity.com/17279/split-flux-transformer/msg528437/#msg528437
https://overunity.com/17279/split-flux-transformer/msg528443/#msg528443

And I started to build and test these.

                                                                                                                      percent Efficiency


I tried to loop 1 a, b) with a single BC -transistor after that (but I don't remember exactly how).
 Kick started it with a short sinus burst and it oscillated then for 15-30 seconds.

The two input primaries (5-legged trafo) can be series or parallel
All coils 100+100 turns,  0.3 mm (#28).
(And it dosn't matter that the coils are much wider than the cores, only for test purposes here. Tighter is better of course)
Cores : KÖNIG ELECTRONIC FAT100, Smooth blank ferrite

This is confirmation-of-OU-devices-and-claims
Is this OU? Try it!

Regards Arne

N.B.  No LED's !!!


I believe this is what you were working on.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8NunH9TzFk&list=PLFEHIlsTyqx_KlRsYA8NKBOwtNoYh7AGk

rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1802 on: August 01, 2019, 02:36:18 AM »
Yeah running from your fallacies.
I already posted things for 15 years now. Guess you are not reading.
And lest we forget the kind of testing you do  :o

Yes, that has been obvious for quite a while already.  ;D
I asked for a basic schematic and any essential build details for a basic setup which
could show OU or anything unusual at all, so I could build it and test with it, and got nothing
back in response from Rick...

Running... from the truth, it would appear... ;)
Really, self-loop testing is nothing to be afraid of at all, unless of course you already know it will fail
such a test, so that is why you are avoiding showing such a test.

Hopefully Stefan will show such a demo... I will be interested to see the results of a self-loop test.

rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1803 on: August 01, 2019, 02:44:05 AM »
Red,
You either have serious problems or are trying to pull another red herring!  ::) I mean, I said your highlighting of my post's "you" words was a red herring because you diverted from the points I made. You once again posted something of no significance while diverting from important things mentioned in this ongoing debate. That is a red herring. And that is what you do.
The frequency generator point is also a red herring as we all admit it takes nothing to do that and a video was posted over a year ago doing that with the kit doing that.
So you have earned the name Red, for red herring fallacy man. This is what you do here.

This is not a Red Herring, it is an unambiguous claim that Rick can run his Frequency Generator on the output of one or several of his receiver coils. A claim that is unsupported by even the slightest attempt at demonstration.

So Rick Friedrich can just make all kinds of wild claims, post his RED HERRINGS to try to distract everybody from the FACT that he cannot do what he claimed to be able to do. That's a new standard for OU, for sure!

rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1804 on: August 01, 2019, 02:51:50 AM »
We already addressed those videos. The fan one is most revealing. He has 4,000,000 views based on a fake disproof video. Look at all the likes. So what does that tell you? People want to believe what is fake, and disinfo people can count on that.
As for Bedini, he goes down as a liar that can't be trusted as I have pointed out. That video my friend took at Aaron's meeting there in 2015 or 2016 reveals one such example.

Void AG was interested in showing us these two videos and JB's video 7 but the second video is important
I suggest you make a point in watching it.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1805 on: August 01, 2019, 02:56:41 AM »
Red,
You either have serious problems or are trying to pull another red herring!  ::) I mean, I said your highlighting of my post's "you" words was a red herring because you diverted from the points I made. You once again posted something of no significance while diverting from important things mentioned in this ongoing debate. That is a red herring. And that is what you do.
The frequency generator point is also a red herring as we all admit it takes nothing to do that and a video was posted over a year ago doing that with the kit doing that.
So you have earned the name Red, for red herring fallacy man. This is what you do here.
Ah, but everything I have posted is directly relevant to the topic under discussion, which you might be able to see if you actually bothered to watch any of my videos. Other people have watched them and know exactly what I am talking about.  You can name-call and use ad-hominem fallacies all you like, but it will not change the uncomfortable fact that you cannot support your claims with valid demonstrations... and I can.

No, we don't all "admit" that it takes NOTHING to power your Function Generator, because it does not in fact take NOTHING to power it. And why don't you just post a link to that "video posted over a year ago" showing your Frequency Generator powered by one or several of your receiver coils, if that claim is true.
And now that you remind me... you also claimed that ZERO CURRENT was flowing during one of your demonstrations. But you cannot just use a charged capacitor to provide the voltage.... because current is in fact drawn and a cap will run down much faster than a battery would. So that is Yet Another bogus claim you have made without any support or even any attempt to demonstrate the truth of the claim. Because you cannot!



Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1806 on: August 01, 2019, 03:09:29 AM »
Seaad made a claim of anomalous energy [post 1770 in this topic] ,it got bypassed here and I am bumping the spot where it first got posted ,seems a Thane Heinz derivative ,and if I am not mistaken
Seaad wrote here somewhere he has filed for a patent on this claim. [if I am wrong please correct me]
topic here https://overunity.com/17279/split-flux-transformer/msg537900/#msg537900
  Chet K

Hi Chet. I did see Seaad's comment earlier when he posted it, but unfortunately
I don't really have time to look into it myself. I have experimented with various different transformer
schemes in the past, although not this specific one, and did not see anything unusual in
my test results. I haven't tried this specific transformer arrangement previously however, so I can't say
how it might perform.

All the best...


rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1807 on: August 01, 2019, 03:29:00 AM »
Red,
The first thing you did in this exchange was post a video without explaining the relevance of it. Then you get all up in arms about me not watching your other videos. You go on the immediate attack without even knowing what I had shared. This looked really foolish and my drawing a few posts back captures the spirit of all that. Then you try and trap me with question. I saw through you the whole time Red. You really failed at what you were trying to do against me. So your presence here has been but a fiction reality. Why would I spend another moment looking at your videos when you behave this way here and don't even realize what a red herring fallacy means? And you keep asking us if your videos are OU or not. So either you are trying to trap people with games or don't know yourself. If you had an important video, why did you not just post it in all seriousness. Instead you played games with us the whole time. You have not shown yourself relevant when you do such things.
Maybe you are getting some of this after all. All videos cannot be proven to be real or to properly convey the entire environment and particulars to another person not physically present. So that is fiction in a sense. To someone without access it is like fiction. But just like a movie, you can get ideas to try at home in the real world. If you have provided useful information about OU research then that would be a good thing. But you have played so many games that I don't think very many people will take you seriously. Especially when you deny the very things you write only a few posts back. That's some serious problem Red. Yeah, you only approve of high value entertainment and think that amateurish and boring videos are automatically nothing. You would reject Faraday in his day. Like I said, you are overwhelmed with a fiction existence in cyberland and need to get back to reality.

You claim in your Red Herring graphic that my videos are "fictions". Yet everything in them is supported by demonstrations and checkable facts, and full information is provided for anyone to repeat what I've shown. Of course you would not know that since you have not watched them.

 That is, my videos are not "fictions".... but yours definitely are, since nobody can reproduce what you claim, your information is incomplete, and your delivery is amateurish and boring.

Again, it is already demonstrated, and it makes no difference. I will share what I want when I have the time to do that. But why would it matter anyway. You don't believe any of this anyway. Like I wrote, if there was nothing important here you guys wouldn't be so consumed with all this and there wouldn't be 135,000 views here.

Now, are you going to demonstrate running your FG from the output of one or several receiver coils, or are you going to admit that that claim was a great FICTION and you cannot do it?

rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1808 on: August 01, 2019, 03:56:05 AM »
Red,
A fallacy is an error. You took on that name yourself by justifying it. I don't know your actual name anyway. I say all this in jest. You need to calm down and take it easy. This is after all, just an information sharing place. If you had something relevant, then you should have respectfully explained that rather than come back on here like a bulldozer and trickster as you did. You have not retracted anything you did in many many posts. So your work has zero relevance to me. Maybe if you took the time to tell people what you wish them to look at before you just demand that and insult people for not boosting up your view count and ego they may actually look.

So what is a valid demonstration Red? Something done over the internet? Are you still playing that game?

POINTS HAVING BEEN PROVEN SINCE JUNE 2019:
1. OU Claims and Disproof OU Claims Cannot be Proven Over Video, Pictures, and Words Over the Internet. People Can Only do Science and Prove Truths of Demonstration to Themselves In The Real World.
2. Forums Can Only Provide Information to Other People which Needs Personal Verification Unless it is Self-evident.

3. Free Energy and Over Unity Do Not Imply Self-running or Self-looping, while the Inverse is True.

Well the FG tiny input was not a concern until you pressed it and I don't take you seriously Red. I would have to take the time to look up that link and I can't be bothered at this time. If that is so important to you then I can see you are really given to red herrings. Every time I show you guys something minor like that you never acknowledge it anyway, and then just stomp on me more while making more demands. I can't prove anything over the internet anyway. You can do this very easily yourself. That is what this forum is about Red, confirming things for yourself. There is nothing special about that. Just connect a secondary coil to the input of the gate driver once it is started with the right frequency. Just don't have the coil too close as it may damage the gate driver (or put a resistor in series).

Whatever you mean in the last paragraph just amounts to a ramble. You are just getting yourself into a fit as it looks like. Not understanding what I wrote or said and then, as always, calling me bogus. Again, if I was just always bogus then you wouldn't be so interested would you? I think you are bogus so that is why I have no interest in your videos. So on the one hand many of you guys attack me as saying everything I do is bogus, but then you demand and beg for me to share more. I tell you I am not trying to prove anything but you judge me as if I am!  :o You write: "claim you have made without any support or even any attempt to demonstrate the truth of the claim." Again, I do support and demonstrate my claims in the real world in person. But you expect that through a video, which is absurd. The game is up man. It is busted for good. It's been settled since June now. The trolls have lost all their power because of that. Sitting behind a computer screen and opinionizing just doesn't have any more appeal when the realists expose that child's play.

Ah, but everything I have posted is directly relevant to the topic under discussion, which you might be able to see if you actually bothered to watch any of my videos. Other people have watched them and know exactly what I am talking about.  You can name-call and use ad-hominem fallacies all you like, but it will not change the uncomfortable fact that you cannot support your claims with valid demonstrations... and I can.

No, we don't all "admit" that it takes NOTHING to power your Function Generator, because it does not in fact take NOTHING to power it. And why don't you just post a link to that "video posted over a year ago" showing your Frequency Generator powered by one or several of your receiver coils, if that claim is true.
And now that you remind me... you also claimed that ZERO CURRENT was flowing during one of your demonstrations. But you cannot just use a charged capacitor to provide the voltage.... because current is in fact drawn and a cap will run down much faster than a battery would. So that is Yet Another bogus claim you have made without any support or even any attempt to demonstrate the truth of the claim. Because you cannot!

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1809 on: August 01, 2019, 04:13:57 AM »
Void ..I have rebooted the topic over here  https://overunity.com/17279/split-flux-transformer/msg537909/#new
and for clarity there are MANY who have played with this Thane type solid state device.
will be connecting with as many as possible ,I must admit I am stupified  by the idea that you can't teach on the internet ...I had no idea....

maybe somebody should let the world know ??

sounds fishy to me ??

at the topic I linked to is an example of a man who wants to teach/share and what that looks like ?
I'll make a bet he will answer every question as best he can to any builder who shows up !!

rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1810 on: August 01, 2019, 05:11:08 AM »
Fishy? Making more reference is Red Herring?  ;D

Hmmm, who said you can't teach on the internet. Now you are equivocating. You can read again:

POINTS HAVING BEEN PROVEN SINCE JUNE 2019:
1. OU Claims and Disproof OU Claims Cannot be Proven Over Video, Pictures, and Words Over the Internet. People Can Only do Science and Prove Truths of Demonstration to Themselves In The Real World.
2. Forums Can Only Provide Information to Other People which Needs Personal Verification Unless it is Self-evident.
3. Free Energy and Over Unity Do Not Imply Self-running or Self-looping, while the Inverse is True.

You substitute "can't teach" with "can't prove". Nice try though. Teaching is sharing information, proving is settling a matter when the conditions have been met. You didn't read the second point.  ::)

I must admit I am stupified  by the idea that you can't teach on the internet ...I had no idea....

maybe somebody should let the world know ??

sounds fishy to me ??

rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1811 on: August 01, 2019, 05:23:07 AM »
Like I said you just prove to be a red herring. Even Itsu didn't waste his time doing that. You can write what you want, but it only shows you are given to red herrings. Just fill up the pages with repeating the same thing without adding anything of importance. Ignore the fundamental points shared. Never respond to your exposed fallacies. Fixate on a penny on the ground when some Bens are on the table in front of you.

He can't do it.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1812 on: August 01, 2019, 09:40:23 AM »
Itsu doesn't waste his time or ours by making false claims he cannot support with evidence. You do. That makes you a LIAR, Rick. And nobody can believe anything that a proven LIAR says, unless it is supported by valid evidence.


You make a claim. You cannot provide evidence that your claim is true. And I've just picked the most simple and blatant one, out of a bucket of unsupported and even proven false claims you have made. You can't do it! You won't even try, because you know you can't do it.

You can call me all the names you like, as you project your own failings onto others. That does not change the FACT that you have made claims you cannot support with evidence, nor the FACT that many of your claims have already in FACT been disproven soundly.







Raycathode

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1813 on: August 01, 2019, 11:14:48 AM »
Rick maximus Friedrich,
Come on man show your negative energy pulsing 'more out than in claim' that John Bedini showed in as his
selling point the so called 'Tom Bearden invention'! all you have to do is show it working, show them the clip
that you discuss here on this very thread and JB shows in CD no 7.

Why can't you do it ? do it man!

what's the problem ?

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1814 on: August 01, 2019, 01:14:35 PM »
Rick separating teaching from Proving is something which is not in my frame of reference .,in a world that can put two people on opposite sides of the planet into the same room ,Car or street corner at the push of a button ...looking and talking together?
.... a Forum does the same thing on steroids if you really want it too...
we have different goals and that makes us chose different paths .

I truly hope Stefan's friend has a burden for his planet and the people here
you Rick play as a God ..and try to tell me its Dark outside when I'm standing in sunshine..and people die while you Fiddle.
and you can take that to the bank !!