Nice red herring fallacy.

Good grief.

Rick when this topic hit the forum..it had nothing to do with batteries AKing told us you had soosed ? or sorted Don Smith...and kapenadze
etc etc ?maybe even the TPU..?
this was the secret to all these devices? nothing at all about needing batteries [was my impression]

plenty here have done battery swapping experiments .could never see a Magic gain when hooked up to appropriate equipment ?
that being said ,yes it is easy to juggle batteries ...let them rest and work within battery friendly load conditions and not have to charge them as much .
..one member commented that this cycling of batteries was an old Ham radio trick from many years ago.  ...So we buy more batteries to run big loads ?
how many to run a 1KW load ?[continuous ??}
since now its about the batteries ..
I think most here were not too interested since you had said you no longer do these ?  you found a solid state method to harvest energy?
Don't think for one second that any builder here when presented with an experiment would not perform the experiment.And no one here is suppressing these experiments except You.
lighting fires around others to distract from the problem [lack of an experiment]not good.
  I see it is hard to explain in an open source forum something which is not open sourced ...[no experiment to prove]
  Yes members are confused by this.. If we were having this discussion in Ricks factory We would understand getting thrown out for requesting proprietary information. here we are supposed to be open source friends not customers .
Open source an experiment and stand Back and watch what happens.100% transparent investigation for all to see ,Discuss, and replicate.
But you already know that..and as of this writing ...it has not happened.
   Here in the membership are persons who would save lives with this immediately !!and yet you type ........as if we discuss cake recipes ....or knitting techniques ....or point to others and type about suppression ??YEESH !!
Chet K

  Hopefully Stefan's friend can show something special !!and all the info to replicate .
 

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.labsphere.com/site/assets/files/2570/the-radiometry-of-light-emitting-diodes-leds.pdf&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwi97YKEjN_jAhWnxIUKHRqhB3AQFggQMAA&usg=AOvVaw0hdJdpgSoCQnk5SqzH6I8N
linear versus progressive :
viewing angle 60°/30° : 4 times the power

We can do experiments -at first- for a better private household " light generator" ! Beginning with small steps. !

Chet,I allow in my calculation a battery/capacitor for the " starting 'kick'", because actually battery and charger and con-/inverter makes such continous use systems to expensive. !
Motor and transformer need also for the first process beginning cycles high current draw :without "inrush current limiter" - up to 20 times the nominal current value
Aliernatively the ancient ic-mobile starting device : hand-curbe

Nice red herring fallacy.

How can an image of YOUR POSTS be a "fallacy"?  Seek help, Rick.
Meanwhile, either demonstrate the truth of this claim, or admit that it is false:

Assuming each red led is ...

Hi a.king. That is exactly the problem, as you should be fully aware of by now.
You simply can't make assumptions about input power and output power.
This is something which has to be measured properly.

Also, the fact that Stefan says that he thinks you need a battery in there for the system
to 'work', is another potential warning sign to me, because if it doesn't work with super caps or ordinary caps,
then that seems to indicate that the current draw from the battery may actually be higher than is being assumed/stated.

At any rate, all these assumptions about LED power consumption is very counter-productive.
If people are afraid or can't do proper power measurements, at least power some 1 to 3 Watt incandescent bulbs
instead, and then see how the bulbs light. Any demonstration with LEDs is just not at all helpful, as I
pointed out several times already that they can be very misleading and tend to fool a lot of inexperienced people, as
they can glow quite brightly while actually consuming only a relatively very small amount of power.
Any demonstration using LEDs is really of no practical help at all.

Start point A                to                  Meta/Finishpoint B : 10 meters
10 Km/ h fast human velocity : from A to B 1/1000 hour ;


human KWh per hour : 80 Wh /1000 = 0,08 Wh energy for 10 meters

Stand point A : I or else with full gasoline 5 Liter can/ister and bringing the 5 Liter gasoline can/ister full to Meta/Finish point B

50000 Wh ~ 5 Liter gasoline
                50000 Wh : 0,08 Wh = work performance A-B
                                                   C.O.P. 625000

                                        using humans like simple machines
 f.e.heat from start point A to Meta/Finish point B transporting  devices                                 
                                              called heat pump or fridge
In energetischer Bilanzaufstellung : Idioten !


 

Hi you lot  …

Hi Raycathode. Thanks, but you are just not helping with silliness like that.   
I could swear RF seems to be hypnotizing people...