From what I have seen, a common way that people can get tripped up when
analyzing circuits is they look at voltage or current or maybe electric field
or magnetic field, and if they see an increase of any of these they think maybe that
implies a magnification of output power (an increase of energy in the system over
what is coming from the input power source). In AC circuits especially, you certainly can't just look
at the magnitudes of current and voltage, as you also must accurately take into account
the phase angle between the voltage and current, so this can also trip people up, and often
does in forums like this.
From the point of view of over unity experimentation, rather than looking at individual
things like voltage magnitude or current magnitude, or magnetic field strength or whatever else
when trying to analyze how a circuit may be performing, which can easily lead you astray, if you think
in terms of energy transfer in the circuit you will get a clearer overall picture of what should be
going on, and you should see why most over unity schemes are likely doomed to failure. If we allow that
energy can neither be created nor destroyed, only transferred from one point to another or converted from one
form to another, unless your over unity scheme incorporates a way to draw excess energy into your setup on top of
what your input power source is supplying to the system, there should be no way to achieve over unity. Your
circuit setup must draw extra energy in from outside your setup to be able to achieve over unity.
In the attached diagram I show how energy will transfer from a battery or power supply
to a high frequency generator to the transmitter LC tank circuit, and from there divide amongst
the four receiver LC tank circuits. Since all circuitry has at least some losses, the total average
ouput power will always be at least a little less than the average input power. Each receiver
LC tank circuit receives a proportional fraction of the overall energy that is being delivered into
the transmitter LC tank circuit. Unless there is some special factor at play in such a setup which
draws in energy from external to the circuitry somehow, Total Pout < Pin, (assuming you have some
type of real loads connected to each LC tank receiver).
Now you could hypthesize about a 'heaviside component' or something else which some unique aspect
of your circuit is supposedly tapping into to provide excess energy to your setup, but you would have
to have some very unusual aspect/arrangement in your circuit which ordinary circuits do not
have (keep in mind that LC circuits are very common circuit arrangments used in various types of applications),
and, more importantly, your test results would have to bear out that hypothesis of a special way of drawing
in excess energy into your setup. This will involve either careful and proper measurements or self-looping.
'Guesstimating' based on perceived bulb brightness or whatever else is just not going to be of any real
value in determining actual circuit performance. The human eye is just not very good at all at accurately
judging light bulb brightness, and especially not for translating that to an accurate average output power
estimation. A possible exception to that would be, for example, where you are powering say a 60 Watt incandescent bulb
or higher very brightly and steadily and continuously for some length of time and your input power is reasonably accurately
measured as only say a few Watts or less. Then it would seem that something unusual may very well be going on, but you
would still want to check everything over carefully and make sure you are not overlooking something.