Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

    Listen carefully:  I have watched his long drawn out videos, and still don't know all the details that I mentioned in my last post. It's hard to watch a two hour video, and harder yet to have to watch 3 hour videos, about his opinions, without careful measurement to go along with it. But, I did watch it. LOL.   Yet, you say "it's all there". Really?
    So, A, now that you know all that needs to be done and are familiar with his devices, videos, and chats, and are up to speed, why don't you show the results. Like itsu has done. Perhaps you can show some actual gains. That would help. As most of us have watched at least his more relevant videos, and still don't get it. But, getting it, is not the same showing it working as a OU device.
   Kapanadze also has a patent. Did that help to produce a working replication? He also talked about the cause of free energy, yet, no one can replicate what he has shown many different times, as yet. So, perhaps you can tell us what is missing? And show some gains that can be measured and replicated. As battery swaps and noisy motor devices are NOT what this thread is about.

I am thinking about if I want to get involved for the next 6 months or not.  I took a two year break and came back rusty but soon got up to speed. I am wondering whether to open up a thread on the Ukrainian Don Smith device or not. So I am thinking about it. ie Kapanadze is a Don Smith copy in my opinion

TK could you please explain the what looks like shorted copper winds please

You know with all the brains on this site I am sure we could do something constructive.  Instead it's one faction against another faction all the time.  It's just sad folks.

I hope you noticed that that string of 20 NE-2 neons in series with 16 of them lit up (90 volts each) was just being held by my fingers at one end, and not connected to anything at the other end. Like I said, a powerful e-field emitter that can and will wreak havoc with instrumentation. And it could be made even stronger quite easily but then I wouldn't want to run it in the house.
Is that OU?


Back to my three videos and the questions for RF. The first video shows a great gain in VARs over input power in Watts. The phase shift measurement that _indicated_ in phase was an error introduced by the current measuring method I demonstrated which introduced a phase shift of its own. I wanted to know if RF's Overunity was Overunity in VARs, and whether or not 1) he had measurements he could show of his own, and 2) whether he would point out the phase shift error as Itsu did.
The second video shows overunity measurements in the Partzman bft, and _fully accounts_ for the phase shift problem with its careful layout and use of non-inductive precision load and current sense resistors. The phase shift is evident and correctly displayed on the scopes that I and others have used, both low and high end equipment. I wanted to know if RF's Overunity was Overunity measured in power dissipated by a noninductive resistor in a situation of high, known phase shift incorporating a resonating coil as demonstrated there. Unfortunately RF has been too busy (typing and talking?) to view that very significant demonstration that most of the rest of you have seen.
The third video shows overunity in TinMan's bifilar LED driver circuit by having the load and the internal LEDs, 4 in all, shining brilliantly with ZERO current shown on two inline ammeters, even in the most sensitive 2000 microamp range. I used cheap meters but this effect has been reproduced with all kinds of meters cheap and expensive. My Fluke 87-III acts the same way and is even more sensitive. I wanted to know if RF's Overunity was this kind of Overunity, where meters indicate zero current supplied to a resonating loop but the load is still running along happily.

Three possible types of Overunity indications. But RF's is somehow different? And his measurements somehow more valid? OK, I'm willing to consider that... with evidence. Unfortunately, walls of gobbletext and anecdotes about other people's work done in the misty past do not count as evidence for me.

Nick,
I'm the worst critic of my videos. I delete them all the time. The truth is that I haven't had the time to do quality videos. Sometimes I do forget to post the schematic of what I was showing, or to bring the camera close. I have deleted a good number of videos that I made and never uploaded because they just were not good enough. I did get a proper mic however, and that was an improvement. I do show meter readings all the time, so this shows that you really haven't watched my videos. Like I said, I am making a new website right now and I'll organize the more relevant videos from those that are obsolete and just taking up space and need to be deleted.

But you have to understand that I did not do these videos for you or for people just starting out. They are me talking to customers. They want those rambles.    So it is a matter of doing something rather than nothing. I guess the point is that my videos are gifts so who can complain. If you don't want the gift then you can ignore them as you do what I write here.

The other point is that it is not my goal to prove OU in a video, or to always show the same measurements. I am dealing with many different topics. The goal is not to prove OU but show people how to maximize this. You guys keep making all these fallacies to try and discredit me. That is your only goal the last month. I rarely see anything useful from the whole lot of you. Sometimes something said is good, but somehow I am supposed to do everything I guess. I never came here to prove OU, even if someone else may have. If you are not satisfied with the information or videos then so be it!

    Listen carefully:  I have watched his videos, and still don't know all the details that I mentioned in my last post. It's hard to watch a two hour video, about his opinions, without careful measurement to go along with it. But, I did watch it. LOL.   Yet, you say "it's all there". Really?
    So, A, now that you know all that needs to be done and are up to speed, why don't you show the results. Like itsu has done. Perhaps you can show some actual gains. That would help. As most of us have watched at least his more relevant videos, and still don't get it. But, getting it, is not the same showing it working as a OU device.
   Kapanadze also has a patent. Did that help to produce a working replication? He also talked about the cause of free energy, yet, no one can replicate what he has shown many different times, as yet. So, perhaps you can tell us what is missing? And show some gains that can be measured and replicated.

Nick,
I'm the worst critic of my videos. I delete them all the time. The truth is that I haven't had the time to do quality videos. Sometimes I do forget to post the schematic of what I was showing, or to bring the camera close. I have deleted a good number of videos that I made and never uploaded because they just were not good enough. I did get a proper mic however, and that was an improvement. I do show meter readings all the time, so this shows that you really haven't watched my videos. Like I said, I am making a new website right now and I'll organize the more relevant videos from those that are obsolete and just taking up space and need to be deleted.

But you have to understand that I did not do these videos for you or for people just starting out. They are me talking to customers. They want those rambles.    So it is a matter of doing something rather than nothing. I guess the point is that my videos are gifts so who can complain. If you don't want the gift then you can ignore them as you do what I write here.

The other point is that it is not my goal to prove OU in a video, or to always show the same measurements. I am dealing with many different topics. The goal is not to prove OU but show people how to maximize this. You guys keep making all these fallacies to try and discredit me. That is your only goal the last month. I rarely see anything useful from the whole lot of you. Sometimes something said is good, but somehow I am supposed to do everything I guess. I never came here to prove OU, even if someone else may have. If you are not satisfied with the information or videos then so be it!

    Rick: Ok, well, I like the tone of your last comments and post. They are easier to deal with, than previously. 
     You know that I don't know all about you, what you've done, or shown, or said. But, I wonder if you know anything about me, other than being a "troll", that is. Have you looked at my videos, at all?  No? So, we are both lost in space, as far as that goes. Or what itsu has done, or TK, or Hoppy, and other replicators of these supposed free energy contraptions. What guys like me have done through the years here, also. Hoppy and I have over 8000 posts between us here, and at what we call the asylum. TK has almost twice as many posts, or even more than that, including other sites. Maybe that is not important to you, but, you must recognize that WE are not trolls, not believing in free energy, and doing what we can to disrupt it, when possible. Just the opposite.
     I have recommended that you make a video, for us. Not for your customers, clients, or those that you've deal with before, this time.   Will you do that, for us?  Please... 
   And yes, showing updated improved scope close-ups, and output readings, as mentioned by the other guys, here. So, that we can see the scope readings, with all the bulbs facing the camera this time.  I'm sure that would please everyone following you on this venture. As that video would be for us. And anyone else interested.
   You see, I have watched your videos. But you haven't watched mine, or I'd know it. 
   The idea is not to prove or disprove anything, but just to observe the results. That's all. That is what I try to do on my videos.  And TK does with his, "is this OU".  No claims, just showing what is happening. No need to get personal, or judgemental. 
   I am not blind, or dumb, and can see that you MAY have something there, worth pursuing.   
   Pura Vida,           
                   NickZ   

Nick,
Those were nicer words than usual for you. I don't know your videos because how would I? I don't even know your name or where to look. But I do have a lot of experience on forums since the beginning of the internet as we now know it. I was owner of many groups and moderator. And I have a very wide network of friends all over the world who read these forums. I have a good idea of the tricks people play and agendas. Some of you guys are more obvious than others. Yeah some people just have personality issues, I get it. But I see the subtle things happening. I see that these forums are all hacked. They are useless because no matter what people do your type of guys will always be filling up pages with things that go nowhere. Why not build upon what you know about OU and just pass on what you know. I have always done that since 2004. So you guys here and on OUR can't get one replication finalized? That is ridiculous. I really doubt that after all this time you don't have OU. Because it isn't that hard considering the knowledge you have form this forum alone. So it is obvious that you are just data mining in wanting people to work for you for free. That's fine, but then you turn around and attack them after they gift you such information. You act like you don't believe something but you actually do know it is true. Obviously there are a lot of crazies and mistaken people as well. But not everyone. But your type just ruins something that could be so much better. The forums that have policy of requiring people to be polite are far better. I really can't understand why rudeness is tolerated.

Now I don't spend all this time writing for you at all Nick. It is for other people who are reading this. And I am organizing all of this for a reason so people can understand these games and how people respond. I wouldn't do a single video for you Nick. All you will do is twist anything. You go back and forth from saying a nice or ok thing to vicious attack and mocking. I know exactly what it is. It is trolling. I exposed it here and you guys flipped out.  The fact that you have so many posts makes everyone wonder what you have been doing all this time then. That is consistent with a Troll who is here for the longterm to ensure that OU never goes anywhere. If someone says something good, you will just drown it out with diversions, rudeness, or whatever it takes to get ride of them.

I don't do videos for forums. I do videos for customers and for people who not only ask for them but benefit from them. You insult and say nothing good about my videos. Why would I do another. Everything you ask for is in my videos. Give me another week to finish up my organizing of my videos on the new page and you will be able to see the more important ones. Even the video I posted here was not for you guys but for the first meeting I had in NC, as I only showed the second group it running and I wanted to show the first group what it was like running.

The point is Nick, no matter what I do, you will still say some diverting thing. You don't care about real world demonstrations. Everyone knows that I have done many real world demonstrations. You don't care about them, but what cyberworld demonstrations. I have given many of those as well. And I gave you just enough to test you out. Yes I did the video for others, but I did the bulbs just bright enough to get these exact reactions out of you. And it shows everyone your double standard. You can talk all day long about LEDs being useless for indicating anything, but that would be the case for the tiny ones. These big ones are not able to be bright at all when you divide them by the input. I was forcing you guys to misjudge me in doing that. Anyone who works with those LEDs know that if you believed a video was not faked then that video would prove OU in the right sense of the terms. Yes I could have put a meter there, but I wanted to show you that you don't always have to have a meter to see OU. I really don't care what you think of me for doing that. But I know what many more people watching this thread are telling me about all this. Everyone can see who won these debates here. It is the one calling for realism, that is proof in the real world, rather than unverifiable measurements in fantasy land.

Like I said, if people were genuinely polite and earnest in their search for OU I would share more to help them personally. And many times I deal with them privately. I talk on the phone many hours a day with these people. But you guys are hear to mock and disprove and twist and gas  I posted that important book from Barrett last night. I spent a long time doing that for all of you. That is fundamental. It is exactly what I am talking about. I answered G there finally. You all thought that I was just avoiding that subject. But I had to get the time to do that as it took some hours. That is the foundation for OU. The historical foundation for why it has been suppressed. The mathematically reason why it is suppressed. And the evidence amount to proof for OU. You won't look at that. You won't want to admit what it proves. You don't want to see that THAT was the reason why I made the kit as I did with the small leds. You just want OU you say to us. But you don't want to learn what is the reason for it. I have been showing these things Barrett and Kron wrote about all those years ago. The things Tesla was doing way before that. I have done the very large OU demonstrations. But now is the time to learn the subtle details, because when it comes to RF you can't afford to not know these subtle details. Do you really think I could be fine with people getting hurt?

I still have to process a 3+ hour video before I do any more, and that one doesn't have meters on it. I have a lot of work to do on the new website, so I will not be able to do another video for a few weeks. I have no interest in trying to prove something with meters. If I show meters it is for explaining something specifically, but not to prove OU. If I did a meter shot in a way that you would assume OU then I would be encouraging the idea that people should believe videos. So now I see you are finally getting it: "The idea is not to prove or disprove anything, but just to observe the results." Very good.

Actually, I have only every let my customers share their observations. That is how my battery chargers and kits sell. I don't advertise. So I let people tell others what they have discovered. I don't do anything in this work but what good people ask for. They don't ask me ever to try and prove OU on the video. Just, can you sell this? Can you talk about this? I show scope shots all the time, and usually have the amp meter and volt meters on.

Anyway, the new website should be of value.

    Rick: Ok, well, I like the tone of your last comments and post. They are easier to deal with, than previously. 
     You know that I don't know all about you, what you've done, or shown, or said. But, I wonder if you know anything about me, other than being a "troll", that is. Have you looked at my videos, at all?  No? So, we are both lost in space, as far as that goes. Or what itsu has done, or TK, or Hoppy, and other replicators of these supposed free energy contraptions. What guys like me have done through the years here, also. Hoppy and I have over 8000 posts between us here, and at what we call the asylum. TK has almost twice as many posts, or even more than that, including other sites. Maybe that is not important to you, but, you must recognize that WE are not trolls, not believing in free energy, and doing what we can to disrupt it, when possible. Just the opposite.
     I have recommended that you make a video, for us. Not for your customers, clients, or those that you've deal with before, this time.   Will you do that, for us?  Please... 
   And yes, showing updated improved scope close-ups, and output readings, as mentioned by the other guys, here. So, that we can see the scope readings, with all the bulbs facing the camera this time.  I'm sure that would please everyone following you on this venture. As that video would be for us. And anyone else interested.
   You see, I have watched your videos. But you haven't watched mine, or I'd know it. 
   The idea is not to prove or disprove anything, but just to observe the results. That's all. That is what I try to do on my videos.  And TK does with his, "is this OU".  No claims, just showing what is happening. No need to get personal, or judgemental. 
   I am not blind, or dumb, and can see that you MAY have something there, worth pursuing.   
   Pura Vida,           
                   NickZ   

  Rick:   
  Can we just dispence with personal issues and focus on this project? For once.   I can see that you know nothing about me, nor the rest of us that you are still considering as trolls. Ok, no problem. I am done pleading. You won the debate, I forfit.   I can see when I am waisting my time.    I have provided my full name to you as can be found on youtube. Some of the other guys on this forum, can be found there as well But, you won't look, to see what we've done or anything about us.And considering that you won't "do videos for forums, I think that pretty much sums it up.   No further questions. Thanks for your kind reply. I will not trouble you again, as I can see that you are just much too busy to cooperate with "guys like me". I understand now.     NickZ