Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84086
  • *Latest: Harper77

  • *Total Posts: 895484
  • *Total Topics: 15752
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 11
  • *Total: 13

Author Topic: Confirmation of OU devices and claims  (Read 296623 times)

Offline rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #705 on: June 24, 2019, 06:40:48 PM »
Any mistakes in life and technology. I am sharing many of my mistakes and those of others so that others need not fall into any traps and waste time, money, and their faith.
I always appreciate prayer, even if people think I am in the wrong. I learn from other people's criticisms as well.

What mistakes would those be then ?  :)
I will get my religious bud'y to pray for you.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #705 on: June 24, 2019, 06:40:48 PM »

Offline rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #706 on: June 24, 2019, 07:37:39 PM »
Nick,
You didn't consider what I said in the video demonstration or on this forum. It doesn't matter what I or anyone shows because anyone could be mistaken or fake a video, picture, or testimony claim. No matter what I show in the cyberworld it should not be believed as any kind of proof. This practice of believing things for or against claims on these forums is reckless. It is fine as giving information on how people may prove these things to themselves, and that is all I ever attempt to do. All I am seeking to do is enable people to help themselves. There is a big difference. I did a sensational video demonstration WHILE MAKING THIS VERY POINT. It was sort of a test to see people's reaction. I get zero response to that video here from those wanting to disbelieve my claims, while A posts a picture and people are all supportive. This is crazy don't you think? You want a meter showing zero, but you should not believe that until you can see your own meter zero. I have given everyone a means to see my claims proven, but I only do that in the real world. I am a teacher and will not teach falsely. That is I will not promote any belief in something that should never be believed. I watch you guys do this now and it is very concerning. You guys lack real-world experience to insist upon and expect belief about claims shown through pictures and video. I work with technicians and am one myself, and as such I know that what someone says over the phone, in word, or through picture and video is often not revealing the whole picture. You have to go there to see. Soooooo

if you assume the situation is how people tell you they think it is, especially in this research, you will usually be mistaken. I have 15 years in this. I know how easily people are mistaken. We are not just dealing with fakery but simple mistakes. And everyone here wants to assume their own bias. This is not real science at all. It is rash, sloppy, and foolish to assume all these things for or against claims. In the end I have to pick up the pieces of people who have wasted so much of their time and money and have lost their faith because of indulging in these kinds of assumptions.

Now if you want to do that I have given a video demonstrating over 80 coils powering loads, while showing you how that was just a small number that could be powered. I do not do that to prove anything to anyone, but just to show you what you can show yourself. So the lack of response to that from some of you reveals that no matter what I show you in video it will not matter. Notice the first remark about my first picture post was a scoff that there must be hidden wires. So that is why I agreed to the underlying doubt of that comment and pointed these things out about the nature of proper belief and proof. Why should that scoffer believe a picture? How does he know I didn't make mistakes that were not revealed by the picture? How can he judge whether or not it was faked? He can't.
So with A's pictures posted the other day. You guys love that, and you assume many things about the picture for or against what A believes he has demonstrated. So I brought up that as an example. I explained what we don't know from what he showed and said. There are many factors that could account for what we see in the picture. Each person wants to quickly assume many things according to what they want to believe about it. Those seeking OU can run with it and those doubting it can resist it. But I am neither for or against claims. I'm a realist having been at the center of all these kinds of claims online and off-line in the real world. These are games people.

What I'm getting at is that pictures and videos are no more believable than words. Ultimately pictures and videos have little content until descriptive words are added to it. Now I have given such pictures and videos showing meters at zero, devices self-running, etc. But these are just rejected by those who choose to disbelieve such demonstrations and believed by those who are inclined to believe them. I have learned that it doesn't settle what needs to be done here. It only fosters more of the same assumptions that eliminate proper scientific discussion and development. What is needed is for people to agree to stop assuming things for and against claims and hold any claim, testimony, revelation up as merely a hypothesis to be personally confirmed. But instead we have people accepting such testimony as fact and making conclusions about the real world as if they have good reason to do that. That is reckless and is the main reason why these forums will always fail. Look, all you have to do is NOT make conclusions about anything so presented here and then it would be fine. But the fact is I constantly see people assume a picture has proven minor points as if the reader can know all the details of the conditions and environment and the legitimacy of the testimony. This leads to countless judgments prematurely for or against claims. So people are over and under believing things and therefore it is all chaos and no real benefit. What is this so hard to admit people?

And why is self-running the only thing that is important? I have demonstrated live all forms of energy outputs for people to measure with or without self-running. I power motors, generators, heaters, inverters, incandescent bulbs that heat up, etc. But you will never be satisfied unless you do it yourself anyway.

Anyway, you don't get my point. You are only considering this from one side, as if only the skeptics are to be faulted for disbelieving claims here. But doesn't it apply both ways? Is it right to believe a claim anymore to disbelieve a claim? Why are you justified in believing this Nelson you mention? You prove this point to yourself in saying "Hopefully, Nelson's devices are not faked". Well it just so happens that I deal with countless people who have believed things that were faked on these forums. And others that were just mistakes. The classic examples are when people rapidly charge up a sulfated battery that has no real capacity and think they have something special. Or someone has a voltmeter that shows the voltage going up merely because the battery is dead and it gives a false reading. So people can be mistaken and really believe they are experiencing something special, and they can also fake things. So these forums promoting such practices that assume things foster so much needless confusion and chasing after this or that claim that wastes so much time, money and faith. This is why I feel this is more than just sloppy practice but is deliberately fostered for people to fail. This is probably why I get none of these old-timers backing me up on this. It is very revealing. Yet is it is a huge change of lifestyle to be a person of integrity and control your judgment from assuming what you want. Most people have no interest in living that way. So it is a spiritual problem as well. But everyone can see that it is a fundamental science problem. Without this sound practice all this is merely entertainment as fiction is preferred over due process.

You end with "better safe than sorry" and that is my point. Be safe and suspend your judgment. Do not assume anything and you will be safe. Don't conclude as a gamble hoping that something is real. Learn to evaluate all such claims as merely a possibility. Is that so hard to do? Is this unreasonable people?

  Rick:  I feel sorry for what you are going through. But, what we really need here is more proof that adding more and more coils, (hundreds), does not affect the input. And more importantly, does not affect the total brightness in a negative way.   If there really is more output than input, then this needs to be recycled, to self run the device. Until this is shown and proven, the negative speculation will continue. No amount of words and long explanations from you will change that.
   So, please SHOW it self running itself.   Not everyone believes that every OU device that are shown HERE are faked.
   Hopefully, Nelson's devices are not faked, and do self run. Although he won't admit it. Good call, for him. Better safe than sorry.

Offline NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4972
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #707 on: June 24, 2019, 07:54:05 PM »
    Rick:    Thanks for the reply.    Like I said, for people like me, who is are builders, and not just a speculating armchair forum posters, we need more proof in order to do what itsu is doing now. He is one of our best replicators, and if he can't show and replicate your circuit, then most likely none of us can. Is he doing something wrong, or what? Can you provide the needed info so that he can achieve what you say is possible?   No need to post long essays, just some critical technical info, and just avoid getting into any personal issues. They only distract from what we are trying to do. I am on your side, and not trying to antagonize you or anyone else, at all.
   BTW: The only reason I mention "Nelson" and his devices, is because, he is the only one on this forum that has shown a self running device. The ONLY one...
   In any case, I'm not here to discuss fakes, I'm here to replicate, and to build a working self running device.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #707 on: June 24, 2019, 07:54:05 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #708 on: June 24, 2019, 08:50:10 PM »
But it is speculating when you assume any claims are to be believed. You don't get it Nick, you can't be shown a self-running device through the forum. Nelson did not show you or anyone a self-running device. You just assume he did, and you have no basis for that. Maybe it is real or maybe it is not. Same with everything Itsu. Why do you assume the words and pictures show you the reality? As far as I noticed when I initially looked at his postings some weeks back I found mistakes and assumptions and significant differences. But more importantly, your comments here, and those similar reveal a bigger problem. You have made him a person to evaluate a claim of another person. All this not in the real world but through cyberland. Why do you assume he is your "best replicators"? And notice your more disturbing belief: " if he can't show and replicate your circuit, then most likely none of us can." So you will conclude on a matter based upon the work of someone else who you cannot possibly be sure that their work is accurate over the internet. This is prejudice people, no matter if you start your email with the statement "without prejudice".
I have played this game before for years. Trying to troubleshoot over the internet is difficult because you need to be there.

Anyway, your expectations and practices are your own. You can't expect everyone to put themselves under that. Itsu is not actually replicating my claims. Now I have suggested what you can do apart from my kit, and that is fine. But Itsu has never attempted to replicate my kit yet. And you guys will never be able to disprove my claims through the internet. Nor will anyone else be able to prove them through the internet on the other hand.

This does not mean that I am not willing to help and give suggestions. But until your prejudice is admitted and overcome I ask, what does it really matter? In the end if someone makes a mistake or fakes something you guys will just believe what you want.

Now A has been giving some recommendations to Itsu and has also been optimistic about him succeeding. But I found several fundamental assumptions in his presentations and claims that prevent him from being able to do these experiments. And you guys are willing to dismiss something if he can't succeed in doing a certain requirement from you. Sounds like pseudoscience to me. This just confirms that those taking control of these forums are out to prevent true scientific research and to try and disprove claims while assuming the disproving claims.

Again, it would be completely different if we were all physically present. Itsu could do his work and we could all see the actual running of things and then go home and do it ourselves. You guys are just so accustomed to this fantasy internet existence that you confuse the real world with the unreal.

You expect me to come into a hostile environment and coach someone who is not even using my parts when I cannot know what he is really doing in the real world. So then I attempt to do this and what results? If you want such examples just go back to 2005-2008 on the groups and you will see that with thousands of people already. I have met many of these people and in the real world looked at their work. Guess what? It was always different than the pictures and videos shown.

Anyway, if these points were admitted and it wasn't such a hostile environment I would help people as you can see I do on YouTube and in the real world. But I am not about to fall into these traps you guys are setting with all your assumption that you are not willing to give an account for. Nor am I going to give hostile people help so that they can personally profit from things I have already told them how to do. Again, you insist upon doing one thing because you are merely looking for power meter readings. I have already given the power meter readings showing zero for years. Would that prove anything if I showed you this again?

I have a video from 4 years ago showing an hour long demonstration in front of many attendees of my Chicago meeting where my 4 pole was self-sustaining while running various loads. That is what you are expecting but what will it prove if you were not there? If Itsu did the same, what would it prove to you? If he SAID he couldn't do it what would that prove?

If you want any more help you have to agree to do real science. So far all this is science fiction fixation. You admit here that you do not care about real science but only want to conclude upon unverifiable claims. Change your prejudice method and we can actually do something constructive. But no, you just want to jump to the conclusions and limit yourself to throwing around pictures and numbers and claims. And where has it got you all these years? Nowhere! Ever assuming and hoping and wasting money and time. Well we never know what people are really doing in the real world do we?

So what do you want Nick? Science or Science fiction? Reality or Fantasy? Free Energy or Gossip? Scientists or Patsies? Hypotheses or Prejudice?

    Rick:    Thanks for the reply.    Like I said, for people like me, who is are builders, and not just a speculating armchair forum posters, we need more proof in order to do what itsu is doing now. He is one of our best replicators, and if he can't show and replicate your circuit, then most likely none of us can. Is he doing something wrong, or what? Can you provide the needed info so that he can achieve what you say is possible?   No need to post long essays, just some critical technical info, and just avoid getting into any personal issues. They only distract from what we are trying to do. I am on your side, and not trying to antagonize you or anyone else, at all.
   BTW: The only reason I mention "Nelson" and his devices, is because, he is the only one on this forum that has shown a self running device. The ONLY one...
   In any case, I'm not here to discuss fakes, I'm here to replicate, and to build a working self running device.

Offline a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1613
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #709 on: June 24, 2019, 10:47:27 PM »

Re Rick:


My comments on some of the comments.


Yes I am guilty for highlighting Rick on this and another forum - but not BEFORE I had checked him out.  I listened and watched and analysed over 50 hours of Rick's videos and spoke to him extensively on the phone  before I came to my conclusions.
Specifically he had done the Benitez experiments as I had.  I was talking about Benitez 5 or 6 years ago on these forums and the posts are still there.
I checked out Rick's information about the Bedini and derivative systems.  I will post the new information at the end.
Then I saw he had replicated much of Don Smith. I talked with him extensively about the Don Smith process and  book.  He told me repeatedly that I did not have to buy the book - all the info was already on line ( mostly).  I then realized that he knew what he was talking about - and from a practical not theoretical point of view.
I bought the book and am glad I did.  He has demystified Don Smith.
I checked Rick out on the Energetic forum and read all the vile personal criticism - but not one contradiction that was viable of an electrical nature.  I phoned Rick up extensively to double check him out.  I even found out he had a convention in Canada and rang him there.  I knew positively then that Rick was being lied about and defamed. (They claimed he was an illegal)
I checked out the products for sale on that forum:  Only books and dvds. Benfr started a forum on Rick's Resonance induction  kits on Energetic. Vitriol followed - so I posted a sarcastic comment that I would love to buy a Don Smith kit from them.  Obviously they were incapable of anything like that.  The only 2 people worth following on that forum are Peter Lindeman and Eric Dollard.
I started a thread on Overuityresearch about Rick's kit.  Vile vitriol followed. It was so bad I had to close the thread down.  It got so bad that 2 members resigned.
So here is a summary of what Rick has taught me through personal contact and his extensive videos online.
1 There are  4 types of electricity:  Dc, Ac, oscillatory and impulse.
2 Impulse technology is Tesla's technology and is the one to be considered for OU
3 The Heavyside component:  Impulse technology in the Bedini systems makes extensive use of the Heavyside component. This calls into question your battery placement and connecting wires. You can easily mess up the magnetic fields by sloppy arrangement of the components.
4 Don Smith patented this effect and called it the Don Smith effect.
5 The Bedini SG and other systems and derivatives use Tesla's impulse technology and can charge a bank of batteries from one input  (Who knew that?). (BTW I had already done this over 5 years ago)
6 Tesla's one wire system creating nodes. (Video 7).  Of course I knew about it - just never realized it's significance.
7 Resonance is a gain. 
7 b Rick's use of the gate driver without the transistor to mimic somewhat Tesla's impulse technology.
7c Using this impulse technology at Resonance (EEs vehemently disagree with this even though they know virtually noting  about impulse technology at resonance)
7d Seeing the power draw REDUCE as more loads are added. ( phase mirroring effect).
8 Don Smith:  The Kapanadze system and the Don Smith system are the same principle. Don Smith 1994 - Kapanadze 2004.  Don Smith was talking to the Russian academy of sciences - Kapanadze also (I have been told Kapanadze bribed an official of the Russian academy).
8 Back to Bedini: Solid state SSG. We all put welding rods or iron insulated garden wire in our trifilar coils. Guess what?  Doesn't work at 27 khz.  You need a ferrite core.  Nice sneaky  trick by Bedini fooling us all.
 Don Smith:
 1st process  HV HF impulse technology.
Next 1/4 wave up or down.(Resonance process)
Next pulsed DC through High speed High voltage rectifiers
Now the tricky bit which people don't get: FREQUENCY REDUCTION TO 120 HZ in the US. (60 up 60 down)
This is the most critical part  where each reduction in frequency is an increase in power.
Those who criticise this process because they are radio hams don't understand the following: Radio is AC with a superimposed signal on the carrier wave. This is Tesla impulse tech at resonance.   It is also converted to pulsed DC.  The use of the US radio league nomograph to get the frequency reduction is a Don Smith discovery that works. ( I have not tested this yet).
Kapanadze also uses frequency reduction in a different way.  He uses a 50hz 220 volts generator to superimpose the mains frequency on top of his resonant Don Smith frequency to power his loads. This is done in the grenade coil.
There is obvioulsy much more in the  detail re the different set ups in Rick's videos and and online comments.



So in conclusion I have one request:  Treat the resource of having Rick converse with us on this forum as a treasure which no-one else on the planet has . Engage your brain before typing nasty comments. Ask reasonable technical questions and get your soldering iron out and DO SOME EXPERIMENTS and contribute something instead of just taking.
I have done my bit.  I have brought you aquarium 2 and I have shown you some results of experiments.
Please  do as much as I  have tried to do and be nice to Rick.
Please.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #709 on: June 24, 2019, 10:47:27 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline WhatIsIt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 656
    • At The End It Will Matter!
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #710 on: June 25, 2019, 12:14:44 AM »
Rick,

You are right. It is difficult or impossible to prove anything to anyone over the internet.
Over the net we can only talk, which we do. How much of youtube FE devices are true you already pointed, video is not prove.

We can only believe and that could be painful at the end.

You mentioned importance of Tesla's one wire system. Can you point on some of your videos where you touched the subject, if you did such video.
Or can you talk more about it from your point of view?

Thanks!


Hoppy, thanks for the explanation!
And, Kapanadze impressed me as well. Still does.

Quote
I worked on Bedini tech for several years and built several electro-mechanical and fully solid state energisers. It became a cult with much time and money being expended by many in the search for free energy manifested in the battery bank by the actions of the energiser - a definitely not OU device in itself, as pointed out many times by John. So we were all looking for a free energy gain in our LA battery banks after having completed many charge / discharge cycles. Not forgetting the 'mechanical' gain by virtue of the torque available from revolving bike wheel, which John also reminded us many times was free, if of course and only if we built the energiser properly and not just the way that we wanted to build it. In the meantime, John was publishing books with riddles to the building and secrets of the various energisers and more exotic devices like the 'Window Motor'.

Confusion mounted as time went on, as battery load testing appeared to be carried out in different ways, until a load testing guideline was produced by SG forum members. I hit an apparent gain on many occassions, especially during the first few load testing cycles, until I realised why. The 'why' held the secret as to why my batteries appeared to be gaining real capacity. Interestingly, when I reached around the 8th and then subsequent cycles load testing cycles, I noticed a slow reduction in gain in the form of a flatlining data curve. What was causing this I thought to myself. Well, I know that other experimenters know why and I think Rick does but to my knowledge the answer was never openly acknowledged by those leading the cult, as it exposed the myth of free energy from LA batteries.
Towards the end of those cult years, John made an astounding admission, that all our battery 'spiking' with energisers without the use of cap pulsers, was damaging our batteries!!. I'd had enough of it by then and moved into what has become a new cult - Kapanadze free energy devices.

Offline rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #711 on: June 25, 2019, 12:48:31 AM »
Thanks A,
I'm not asking for any of that, and I don't care if people don't believe a single thing I say. All I care to see is people do science and not science fiction. Since there has been little response to wanting to engage in science then there is nothing more to say. You guys will inconsistently believe and disbelieve claims for many more years and when I need some fiction in my life I'll check back now and then. You all have what you need to be energy independent. You don't need some fictional messiah guy to prove something out for you in fantasy land. You are making things a whole lot more difficult than you need to. Just open the loop up from the death circle. Open the window and let the sun shine it. Never mind opening your browser do some science in the real world. Tap a dipole. Charge a battery with your fans. Make a buck boost into a motor at the same time. Catch a wave from out of this world!

Re Rick:


My comments on some of the comments.


Yes I am guilty for highlighting Rick on this and another forum - but not BEFORE I had checked him out.  I listened and watched and analysed over 50 hours of Rick's videos and spoke to him extensively on the phone  before I came to my conclusions.
Specifically he had done the Benitez experiments as I had.  I was talking about Benitez 5 or 6 years ago on these forums and the posts are still there.
I checked out Rick's information about the Bedini and derivative systems.  I will post the new information at the end.
Then I saw he had replicated much of Don Smith. I talked with him extensively about the Don Smith process and  book.  He told me repeatedly that I did not have to buy the book - all the info was already on line ( mostly).  I then realized that he knew what he was talking about - and from a practical not theoretical point of view.
I bought the book and am glad I did.  He has demystified Don Smith.
I checked Rick out on the Energetic forum and read all the vile personal criticism - but not one contradiction that was viable of an electrical nature.  I phoned Rick up extensively to double check him out.  I even found out he had a convention in Canada and rang him there.  I knew positively then that Rick was being lied about and defamed. (They claimed he was an illegal)
I checked out the products for sale on that forum:  Only books and dvds. Benfr started a forum on Rick's Resonance induction  kits on Energetic. Vitriol followed - so I posted a sarcastic comment that I would love to buy a Don Smith kit from them.  Obviously they were incapable of anything like that.  The only 2 people worth following on that forum are Peter Lindeman and Eric Dollard.
I started a thread on Overuityresearch about Rick's kit.  Vile vitriol followed. It was so bad I had to close the thread down.  It got so bad that 2 members resigned.
So here is a summary of what Rick has taught me through personal contact and his extensive videos online.
1 There are  4 types of electricity:  Dc, Ac, oscillatory and impulse.
2 Impulse technology is Tesla's technology and is the one to be considered for OU
3 The Heavyside component:  Impulse technology in the Bedini systems makes extensive use of the Heavyside component. This calls into question your battery placement and connecting wires. You can easily mess up the magnetic fields by sloppy arrangement of the components.
4 Don Smith patented this effect and called it the Don Smith effect.
5 The Bedini SG and other systems and derivatives use Tesla's impulse technology and can charge a bank of batteries from one input  (Who knew that?). (BTW I had already done this over 5 years ago)
6 Tesla's one wire system creating nodes. (Video 7).  Of course I knew about it - just never realized it's significance.
7 Resonance is a gain. 
7 b Rick's use of the gate driver without the transistor to mimic somewhat Tesla's impulse technology.
7c Using this impulse technology at Resonance (EEs vehemently disagree with this even though they know virtually noting  about impulse technology at resonance)
7d Seeing the power draw REDUCE as more loads are added. ( phase mirroring effect).
8 Don Smith:  The Kapanadze system and the Don Smith system are the same principle. Don Smith 1994 - Kapanadze 2004.  Don Smith was talking to the Russian academy of sciences - Kapanadze also (I have been told Kapanadze bribed an official of the Russian academy).
8 Back to Bedini: Solid state SSG. We all put welding rods or iron insulated garden wire in our trifilar coils. Guess what?  Doesn't work at 27 khz.  You need a ferrite core.  Nice sneaky  trick by Bedini fooling us all.
 Don Smith:
 1st process  HV HF impulse technology.
Next 1/4 wave up or down.(Resonance process)
Next pulsed DC through High speed High voltage rectifiers
Now the tricky bit which people don't get: FREQUENCY REDUCTION TO 120 HZ in the US. (60 up 60 down)
This is the most critical part  where each reduction in frequency is an increase in power.
Those who criticise this process because they are radio hams don't understand the following: Radio is AC with a superimposed signal on the carrier wave. This is Tesla impulse tech at resonance.   It is also converted to pulsed DC.  The use of the US radio league nomograph to get the frequency reduction is a Don Smith discovery that works. ( I have not tested this yet).
Kapanadze also uses frequency reduction in a different way.  He uses a 50hz 220 volts generator to superimpose the mains frequency on top of his resonant Don Smith frequency to power his loads. This is done in the grenade coil.
There is obvioulsy much more in the  detail re the different set ups in Rick's videos and and online comments.



So in conclusion I have one request:  Treat the resource of having Rick converse with us on this forum as a treasure which no-one else on the planet has . Engage your brain before typing nasty comments. Ask reasonable technical questions and get your soldering iron out and DO SOME EXPERIMENTS and contribute something instead of just taking.
I have done my bit.  I have brought you aquarium 2 and I have shown you some results of experiments.
Please  do as much as I  have tried to do and be nice to Rick.
Please.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #711 on: June 25, 2019, 12:48:31 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline baudirenergie

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #712 on: June 25, 2019, 12:53:47 AM »
I would like to give some informations for all the people here, that really wants to find something that gives you a direction to OU.
I am only a simple replicator of Ricks Informations, with bad english skills and small knowledge about electricity, but after I followed his Informations I had first positive results.
Please guys. Read Ricks comments line by line. I have do that with every word here and every sentence in his videos. I made about 80 pages of notes for myself. Struggled with all the english words that I heard, but couldn't find in the translater and also give up many times, because I had to watch all the videos 3 to 4 times.
I don't want to convince you. But when it is possible for me, you will also be able to do it. Come on guys, it is not so hard. Only what you need is a little bit of time an trust and you will be pretty successful. And DON'T GIVE UP!
My first result was the replication of what he has shown with this many coils. With every coil I put into the system the total power consuption goes down and down and down, but in the same time I have more new outputs for FREE!
You don't need the resonance kit to do that, but for me it was the key.
Yes I have many questions because of lack of knowledge. For sample, the correct gounding, impedance monograph etc. (next Steps to working Don Smith device) but I know, everything is in one of the books or he had sayed it in one of the videos.   
So, I am very happy. Thank you very very much Rick!

Offline AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3492
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #713 on: June 25, 2019, 01:23:49 AM »
Any mistakes in life and technology. I am sharing many of my mistakes and those of others so that others need not fall into any traps and waste time, money, and their faith.
I always appreciate prayer, even if people think I am in the wrong. I learn from other people's criticisms as well.
Rich, thanks for the reply  :) i can see whats wrong my old device (newman motor). It will need some work doing on it for sure.


regards AG

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #713 on: June 25, 2019, 01:23:49 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3492
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #714 on: June 25, 2019, 01:30:43 AM »
Re Rick:

Next pulsed DC through High speed High voltage rectifiers
Now the tricky bit which people don't get: FREQUENCY REDUCTION TO 120 HZ in the US. (60 up 60 down)
This is the most critical part  where each reduction in frequency is an increase in power.
Those who criticise this process because they are radio hams don't understand the following: Radio is AC with a superimposed signal on the carrier wave. This is Tesla impulse tech at resonance.   It is also converted to pulsed DC.  The use of the US radio league nomograph to get the frequency reduction is a Don Smith discovery that works. ( I have not tested this yet).
Kapanadze also uses frequency reduction in a different way.  He uses a 50hz 220 volts generator to superimpose the mains frequency on top of his resonant Don Smith frequency to power his loads. This is done in the grenade coil.
There is obvioulsy much more in the  detail re the different set ups in Rick's videos and and online comments.
Hi have you got any info on this 60/up 60/down thing please ?

Offline rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #715 on: June 25, 2019, 01:42:52 AM »
Wow, finally! I know it is difficult for people to admit that but I am just trying to save everyone that pain.
Hey, talking is fine and necessary and fun. Throwing ideas is great and needed. We just have to avoid bar talk from becoming beliefs. We just can't have "more of the same".
There are too many videos for me to single out. What I did initially was print out everything that's available on Tesla and spread it out throughout my whole house while I was doing my book. I also had to transcribe some lectures so that I was also able to search everything for key words. I searched for "one wire" and related words. But this was only after I read everything very carefully so I got the broad context as well as the specific context. I have put many of those quotes in my kit book in the advanced section. So you don't need the book. Just read carefully over those first three lectures carefully. You may get bored at times and think the lengthy focus on bulbs is pointless, but there will be important things here and there. Remember that Tesla said later that he wanted to share more about Resonance but the attitudes prevented him from opening up. So that means there are only hints here and there. More than hints, all the important stuff is there if you have an eye for details and realize sometimes he only said something once. This is especially true in his patents. Of course the 1916 lawyer document is very important but you will find what you need in the first three lectures from 1891-1893. Notice all the one wire circuits (there are others in other places as well). Notice the position of the grounding(s), and these are air groundings indicated by the letter P. Notices especially and start here:

http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1893-02-24.htm#impedance_phenomema

"Very high frequencies are of course not practicable with motors on account of the necessity of employing iron cores.  But one may use sudden discharges of low frequency and thus obtain certain advantages of high-frequency currents without rendering the iron core entirely incapable of following the changes and without entailing a very great expenditure of energy in the core.  I have found it quite practicable to operate with such low frequency disruptive discharges of condensers, alternating-current motors.  A certain class of such motors which I advanced a few years ago, which contain closed secondary circuits, will rotate quite vigorously when the discharges are directed through the exciting coils.  One reason that such a motor operates so well with these discharges is that the difference of phase between the primary and secondary currents is 90 degrees, which is generally not the case with harmonically rising and falling currents of low frequency.  It might not be without interest to show an experiment with a simple motor of this kind, inasmuch as it is commonly thought that disruptive discharges are unsuitable for such purposes.  ….  By observing certain elementary rules I have also found it practicable to operate ordinary series or shunt direct-current motors with such disruptive discharges, and this can be done with or without a return wire.
 
IMPEDANCE PHENOMENA
"Among the various current phenomena observed, perhaps the most interesting are those of impedance presented by conductors to currents varying at a rapid rate.  In my first paper before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, I have described a few striking observations of this kind.  Thus I showed that when such currents or sudden discharges are passed through a thick metal bar there may be points on the bar only a few inches apart, which have a sufficient potential difference between them to maintain at bright incandescence an ordinary filament lamp.  I have also described the curious behavior of rarefied gas surrounding a conductor, due to such sudden rushes of current.  These phenomena have since been more carefully studied and one or two novel experiments of this kind are deemed of sufficient interest to be described here.
[See what is wrongly called Tesla Hairpin Circuit]
"Referring to Fig. 19a/183a, B and B1 are very stout copper bars connected at their lower ends to plates C and C1, respectively, of a condenser, the opposite plates of the latter being connected to the terminals of the secondary S of a high-tension transformer, the primary P of which is supplied with alternating currents from an ordinary low-frequency dynamo G or distribution circuit.  The condenser discharges through an adjustable gap d d as usual.  By establishing a rapid vibration it was found quite easy to perform the following curious experiment.  The bars B and B1 were joined at the top by a low-voltage lamp l3 a little lower was placed by means of clamps C C, a 50-volt lamp l2; and still lower another 100-volt lamp l1; and finally, at a certain distance below the latter lamp, an exhausted tube T. By carefully determining the positions of these devices it was found practicable to maintain them all at their proper illuminating power.  Yet they were all connected in multiple arc to the two stout copper bars and required widely different pressures.  This experiment requires of course some time for adjustment but is quite easily performed.
In Figs. 19b/183b and 19c/183c, two other experiments are illustrated which, unlike the previous experiment, do not require very careful adjustments.  In Fig. 19b/183b, two lamps, l1 and l2, the former a 100-volt and the latter a 50-volt are placed in certain positions as indicated, the 100-volt lamp being below the 50-volt lamp.  When the arc is playing at d d and the sudden discharges are passed through the bars B B1, the 50-volt lamp will, as a rule, burn brightly, or at least this result is easily secured, while the 100-volt lamp will burn very low or remain quite dark, Fig. 19b/183b.  Now the bars B B1 may be joined at the top by a thick cross bar B2 and it is quite easy to maintain the 100-volt lamp at full candle-power while the 50-volt lamp remains dark, Fig. 19c/183c.  These results, as I have pointed out previously, should not be considered to be due exactly to frequency but rather to the time rate of change which may be great, even with low frequencies.  A great many other results of the same kind, equally interesting, especially to those who are only used to manipulate steady currents, may be obtained and they afford precious clues in investigating the nature of electric currents.
"In the preceding experiments I have already had occasion to show some light phenomena and it would now be proper to study these in particular; but to make this investigation more complete I think it necessary to make first a few remarks on the subject of electrical resonance which has to be always observed in carrying out these experiments."
END TESLA QUOTE

The rest you'll just have to read in this context. You have to take away the point that the effect does not happen without the beneficial process, and therefore it is not a matter of volts and amps. Impulse is not DC, and these effects will not happen with regular processes of both impulsing and resonance. Out of resonance you will have some benefit with impulsing, as we show with the motor and the basic third stage process demonstrations. But with resonance and proper impedance matching you can multiply it out as you wish. And you can see more than fifty different Tesla one wire loaded circuits throughout his writings to show you your options. You can power any loads, resistive or reactive. It is only here and there where find with any of these big names that you can multiply out these processes as much as you want. It is always implied in the teaching if you study carefully. Even with Bedini I am not aware of anyone else having noticed what he said in that respect in DVD7 but my one student who ended up making the black box that did just that. Tesla made few remarks along those lines for his own reasons. Ultimately he was interested in selling power systems and trying to progress human evolution rather than trying to teach the individual how to have energy independence. It will take a good month to properly learn Tesla on these points because we have to unlearn while we expand/open our minds.

Rick,

You are right. It is difficult or impossible to prove anything to anyone over the internet.
Over the net we can only talk, which we do. How much of youtube FE devices are true you already pointed, video is not prove.

We can only believe and that could be painful at the end.

You mentioned importance of Tesla's one wire system. Can you point on some of your videos where you touched the subject, if you did such video.
Or can you talk more about it from your point of view?

Thanks!


Hoppy, thanks for the explanation!
And, Kapanadze impressed me as well. Still does.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #715 on: June 25, 2019, 01:42:52 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #716 on: June 25, 2019, 01:53:57 AM »
Very good. Newmans coils are to be in resonance as well.

Rich, thanks for the reply  :) i can see whats wrong my old device (newman motor). It will need some work doing on it for sure.
regards AG

Offline rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #717 on: June 25, 2019, 02:15:18 AM »
A sine wave.
As for people having a hard time doing the frequency conversion just study how the rectenna's do it as they are working in the GHz converting down to DC or in some cases 50 or 60Hz. This is whole other teaching, but since it is not directly OU it is just conventional knowledge. So everything from the L2 onward is found in the rectenna technology. And some of the L1/L2 relationships as well. In fact, at my last meeting I showed everyone how I could take three off the self products and put them together to have full Don Smith high output system that was self-tuning. Not a big deal once you get the main foundational points I have been stressing...

Hi have you got any info on this 60/up 60/down thing please ?

Offline popolibero

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #718 on: June 25, 2019, 09:53:23 AM »
Hi Rick,


You said nobody valued the info you are sharing, that is not true at all, in my case at least. I merely pointed out that fact that when the coil discharges, after the radiant event we still find a bit of current also, even though I totally agree on the fact that without the neg impulses we're tied to finding classic results only and won't find OU. But you misunderstood and overreacted and things went south. 
I totally agree that nothing can be demonstrated or proven on the net. Info can be shared and then everyone who replicates on the bench can only prove it to himself and who's physically around.
Just so you know why I'm here, my goal is to be able to have a solar system with no solar panels ;) , where I'm either rotating 2 battery banks to run an inverter (or one bank that doesn't run down while powering the inverter.) While I understand your point about making the coil a motor, although I have done that, at the moment I'm interested in a solid state energizer with added one wire loads, that charge caps for battery pulse charging. I have been trying that years ago when dvd 7 came out, but back then I din't understand Tesla the way I do now (I know you don't think I do lol...) even though I still have a lot to read and learn. But the principle about fast and sharp impulses to trigger another type of inrushing energy is perfectly clear in my mind and is what I have been working on for quite some time. I built SG's more than 10 years ago and then moved to solid state, then after JB's riddles I got frustrated and moved to other projects such as delayed lenz generators, SERPS and other stuff, spending a lot of time and money. But I always knew there had to be a way to make the solid state SG do want I want it to do, that's why I jumped aboard when I saw your posts about dvd7 and the one wire, as I need direction from someone with the correct info. That's why I'm actually grateful for you being here and sharing, like someone else wrote, I'm on your side too... and ready to learn.


thanks,
Mario

Offline rickfriedrich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 446
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #719 on: June 25, 2019, 11:48:00 AM »
Okay, now we are getting somewhere. I totally understand your frustration with Bedini's riddles and games. That was part of his disinformation.
And I understand, yes there is no need to use either motors or batteries. They are just easy to use for beginners to see different types of gains. I have pretty much exhausted my research in them and don't need them anymore. But motors and batteries seem to be the line that is allowed, so that is all we can sell without trouble. They are enough for everyone to have all their needs supplied like solar and wind (without their limitations and ruining the batteries). Then people can add this third stage process and multiply the energy out as much as they want as you will see in the next post of the movie I just uploaded...

Hi Rick,
You said nobody valued the info you are sharing, that is not true at all, in my case at least. I merely pointed out that fact that when the coil discharges, after the radiant event we still find a bit of current also, even though I totally agree on the fact that without the neg impulses we're tied to finding classic results only and won't find OU. But you misunderstood and overreacted and things went south. 
I totally agree that nothing can be demonstrated or proven on the net. Info can be shared and then everyone who replicates on the bench can only prove it to himself and who's physically around.
Just so you know why I'm here, my goal is to be able to have a solar system with no solar panels ;) , where I'm either rotating 2 battery banks to run an inverter (or one bank that doesn't run down while powering the inverter.) While I understand your point about making the coil a motor, although I have done that, at the moment I'm interested in a solid state energizer with added one wire loads, that charge caps for battery pulse charging. I have been trying that years ago when dvd 7 came out, but back then I din't understand Tesla the way I do now (I know you don't think I do lol...) even though I still have a lot to read and learn. But the principle about fast and sharp impulses to trigger another type of inrushing energy is perfectly clear in my mind and is what I have been working on for quite some time. I built SG's more than 10 years ago and then moved to solid state, then after JB's riddles I got frustrated and moved to other projects such as delayed lenz generators, SERPS and other stuff, spending a lot of time and money. But I always knew there had to be a way to make the solid state SG do want I want it to do, that's why I jumped aboard when I saw your posts about dvd7 and the one wire, as I need direction from someone with the correct info. That's why I'm actually grateful for you being here and sharing, like someone else wrote, I'm on your side too... and ready to learn.


thanks,
Mario

 

OneLink