Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83537
  • *Latest: Skyrob

  • *Total Posts: 514441
  • *Total Topics: 15310
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 0
  • *Guests: 12
  • *Total: 12

Author Topic: Confirmation of OU devices and claims  (Read 193432 times)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1620 on: July 27, 2019, 05:56:37 PM »
Dont be another Rick!
One was enough. Lets forget nightmare!


I gather English isn't your first language. You write and understand it very well, but sarcasm and irony sometimes get lost in translation. I am as far from being "another Rick" as you can imagine. Please refer to my YouTube channel if you would like to learn more about me and my work.

For example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeQ5WnziKBA



And I'll post a link to this one again, since it once more is relevant in several ways: first, you get a "demonstration" of a complete demonstration with measurements, schematic, closeup pic of the actual build and full instructions, in under 10 minutes, and second, it explains a bit about subharmonics and resonance and may help one decide whether or not resonance may be important in whatever "task" one might be attempting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChV7n0EY2h0
And it may help you understand who and what I am.


 8)

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1620 on: July 27, 2019, 05:56:37 PM »

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1621 on: July 27, 2019, 06:02:01 PM »
Hi here is a trailer for JB's Lockridge device, watch it or ignore it, but was it OU?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AykzfzpmNLU

Has any one got a copy of DVD no 14 I can watch E-mail me?
Well that's three minutes of my life that I won't ever get back.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1622 on: July 27, 2019, 06:29:20 PM »
Here's a bit longer video that is a companion to the Subharmonics demo. In this one I demonstrate the CD4046BE Phase-Locked Loop chip in both the VCO and PLL modes, with scoposcopy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMQkCW5vZVc



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1622 on: July 27, 2019, 06:29:20 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Raycathode

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 87
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1623 on: July 27, 2019, 06:47:26 PM »
Well that's three minutes of my life that I won't ever get back.
Hi Mr Tinsel K, Was it that good ?  ;D
I just couldn't stop laughing, there was this huge builds up and then it finished,   :-\
never mind some joker is bound to erase it.

Offline Raycathode

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 87
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1624 on: July 27, 2019, 06:57:13 PM »

I gather English isn't your first language. You write and understand it very well, but sarcasm and irony sometimes get lost in translation. I am as far from being "another Rick" as you can imagine. Please refer to my YouTube channel if you would like to learn more about me and my work.

For example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeQ5WnziKBA
This is an interesting video  from the point of view that both legs  of the neon are lit up (ac) as you'r a clever
 guy with the amount you build, how would you build a similar device that produces negative only pulses ?

Regards Raymondo

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1624 on: July 27, 2019, 06:57:13 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Gear

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1625 on: July 27, 2019, 10:09:28 PM »

I gather English isn't your first language. You write and understand it very well, but sarcasm and irony sometimes get lost in translation. I am as far from being "another Rick" as you can imagine. Please refer to my YouTube channel if you would like to learn more about me and my work.

For example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeQ5WnziKBA



And I'll post a link to this one again, since it once more is relevant in several ways: first, you get a "demonstration" of a complete demonstration with measurements, schematic, closeup pic of the actual build and full instructions, in under 10 minutes, and second, it explains a bit about subharmonics and resonance and may help one decide whether or not resonance may be important in whatever "task" one might be attempting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChV7n0EY2h0
And it may help you understand who and what I am.


 8)

You got me wrong! I watched all your videos before.
You have sharp mind and sometimes sharp, almost rude answers.
Loose a little bit, dont behaive like Rick. That is what I ment. Nothing more.
If you understand my post as sarcasm, my apology.
I see in you researcher, so sarcasm has no place in my posts to you! Sorry.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1626 on: July 27, 2019, 10:33:13 PM »
This is an interesting video  from the point of view that both legs  of the neon are lit up (ac) as you'r a clever
 guy with the amount you build, how would you build a similar device that produces negative only pulses ?

Regards Raymondo
Ah, but they are not both lit at the same instant!   ;)

A high voltage, high frequency rectifier? Maybe even synchronous rectification using more complicated circuitry. Simple DC biasing might be the best way, depending on whom you are trying to troll.

But it is my experience that if one pulses something negatively, somewhere something else must pulse positively if nothing is to be wasted. Sure, one may contrive various clever schemes to drain off the positive pulses to ground, or use them to charge a battery while using the negative pulses to run a motor (as I show in the MHOP video series, the Better-Than-Bedini (tm TKLabs) battery charger/pulse motor).

But is it OU?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1626 on: July 27, 2019, 10:33:13 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1627 on: July 27, 2019, 10:34:12 PM »
You got me wrong! I watched all your videos before.
You have sharp mind and sometimes sharp, almost rude answers.
Loose a little bit, dont behaive like Rick. That is what I ment. Nothing more.
If you understand my post as sarcasm, my apology.
I see in you researcher, so sarcasm has no place in my posts to you! Sorry.
OK mate, no worries, we are cool!   

(If I seem rude at times... it is only because I mean to be.)

Offline Gear

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1628 on: July 27, 2019, 10:44:16 PM »
OK mate, no worries, we are cool!   

(If I seem rude at times... it is only because I mean to be.)

I been watching your progress with interest.
You did not answer to my post about your coil in water video?
I noticed that bulb light up at bottom of jar.

I presume it is not real, but I am not sure.
Was it your joke about Rick or real thing?
Is it something under table?
I am just curious! Because i trust your videos.

Thanks!

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1628 on: July 27, 2019, 10:44:16 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Raycathode

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 87
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1629 on: July 28, 2019, 12:31:23 AM »
Ah, but they are not both lit at the same instant!   ;)

A high voltage, high frequency rectifier? Maybe even synchronous rectification using more complicated circuitry. Simple DC biasing might be the best way, depending on whom you are trying to troll.

But it is my experience that if one pulses something negatively, somewhere something else must pulse positively if nothing is to be wasted. Sure, one may contrive various clever schemes to drain off the positive pulses to ground, or use them to charge a battery while using the negative pulses to run a motor (as I show in the MHOP video series, the Better-Than-Bedini (tm TKLabs) battery charger/pulse motor).

But is it OU?
I was thinking in terms of why JBs youtube videos use negative high voltage to drive tesla coils
and then the pointer or video gets deleted this also applies to Master IVOs videos witch to my knowledge are still viewable and the main difference being i can think of is electron flow direction as opposed to holes.  ::)

There might be another school of thought here and that is impulsing the low turn impulse winding with such a narrow negative going pulse width with out using a spark gap device as one guys suggested using a Russian titanium hydrogen excited thyratron but if negative energy is required to earthy side thyratrons polarity would need reversing, oh such fun ;D ;D 

Raymondo

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1630 on: July 28, 2019, 12:57:09 AM »
I been watching your progress with interest.
You did not answer to my post about your coil in water video?
I noticed that bulb light up at bottom of jar.

I presume it is not real, but I am not sure.
Was it your joke about Rick or real thing?
Is it something under table?
I am just curious! Because i trust your videos.

Thanks!
Hint: If my video is in the "alt.snakeoil" category you can be sure that all is not as it seems.    ;)
In this case you may recognize the wireless receiver from other videos where I demonstrate and explain. So even though it is not evident in the video, you could probably bet that a wireless power transmitter is somewhere nearby. Running under water is no trick, even though the water is  normally a short circuit, at high frequencies it has a high impedance so does not affect the lighting of the bulb. The behaviour of the bulb, brightening and dimming, is also a big clue.

Don't worry, if one of my videos isn't in "alt.snakeoil", it is totally legitimate.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1630 on: July 28, 2019, 12:57:09 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13971
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1631 on: July 28, 2019, 12:59:58 AM »
I was thinking in terms of why JBs youtube videos use negative high voltage to drive tesla coils
and then the pointer or video gets deleted this also applies to Master IVOs videos witch to my knowledge are still viewable and the main difference being i can think of is electron flow direction as opposed to holes.  ::)

There might be another school of thought here and that is impulsing the low turn impulse winding with such a narrow negative going pulse width with out using a spark gap device as one guys suggested using a Russian titanium hydrogen excited thyratron but if negative energy is required to earthy side thyratrons polarity would need reversing, oh such fun ;D ;D 

Raymondo
OK... Maybe Wesley could try his Krytron....

Offline a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1611
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1632 on: July 28, 2019, 02:05:42 AM »

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3586
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1633 on: July 28, 2019, 04:19:04 AM »
T K  does Bedini:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DbTy8EVaGI[/size]


R F does  Bedini: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXuEeLUMAug&feature=youtu.be


You decide...
What's your point?


Even if the equipment in Rick's video was his own (which it isn't), and he was in his own lab (which he isn't), so what?


Again, what is your point? It seems as though your only interest here is to discredit anyone who does not consider Rick to be their hero, as you apparently do.


Surely you're not trying to compare TK's and Rick's knowledge and abilities in these realms? If you are, that's laughable.


Rather than trying to discredit others for their fine work, I would suggest you present your own work that supports your hero. Otherwise, knock off the nonsense please.

Offline overcurrent

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 34
Re: Confirmation of OU devices and claims
« Reply #1634 on: July 28, 2019, 05:17:28 AM »
What is the point is the right question, just where are we now because I am a little confused. The thread started out to confirm or deny claims of overunity and it started with the Bedini motor. Years ago I started making one but gave up because of the mythbusters and others saying it was a hoax. Then I got excited again when I saw this thread might show me the proof I was looking for on this subject instead of just going by what others had said (mythbusters). Now I am not an idiot I do understand that there is a conservation of energy and I do understand power factor calculations and the difference of real power and aparent power as an electrician I have had to use those formulas but that was years ago, however I am not into the electronics like most here are so I wasn't to interested in the rf part of where this thread went but what about the Bedini motor and batteries. Did the motor charge batteries better than conventional methods and did the motor rejuvenate sulfated batteries, even if the motor only improves efficiency and desulfates a bad battery I would be interested in continuing this project I have started collecting parts for but after 109 pages I still don't know. Maybe I am an idiot, am I missing something or was this proven not to work, I know we started out with some good replications from Tinman and Grummage but then it moved to the rf portion and I didn't really get my answers from those replications on the battery charging part. I haven't wasted any money so far I am just collecting parts for a build but before I do spend money I thought someone might have a reply that would convince me one way or another thanks.

 

OneLink