There are many issues to which he doesnt want to answer to.  Like the 2 dc sources, they are not being measured individually to see if those are where these large currents are coming from.  And if they are, i believe they are, these losses are not factored in.

Im tired of looking at it any further. Its like it was designed to be hard to follow. XMM1 for some odd reason is almost all the way to the left buried into the circuit but its leads go to measure things on the far right, for just 1 example. I cannot conceive why. I would have naturally put it close to where it is connected for the measurement, all just to make things easier for me, let alone for others to see and go over. Just because of the few major issues, Im not going to waste more time in it, like redrawing for ease of reading the circuit. I have a good enough eye for this that I already see these big problems. And TK has a better eye for it. I didnt see the problem with the source you pointed out. I lost interest after what has been pointed out already. Hopefully he figures it all out and stops badgering others for seeing what he didnt, and still doesnt.

It is what it is. Ive said my piece, and hopefully he figures out the issues and learns from it.

Mags

Lol, remove the sig gen and the transistor from the primary circuit and it probably still has these huge currents. So we can probably throw that portion of the circuit out.

Mags

about the whole wattmeter discusion i can be clear
an wattmeter has 4 terminals 2 for amps and 2 for voltage both plus and minus
all it does is calculate how much amps are going trough the wire and how much voltage is aplied
it multiplies that and show you the watts, there are no amps lost there neither does it create amps it's a meter

THE WIRE

The problem is that your "wattmeter" is not being used to measure voltage and current through the "same wire". You are NOT USING IT CORRECTLY. To have a valid power reading you must connect the V and I inputs of the wattmeter to THE SAME "WIRE" (that is, to the same circuit branch). You connect the V inputs in parallel with the voltage source to the "wire" (circuit branch) and the I inputs in series with the "wire" (circuit branch). THE SAME CIRCUIT BRANCH. All your simulation schematics have your Wattmeter's voltage input connected to one branch and the current input connected to A DIFFERENT BRANCH. So you have garbage in (values from different circuit branches) yielding garbage out (invalid "power" readings).
 
The simulator is pretty smart but it can only do what you are telling it to do, and if you are telling it to do something stupid or ignorant -- it will do it, and return the ridiculous (and invalid) results that you are seeing.

Furthermore, if you want to claim "OU" you have to compare INPUT POWER -- that is, the correctly measured TOTAL power that is put into your device -- with OUTPUT POWER, which is the power delivered to a load. You have no clear total input, and no clear load, in your simulation. In fact the huge "power" you are incorrectly measuring could just as well be considered INPUT since part of that "power" measurement comes from a SOURCE of power not a load. However as I have explained your wattmeter is not really giving you a POWER measurement at all, of any kind, since it is not measuring V and I in the same circuit branch.

Now go play in the street, or something.

lol. If ya think about the apple pie further, and cut each and every piece in half while your at it, how many total cuts would it take to reduce the whole pie down to just single atoms? The initial example gets rid of half of each cut and the next cut is just one of those halves.

If you were all the way down to the final cuts, all  final pairs of atoms, there would be as many cuts left to do as there is half of the total number of atoms in the whole pie.  Segans example holds a little trickery in the getting rid of 1 half of whats left of the pie after each cut for some shock and aw value. His example would have been better if he had also given the answer for my question with that. His example seems to make it seem like atoms are not that small in a way.

Now for the final thought on that...

Would it take more cuts to take the pie apart 1 atom at a time or to cut all the pie pieces in half along the way like I explained above?

Mags

That saying must be very true because everyone on this thread has tried to teach you but all you return is scorn and slander.

The last real message that would help anyone reading this thread was  my advice for them to ignore you.  It is very clear you don't have any idea how to design a circuit or how to use meters to measure what you have.  Take Mags advice and disconnect the signal generator and see what you get.  You'll see your circuit doesn't work like you keep insisting it does.  I will reply any time I feel like it.  You clearly don't understand electronics and you want everyone else to be as confused as you are.  Fortunately there are a lot of folks on this forum that can see your foolishness for what it really is.

I suspect you are really an agent of the oil companies trying to confuse and misdirect those who are actually looking for OU.  You silly tactics won't work here.  So you might as well take a hike.

last pic for inspiration
 

Again