Hi Taras,
First I reflect on your following text (regardless of when you return to this forum):
"The reason why I'm so cool currying on details is because that only three month ago
I was just the same sceptical and paranoic about checking of results as yuo people are."
Well, I consider myself a healthy sceptic, with appropiate background knowledge in electrical engineering to be able
to decide whether a setup has some virtue or just one out of a dozen. BUT I am certainly not paranoid on this or any
other setup to treat it as a crap no matter what, ok? I do not preclude, I believe in the possibility of overunity and
I am aware of most of the obstacles that natural (mainly physics) laws establish against overunity.
What you mention on the RF PMG-MMEIR 4E6M setup, I quote:
"There was not much watts to admire but frustrating was that it was 19 watts from 16 watts drive, ..."
So again the usual question arises how did you measure the 19W and how did you know that the 16W input power did not
increase during the load test when the 19W was provided to a load, and what was the load? Again, you would need to
provide such details that simply are NOT included in the relevant videos. See my question at the end of my above
post, for instance.
It is okay and good that you discovered by experimentation the Faraday law of induction, that the use of more magnets
i.e. magnetic flux and more number of turns the induced output VOLTAGE increases and (as you wrote in your blog) with
the increase of RPM too. I deliberately used capital letters for 'voltage' because in most of your videos you measured output voltage
and not output power, that is of paramount importance. And YES, when your generator coil output is unloaded, the induced output voltage
is increased when you increase the loops in the coils and the number of magnets.
So your poematic guess question on what will happen with 8 CCCs the answer is given, no problem with that.
The big problem is your assumption of the 16-17 W input power would remain the same when you really load the
generator output with say a 25W or a 40W or a 60W incandescent light bulb.
IF you do not use any such or similar power load so the output remains unloaded, then the 16-17W input power draw
is guaranteed, it remains the same 16-17W. It SHOULD remain the same because if there is no load, there is no Lenz law.
Here I just mention your incorrect use of the voltmeter during the load tests: you have not answered why you connected the voltmeter in SERIES with the load?
The series (and not parallel with the load) connection guarantees, willy-nilly, the 16-17W input power to the generator would not change at all during the 'load' tests.
ALL these facts mean your claim of having a hyperefficient generator with 1000% efficiency is only a dream.
Unless you prove it with correct measurements.
Gyula
Look, Gyula, as I observe my stopwach, I realize that soon, I might discontinue my
public relations and that might last, hope that not for long but befor that
I have to produce sort of short-cut here on this discussion.
The reason why I'm so cool currying on details is because that only three month ago
I was just the same sceptical and paranoic about checking of results as yuo people are.
Though my superior virtures allowed me to come out of hell circles just wasting just one week.
When I had tested RF PMG-MMEIR 4E6M [size=78%] [/size]
https://sites.google.com/site/ageofmagnetizm/home/magnetomechanics/mpg-mme
There was not much watts to admire but frustrating was that it was 19 watts from 16 watts drive,
and I was cheking and talking and washing pegs
and punching keybords, but that result was just one from series of similar results where was clear that:!!!
With increase of number of magnets and numbers of loops in coils - the output increases while input is the same.
The following course of Least Action was so obvious: why talking if I can just to SEE the continuation of increase.
And in one more week I had 8 magnets rotor and C -Core with 111 oms coil on it.... and I have got the answer:
Previous prototype had round 100 ohms on stator and giving up round 50 volts
and here I hade stator with similar 100 ohms giving up 75 volts.............
What next? More same CCC simply multiplying the output while rotor need no more power for same 1400 RPM
And with four CCCs there 270 volts,
Now gues what will happen with 8 CCCs.... there round rotor is plenty of space for them.....?
But I've got not much 1/3 wire left... and no needs to produces even more proves,
Its wise to move forvard instead of stubbing on doubt.
That what I call Path of Least Resistance
where results are depending only on my actions without confusing complications usual in teamworks.
Hope I'll be here for a while, and hope for many other nice developments here and round this small planet.