Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Simple and low cost perpetual machine  (Read 11535 times)

vikram_gupta11

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
Re: Simple and low cost perpetual machine
« Reply #15 on: May 16, 2017, 09:13:27 AM »
Dear Sir.
I want to build it but I don't have technical resources and also financial .that's the main problem.

citfta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: Simple and low cost perpetual machine
« Reply #16 on: May 16, 2017, 01:16:19 PM »
Why do you keep posting here?  Everyone that has replied to you has told you your idea WILL NOT WORK.  You don't understand the basics of inertia.  No one here is going to build your device because we all can see  that it WILL NOT WORK.  So there is no reason for you to keep posting your sketches and saying it will work when you can't find anyone that will agree with you.

vikram_gupta11

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
Re: Simple and low cost perpetual machine
« Reply #17 on: May 16, 2017, 03:48:01 PM »
Dear Sir.
Where is inertia problem in this design as I don't see any inertia problem in this design.I have tested it with cardboard designs and it works.
Please tell me about inertia problem in this design.

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Simple and low cost perpetual machine
« Reply #18 on: May 17, 2017, 12:24:40 AM »
the thing about levers,
as Archimedes the Great so adamantly explained

When one side goes UP, the other goes Down.

Where ever the ball may be when it started, it must roll down to go the other way.
to get back to the starting point on the other side one of two things must happen

the ball must go UP
or
the fulcrum must go down.

otherwise, you are left with the disadvantage of moving the fulcrum UP, during the start of each cycle,
which requires lifting both the ball AND the counterweight.

in way you slice this, you lose energy, not gain.

vikram_gupta11

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
Re: Simple and low cost perpetual machine
« Reply #19 on: May 17, 2017, 08:14:02 AM »
Dear Sir,
I think a working model is last way  so I have started work on it and will soon prepare a working model to prove its feasibility.
Thank you Sir!