2nd "law" violations > Heat to electric energy conversion

Proven Overunity ? Dr. Gerald Pollack - seems to violate 2nd law to me

(1/1)

schuler:
Hello,
Have a look at 6:00 on this video to get a quick idea:
Water, Cells, and Life | Dr. Gerald Pollack
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9UC0chfXcg


Look at this video also:

The Fourth Phase of Water: Dr. Gerald Pollack
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-T7tCMUDXU


 :) Have fun. :)

Bertoa:
Sorry, but what is the point? It's known for years that when you put electrodes in salt water you get a small voltage and current. I used to make a battery by taking a copper tube and around this an alluminium tube with inbetween a piece of cloth soaked in salt water as electrolyte. I believe that a human is always in a state of overunity. I agree with Dr. Pollack.

Shanti:

--- Quote ---Sorry, but what is the point? It's known for years that when you put electrodes in salt water you get a small voltage and current. I used to make a battery by taking a copper tube and around this an alluminium tube with inbetween a piece of cloth soaked in salt water as electrolyte. I believe that a human is always in a state of overunity. I agree with Dr. Pollack.
--- End quote ---

Sorry you didn't quite get it. If you use two different metals, you have simply made a battery.
But the effect from Pollack doesn't need two different metals.

But Pollack himself easily explains, where the energy is coming from, so this doesn't violate any known law. The energy comes from light. So it's basically some type of solar cell, although surely working quite differently than the common ones.

dieter:
Speaking of voltaic current, it is also possible to use similar metals, if they have a disimilar molecular structure. For instance cristaline gold and amorphous gold should produce a current. But then I ask myself, what is going to oxidize here?


Sorry, didn't want to chanche the topic, pn me about this subject if interested.

jhewitt03041976@gmail.com:
First, remember the wording, it includes "Isolated System", a system whole may consist of more than one connected sub-systems which can minimize Entropy

the word "Entropy" itself is at times misunderstood, it is a simple reference to various forms of resistance

Entropy itself is not a set and defined constant and it's value is affected by the efficiency of the materials/parts/equipment used in the system/s

Entropy also stabilizes as the load & supply synchronize and stabilize. Despite the wording of the second law, if Entropy did not stabilize as the load/supply system/s stabilized, and continually and constantly increased, the loads of ALL powered system/s (stored and transmitted/generated) would continuously draw an escalating amount of power to maintain the system until the materials could no longer handle the massive amounts of power and cause a dangerous meltdown or even explosive failures, even small battery powered would drain power and melt or burst into flames within minutes

A true "Overunity" system does not actually defeat or violate physics laws, quite the opposite, it relies on them, but don't forget, at the times most established "Laws" were created during times when there was a lot of undiscovered data, technology and processes, at the times, these various laws may have been true, but rarely are established laws ever updated and/or edited to account for the changes in scientific discovery

Navigation

[0] Message Index

Go to full version