AG,

Until now you probably realized that you wont get FE device on a plate,
ready for use.

If you want device, you will have to invent it by yourself.

Forum is of great use to observe ideas and which experiments failed,
so you can narrow the search.
Which can be of great help.

You also are lone wolf, not willing to work in group.
But you expect others to do differently?

Thanks but I don't need advice on FE or groups I'm an experimenter I don't produce things and i don't accept tails of bull shit
if Z Point is  illegal in your country your at risk unless you stick to the rules and play the game.

If the bucking coils produce large currents and magnetic fields in the coils that fight each other, then could a motor be built into the system so that the system could produce mechanical power along with the electrical power production?  The magnet in the motor would have to rotate at the resonate speed of the frequency of the bucking coils.  But can the bucking coils be designed to operate at a lower speed that the magnet cn rotate at that speed?  It just seems to me that if you have opposing magnetic fields, that this could be used to operate mechanical movement somewhere in the system at the same time as performing the electrical energy?  I like to read peoples comments.

The Lunkster

You should post on thread partnered output coils.
Owner of thread is expert in bucking coils for 10 years now.
He has solid state version of your device.
He will be very glad because it looks to me that your  device is identical to his,
and his device is cop 1.7 or maybe selfrunner, I am not sure.
Because it is so advanced there is lots of secrecy involved, so details are not revealed.

Your device looks promising just as his.

He will explain everything to you.

If the bucking coils produce large currents and magnetic fields in the coils that fight each other, then could a motor be built into the system so that the system could produce mechanical power along with the electrical power production?  The magnet in the motor would have to rotate at the resonate speed of the frequency of the bucking coils.  But can the bucking coils be designed to operate at a lower speed that the magnet cn rotate at that speed?  It just seems to me that if you have opposing magnetic fields, that this could be used to operate mechanical movement somewhere in the system at the same time as performing the electrical energy?  I like to read peoples comments.

The Lunkster

I asked member emjunie from thread partnered output coils to help you
with his solid state version of bucking coils.
Here is his schematic which is advanced version of less advanced version from before 5 or 6 years.
Both versions are very similar, but this one is very advanced because he is been
developing that for almost 6 years with help of many of his researchers.
I think they placed diodes on old version and made this one so much advanced.
And all of that in only 6 years, maybe more, but rouggly 6.

He is planning new version, but is secret for now.
For everything about bucking coils you can ask member emjunkie,
he can help you to turn rotor on your motor with bucking coils.

Chris,

Many people can say same for you.
You got thread to perform experiment which researchers can follow.

You are advertising your web site here.
You copy and paste same text over and over.
You are pointing to other members work as your own.
And about your pm to members I even dont want to talk.

So, are you here to troll and destroy?
While rerouting visitors to your web site.

You are doing exactly what you accusing others.

Start a experiment from zero, so anyone can follow,
 and nobody will say a word against you.

Do what you said you will.
Dont use this forum for advertising!

If the bucking coils produce large currents and magnetic fields in the coils that fight each other, then could a motor be built into the system so that the system could produce mechanical power along with the electrical power production?  The magnet in the motor would have to rotate at the resonate speed of the frequency of the bucking coils.  But can the bucking coils be designed to operate at a lower speed that the magnet cn rotate at that speed?  It just seems to me that if you have opposing magnetic fields, that this could be used to operate mechanical movement somewhere in the system at the same time as performing the electrical energy?  I like to read peoples comments.

The Lunkster

Hi
Why don't you replace the rotor with a coil so to see for yourself what is your chances to do it!
Obviously you need a delay of current in one of your coils. This can be also done at any frequency you like. And if you comprehend the idea then your rotor will not load the input power even if you force it to stop rotating.

Regards

@Lunkster, Great work, ignore the Time Wasters! See patent: US4806834A

Don't let "No-Body's" with nothing of value, guide you! Follow your Gut! Ignore Trolls! If this forum could moderate the Trouble Makers out, it would be so much more useful!

Jeg is right. Many things to investigate here! Action, Reaction and Counter-Reaction!

Best wishes, stay safe and well in these dire times,
   Chris Sykes

H2OPower,

Maybe the reason for rejecting H tech is that everyone realized,
if they make solid state FE, you dont need H tech.
With solid state FE you can have H as much as you want.

I doubt that anywhere you will find interested party in H tech anymore,
Chris site or anywhere else.

You do what you want. Me personaly H tech is not of any interest.
Solid state is.

H is part of past. Move to another tech.
I presume that you invested time and effort.
Sometimes does not pay back.
It is shame, but that is what it is.

Whatisit
Quote from EMJ... If this forum could moderate the Trouble Makers out, it would be so much more useful!

That is an interesting concept, so what defines a "trouble maker"?, asking questions, being critical of other idea's and concepts?.

It would seem to me that all the most successful inventors in history questioned everything and EMJ said we should question everything but now he is suggesting that anyone who questions him or his beliefs are "trouble makers" and should be moderated ergo silenced. Strange isn't it, to suggest we should all be more open minded unless we question him in which case were close minded and trouble makers, lol.

It sounds like Socialism or Communism in my opinion. As if to say it's great to have an opinion so long as it's the same as mine otherwise you should be silenced. Adolf Hitler, Stalin and Putin would agree however no rational, open minded person should. I don't think EMJ is a communist rather just another self entitled a$$hole looking for gullible patrons to donate money. I thought it was obvious however some don't so I would simply call it a difference in opinion.

The neat part is we have seen these kinds of people come and go like the wind and all we have to do is wait because time is always on our side. They always self-destruct and it's basically a waiting game. It's kind of sad in a way, seeing them do this to themselves and already knowing the outcome. Yes, it's just sad.

Regards