Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: THE RANT ROOM  (Read 177176 times)

WhatIsIt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 651
    • At The End It Will Matter!
Re: THE RANT ROOM
« Reply #240 on: June 29, 2020, 09:31:50 PM »
I contacted Stefan.

It is obvious that Sykes is not here to show and teach.

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: THE RANT ROOM
« Reply #241 on: June 30, 2020, 12:55:23 AM »

Hi WhatIsIt and v8karlo,

I agree with both of you.  I already asked EMJunkie to make a short video just on showing the DC input and DC output power measurements of his setup here , to back up his Input = 12V @ 0.5A = 6 Watts, Output = 17V @ 0.7A = ‭11.9‬Watts, COP = ‭11.9‬Watts / 6 Watts)  = ‭1.98‬ claim but he hides his head into the sand when being challenged. 

 Another example of this is here where another member challenged him too (EMJunkie also deleted his post, this is why member onepower started a new thread where EMJunkie has no moderation rights).

I attached one of my posts to him what he deleted too, it was Reply #148   I made originally at 05:23 PM, June 16, 2020 but if you go to that thread you cannot find it any more.  But he quoted from it here in his post.  :) Just read what 'argument' he devised against me: I do not understand the use of, or the meaning of the = sign.      ;D
I hope Stefan makes the necessity steps.
Gyula



Just like Spoiled Children, having a tantrum! Do you even read your own posts? Posts FULL of tantrums!

Unbelievable! Gyula whats wrong with you!!!

Best wishes, stay safe and well in these dire times,
   Chris Sykes

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: THE RANT ROOM
« Reply #242 on: June 30, 2020, 12:59:18 AM »
Grumpy shared a list
IMO a list which requires success with FE and open sourcing that success.
how to get there as fast as possible and as effectively as possible ..?

Sustainable Development Goals

    Goal 1. End poverty in all its forms everywhere
    Goal 2. End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture
    Goal 3. Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
    Goal 4. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
    Goal 5. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
    Goal 6. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
    Goal 7. Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
    Goal 8. Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
    Goal 9. Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
    Goal 10. Reduce inequality within and among countries
    Goal 11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
    Goal 12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
    Goal 13. Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts*
    Goal 14. Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
    Goal 15. Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
    Goal 16. Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
    Goal 17. Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: THE RANT ROOM
« Reply #243 on: June 30, 2020, 01:11:08 AM »
Grumpy shared a list
IMO a list which requires success with FE and open sourcing that success.
how to get there as fast as possible and as effectively as possible ..?

Sustainable Development Goals

    Goal 1. End poverty in all its forms everywhere
    Goal 2. End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture
    Goal 3. Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
    Goal 4. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
    Goal 5. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
    Goal 6. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
    Goal 7. Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
    Goal 8. Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
    Goal 9. Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
    Goal 10. Reduce inequality within and among countries
    Goal 11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
    Goal 12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
    Goal 13. Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts*
    Goal 14. Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
    Goal 15. Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
    Goal 16. Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
    Goal 17. Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development




Chet, I agree!

Please take a minute to read this:

With respect to partnered output coils...

I understand myself and Chris have had misunderstandings and disagreements in the past however I hold no grudges with anyone and try not to judge. That being said my disagreement was not with his work but more so with his language and how he treats other people in some instances. I wish he would tone it down a little and I think it's important to separate our work from any personal feelings. For creative people like those of us here it is doubly hard as our creativity and emotions tend to drive us forward... I am no exception.

On the work Chris has done, I got a better chance to look at his theory and video series and in my opinion it's pretty solid work. His reasoning is sound and flows smoothly from one concept to the next. As well there is none of the hocus pocus or distractions and he stays on point, well done. All too often we see video's or posts which are incoherent offering no insight or justification which is a problem.

On the technology, I have seen similar layouts or variations of it before in patents and in the literature dating back to the 1900's. I believe the Akula/Kapanadze technology uses a similar coil topology in there circuit which some call a grenade coil. In any case it is a recurring theme in many technologies thus obviously has merit in my opinion. However as we know the coil(s) configuration is only half the battle and switching and energy flow dictates what will happen and why. I like the layout however based on my own work the closed core material can become problematic later on. A core gap with a magnetic sensor or pickup coil added to the control electronics could be beneficial.

Here it's important not to get too caught up in any one layout or theme and we should focus on what the layout and circuit are accomplishing as a process and why. It is the combined effort of every aspect of the device which drives the process however once the exact process is known any number of better or simpler variations could be built.

Food for thought, and based on my own work I think Chris is moving in the right direction. I have my own work and cannot get involved however I would suggest those looking to take on a project consider jumping on board. I am critical of everything and everyone in my nature with respect to science and engineering however this should not be considered as personal. I simply question everything and I think there is evidence to suggest this is a good project and it's about time in my opinion, well done.

Regards



Many here laugh at, and mok EMJ, but the fact is , he is basically right in what he is trying to put forward.


So here is where im at with V3 of the rotary transformer. Adding the bucking coil setup did indeed increase the overall output of the system-both mechanical and electrical. When i say bucking coil,i mean a coil that acts as a magnet that can be switched on and off at the right time. As it is a coil that is being shorted,and thus becomes an electromagnet that pushes against the rotors collapsing field just at the right time. This field also travels around the stator core,and boost the field within the secondary(generating)coil that provides the power for the globe.
So we do have a coil that is bucking both against the rotor's field and also the field of the generating coil.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDFvKJCW9WI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMXaA0zlb-M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pioohhRyfHk




Before the Childish Tantrums, started, and carried on, by Learning Impaired Bio Slushies, we had a chance to do exactly this!

But, you need to move all this down 1 notch and put this at the top:

   1: Force Learning Impaired Bio Slushies back to school and teach them, the best way to learn is by experience only! Keep their big mouths shut until they are educated! Learn from Facts ONLY!


Chet, nothing has changed here, only the names!

For PPL with a Brain and wanting to learn: Here, do the damn Experiment!

Guys, I have a proposal for anyone that is honest and interested.
Please put this statement into your mind without any doubts: The device works on the exact principles Chris shared.

Now please go to the workbench and don't quit until you make it work! There are 2 choices to succeed: be smart and do it fast or be stubborn (like me) and do it by failing many times first. Either one works.



You know where to find me if you want to step up and leave the loonies behind!

Best wishes, stay safe and well in these dire times,
   Chris Sykes


WhatIsIt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 651
    • At The End It Will Matter!
Re: THE RANT ROOM
« Reply #244 on: June 30, 2020, 01:22:43 AM »
Do you even read your own posts? Posts FULL of tantrum!

Do you even read your claims and promises?

Long time passed without experiments and results here on this forum.
All you do is insulting and insisting to go to your forum.
You claimed, and it is on you to show measurements but here on this forum.
No more promoting your forum without showing anything here.

You are extremly rude to members forcing them to be rude to you.
We already had that situation with Rick Frederick and now you.
I promised Stefan that it wont happen again.

That is why I asked Stefan to evaluate your work here.

WhatIsIt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 651
    • At The End It Will Matter!
Re: THE RANT ROOM
« Reply #245 on: June 30, 2020, 08:01:47 AM »
Chris,

What are you advertising?

Your device or

Your forum AboveUnity.com ?

WhatIsIt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 651
    • At The End It Will Matter!
Re: THE RANT ROOM
« Reply #246 on: June 30, 2020, 09:03:31 AM »
Chris,

Dont forget,

I was the first one welcomed you back,

Then Chet accepted the idea that this time something positive may come from you. He forgot old fights and tried to make all of this works.
He gave his best.

We all supported you!

Then you started to be rude and insult everyone.

I tried to make your device, but I failed.
Can be my mistake and I did not claim it does not work.
You never tried to make further efforts to make small pdf with more detailed instructions which we asked you to do.

You just copy paste same text, together with advertisement of your forum,
over and over, claiming cop >1 (1.9) without any measurements or explanations,
and keep insulting people, but later deleted your insults and posts.

Now we are loonies?



lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: THE RANT ROOM
« Reply #247 on: June 30, 2020, 12:45:29 PM »
https://overunity.com/15395/partnered-output-coils-free-energy/dlattach/attach/176302/image//


http://www.rexresearch.com/kawai/1kawai.htm



REGAUGING
and Multivalued Magnetic Scalar Potential: Master Overunity Mechanisms
by T.E. Bearden
© 1996Introduction ~
This is a flash release of information on the operational principles of three overunity electromagnetic engines that are in the successful prototype stage or advanced engineering development. My purpose is to provide an explanation of the master overunity mechanisms utilized by these devices, and to alert researchers and experimenters that the mechanisms are well-established in the conventional scientific literature, though still but little known to the majority of electrical engineers.

My series of articles[1] on overunity engines and mechanisms, for The Virtual Times, Internet node www.hsv.com, covers these three engines, the master regauging mechanism, the multivalued potential, and several other overunity mechanisms or proposed mechanisms. The magazine has just released my latest article over the Internet, entitled "The Master Principle of EM Overunity and the Japanese Overunity engines: A New Pearl Harbor?" The article is heavily referenced and gives a thorough explanation of the three overunity devices: (1) Johnson's nonlinear boosting permanent magnet gate, [2 ,3] (2) the Takahashi engine, and (3) the Kawai engine.

All Three Engines Use Regauging of Magnetic Scalar Potential ~
All three devices freely asymmetrically regauge (A-regauge) (recharge or discharge, as required) the magnetic scalar potential energy of the device in a selected A-regauging sector.[4 ,5] Johnson uses a multivalued magnetic scalar potential to accomplish this A-regauging completely by means of a nonlinear permanent magnet rotor and nonlinear permanent magnet stator, without any electrical input. Takahashi and Kawai both use external electrical input to create or alter a magnetic scalar potential in the A-regauging section.

Conservative and Nonconservative Fields and Multivalued Potential (MVP) ~
Normal engine designers work with conservative fields, which require single-valued potentials. (See Figure 1). They consider A-regauging operations, as well as the multivalued potential (MVP), to be nuisances, since A-regauging may immediately involve nonconservative electromagnetic fields (see Figure 2). Most of the favored "engine design" laws and trusted circuit laws "blow up" during A-regauging, whether by electrical injection or the MVP region. So electrical power engineers just design conventional electromagnetic engines to avoid the MVP or eliminate it. On the other hand, if one deliberately evokes and properly uses the free "jump" of stored potential energy that occurs in an MVP-containing sector of an engine, a standard gauge-theoretic analysis will show that one can legitimately have overunity coefficient of performance from that engine. (See Figure 3). I first pointed this out in 1980.[6 ]

                            http://www.rexresearch.com/kawai/figure3.jpg







But : conventional industrial electric motors and generators are not concipated - warranty preserving - to reach possible limits related  given material potential !



https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=11&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20020425&CC=US&NR=2002047346A1&KC=A1

[0013] All DC permanent magnet motors run the risk of demagnetization of their permanent magnets if the electromagnetic field of the windings exceed the coercive force of the permanent magnets. To alleviate this problem, a maximum safe operating voltage for any DC permanent magnet motor is specified which under maximum power conditions (i.e., at stall) the resistance of the electromagnet windings will be high enough to prevent a flow of current through the electromagnet sufficient to cause irreversible damage to the permanent magnets. This current is considerably greater than the normal operating current, and for this reason, normal operating conditions for traditional permanent magnet DC electric motors only utilize a fraction of their true power capabilities based on their permanent magnets.


                                  In fact, most of these motors only utilize between 10% and 25% of their true potential.


So new concepts must remark/recognize and accept mass production devices limitations ! Optimizing conventional motors 4-5 times :


                                                                     10% x 4x or 5x =   40 to   50 % real efficiency
                                                                     25% x 4x or 5x = 100 to 125 % real efficiency



                                                               The Kawai engine C.O.P. without pulse- on/off duty cycle- dc ?

















https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=kango+iida&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19820817&CC=US&NR=4345174A&KC=A


                                                                                                distance and effect

The operation of the inventive engine 10 will now be described. It is first to be noted that the pull of an electromagnet varies as a function of the area of the holding surface muliplied by the square of the flux density divided by a constant. Also, that the flux density increases as the distance to the holding surface decreases. Hence, changes in the flux density is the greatest contributor to the pulling force of an electromagnet. Experiments conducted by the inventor have shown that an electromagnet powered by two "D" cell batteries can produce a holding force of 500 pounds and that the magnetic attraction force varies with the distance between the surface of the electromagnet and the item to be lifted. It was found, that at a distance of one-eighth of an inch, the force is approximately 7.8 pounds; at a distance of approximately one-twelfth of an inch the force is 31 pounds; at a distance of approximately one/twenty-fourth of an inch the force is 125 pounds; and, as stated, at contact, the force is 500 pounds. Thus, a usable force begins when the distance is one-eighth of an inch and increases rapidly thereafter.



                        the transformer gap,distance :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=21&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19990720&CC=US&NR=5926083A&KC=A

Thus, the inventor examined as described below how much the flux of the permanent Magnet 1 contributes to the induction of the third flux 13 in FIG. 2. First, the inventor provided static magnet dynamos of the basic configuration indicated in FIG. 1, one with a permanent magnet 1 and another without a permanent magnet 1. The inventor then compared the power levels needed to induce fluxes of equal flux densities to the second core 3 of each embodiment, that is, the power levels supplied to the magnetized coil 4. As a result, an embodiment with a permanent magnet 1 required only a very low power level to be supplied to the magnetized coil 4. It was observed that the power level required was no more than 1/40 of that of the embodiment without a permanent magnet 1, depending on the test condition.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2020, 03:02:51 PM by lancaIV »

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: THE RANT ROOM
« Reply #248 on: June 30, 2020, 01:59:23 PM »
Chris quote
Chet, nothing has changed here, only the names! end quote
Chris there is no "here" anymore...it is everywhere..instantly global communications to billions ..who have access..but not the billions more who don't .
every thing has changed in the few months since your new topic started..Fear is not an option ....half measures will not get the job done.
One anomaly... shared.. in one instant [when taught to successful public replication] will bring all we hope for.
The world is being bound into a loop ATM ...we need another loop to keep us free...
None of us are free till everyone of us are free ...like the price of sunshine, air etc etc..seems our destiny _here_ on planet earth 2020....
Just one anomaly taught and shared will do !

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: THE RANT ROOM
« Reply #249 on: June 30, 2020, 03:02:39 PM »
Chris quote
Chet, nothing has changed here, only the names! end quote
Chris there is no "here" anymore...it is everywhere..instantly global communications to billions ..who have access..but not the billions more who don't .
every thing has changed in the few months since your new topic started..Fear is not an option ....half measures will not get the job done.
One anomaly... shared.. in one instant [when taught to successful public replication] will bring all we hope for.
The world is being bound into a loop ATM ...we need another loop to keep us free...
None of us are free till everyone of us are free ...like the price of sunshine, air etc etc..seems our destiny _here_ on planet earth 2020....
Just one anomaly taught and shared will do !
Well why do you ignore THIS little hush hush fact ?

https://www.gaia.com/article/project-serpo-zeta-reticuli-exchange-program?utm_source=google+paid&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=&utm_campaign=1-USA-DYNAMIC-SEARCH&utm_content=UFOs+&+Aliens&ch=br&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIsfCSrMyp6gIVb4BQBh1uSA6tEAMYASAAEgJBUfD_BwE

https://www.gaia.com/article/project-serpo-zeta-reticuli-exchange-program?utm_source=google+paid&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=&utm_campaign=1-USA-DYNAMIC-SEARCH&utm_content=UFOs+&+Aliens&ch=br&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIsfCSrMyp6gIVb4BQBh1uSA6tEAMYASAAEgJBUfD_BwE

So does this make ZPE a reality ?

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: THE RANT ROOM
« Reply #250 on: June 30, 2020, 03:03:40 PM »


Just like Spoiled Children, having a tantrum! Do you even read your own posts? Posts FULL of tantrums!

Unbelievable! Gyula whats wrong with you!!!

Best wishes, stay safe and well in these dire times,
   Chris Sykes

What is wrong you dare to ask?    ???

 You  made  misstatements in interpreting the correct relation between the units of electrical energy (Joule or Wattsecond)
and electrical power (Watt or Joule / second). 
You wrote these: 
                                        "Automatically when you specify "Watt" it is Watt Second!"   
quote is from here: https://overunity.com/18464/partnered-output-coils-builders-group-moderated/msg546724/#msg546724 

or 
                                  "Again: One Watt Second = One Joule per Second - Non-refutable!"    quoted from here:
https://overunity.com/18464/partnered-output-coils-builders-group-moderated/msg546727/#msg546727

Member Bistander and I attempted to correct you and you then went to great lengths to confuse 
the less observant readers to think you were correct all the time and bistander and I were wrong. 

And in your confusing posts you included mocking words on us what you have continued since then.
This attitude is the one that needs drawing widespread attention to,  IMHO. 



But this is a smaller problem,  the big problem is your unfounded claim of

   Input = 12V @ 0.5A = 6 Watts, Output = 17V @ 0.7A = ‭11.9‬Watts, COP = ‭11.9‬Watts / 6 Watts = 1.98‬.

When bistander asked his question in your thread on an obvious discrepency you deleted his post. This was his post you deleted but he reposted here  https://overunity.com/17252/the-rant-room/msg547079/#msg547079  and I quote it below:

Hi EMJunkie,

Globe spec is 12V, 300mA. Calculates to 40ohm.
Your test data are 17V and 0.7A. This indicates globe R = 24.3ohms.
Why the discrepancy?
Regards,
bi

So Chris Sykes I ask this:   Unbelievable!  Chris whats wrong with you ?

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: THE RANT ROOM
« Reply #251 on: June 30, 2020, 03:21:48 PM »
Why the discrepancy ?       Ohm and the temperature dependence !


https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.elexs.de%2Fkap2_3.htm


The resistance of 15 ohms is only measured at the full voltage of 6 V. At lower voltages, there is less resistance because the resistance of a metal wire depends on its temperature. When cold, the lamp has only about 1.5 ohms. The cold / warm resistance ratio of 1:10 applies to normal incandescent lamps. But there are also different lamps that behave very differently. A halogen lamp achieves better efficiency through a higher filament temperature. The on-resistance is therefore much lower. It is completely different with the older carbon filament lamps, which have an increased cold resistance. The situation is even different with an LED lamp. Here the resistance depends largely on the operating point. If the voltage is less than 1 V, the resistance is practically infinite,as the current increases, it decreases.


Nominal voltage and lower or higher voltages difference behaviour : material temperature  ( metal or carbon)






https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/accircuits/reactive-power.html

Generally, for a load with a power factor of less than 0.95 more reactive power is required. For a load with a power factor value higher than 0.95 is considered good as the power is being consumed more effectively, and a load with a power factor of 1.0 or unity is considered perfect and does not use any reactive power.


related

https://overunity.com/12736/kapanadze-cousin-dally-free-energy/22275/ #22288


My Members are well aware of the Fact, that we must achieve Magnetic Resonance between the Coils! As is Conico!


We have been told by so many: Resonance


Below, Floyd Sweet told us: Reactive at RESONANCE


Ruslan told us the same! So many have!Verpies, Smudge, you guys, why don't you jump in and give some advice on these real simple facts we are covering?




     so changing :        and a load with a power factor of 0 or zero is considered perfect and does  use only reactive power.


                                                          resistivity : unit Ohm    conductivity : unit Siemens


                                                         variable partnered output : semi-conductor (principle)

bistander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 705
Re: THE RANT ROOM
« Reply #252 on: June 30, 2020, 05:10:00 PM »
Why the discrepancy ?       Ohm and the temperature dependence !
Nominal voltage and lower or higher voltages difference behaviour : material temperature  ( metal or carbon)

Globes, commonly called incandescent light bulbs, typically use nichrome filaments. The coefficient of resistivity w/r/t temperature for nichrome is 0.00017-0.0004/°C. Quite low. How hot is filament? Was spec given at rated load condition? I suspect discrepancy is not due to change in globe resistance. But a reason I ask Mr. EMJunkie.
Regards,
bi

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: THE RANT ROOM
« Reply #253 on: June 30, 2020, 06:11:45 PM »
Lanca,...You are writing supporting claims here from persons not writing here.
with no permission to do so or citations for reference and perspective ?


once again your contribution is  clear as mud ....... [not the first time either..
flaming a fire that burns all... and supports no result ...conclusively ?
last time you did this it was also clear as Mud...with much fighting as you disappeared ?


// Note to AG on interstellar travel suppression by horrible US gov't [and obviously others too]I apologize for all atrocities globally by all of our gov'ts....as  well any football[sports] or religious atrocities...oh also 5 G or anything else you care to pin on any particular member here...[guilt by geography ...? that too...]

our burdens are tuff to carry at times...as if we did not have enuff to sort out here...

 




 

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: THE RANT ROOM
« Reply #254 on: June 30, 2020, 09:07:56 PM »

...
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.elexs.de%2Fkap2_3.htm

The resistance of 15 ohms is only measured at the full voltage of 6 V. At lower voltages, there is less resistance because the resistance of a metal wire depends on its temperature. When cold, the lamp has only about 1.5 ohms. The cold / warm resistance ratio of 1:10 applies to normal incandescent lamps. But there are also different lamps that behave very differently.
A halogen lamp achieves better efficiency through a higher filament temperature. The on-resistance is therefore much lower.
...
Hi lancaIV,
I think what I quoted from you above is a correct translation and if you check EMJunkie video 7  at video time between 30:30 to 31:30, you can see a normal filament bulb I attached snapshots of.  It is not a halogen type and must have the usual Tungsten filament. Here is a link on such lamps which includes halogen ones too and a bakelite globe holder as seen in the snapshot.
If this is correct and EMJ perhaps confirms this, then the voltage - current characteristic of such Tungsten lamps is indeed nonlinear i.e. the resistance is nonlinear too,  increasing with increasing voltage and current. The nonlinearity (as also included in the above translation) is caused by the effects of high temperature on the metal filament wire of the globe.  The higher the filament temperature (due to the higher voltage and current), the higher the hot resistance becomes.

This means that bistander's discepancy question remains valid:  when such globe is fed at 17V and 0.7A, its instanteneous resistance cannot be as low as Ohm's law calculates it (24.3 Ohm), while its instanteneous resistance at 12V and 0.3A calculates to be 40 Ohm.  The temperature of the filament should be much higher at 17V than at 12V, so the resistance at 17V should be higher than 40 Ohm,   ok?
This also needs clarification from EMJunkie. 

Gyula