TinMan's neon is lit, but it can light with 70v or sometimes even less voltage, and not the 200+ he is stating. As it is just barely lighting the neon...
 You can try a regular voltmeter, to see what it reads, also. Sometimes they can read the correct values, on something like this, but mostly they won't read correctly. Just like the Dr. showed, (incorrect scope values).

   Please place any circuit or coil away from the table, on some styrofoam (or similar), and elevated off of the table by a few inches. Same thing with your SG, and it's wires. Turn off you house breakers. 
   Otherwise you're just fishing for stray AC.  I'm sure you'll find that stray capacitance, all over the house.And you'll be fooled by it, lighting an led bulb.
   

   Dr. Stiffler just posted another new video. By adding another diode, he was able to obtain a higher output at the cree bulb.

AG - your comment was pure gold there about the Americanisms. I'm English, but live in the USA 
I do though acknowledge the strange cross-over in language use that has developed.
The coil is a flat single layer pancake, 2 wire core wound around and around on itself 15 times and secured with superglue. 9 turns is about the minimum, extra turns than 15 don't yield extra output. The circuit will saturate above about 3V, so a 1.5V AA or AAA is ideal. Old 56K modem cables are ideal. A diode from either battery connection can reduce current or heat, as can a resistor to the Base of the transistor, but then it starts to step away from being the simplest wireless circuit possible. It was named 'Simple Wireless Electricity System' or SWES.
I know it's not the focus of these experiments and I don't sell them or anything, it's always been Open Source since 2012 and replicated without acknowledgement ever since (not that it's needed).
Vid link to explain: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSUGXCWIVoI
An even easier and simpler version is SWES 2, 2 coils of wire wound around a medicine bottle as a former.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpGRghguv2g

There is a point to trying the Dr. Stiffler experiments with other forms of input, especially Exciters, because folks are having troubles building or acquiring 20MHz signal generators !
These simple things of mine are an extra route of doing so.


Yes indeed Nick, outdoors demo's are becoming ever more needed. Also, motors and filament bulbs for better power showing than LED's. A gent on Youtube suggested that and I quite agree, mains being a heck of a deceiver to the results of experiments.

   And yet another video just posted today by Dr. Stiffler.  This time with no third diode.  Look for it yourself, if interested. I can't post a link from this tablet.   There must be a point to all his musing, but I don't know where it's leading to.
   The problem with using an Exciter is that you can't control the frequency, without adding or removing wire turns on the secondary coil. Ferrite inside the core will only control the frequency to a point.
   Looks to me like the Doc is using a 3 inch piece of 1/2 inch hot water pipe as his coil former tube.
So what gauge mag wire and turn count is he using, now?   I have a signal generator, but only goes to 2MHz. So I would need to find a lower harmonic, within my range.

  I thought the Doc's psec was a more interesting circuit, as it did not need a high end SG signal, to light some LEDs. Kind of ironic, isn't it? What happened to tapping the Aether, ambient, "or whatever you want to call it"...

 I made a simplified 'Stiffler Loop' today using just one LED.  Everything is chopped down to bare bones.  I used a small Slayer Exciter to drive it.  How does this work?   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gK-8Sd3W5o

Hi that's an interesting frequency 27 Mhz since the resonance of the Universe will divide equally into it with no remainder
and so also will the resonance of the earth 8hz and 9hz and also 432hz brilliant 



AG

Older R/C flyers will remember 27MHz clearly, plus 49MHz and 72MHz.
But the Doc did state that the resonant freq of his Cree board was in the 13MHz range.
He's also stated that 13.6MHz is very important, because iirc it was seen on his spectrum analyzer to always be present.
Not all such arrays or LED's will be at that freq....so am presently swapping out crystals and looking at the scope for the cleanliness. The whole point being to help out folks with no signal generator if possible. If there are successes with a simple circuit, then it could be housed in a real bulb.
It would be neat to have a switch on bulbs for A/C mains or Exciter operation and also reminds of the data over the mains thing of the 1980's. Regular household gear would run on the 60Hz, Exciter stuff would run on the far higher frequency, on the same wiring. 

There isn't much cleanliness yet lol, attached is the shot of the 13.4MHz crystal. Looks like I need to adjust the cap values. Transistor is an H945 (had never seen the H variant, so desoldered it from a junker board and threw it in).


I think the point of these latest experiments is to run a bulb from far less power input than would regularly be used. Plus by the very nature of resonance, every bulb would be dimmable. These dollar store ones say 'non dimmable' for example. Also the use of a single wire is far safer than regular mains.

  Standing waves, or the Stiffler loop. "Which is it".  Both, perhaps. 

   Guys:
   Watch the Docs latest video, posted today, about that.   I think that I know where he's going with all this, but he's still a ways away.
These last few videos are just more tests to see what up with that.
   I would like to tag along, but don't have the high end SG.
   However, I do have a working Kacher circuit, able to output about 5000v, or higher. As well as a 2Mhz signal generator, that's just collecting dust. I don't know if any of that would really do, here.
   
   We need to know the exact turn count on his coils, including the new one he added just today.
And if it's pvc hot water pipe for his former? Along with any other info needed.

   As the Doc would like to see some replication efforts, instead of just comments without hands on, to back things up.
   I think that the Doc's been reading my post, and finally is showing the possible effects of the stray AC output on his AV plug/led tester, that he is now showing on his last video today. Although he calls it something else.
  So, bottom line is... That there is more to this than meets the eye.
  And, we could use his help, here on this thread, as well. 
  So,   Dr. Stiffler,  please sign in and give us a hand.