Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Dr Ronald Stiffler SEC technology  (Read 277048 times)

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: Dr Ronald Stiffler SEC technology
« Reply #405 on: June 29, 2018, 09:11:12 PM »
Hi Lidmotor,
We need to ask mikrovolt where he thinks to use this filter?
I ask this because my impression is he may mean to increase oscillator output amplitude by making impedance transformation.
Dr Stiffler applies filter mainly for the supply voltage rail filtering if I recall correctly. Maybe he used it at other places I cannot recall now.
Thanks,  Gyula

EDIT  I believe mikrovolt means to use this filter either at the output of a low level generator or crystal oscillator, to increase the amplitude of the low output.  This is possible because the output of this filter at the left hand side may have a high resonant amplitude when it is terminated via a single wire by a high impedance load like an L3 coil with the capacitive coupled LED array.
The 50 Ohm resistor on the right indicates the internal resistance of a generator, that is the input of the filter I believe.

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: Dr Ronald Stiffler SEC technology
« Reply #406 on: June 29, 2018, 09:33:38 PM »
Hi Itsu,

As I wrote about the tank and L3, both are a parallel resonant circuit connected in
series via the stray or distributed capacitors. I edited your schematic diagram.
I labeled the toroidal coil as Lt and the self capacitance of L3 as Ccoil.  I also included a Cstray capacitor
that very likely 'connects' the 'hv' end of L3 and the LED array back to the circuit via the
enviroment, closing the two parallel resonant LC circuits in a series connection with respect to
each other. 
Putting this otherwise: we have two LC parallel circuits in series connection via the Cstray capacitor.

This can give multiple resonances: Lt can make a series circuit with Ccoil at a certain frequency and the trimmer cap C_VAR
can also make yet another series circuit with L3, these are the main two additional series resonances
beside the two parallel resonant tanks. 

Maybe this is not so complicated in practice because we have a single frequency, 13.56 MHz
defined by the crystal and some of the resonances may be far from this frequency so their effect
may be neglected.  One thing is sure: you and others found that the output voltage of a generator
reduces when L3 with the LED load on it (attached by a single wire to the hot output) is tuned to
resonance at the generator output frequency.

We may need to further ponder on this.  8)
Gyula

Lidmotor

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 133
Re: Dr Ronald Stiffler SEC technology
« Reply #407 on: June 29, 2018, 09:53:22 PM »
Gyula---You are right.  Mikrovolt's filter is on the output not the input.  My mistake.  I was thinking of Doc's filters that he used on his circuits inputs. 

--Lidmotor

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: Dr Ronald Stiffler SEC technology
« Reply #408 on: June 29, 2018, 10:02:10 PM »
Okay Lidmotor, no problem.
The real "problem" is that with such RF voltage step up transformations by resonant circuits, filters etc,  the energy does not increase what we feed into the circuit at our own expense.   At least, so far there has been no evidence for this.

Of course, it is always useful to have a LED lamp which consumes less input energy than earlier when was bought as an off the shelf product.  And the source of energy can also come from a solar cell when practical.  These are useful pieces of advantage, no doubt.
Gyula

itsu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1845
Re: Dr Ronald Stiffler SEC technology
« Reply #409 on: June 29, 2018, 10:22:09 PM »

Gyula,

i thought that the L3 in combination with the alu backplate (capacitance) of the leds form a series LC circuit resonant
at 13.5MHZ (15MHz in my case).

The reason for that thought was that my FG voltage dips at resonance, meaning low impedance and high current
which is a mark of a series LC in resonance.

That would mean that i now have a parallel LC (tank circuit) in series with a series LC (L3 + leds).
But i see what you mean with your explaination.

Anyway, i have tried to match the tank LC only (so no L3 / leds connected) with a bigger variable C (6 -60pF)
to produce max oscillations at 13.5MHz.

The screenshot shows the result, but it blows the BC337-40 transistor within seconds.
So i am looking for a replacement transistor that can withstand that power.

Than i will start to match the L3 with leds to be spot on 13.5MHz too (rewind L3 probably).

Blue is collector signal,  yellow the tank output.
Itsu

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: Dr Ronald Stiffler SEC technology
« Reply #410 on: June 29, 2018, 10:42:04 PM »
Hi Itsu,

Very, very nice result with the 200 Vpp tank circuit voltage !   

I can agree with your reasonings for L3 forming a series circuit with the Alu backplate when viewing them from the generator output. This can also explain the reduction of the generator output voltage, also this loading is what takes the energy from the xtal oscillator. 

Regarding the transistor, can you think of a 100 V fast switching bipolar power transistor you may have in one of your drawers? IF you do not have such at hand, what component suppliers can you reach at your place to order from? I could help select from the choices in stock offered by them. You may PM if you wish of course.

Thanks,
Gyula


EDIT  if you have mouser.com in your country, here are some good transistor types, with very low collector-emitter saturation voltages and higher than 100 V collector voltage ratings:https://mouser.com/ProductDetail/Diodes-Incorporated/ZTX855STZ?qs=sGAEpiMZZMshyDBzk1%2fWizF0eVyYE44Z2nyOhAR0%252bHE%3d

https://mouser.com/ProductDetail/ON-Semiconductor/2SC4027S-E?qs=sGAEpiMZZMshyDBzk1%2fWiwdH0KqkRU51WtddJ3XM6TA%3d

https://mouser.com/ProductDetail/ON-Semiconductor/2SD1815S-E?qs=sGAEpiMZZMshyDBzk1%2fWiwdH0KqkRU513QpD3tszHKs=
 
If the links do not work for somebody, the transistor types are included in the links (ZTX855STZ, 2SC4027S-E, 2SD1815S-E).

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Dr Ronald Stiffler SEC technology
« Reply #411 on: June 30, 2018, 01:03:35 AM »
  Speaking of transistors...  I've been working on making a crystal oscillator, as well.  I'm using the 2SC5200 transistor,  an unknown value choke with some 2.5ohms resistance, a 100k ohm resistor, a 22pf cap, and a 100nf cap before the home made L3.  They are all used parts from my junk pile. Which is why they look so old and rusty. Oh, and also a 12.000MHz crystal.

  The problem that I'm having is that although I get the 12v input through all the filters and chokes, I only get 0.5v at the transistor base, between the emitter and base. I don't know if I should be measuring it another way. But, there does not seam to be enough voltage at the transistor base to properly switch.
 
The input is from severall lithium ion batteries,  there's 12v at the collector/emitter, but the transistor is not switching.   
Any ideas are welcome.                                     
   BTW:  I do have several of the 1815 and 945 transistors, if I can't make the 5200 turn on, but no 2222.
   
   PS:  Itsu:  Great to see you here, and showing some very nice results, as well.                                                                                                                                                                                               NickZ
« Last Edit: June 30, 2018, 05:13:19 AM by NickZ »

Slider2732

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
Re: Dr Ronald Stiffler SEC technology
« Reply #412 on: June 30, 2018, 04:50:37 AM »
Neither the 1815 or 945 are rubbish for this...they work.
Most especially the C1815 if GR variety, quite excellent.

You say 100ohms ? the one across the crystal ?
That's far too low :) it does need to be approx 100K.

If no joy, physically tapping the L3 may start it up if it doesn't start on its own.
I would advise putting an LED from Emitter to Base in reverse (positive of the LED to batt negative). That way, when the LED is on, the circuit is running.

mikrovolt

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: Dr Ronald Stiffler SEC technology
« Reply #413 on: June 30, 2018, 06:23:19 AM »
The crystal oscillator can be filtered to improve the wave shape.
A low distortion sine wave has better harmonics.
The theoretical LC values can be found for any impedance using the web page calculator listed above.







« Last Edit: June 30, 2018, 10:02:42 AM by mikrovolt »

itsu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1845
Re: Dr Ronald Stiffler SEC technology
« Reply #414 on: June 30, 2018, 11:11:13 AM »

Gyula,

i tried a BF869 which i had, but it did not oscillate somehow also a TIP122 with same result.
I will try to locate one of your mentioned transistors in my pile of circuitboards or else
order some, they look just what i need.

The switching off / on of the oscillator i see, seems to be due to it flipping into a 3th harmonics
(40MHz @ low amplitude) oscillation with the 5K trimmer pot at a certain point (low ohms value).

The reason for running at the 12V (and blowing the transistor) is that at that voltage the oscillator
seems to work best showing a nice sine wave etc.   
Lowering the voltage (keeping the transistor alive) seems to distort the signal it can produce.



Nick,

try to run the oscillator without the L3 coil attached first.
The L3 and leds causes strange influence on the oscillator, making it to stall often.


Itsu 

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: Dr Ronald Stiffler SEC technology
« Reply #415 on: June 30, 2018, 12:18:42 PM »
Hi Itsu,

I think you could connect a 22 to 33 pF ceramic capacitor across the base and emitter of the BF869 transistor, this may help oscillate the circuit. You surely know that the base and emitter is mixed up in the TO-202 casing if I recall correctly http://pdf.datasheetcatalog.com/datasheet/philips/BF871.pdf  (the first pin on the left is the emitter).

Also, the collector current can only be maximum 100 mA peak but still this would be worth trying.

I believe the use of a capacitor across the base-emitter would help reduce tendency for harmonic oscillations too.

When there is a certain resistor value set by the 5 kOhm trimmer, the DC operational point is changing because the 100 kOhm base resistor receives a reduced supply voltage due to the voltage drop across the series set resistor, this would involve the use of a 100-220 kOhm trimmer potmeter instead and control base current in such cases.  Alternatively, you could connect the top pin of the 100 kOhm resistor (or potmeter) directly to the positive input rail, to avoid the voltage drop effect for the base.
The BF869 has a much lower hFE than the earlier BC337-40 so adjusting the operation point is needed.

Gyula

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: Dr Ronald Stiffler SEC technology
« Reply #416 on: June 30, 2018, 02:33:46 PM »
Hi Nick,

The 0.5 V voltage level (I assume you meant DC voltage) across the base and emitter can be correct for a bipolar npn transistor.

Would like to ask whether you connected your scope probe across the collector and negative supply ground? to see any waveform?  IF you did check that and saw only the 12V DC level on the collector (flat line at around the 12 V height from the zero line and the time base set to some ten nanosecond), then try to follow what I suggested to itsu with the use of the base emitter capacitor and 100 kOhm trimmer potmeter.
In such oscillator circuit the transistor is normally needed to be DC biased to 10-20 mA collector current by the 100 kOhm but due the various hFE values of the different transistors, it should be adjusted individually.
What is the DC current draw for you oscillator from the 12 V battery input?  You can watch the input current on a DMM while you close the base and emitter pins of the transistor by a slightly wet finger: if the crystal oscillates then it probably stops when you touch the two pins so input current should change.  But the scope probe across the collector-emitter is better to use for checking.
I can see something sleeved onto the wire which connects the collector to the board: are they ferrite beads? What are they?  IF they are ferrit beads, then try to remove them, they are not needed in this oscillator.

Your choke coil may have come from an AC mains filter part of a monitor or tv set etc input power supply, it may have two windings and I think it is enough to use only one of them in the collector. Did you mean the 2.5 Ohm DC resistance for one winding or both in series? In an unfortunate case when you connected the two coils in series, they may cancel each other so that a very small inductance can remain for the collector in that case, preventing oscillations.   
There are numbers and letters on the label of the choke, try to search for either the top full line or the bottom by google, you may get a hit and the inductance of the choke may turn out. As Itsu suggested, do not connect coil L3 yet, first focus on the oscillator. 

EDIT:  perhaps you have the 1 kOhm resistor in the collector what I suspected to be ferrite bead I guess. And the choke coil is used for supply rail filtering? 


Gyula
« Last Edit: June 30, 2018, 05:00:59 PM by gyulasun »

itsu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1845
Re: Dr Ronald Stiffler SEC technology
« Reply #417 on: June 30, 2018, 10:38:28 PM »

I did not do much today, the weather is very nice still here.

I tried to use the BF869 (yes indeed different layout, as with all these transistors, so i always measure where the base is first).

But i could not get it running, not with the extra 20pF across base/emitter either.

Then i tried to attach the 100K to the 12V plus line instead of behind the 5K trimmer pot, but then even with the BC337 it did not oscillate anymore.
The base voltage in either case is around 650mV, so it seems to need the feedback line from the collector to oscillate.

Changing the 100K for a 200K trimmer pot (2x 100K in series) and varying the voltage there did not made it oscillate.

So i decided for now to stay with the old setup (bc337 transistor, fixed 100K to the collector voltage) and lower with the 5K trimmer pot the voltage on the collector so it stays around 30°C  (86°F) and still deliver about 100Vpp at the output.

The spectrum analyzer shows the noise this thing produces (even into the 500MHz range!), see screenshot 1.
The screenshot 2 shows the output signal (yellow), the collector signal (blue) and the base signal (purple).

Still need to redo the L3 coil so it resonates at 13.56MHz with the leds.

Itsu

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: Dr Ronald Stiffler SEC technology
« Reply #418 on: June 30, 2018, 11:56:19 PM »
    Well guys, I can see that I'm not the only one having a heck of a hard time trying to get this simple little device working.
     I changed the 2SC5200 transistor to a 1815, and it fired up, but only by touching the base, although that's not what its supposed to do. It also fires up by holding the L3 end, or touching it.  I don't have a 100k trim pot.
  I still get no light at the single led, with the diode loop, even though there's about 200v, showing on the scope, but no light on the bulb.
 
   I have no hairs on my head left to pull. I hope that you guys are having an easier time of it. No wonder it took the Doc 6 months just to get as far as he's shown. Makes me wonder what other tricks he has up his sleeve.

   Gyula:  The black (ferrite bead), is actually the choke (1000uH?) with 2.5 ohms of resistance mounted on the red wire going to the collector. There's NO numbers or letters on it
   The tiny ceramic cap (22pf) has only a 22 written on it. So, I'm guessing that it's the right one.
 
   I may remove all the AC filters from the board, and try again.  This small PCB was meant for another Kacher circuit project, but I'm using it, as it's the only board I have left to mount these parts on, until I can get some more of these blank boards to build on.
   
   My idea was to see how high of an output could be obtained by using a higher voltage transistor, but now, if I could only light the single led/loop, I'd be a happy camper.
   
   I ordered two different boost converters about a month ago. They have not arrived from China, by turtle mail, as yet.   
   Itsu, the parts that you shipped have not arrived, either. That's why I'm working on this Dr. Stiffler project, for now.   
 I hope that it pans out...

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: Dr Ronald Stiffler SEC technology
« Reply #419 on: July 01, 2018, 01:03:35 AM »
Hi Itsu,

Thanks for all your efforts and of course enjoy good weather and take your time as the most convenient.

I think the hFE values of transistors are that crucial, first of all, and cause the problem. Transistor types with lower hFE like say 40-50 (BF869) need at least 15-20 mA quiescent collector current where they already can amplify better.  A 100 kOhm resistor lets roughly 12V / 100k= 0.12 mA base current and with a hFE of 50 the collector current can be only around 50 x 0.12 = 6 mA.
A BC337-40 has a hFE of not less than 400. The same 100 kOhm resistor drives the same 0.12 mA current into the base and the collector current will be at least 400 x 0.12 = 48 mA, a huge diference. The MPSA types the Doc uses have a hFE of at least 120-150 or higher if I recall correctly.

I do not get why the oscillator is not working when the 100 kOhm is directly connected to the positive rail. It is ok that there is feedback created from the collector (or rather from the top wire of the tap) when you insert (set) a resistor value by the 5 k trimmer but it is negative feedback which reduces gain, yet it creates an operational point where the crystal is able to work.
But with the extra collector resistor set by the 5 k trimmer the transistor sees higher collector impedance hence able to amplify maybe better,  I would think. You may say then that the higher collector impedance is present also when the 100 kOhm is directly on the positive rail, yet the oscillator does not work. I know it is easy to say that conditions for oscillations are not insured in the latter case... and I cannot know the actual circumstances, details.Regarding the capacitor between the base-emitter, I may have said too little value (20 pF), it can go up to 40-50 pF or higher too. The 22 pF across the collector-emitter can also be increased but then the 18 turns on the toroidal core should be reduced by 1-2 turns to bring back the resonant frequency of the tank (unless C_var can compensate it).

Thanks, Gyula


Hi Nick,   

Sorry for your finding this hard to build, it is difficult to help, so many issues may develop and even one of such issues is enough for the oscillator not to work.  If the choke in the collector is not a choke with at least some hundred uH value than the transistor with relatively low hFE could not amplify enough.  The 2.5 Ohm choke resistance may indicate it more than likely has 1000 uH, only an L meter can verify it (or there are means to measure it otherwise). The label with letters and number are on the ferrite mains filter and that was I thought you use it in the collector as the choke.   Gyula