here will be a gentleman's rules Terms of service investigation into the claims [ 'supported claims"]
of member Synchro 1
I leave the floor to Synchro ...
here is one unanswered question from Synchro
Which way does current flow in a Ruhmkopff Secondary Coil when the current's interrupted in the primary and can you define "Negative Current"?
We know that the serial bifilar coil can cancel self inductance, and also that the single wire is not an inductor.
Even a single, straight piece of wire has some inductance![/left]We generally associate inductance with a loop or coil of wire. However, even a straight piece of wire, or your electrode, has some self-inductance. This can be important if you are dealing with low impedances (< 1 ohm) at high frequencies (> 10kHz).
@evostars,(emphasis mine)
Discharging a capacitor is like decanting water from a five gallon jug; Slow starting, followed by a strong gush at .67, tapering off to a slow flow: Charging exactly the reverse, max charge rate at .33 capacity:
@Tinman,
Current reverses direction and travels in the same direction at the same time like the 60 Hz A.C. current in our overhead transmission lines; Like boarding a bus and moving toward the rear while the bus is accelerating forward. It may appear to a stationary observer that the bus passenger is standing still.
Here's another claim, just made today.Ha, Ha! you do know some of these people are anly ten years old ;) yeah!
(emphasis mine)
So why don't both LEDs flash in my Coil Current Direction (2) demonstration?
And I'll bet that a lot of power distribution system engineers would be very surprised to hear that electrical current in wires flows in two opposite directions at the same time.
Of course if some solid experimental proof exists of this claim...................... we all would like to know about it.
:D Well, the answer to the first part is right there in Faraday's Law of Induction.Hi, Mr Tinsel, i'm aware of the characteristics you mention above but I do so hate reinventing the wheel so to speak, you must have noticed some of Nelson's experiments he calls 'electron traps' I would have thought you might have some 'light' to through on this subject, with your background as we are still learning.
-E=d(B)/dt
So to maximize E, you want to maximize the change in B and/or minimize the change in time. This means it isn't the pulse _width_ that is most important for high EMF, but rather the pulse rise and fall times for a given current in the pulse. High currents coming on and going off in the minimum amount of time. The pulse _width_ will then be important (in the form of frequency and duty cycle of pulsation) to allow the RLC bits enough time to charge/discharge to the required degree before the next pulse comes along. A well-designed Tesla Coil of modern form does all this explicitly, and it is the reason why Tesla spent so much time on spark gaps of various kinds.
Is it possible to get a "gain" or not? Well that all depends on what you mean by "gain". Certainly you can push the EMF or BEMF to ridiculously high voltages by using fast rise/fall times. By the right combination of frequency and VRSWR (voltage rise by standing wave resonance) can you entrain extra energy from "somewhere" (environment, space, vacuum, water, ten-year-olds, etc)... well, that's the 64 dollar question, isn't it. ???
(But I wouldn't put my money on the ten-year-olds.) ;)
AlienGreyThanks for the information young Ramset, I have done some tests already myself but found it difficult tracing Nelsons circuit in his videos on several of his projects, with no avail, even after chatting to Nelson himself, of course, there are so many variables like rewinding MOT' and Earth loops to water supply Earths ect, and of course different metals in the windings, Anyway when might I ask is this learning curve about to happen, any ideas ? note Tesla does appear to like the use or iron in his projects, i don't know the truth on this being a sauce of free electrons or not.
sir,
not trying to speak for TinselKoala here, this Topic "Nelson circuit"[or other name ??] will be opened soon [with Nelson's permission [already approved]]
and some have asked Tinsel for a build up of this circuit ,for discussion here so as to learn
what is possible there [others will be building too]
it will be a moderated topic [been much disrespect of Topics lately Stefan will be fixing that soon ].
respectfully
Chet K
Well, unlike some other people posting on this forum (without presenting a lick of proof) I do not pretend to "know" how to achieve OU performance in an electrical circuit. Yet!
However I suspect that IF it can be done, it will involve stressing space with extremely high voltage gradients and very fast transitions. See the papers published in mainstream physics journals by Hal Puthoff and Michael Ibison for some hints and some justification for my "guesses" in this matter. Polarizing the vacuum, changing the refractive index of space itself, tapping the real ZPE (not some bogus dreamlike fiction of what ZPE is), entraining environmental energy (as Tesla said "tapping the wheelworks of Nature) ... these are things that will require not only careful and knowledgeable construction of apparatus but also a solid grounding in actual physics. And maybe these things are simply beyond the reach of hopeful amateurs like us, or maybe not. Only careful and knowledgeable experimentation, along with hard criticism when stuff that is simply wrong is tossed about, will have any chance of finding out.
When people here repeat silly conjectures that are easily proven wrong, or buy into bogus models of physical reality that in fact do not represent actual reality, that does a real disservice to everyone who is honestly experimenting along these lines. Censorship does not help when it is not based in reality. It is important to discuss even the false claims, by showing them to be false so that others do not make the same errors. Claims without evidence, or blindly falling into hopeful belief of fairy tales or money-grubbing YouTubers, can be dismissed as the fictions they are.
How about coil shorting multiple times when it is almost saturated by magnetic field ? ::)
Well, unlike some other people posting on this forum (without presenting a lick of proof) I do not pretend to "know" how to achieve OU performance in an electrical circuit. Yet!So how come Henry Moray managed it? And so did Tesla extract energy from an iron core and early morse code telex transmissions, and why did Gray at Oxford university need to 'doctor' Maxwell's calculations and even Albert Einstein said he found gross errors in Greys doctored publication of Maxwell's publication. ect extra.
However I suspect that IF it can be done, it will involve stressing space with extremely high voltage gradients and very fast transitions. See the papers published in mainstream physics journals by Hal Puthoff and Michael Ibison for some hints and some justification for my "guesses" in this matter. Polarizing the vacuum, changing the refractive index of space itself, tapping the real ZPE (not some bogus dreamlike fiction of what ZPE is), entraining environmental energy (as Tesla said "tapping the wheelworks of Nature) ... these are things that will require not only careful and knowledgeable construction of apparatus but also a solid grounding in actual physics. And maybe these things are simply beyond the reach of hopeful amateurs like us, or maybe not. Only careful and knowledgeable experimentation, along with hard criticism when stuff that is simply wrong is tossed about, will have any chance of finding out.
When people here repeat silly conjectures that are easily proven wrong, or buy into bogus models of physical reality that in fact do not represent actual reality, that does a real disservice to everyone who is honestly experimenting along these lines. Censorship does not help when it is not based in reality. It is important to discuss even the false claims, by showing them to be false so that others do not make the same errors. Claims without evidence, or blindly falling into hopeful belief of fairy tales or money-grubbing YouTubers, can be dismissed as the fictions they are.
l have found that in every coil there exists a certain relation between its self-induction and capacity that permits a current of given frequency and potential to pass through it with no other opposition than that of ohmic resistance, or, in other words, as though it possessed no self-induction. This is due to the mutual relations existing between the special character of the current and the self-induction and capacity of the coil, the latter quantity being just capable of neutralizing the self-induction for that frequency. It is well known that the higher the frequency or potential difference of the current the smaller the capacity required to counteract the self-induction; hence, in any coil, however small the capacity, it may be sufficient for the purpose stated if the proper conditions in other respects be secured.
I just want to repeat a passage from Tesla's patent 512340:So if there is no such thing as zero point energy where did Henry Moray get it from, and why is Never a Strate Answer so worried about Sun plasma attacks from the sun frying their warmongering space crap ;)? and where does the static electricity surrounding our planet come from, and isn't it the cosmic radiation from the sun's solar winds he was using by somehow turning into it ? which I'm not going into here, but by charging the local area of collection, he would be effectively raising the altitude of his collection dish and since everything is a frequency.
(emphasis mine)
However I suspect that IF it can be done, it will involve stressing space with extremely high voltage gradients and very fast transitions. See the papers published in mainstream physics journals by Hal Puthoff and Michael Ibison for some hints and some justification for my "guesses" in this matter. Polarizing the vacuum, changing the refractive index of space itself, tapping the real ZPE (not some bogus dreamlike fiction of what ZPE is), entraining environmental energy (as Tesla said "tapping the wheelworks of Nature) ... these are things that will require not only careful and knowledgeable construction of apparatus but also a solid grounding in actual physics. And maybe these things are simply beyond the reach of hopeful amateurs like us, or maybe not. Only careful and knowledgeable experimentation, along with hard criticism when stuff that is simply wrong is tossed about, will have any chance of finding out.
When people here repeat silly conjectures that are easily proven wrong, or buy into bogus models of physical reality that in fact do not represent actual reality, that does a real disservice to everyone who is honestly experimenting along these lines. Censorship does not help when it is not based in reality. It is important to discuss even the false claims, by showing them to be false so that others do not make the same errors. Claims without evidence, or blindly falling into hopeful belief of fairy tales or money-grubbing YouTubers, can be dismissed as the fictions they are.
Where did I say there was "No such thing" as ZPE? Look up Hal Puthoff's papers. What I did say and mean is that most people in these forums who use the term "ZPE" don't know what they are talking about and are making up some fantasy thing they think is ZPE but isn't.Thanks for defining an explanation you saved me the trouble although the Atmosphere and magnet field does not stop everything as we are actually bombarded with varying degrees of radiation and it's increasing as petrochemicals destroys our atmosphere and the earth's magnetic field is reported at an all time low ect
Where did Moray get his energy? I have some guesses about that, but they don't involve either real ZPE or the forum fictitious ZPE. :o
The threat to satellites, especially those in geosynchronous or geostationary orbits, from solar plasma discharges (more properly called Corona Mass Ejections, CME, or solar flares) is very real, because they are way up in space and are not protected by the Earth's atmosphere and magnetic field as much as we are here on the ground. However, should a big CME strike the Earth, it will still create havoc both with satellites and here on the ground, as enough energy will couple into the wires of the electric grid to blow out a bunch of stuff, including the hard-to-replace grid transformers. Had such a large CME / flare event happened during the Apollo moonwalk missions, the astronauts would have been toast.
None of this is "secret" so I don't know why you bring up the "Not So Amigos" .
The threat to satellites, especially those in geosynchronous or geostationary orbits, from solar plasma discharges (more properly called Corona Mass Ejections, CME, or solar flares) is very real, because they are way up in space and are not protected by the Earth's atmosphere and magnetic field as much as we are here on the ground. However, should a big CME strike the Earth, it will still create havoc both with satellites and here on the ground, as enough energy will couple into the wires of the electric grid to blow out a bunch of stuff, including the hard-to-replace grid transformers. Had such a large CME / flare event happened during the Apollo moonwalk missions, the astronauts would have been toast.