Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Home Nucler Reactor class 180  (Read 28919 times)

NKE

  • Guest
Home Nucler Reactor class 180
« on: March 25, 2017, 02:06:06 PM »
I am presenting the parameters of a new series of houme reactors based on IE3 engines.

1. Engine power (kW)                  5.5             7.5
2. Heat production (kWh)             7.5           10.5
3. Workhead efficiency (%)         182*          187*
4. Power consumption (kWh)         6.5           9.1
5. Total process efficiency (%) 115            115 (2:4)
6. Heated surface (sqm)              200           320
7. Equivalent to a coal furnace (kW) 25         35

For heating the surface of 100 sqm the 5.5 kW engine needs 4 hours of operation, 7.5 kW motor only 3.
In Poland according to the current prices of electricity and coal this device produces heat 3 x cheaper than carbon or gas.

For Germans mehr info: http://nspap.livejournal.com/122015.html
« Last Edit: March 25, 2017, 07:12:24 PM by NKE »

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2017, 04:05:45 PM »
Sir
Is this a  cavitation device ?

more info would be great !! ,thanks for sharing this .

respectfully
Chet K

citfta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
« Reply #2 on: April 03, 2017, 08:30:40 PM »
Hi Chet,

I don't believe this is a cavitation device.  Cavitation causes damage to the impeller.  Also cavitation creates a tremendous load on the driving source.  This appears to be a centrifugal pump.  The interesting thing about a centrifugal pump is that as you restrict the discharge side of the pump the power requirement from the driving source goes DOWN.  However the turbulence inside the pump causes the liquid to heat up.  I have seen water from a fire truck come out steaming because someone forgot to leave at least one discharge line open to allow a flow of water through the pump.  I am not so certain that heating water this way is the most efficient way to do it but I know it does work.

The title for this thread seems to be somewhat misleading as I see no connection to anything nuclear about this device.

Carroll

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
« Reply #3 on: April 03, 2017, 08:41:17 PM »
NKE
do they speak of the actual process which produces excess energy ?
is it a friction [oil bath ] heater ?
or ?


I have to agree.....  a person would be silly to run all of that on electricity, unless it saved money ?
after all .....the worlds most efficient electric heater is a resistor...

we did caloric testing a few years Back on a friction disc oil bath heater and found a resistive heating element out performed it!
I believe the member here was user OilPiggy [it was his system]

also there was [maybe still is] a system down in Albany Georgia {USA} which utilized cavitation or friction.
can't remember the company name ...?
will look into that ..

thanks
Chet K
PS
note I see Carroll posted while I was plunking


forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
« Reply #5 on: April 03, 2017, 09:15:21 PM »
“We used magnetic flux to generate electricity which the conventional magnet cannot. It consists of a shaft fixed with eight neodymium magnets which rotates when an initial current is passed through the field coils. The electricity is then passed from the copper coil to a step-up transformer which steps up the power voltage from 32 volts to 200 volts to power the output of the generator,” they said.[/font][/size]


remember http://www.keelynet.com/images/generatornigerian.jpg

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
« Reply #6 on: April 04, 2017, 12:17:46 AM »
NKE
we have members in your country, how can we test this or see a unit ??
thx
Chet

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
« Reply #7 on: April 04, 2017, 03:05:00 PM »
which members ramset ?

kampen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 132
Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
« Reply #8 on: April 04, 2017, 07:49:51 PM »
Free Energy Equinox It Runs On Water Overunity 
Have a look at this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_5tpAWl7IY

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
« Reply #9 on: April 05, 2017, 12:08:48 PM »
Forest
sorry I took so long to respond ,I had to go away on a daytrip for work

@forest quote
which members ramset ?
end quote

We have members here [and elsewhere] all over the globe ,
 a true anomaly would be investigated ,it would at times require
 covering some distance ,but it is doable , other members here offer to cover expenses .


would you assist in an investigation of this tech ?
if we can get more qualifying info and can arrange a visit ?

of course first things first ,

is this claim a true anomaly ? 7500 watts heating a 100 square meter home... Needs more info to explain ??
Much more info...

respectfully
Chet K






pix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 500
Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
« Reply #10 on: April 05, 2017, 12:38:39 PM »

I am presenting the parameters of a new series of houme reactors based on IE3 engines.

1. Engine power (kW)                  5.5             7.5
2. Heat production (kWh)             7.5           10.5
3. Workhead efficiency (%)         182*          187*
4. Power consumption (kWh)         6.5           9.1
5. Total process efficiency (%) 115            115 (2:4)
6. Heated surface (sqm)              200           320
7. Equivalent to a coal furnace (kW) 25         35

For heating the surface of 100 sqm the 5.5 kW engine needs 4 hours of operation, 7.5 kW motor only 3.
In Poland according to the current prices of electricity and coal this device produces heat 3 x cheaper than carbon or gas.

For Germans mehr info: http://nspap.livejournal.com/122015.html


Ten same bullshit from infamous Dr.No.
A few years ago he was banned from this website due to propagation of nazi propaganda.
This is the same picture " nuclear reactor" he was presenting years ago.

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
« Reply #11 on: April 05, 2017, 02:08:01 PM »
Pix
He did seem familiar ??
It has always been my experience when a man is sincere he will make a path to assist in an investigation of his claim.

here it seems no such path is offered ?
much better data would be a start ....

respectfully
Chet K
PS
@Pix
Your TPU Patent is explored here


http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=302.375 [start at reply 386]

as always, if it bears fruit it will be presented at the thread here and elsewhere


pix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 500
Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
« Reply #12 on: April 05, 2017, 03:10:15 PM »

Pix
He did seem familiar ??
It has always been my experience when a man is sincere he will make a path to assist in an investigation of his claim.

here it seems no such path is offered ?
much better data would be a start ....

respectfully
Chet K
PS
@Pix
Your TPU Patent is explored here


http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=302.375 [start at reply 386]

as always, if it bears fruit it will be presented at the thread here and elsewhere


Hi Ramset,
I know about the other page. Myself I am going to perform a test, everything is ready except copper wire 0.75mm I am still waiting to be delivered.
Patent itself looks promising, too many common things with TPU.


Regarding this bullshit "Home nuclear reactor" that looks for me like typical household electric water heater with pump running in closed loop.
Try to run pump driven by 5kW electric motor closed loop- of course it will heat up , all this electrical energy spent on fluid circulation must manifest itself in the heat losses.
It is wery inefficient method of heating up the fluid.
Regarding this guy- I remember him, he is changing his nicknames, a few years ago he named himself "Dr No". He was telling sick nazi propaganda.
He has been removed by Stefan from OU .
Here is a page he is referring to:
http://nspap.livejournal.com/122015.html
And now he is here again.


ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
« Reply #13 on: April 05, 2017, 03:45:29 PM »
Pix
so this is more A Political Guy who wants to spread his news?

Not a true FE  researcher ?

regarding the build at the other forum, most members do not like having to build elsewhere
its just over here the moderation is a problem [no offence to Stefan he is a hero for keeping this going as a one man band.

and over at OUR Peter is also keeping a fulltime job going and trying to run a forum [which is completely dedicated to open source] ,he does not even allow advertising on his site but also had to close membership because of BOT attacks.

ultimately it is hoped that moderation can be instilled here by volunteers who have good history ...[slow process]

respectfully [and with gratitude]
Chet K



 

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
« Reply #14 on: April 05, 2017, 04:44:39 PM »
Not a true FE researcher?

Sorry but I do not do any tests anymore because it makes no sense.  :-\


Not a true FE researcher. QED.