Evostars
My radiant half bridge circuit design does not work as I intended it to work.
Luckily the PCB is still functional as it is able to switch 2 mosfets in series, to produce high voltage impulses (3500v).
In this video I explain what it wrong with the circuit using 3 simple experiments.
I also show how to modify the circuit for series mosfet switching.
https://youtu.be/bl4xk8CMe8I
Your getting there but you have a very long way to go my friend...
One could ask how do I know you among so many are on the right track?.
It was the statement you made implying something is inherently flawed between our understanding of
the relationship between the electric and magnetic fields with respect to induction.
You are correct and my first working device proving as much was estimated to have a COP>100.
The holy grail, the be all end all of all we wish to know is in fact bullshit, it's just an electrical machine based on know principals.
However, we have to understand what's going on in our circuits from a more absolute perspective, the sum of all forces present.
Consider the circuits in the picture posted below.
The circuit labelled inductive isolation can produce an inductive impulse on the make and break of the circuit.
That is, what Tesla called an inductive discharge can in fact be produced on a switch closure and opening provided two switches are utilized as shown.
I realized this probably a decade ago when Tesla claimed the make and break of a circuit could produce the same results which I didn't believe initially.
Hence the reason I did the experiments and in effect prove myself wrong again. There is more here than I could possibly explain and
it would take days to bring you up to speed.
As well, on the picture labelled "impulse output", this is kind of comical. You see I have decades of experience and read thousands of
patents and there was always one anomaly common to them. I didn't get it initially so I will present the problem to you. Suppose we
kept seeing double spark gaps, double switches or back to back diodes as a threshold detector/pseudo spark gap... to what end, why?.
The back to back diodes are a no brainer and it's simply a threshold detector or negative resistance meant to mimic a spark gap.
The voltage rises to a given threshold then conducts all at once within a short time period. A parallel capacitance can reduce the
frequency and increase the magnitude not unlike most negative resistance circuits known in the art. It's kind of comical that almost
all the supposed experts were so amateur that they thought back to back diodes in a circuit was a mistake, not being able to recognize
a threshold detector when they saw one... which is amateur in my opinion.
Your on the right track and all you need to do now is follow through being as objective as you can.
Believe nothing others say, they cannot help you as I explained above, there are no experts only strong opinions
which are generally misguided. Do you know what really pissed me off?, the fact that all these brilliant
FE inventors claimed the process is so simple even a child could understand it but I couldn't.
Then once I did understand FE I understood I was thinking like a child, believing others unfounded bullshit not based on reality.
There lies the contradiction, doesn't it?.
Regards
AC