Solid States Devices > TPU replications
A Simple Question About TPU Replication Attempts
Eighthman:
I scanned through as many pages as I can in regard to TPU replication attempts. The one thing I don't see is any attempt to simply switch a field in sequence around the 4 quadrants of a coil.
Think of it like squeezing a toothpaste tube, first at the bottom, then further up, then in the middle and finally near the top. Now, visualize doing this around a circle, neatly , one pie-quarter at a time.
You brave guys have tested a lot with regard to different harmonics and frequencies and differing pulse widths but I can't find this simple sort of test completed.
I apologize if I somehow missed this but the attempts I observe (here and elsewhere) seem to pursue other motions and notions.
Jeg:
--- Quote from: Eighthman on March 10, 2017, 06:17:11 PM ---I scanned through as many pages as I can in regard to TPU replication attempts. The one thing I don't see is any attempt to simply switch a field in sequence around the 4 quadrants of a coil.
Think of it like squeezing a toothpaste tube, first at the bottom, then further up, then in the middle and finally near the top. Now, visualize doing this around a circle, neatly , one pie-quarter at a time.
You brave guys have tested a lot with regard to different harmonics and frequencies and differing pulse widths but I can't find this simple sort of test completed.
I apologize if I somehow missed this but the attempts I observe (here and elsewhere) seem to pursue other motions and notions.
--- End quote ---
Hey Eightman ;)
Some people have already been there like at the below link. But what makes you think that this by itself will give an increased output in terms of energy?
http://underservice.org/index.php?topic=238.0
Eighthman:
Thanks for getting back to me. I read thru the pages you provided. It seems that Akula had a promising design. Some guy named Vincent claims it is fake and then the thread goes off into discussing different designs, particularly two coil pulsing - so I don't know what to think about it. It looks like Akula did not have an inner coil, forming a circle with coils at the 4 quadrants, so it looks pretty close to what I think but not all the way.
My reasoning is this:
1) the Mark device was reported to have a gyroscopic feel, so rotation of fields must be involved, as there was no spinning part in the device. I can't fully explain how fields could produce inertia but as with my other posts, nobody can really explain why magnetic fields don't act as a gyroscope in normal use anyway.
2) Durbin said it involved fields switched in quadrature. The spinning compass needle also makes the field movement explicit - otherwise it wouldn't spin.
3) There is a belief that Marks copied the Tesla invention in which 4 coils surround a larger circular coil.
4) Finally - and this is a huge intuitive leap - I believe Mark may have found an electromagnetic way to duplicate unbalanced centrifugal movement using coils. I have been looking for a way to imitate the Linevich device using fields instead of complicated mechanical drives. I think it is this unbalanced inertial movement that may be the key to free energy as shown in a number of devices, including Schauberger.
I can clarify further if anything I said isn't intelligible.
forest:
Good,I believe this is the right path ;) Magnetic field is the source of energy !
Eighthman:
I forgot to add the Bob Boyce claims. He uses some sort of ferrite core with a main winding, with three neatly spaced switched coils on top. He's the only person I know of to make a device similar to Mark's to also claim extreme or amazing effects.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version