Well, im not going to do your homework for you


This has been discussed on this forum somewhere
inside those threads are other members experiments
The Nasa video was linked a few times (spacelab possibly?)


Of course ignoring physics, and imagining that i would make things up
just to prohibit you from exploring, is your choice to do.


Feel free to learn first hand from your own personal experience:
If you think you can make it do what you think it will do
Then build one.

When you are doing construction,
The best way to get something to the top floor
is to put it in a bucket, on a pulley and the other bucket
is filled with trash on the way down


The dumb waiter elevator works the same


i’m pretty sure that has been going on since way before
the scientists wanted to examine the math
As Archimedes describes in the 2nd century B.C.,
mechanical systems were already well developed




Lets say we have a spring in the bottom of the bucket that set and latched
when the heavy weight hit the ground
And the value of the energy stored in this spring
were exactly equal to the impact force of the heavy weight


Then we place that spring underneath the smaller weight
at exactly the moment the large weight hits the ground
(before gravity has a chance to make the downward acceleration positive again)
And fired off the spring


E = m(large)*9.8*h(initial) = m(small)*9.8*h(final)


= m(large)*1 = m(small) * h(final)
h(final)= m(large)/m(small)
= 11.1m
11.1 * 9.8 * .1 = 10.878j
1 * 11.1 * 9.8 = 10.878j

Then show the M.I.T. Version that does not follow the known equations above.


If it does what you say, just use the potential energy of the smaller mass to reset the larger mass
And have (97x excess?) to use for something else
While the larger mass throws another small mass into the sky


(or did you miss a decimal?)

You might need to ask for a calculator for Christmas.

You don’t show your work, so its hard to tell
But you appear to be off by 1 decimal, twice
Resulting in 100x a value you should have ended up with


I’m not here to correct your work,
I have shown above the mathematical solution.


If you are convinced that it will work


Then build it

BUONGIORNO COME STAI.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiAZF0pMfyA

Bene ! Salute !

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLNLePqVaQU&t=310sdispositivo gravi centrifugo per la produzione di energia elettrica
Comments
    David Davids    vor 2 Jahren   some info.     at 1:15, the  input force  mechanism, at left, has been correctly conceived; but poorly executed.    in it, reduction-MA  is converted to  INHERENT MA; in the large-radius wheel.     power is, correctly, taken off at a radius that is  smaller than the radius at which at which force was applied.   Mechanical Advantage.      THEN,  the   rotary output force is, stoopidly,  converted to  Reciprocating  motion.     ultimately, this machine does  Nothing.     there is  NO  energy gain in the  secondary mechanism;  in fact, the asymmetrical orbiting mass   is  acting  as a    governor/speed limiter.        any attempt to utilize gravity to achieve an energy gain, Will fail.     why is this true.       any apparent  energy gain on the 'downhill-side'  is ALWAYS  offset, by the Energy Required  to  OVERCOME  gravity, on the 'uphill-side'.     if interested, review my   ou- via-MA    research.      googletranslate        governor  https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNSWIWz7trnMo4Wdbug0j9A/videos
Best greeting to Seychelles their fishermans,in search of Excellence, , or nice mermaid/-s  !
Adeus

OCWL
 

FAIRLY SIMILAR TO MR SKINNER GRAVITY MACHINE BUT IN REVERSE ROUND
ABOUT WAY.