Language:
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

### GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

Many thanks.

# New Book

Products

WaterMotor kit

### Statistics

• Total Posts: 893924
• Total Topics: 15709
• Online Today: 44
• Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
• Users: 2
• Guests: 11
• Total: 13

### Author Topic: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)  (Read 88949 times)

#### that_prophet

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 492
##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #135 on: March 18, 2017, 09:44:58 AM »
This uses the 100 cm of moving belt that comes off of one single rotation of a large 100 cm circumference pulley, that only costs a mere spark of current, the minute amount of current that a DC motor takes to rotate one full rotation. This moving belt is run past 10 small pulleys of 1 cm circumference, to multiply your total # of rotations. Then by simply adding AC generators to these small pulleys, we can multiply the amount of AC electricity. Yes, by adding multiple small 1 cm circumference pulleys to the same belt as the large 100 cm circumference pulley, we can multiply the # of rotations, and by adding AC generators, we can multiply the amount of AC electricity.

On one half of this system we are using the 100 cm of moving belt, off the single rotation of a 100 cm circumference pulley to wind up massive voltage, by multiplying the # of rotations of free running AC generators on 10 small-1 cm circumference pulleys, 10X100=1000. Then, on the other side of this, we are using the high amount of voltage to rotate the large 100 cm pulley one single time.

These many small pulleys run free of most any torque, because they are only winding up massive voltage, as they only need to generate the small bit of DC current, that is needed to rotate the DC motor one single time. This DC motor has a large 100 cm circumference pulley, producing 100 cm of moving belt to work with. I can say this because torque is needed to generate power, and P=IV, which is, power is equal to “I”-current times “V”oltage. Since the current is practically zero, and practically zero times even massive voltage is still equal to practically zero power=torque. http://free-energy.yolasite.com/

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #135 on: March 18, 2017, 09:44:58 AM »

#### Paul-R

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1978
##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #136 on: March 18, 2017, 01:41:16 PM »
Joe
working on getting you that Sim so you can model these things
trying to get one with some support so you can get help working with it.
The software needs to be "Ezekiel enabled" or it won't produce the daft results that that_prphet requires to be confirmed.

#### that_prophet

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 492
##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #137 on: March 19, 2017, 11:17:56 AM »
it only has to produce 100 cm of moving belt, off the one rotation of a 100 cm circumference pulley, and then produce 100 rotations for every small1 cm circumference pulley that you attach. Then by adding AC generators to these small pulleys,,, it produces 100 cycles of AC electricity. That is trading one rotation for 100 rotations, + with AC electricity this can be very beneficial

The software needs to be "Ezekiel enabled" or it won't produce the daft results that that_prphet requires to be confirmed.

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #137 on: March 19, 2017, 11:17:56 AM »

#### that_prophet

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 492
##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #138 on: March 21, 2017, 11:15:01 AM »
This works on the simple principle of through pulley mechanics, being able to trade one revolution of a 100 cm circumference pulley for 100 rotations of a one centimeter circumference pulley. This can be very significant, when you are talking about AC electricity, which is created by rotations. So, the more rotations can mean more AC electricity. So, in effect, you are using pulleys to multiply your AC electricity.

#### SkyWatcher123

• Hero Member
• Posts: 820
##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #139 on: March 23, 2017, 05:17:23 PM »
Hi all, Hi that_prophet, i just had a thought about an easier design, that may operate with the same pulley mechanics prophet is looking for.
Though this does not use individual pulleys.
How about one very large rotor wheel, like 3 feet in diameter or greater, with magnets around perimeter or close to edge.
This big magnet wheel could be separate mounted with dedicated bearings, then shaft coupler or chain or belt drive.
Then, one coil mounted at periphery, would act as the small pulley at alternator.
Then as many coils as one likes can be placed around wheel, next to the magnets.
This seems like the same principle.
One turn of the drive motor, will yield possibly 50 or more coil/magnet interactions, per coil, depending on how many magnets are on the wheel.
Add another coil and we have 100 coil/magnet interactions per drive motor turn.
Now couple this setup, with Thane Heins delayed lentz reaction coil design and things could get interesting.
Does this sound equivalent to your design principals that_prophet?
peace love light

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #139 on: March 23, 2017, 05:17:23 PM »

#### Paul-R

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1978
##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #140 on: March 23, 2017, 06:13:14 PM »

How about one very large rotor wheel, like 3 feet in diameter or greater, with magnets around perimeter or close to edge.
This big magnet wheel could be separate mounted with dedicated bearings, then shaft coupler or chain or belt drive.
Then, one coil mounted at periphery, would act as the small pulley at alternator.
Then as many coils as one likes can be placed around wheel, next to the magnets.
I think you'll find this is described in Patrick's Chapter 2.

#### SkyWatcher123

• Hero Member
• Posts: 820
##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #141 on: March 24, 2017, 03:22:12 AM »
Hi paul, yes i think if i recall correctly, that is the work done by lee tseung or someone else.
Though i don't think they have also implemented Thane Heinz coil methods.
So that could make things even more interesting, beyond the leverage, pulley mechanics advantage that, that_prophet is talking about.
peace love light

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #141 on: March 24, 2017, 03:22:12 AM »

#### that_prophet

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 492
##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #142 on: March 24, 2017, 10:00:08 AM »
To rotate your DC motor you need massive voltage, + practically zero current, only enough current to crank over thee DC drive motor one single rotation. With this one rotation of your DC motor, you are also rotating a 100 cm circumference pulley, which gives you 100 cm of moving belt. If you run this moving belt past 10 one centimeter circumference pulleys with AC generators attached, you would end up with 10X100=1000 cycles of AC electricity.  These 1000 cycles of AC electricity are running free of practically any torque, as they are used to wind up the massive voltage that is needed to crank over you DC motor.
-
Torque is caused when you are generating power, and P=IV or Power is equal to “I”-current times Voltage. Since practically zero current times even massive voltage, still equals practically zero, there is practically zero power + torque being created. So, each half of this system is powered by the other half of this system, where the many cycles of the AC generators are just winding up massive voltage, which is needed to crank over your DC motor just one single time.

#### SkyWatcher123

• Hero Member
• Posts: 820
##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #143 on: March 25, 2017, 07:43:14 PM »
Hi that_prophet, did you look at previous page, the post i made about a possible equivalent design.
Let me know if you think it fulfills the operating principal.
peace love light

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #143 on: March 25, 2017, 07:43:14 PM »

#### that_prophet

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 492
##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #144 on: March 26, 2017, 12:01:37 PM »
This free energy method, (GEM=Geometrical Electricity Multiplication) is super simple, in that it uses multiple # of different sizes of pulleys to multiply the total # of rotations. Then by simply adding AC generators to these multiple # of mini-pulleys, we can actually multiply AC electricity.
-
Please remember, these AC generators run free of most all torque or resistance, + are like free running electric motors, with the only resistance being the viscosity of the bearing lubricant. These 10 AC generators only need to generate the minute amount of DC current to rotate this one DC motor one single time. That’s practically no current divided by 1000 rotations, which is practically 0 divided by 1000. So you only need 1000th of practically nothing for current, and practically zero current times even massive amounts of voltage still equals practically zero. In being easily able to generate this miniscule amount of current, the amount to rotate a DC motor one single time. You now have the free output of a self powering set of 10 AC generators, along with the single DC motor’s output.
-
You do not understand,,, this is sooooo…… simple,,,
This takes the 100 cm of belt that comes off the single rotation of a 100 cm circumference pulley,
+ runs this length of belt past 10 mini-pulleys of thee one centimeter circumference pulleys, which gives you 10X100=1000 rotations + by simply adding 10 AC generators, you can have 1000 cycles of AC electricity.
-
So although it may cost massive amounts of voltage to crank this large pulley over once, it only costs you one flash/spark/bit of current, to gain 1000 cycles of AC electricity, which can easily gain you the massive voltage that you need to crank over your DC motor one single time. And, because you only need the one little spark of current to rotate your DC motor once, these AC generators rotate with practically zero torque.
-
This is a self powering set of AC generators + your one DC motor, all that is missing is 10 full wave bridge rectifiers, to convert your AC output back into a DC input.

« Last Edit: March 26, 2017, 04:46:58 PM by that_prophet »

#### TinselKoala

• Hero Member
• Posts: 13968
##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #145 on: March 26, 2017, 02:31:43 PM »
No, you are the one who does not understand, and you have definitely proven one thing: you never will understand.

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #145 on: March 26, 2017, 02:31:43 PM »

#### Paul-R

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1978
##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #146 on: March 26, 2017, 04:50:45 PM »
No, you are the one who does not understand, and you have definitely proven one thing: you never will understand.
He's a religious fundamentalist with a bunch of mistranslated scriptures. We should be glad he is not inclined to flying airliners into buildings.

BTW, TK, was it you who got together some hefty supercaps and used them to start a car? If so, how long do the caps keep their charge when left in a dry place?

#### that_prophet

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 492
##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #147 on: March 26, 2017, 05:08:35 PM »
Yes SkyWatcher,
I think that your system would work in a similar way.
you are trading one rotation to gain many cycles of AC electricity,
you would be only paying for one rotation of your drive motor,
+ gaining as many cycles of AC electricity as you had of magnets that you had around the edge

Hi that_prophet, did you look at previous page, the post i made about a possible equivalent design.
Let me know if you think it fulfills the operating principal.
peace love light

#### TinselKoala

• Hero Member
• Posts: 13968
##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #148 on: March 27, 2017, 01:51:10 AM »
He's a religious fundamentalist with a bunch of mistranslated scriptures. We should be glad he is not inclined to flying airliners into buildings.

BTW, TK, was it you who got together some hefty supercaps and used them to start a car? If so, how long do the caps keep their charge when left in a dry place?

No, not me. But I have some Nesscap brand aerogel supercaps on my workbench that keep their charge for weeks. They don't seem to discharge at all when not in use. I suppose there must be some internal leakage but I haven't been able to detect it yet.

#### Lakes

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 383
##### Re: GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)
« Reply #149 on: March 27, 2017, 10:53:42 AM »
Its was lasersaber using supercaps to start his car.