Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy
New theories about free energy systems => Theory of overunity and free energy => Topic started by: guest1289 on November 24, 2016, 10:08:22 PM
-
Magnetic-Field Shielding
For a long time people making the most basic design of magnet-motors claimed that if they found a suitable magnetic-shielding material, then they could make a successful magnet-motor.
I'm sure that a successful magnetic-shielding material would in fact be a 'permanent-magnet', facing N-N or S-S to the magnet that needs to be shielded
( in other words, glued or attached, directly to the magnet that needs to be shielded ).
And the magnet used as shielding. could be of of different proportions, strength, and made of different materials, to the magnet it would be shielding, although if so, it probably would not provide a complete 100% shielding, but it could be enough anyway.
Maybe some measurement tests could be carried out, just in terms of general effectiveness, rather than detailed tables of numerical results.
Since it doesn't directly involve overunity, you could even create a wikipedia-page about magnetic-shielding using permanent-magnets, to publish your results.
I used to assume that this idea wouldn't work because I didn't see anyone( on the internet ) using it, but now I wonder how many 'details-undisclosed' magnet-motors of the past, used it.
______
The Most Basic Concepts For Solid-State-Overunity-Generators
Electromagnets / Transformers
An electromagnet is an example of overunity, maybe yes ?, but useless, since you 'apparently'( photovoltaics, others ?) can't use a non-moving magnetic-field to induce any current.
Apparently there was research which found that 'at a very specific frequency', a core( iron-core? ) will emit a stronger electromagnetic-field than the input power, RESONANT-FREQUENCY-OF-CORE?/CIRCUIT?/AEATHER?
( I typed this before in a recent post, maybe on another thread, on this site, and I had posted the webpage-link of where I read that, however, that webpage doesn't actually mention when or who did the research )
But some ideas on getting as much of the overunity generated from a core magnetized by a dc-pulsating-current.
CONCEPT - COMPLETELY OPPOSITE SPECIFICATIONS OF CORES/COILS
- Say you have a 'primary-core/coil' of x-diameter, x-length, x-number of coil-windings( or, spacings ?), then maybe the 'secondary-core/coil' which is used to generate the electricity, should have THE-OPPOSITE-SPECIFICATIONS to the 'primary-core/coil', 1/2x-diameter, or, 2x-diameter, 1/2x-length, or, 2x-length, 1/2x-number of coil-windings( or, spacings ?), or 2x-number of coil-windings( or, spacings ?)
This seems to be purely logical, since the specifications that caused overunity in the 'primary-core/coil', would possibly need to be reversed in the 'secondary-core/coil', in order to gain 100% of the overunity produced in the 'primary-core/coil'.
( I didn't also mention using opposite core-materials, because I don't know enough in that area, to know how that would work )
( Also, I was wondering if you can do it all on just one core, instead of using two cores, by having the 'primary-coil-windings' down one end of the core, and the 'secondary-coil-windings' down the other end of the same core, while at the same time incorporating my idea above of 'COMPLETELY OPPOSITE SPECIFICATIONS OF CORES/COILS' detailed above )
______
-
guest1289
An electromagnet is an example of overunity, maybe yes ?, but useless, since you 'apparently'( photovoltaics, others ?) can't use a non-moving magnetic-field to induce any current.
Obviously what I meant there, is, I was wondering if there's no method similar to photovoltaics to convert the overunity-amount of magnetic-field generated into electrical-current.
( considering that sunlight has an approximate frequency )
Apparently there was research which found that 'at a very specific frequency', a core( iron-core? ) will emit a stronger electromagnetic-field than the input power, RESONANT-FREQUENCY-OF-CORE?/CIRCUIT?/AEATHER?
( I typed this before in a recent post, maybe on another thread, on this site, and I had posted the webpage-link of where I read that, however, that webpage doesn't actually mention when or who did the research )
Obviously this is different to an electromagnet in that a pulsating-current was used, which allowed them to measure the claimed overunity.
_________
Is anyone looking for an overunity-generator to replicate, one that may not be too difficult.
The pictures in the post below were posted a few months ago .
http://overunity.com/16767/an-electric-motor-turning-an-electric-generator-which-powers-the-same-motor/msg489452/#msg489452
If it is overunity, that is a high achievement, but from news in the last year or so, I assume it is not the only successful overunity-generator, otherwise I would be more amazed ( although the device is all AC current, which may make measurments more difficult, thinking in AC is too difficult for me )
I mention this one because I wonder if it could be converted to a completely-solid-state-generator , by, replacing the oscillating magnet/magnets with 1-core?/2-cores?, specifically the 2 concepts I posted in my previous post above , maybe the 2nd concept :
CONCEPT - COMPLETELY OPPOSITE SPECIFICATIONS OF CORES/COILS
- Say you have a 'primary-core/coil' of x-diameter, x-length, x-number of coil-windings( or, spacings ?), then maybe the 'secondary-core/coil' which is used to generate the electricity, should have THE-OPPOSITE-SPECIFICATIONS to the 'primary-core/coil', 1/2x-diameter, or, 2x-diameter, 1/2x-length, or, 2x-length, 1/2x-number of coil-windings( or, spacings ?), or 2x-number of coil-windings( or, spacings ?)
This seems to be purely logical, since the specifications that caused overunity in the 'primary-core/coil', would possibly need to be reversed in the 'secondary-core/coil', in order to gain 100% of the overunity produced in the 'primary-core/coil'.
( I didn't also mention using opposite core-materials, because I don't know enough in that area, to know how that would work )
( Also, I was wondering if you can do it all on just one core, instead of using two cores, by having the 'primary-coil-windings' down one end of the core, and the 'secondary-coil-windings' down the other end of the same core, while at the same time incorporating my idea above of 'COMPLETELY OPPOSITE SPECIFICATIONS OF CORES/COILS' detailed above )
-
(iron)core to metglas(s) to magnetic graphit/graphene: dielectric catastrophe to thermal shock
(process for superconductive materials)
elementary Eigen-Spin administration
Searching and founds for the An international "1 Watt for 1 Cent" generator challenge ! ;)
-
guest1289
CONCEPT - COMPLETELY OPPOSITE SPECIFICATIONS OF CORES/COILS
- Say you have a 'primary-core/coil' of x-diameter, x-length, x-number of coil-windings( or, spacings ?), then maybe the 'secondary-core/coil' which is used to generate the electricity, should have THE-OPPOSITE-SPECIFICATIONS to the 'primary-core/coil', 1/2x-diameter, or, 2x-diameter, 1/2x-length, or, 2x-length, 1/2x-number of coil-windings( or, spacings ?), or 2x-number of coil-windings( or, spacings ?)
This seems to be purely logical, since the specifications that caused overunity in the 'primary-core/coil', would possibly need to be reversed in the 'secondary-core/coil', in order to gain 100% of the overunity produced in the 'primary-core/coil'.
( I didn't also mention using opposite core-materials, because I don't know enough in that area, to know how that would work )
So, that concept is to have the secondary-core be the inverse-specifications of the primary-core .
( Also, I was wondering if you can do it all on just one core, instead of using two cores, by having the 'primary-coil-windings' down one end of the core, and the 'secondary-coil-windings' down the other end of the same core, while at the same time incorporating my idea above of 'COMPLETELY OPPOSITE SPECIFICATIONS OF CORES/COILS' detailed above )
In regard to that last paragraph I'm quoting from myself :
"I was wondering if you can do it all on just one core"
I was also thinking about a Cone-Shaped-Core( with a primary-coil, and a secondary-coil on it ) in regard to doing it all on one core.
( I read a post on this site in the recent 2 or 3 months by someone else where they mentioned a cone-shaped-coil( I did not see that it used a core, so I'm not sure if it used a core ), although I didn't read the details about that one or how it was used , but I had already thought of a cone-shaped-core/coils before reading that post )