Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Why Over-Unity is Possible  (Read 52251 times)

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #90 on: March 22, 2019, 10:08:07 PM »
THE MOTHER AND FATHER OF FREE ENERGY IS EFFICIENCY, AND ONE NEEDS
TO KNOW WHERE THE ENERGY IS COMING FROM.. THE MOST ABANDON ENERGY
SOURCE IS HEAT ENERGY..AND YET NOT ONE HAS CREATED A FREE ENERGY HEAT PUMP
MACHINE.

1. Efficiency is a secondary consideration..... at best.

2.Mankind used fire for tens of thousands of years before we had any knowledge of
where it comes from.

3.The most abundant energy source is heat energy....  but  matter and dark matter are the most abundant forms of energy.

    floor

Offline seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 921
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #91 on: March 25, 2019, 05:42:45 PM »
HERE IS MY FREE ENERGY HEAT PUMP INVENTIONS. THERE IS THREE SOURCE INPUT
OF HEAT ENERGY..1 THE AIR CONDITIONER THE HEAT IS COMING FROM AMBIENT AIR.
2 HOT WATER SOLAR PANEL, 3 A BIT OF A ENIGMA, PUT I WILL PUT IT AS A FRICTION
MATTER HEAT SOURCE..   

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5031
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #92 on: March 26, 2019, 08:59:27 PM »
With new methods we can experiment and get better results for the final optimized thermoelectric converter :
https://newatlas.com/shape-memory-alloy-nitinol-heating-cooling/58837/
And nickel-titanium related :
https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/u-s-army-develop-ultra-strong-3d-printed-steel-parts-to-revolutionize-battlefield-logistics-150367/

Offline Tito L. Oracion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #93 on: March 28, 2019, 09:11:40 AM »
OVERUNITY IS POSSIBLE


SIMPLY BECAUSE WHEN THERE IS UNITY IN EVERYTHING, THINGS BECOMES POSSIBLE AND OVER!!! ;) 


AND THAT IS POWER!!! 8)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdi5HsjWZnc


SEE.? THATS HOW SIMPLE IT IS, JUST A MATTER OF CAREFULL PLANNING AND DESIGN . :)
GOT IT? :D

Offline synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4695
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #94 on: March 28, 2019, 02:15:26 PM »
Itzu reported going OU with his Tinman magnet core coil. No one has gotten back to his nonsense pulse motor thread on Overunity Research for two months.


Tinman is trying to build a pulse motor. I went about 40 times over unity with a piezo transducer chip oscillated by my spring pressure switch permanent magnet backed electromagnet oscillator already.


This output approach for the magnet core coil is much more efficient then a rotor like Tinman is attempting.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIpsn_eZ2rY

Offline synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4695
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #95 on: March 28, 2019, 03:12:18 PM »
The heat from the electromagnet coil is feeding the permanent magnets the thermal heating to offset the cooling effect of the magno-restrictive MCE of the pulse.


The electro magnet has a steel case between coil and ceramic magnets.




« Last Edit: March 28, 2019, 07:17:47 PM by synchro1 »

Offline seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 921
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #96 on: March 28, 2019, 07:16:42 PM »
JUST LIKE TO REMIND YOU ALL THESE ARE OFF THE SELF ITEMS THAT CAN BE PURCHASE ANYWHERE IN THIS
WORLD.. THE FINAL OT WATER TO STEAM WATER CAVITY HEATER CAN BE REPLACED BY A MORE EFFICIENT
INDUCTION WATER TO STEAM INDUSTRIALIZE SYSTEM..

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5031
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #97 on: March 29, 2019, 08:27:08 AM »
https://www.google.com/search?q=charles+law&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=15&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19881020&CC=WO&NR=8808220A1&KC=A1#

"Photon( light) Phonon(wave) " absorber : black (w)hole principle

            vertere/tornar/winden/drehen:            "(w)hole"/Ampere-turn

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FDynamoelektrisches_Prinzip


Mental designing :
http://www.arminwitt.de/hoegl.html
Steel + silicon https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/solar-grade-silicon-at-low-cost solar grade 8 US$/Kg
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.arminwitt.de%2Fhoegl.html
Next step would be similar low cost : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_silicon

                                20-30% conversion efficiency of incident light :                                               

                                                              parabol foil
https://www.google.com/search?q=parabolic+solar+concentrator&tbm=isch&source=univ&client=firefox-b&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjkkNa_oKfhAhUwx4UKHeQ0Dd0QsAQIIA
                   Light concentrating factor ?" Coil cell "un-/ cooled,  in tube evacuated  ?!

                                                              As example :
 http://www.ecochunk.com/6361/2013/02/22/cool-earth-solar-develops-inflatable-solar-concentrators-to-boost-energy-production/ ".... up to 1200 times more electricity ..... "
         From natural - periodically - light/ photon-phonon source to permanent 24/365 conversion process :

                                                        "Artificial fusion chamber "
             https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19900201&CC=DE&NR=3817730A1&KC=A1#
                                                            And related :
              http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/2013/03/14/lenr-cfl-light-bulbs/
                        There is much research about radiant emission converting material :
https://www.google.com/search?q=carbon+instead+silicon+solar+cell&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b



https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=10&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20070201&CC=ES&NR=2265253A1&KC=A1#

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=29&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19941208&CC=DE&NR=4318270A1&KC=A1#

                                      Compact micro device production
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=3&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20040916&CC=US&NR=2004178874A1&KC=A1#
« Last Edit: March 29, 2019, 01:40:47 PM by lancaIV »

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5031
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #98 on: March 30, 2019, 01:21:40 PM »
                                          The " numbers" curiousity and treat
A.

             https://tesla3.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/zpe_hilden_brand_valve.gif

                                    double the flux lines four times the force
     
     Question :                 only attractive or also repulsive ( internal/external field force )



B.                                               magnetic force to rotation


             Richard Fradella generator RPM/ output ratio description
                                          ( like all other conventional generators performance)

            rated and nominal 1000 RPM : 1000 W              1,00 W/ round

                                                500 RPM :    125 W.            0,25 W/ round

                                                100 RPM  :        1 W.  =       0,01 W/ round
                                   Measured efficiency in all three cases : around 95%


Several different ratio results to conclude ! By the same - only - " force converting machine"

This is important to understand the over-sized or under-sized use and performance of generators and/ or motors !                                              charge/ load : ideal resonance point

And to remark the great power saving potential if change from fix ( net frequency controlled) speed/ load to variable and controlled speed/load charge and pulse-2-magnetic force-2-pulse recharge circuit ( feedback cycle)
            And to transform this physical rotative process to MEG-calculation as "static dynamo".


 C.                     Force-" F= BIL" balance for counterforce ( BEMF/FEMF) neutralization
                          MMF/EMF ? permanent or periodically/ pulsative

               remark Hildenbrands number about "4 times force units amplification"
               
               8 Watt permant DC for electromagnetic force/ 1 inch permanent neo magnet force aequivalence
               = 8 W permanent DC/ 3 ( surplus) units ~ 2,6 W permanent DC per mmf unit
               working with pulsed DC  pulse: current on/ off cycles + feedback cycle

             Motor disc rotor : 360° cycle , 2 poles with 10° attraction/repulsion space : 10° /360° = 1/36 power on                                             and 35/36 power off
                                     
                                             rated 360 W = pole field Watt consume = periodic energy need = 360 W/36

D.  " free energy home plant" study and error/ success controls for best performance :        in household the " consume Wattpeak centre" : the kitchen       
       The greatest task to resolve :       https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Inrush_current.gif

                                             http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/_si/0/19966480.jpg                                             
                                               To controle and regulate :
                 https://www.ametherm.com/inrush-current/inverter-inrush-current-protection
                 V-Ampere-max. peak and V-Ampere- average peak and duration !
           
             
                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                      Out from inverter : up 3 KWh power per day                                      + solar collector heat

                 https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.oeko-energie.de%2Fprodukte%2Fsolarstrom-photovoltaik%2Finselanlagen%2Findex.php                                                       

                                                       https://mtbest.net/
           
                                                     
                                                             sommer/ warm season
   
                  3 KWh = 3000 Wh / 24 hours = 125 Watt generator output need /0,5( losts charger,  battery,  cable)
                                                    sufficient by battery-storage :


                                                    250 Watt nonstop  generator
                                                   5000 Watt-hour batteryset
                                                 
                               Better : partial  " on demand" load charge delivery by generator
                                            and lower capacity battery-set ( DoD- malus)                                     

                                                  500 Wp nonstop generator                                             

                                                3000 W-hour batteryset

   Actually there is price related a scientifical competition between battery and hydrogen technology   
             so probably instead batteryset hydrogen-genset

  Or the development from a 1 KW by load demand controled mo-gen rorative/ mo-gen static makes the batterysetand hydrogen-genset obsolete.

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5031
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #99 on: March 31, 2019, 12:33:38 AM »
Rare,  double sided motor shaft,  but existent. !
https://www.google.com/search?q=double+side+motor+shaft&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b
"Relative speed accelerator ":
a generator with rotative rotor and fixed stator to rotative stator : outer and inner rotor : one cw and the other ccw
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the rotative generator stator combine/ couple  with one motor-shaft side and the rotative generator rotor combine/ couple with the other motor shaft side
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Only with this combination we get a transformer ( con-/inverter)  equivalent rotative circuit cycle. !

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5031
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #100 on: April 01, 2019, 01:30:24 PM »
https://www.google.com/search?q=akio+hara+winpro&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b

                                   "Company overwiew" PDF :

                     Characteristic of New Wind-Power Generator ( E= 1/2 m v2)


                                and here their commercial application
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=EP&NR=2383870A4&KC=A4&FT=D&ND=&date=20170412&DB=&locale=#
                               [0050]  description kinetic-mechanical power in/ electric power out ratio?




                                                                                and
                    https://www.voanews.com/a/can-better-electric-motor-save-planet/4235140.html     

                                      description electric input/ kinetic-mechanical output ratio
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Generator-Motor couple
                   eta < 1               efficiency < 100%                  C.O.P. : 2/0,5 = 4

                       4 times better than conventional  Generator-Motor couple = 75% savings per couple                                                   
                                    Generator-Motor-Cascade-Network : on- or off-grid

                      1st couple C.O.P.  :                =       4.                     75,00%      savings related "old society method"

                      2nd couple C.O.P. : 4x4         =     16                     93,75%.     savings   

                      3rd couple C.O.P. : 4x4x4.    =      64.                    98,43%      savings

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply 98, B : The Richard "Dick" Fradella Generator ( motor)  behaviour easy compared :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=US&NR=2012256422A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=20121011&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#

                                                                                 [0092]

           Basic x Acceleration                                     1000 RPM   1000 W output    = 1,00 W/RPM         

                                                                                     200%.Basic                                  400%Basic
         
                                                   
                                                                                 [0093] base line

         Basic power/ velocity.                                      500 RPM.    125 W output.    = 0,25 W/RPM

                                                                                      100%= Basic                              100%= Basic


                                                                                [0094]


          Basic x Deceleration.                                        100 RPM.       1 W output      =  0,01W/RPM       

                                                                                        20% Basic.                                      4% Basic


 
                                                 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle                             

                                                     Pareto "power law and distribution"

Offline Vinyasi

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 31
    • My profile on Quora.
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #101 on: October 21, 2022, 08:11:33 PM »
I agree. Yet, that won't stop my recent contribution to WikiBooks from being deleted since it is offensive to someone's sensibilities:
Quote
"This is original research of the most egregious kind trying to pretend that the laws of physics are a fantasy. It doesn't belong here."

Backed up here.

Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3726
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #102 on: October 24, 2022, 12:06:04 PM »
Consider this::


What is the electrical resistance of a DC circuit that is biased beyond the ionization potential of copper?

Offline kolbacict

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1039
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #103 on: October 24, 2022, 07:40:28 PM »
Is there a potential difference between the earth and the sun (earth-moon)?
What if we will the wire  stretched? And what is the capacitance of this capacitor?
p.s. Do not laugh, many years ago they offered in all seriousness
pull the cable to the moon in order to launch vehicles into space at a lower cost. :)

Offline pauldude000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 612
    • My electronics/programming website
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #104 on: October 24, 2022, 08:27:35 PM »
I can put forth mine.

It seems to me that everything is waves. Light, sound, electricity and even water. Or the interaction is waves. Nature would not have another way of doing stuff. Like everything else grows in the Golden Ratio. That also comes from the same wave idea. Why does everything grow and develop in 1.618 ratio? Study that for a day and you will find out it comes back to a circle and eventually waves.

I think matter is just standing waves or waves of peculiar frequency. This would explain why different theories (gravity,potential energy, electricity) seem to have the same equations, because they are the same deep down.They seem to be different, but then somehow the equations come up the same. We are just being taken for a ride, so it is all hidden in the open. The only place they can be hidden. They just need to debunk, ridicule and push off buildings all original thought.

So a particular apple is just a sum of all the small waves that make up that apple. If we could "record" that wave/sound and then play it back with enough energy we would have just cloned an apple.

I do like the genesis stories where there was just the "word" in the beginning. So the Creator uttered a sound the created everything. Waves again.

Btw you don'tn need hydrogen for anti-grav. Helium works as well and is not flammable


Very good, and to a large extent our concepts are the same. Where I differ is the medium. Try as people (including Einstein) might, the aether is in every day use in physics still to this day -- it has just been renamed, ignored until needed, etc. We call it "the quantum vacuum" and "spacetime" now. I prefer Aether as it is simply easier and shorter to write than either of the other two. You see, Einstein's spacetime is supposed to (according to Einstein at least) be absolutely nothing at all, just hard vacuum -- three vectors of empty space examined through a period of time.  However, absolutely nothing can supposedly be bent/warped/tunneled through/dented, which are all properties of an elastic substance. Quantum Vacuum is just spacetime with added features such as the zero point fluctuations (also called ZPE). The problem is that Einstein based a huge amount of his work on theories based exclusively upon the eather concept (vacuum filled with a fluid type substance) by scientists such as Maxwell, Lorentz, Newton, Faraday, etc., etc., etc., (including all scientists pre-1905).


This leaves us with the modern silly-stupid physics of today. The simple fact is that Maxwell's equations (early-mid 1860's) are based directly upon his concept of the Aether. When Einstein dismissed the Aether (roughly 1905), he invalidated THE REASON for Maxwell's theories and calculations, thus invalidating the calculations in the process, as if the Aether is not real, then calculations designed to explain the Aether are not valid. However, Maxwell's equations worked before relativity came along, and so did the Lorentz Force (1895), as well as Newton's, Faraday's, and others. You see, Maxwell's equations take into effect and calculate for the hydrodynamics and elasticity of the Aether, as well as the centrifugal forces of the particles thereof. Heaviside just bastardized Maxwell's equations to force them to work in the framework of relativity, not "made them better or more functionable."


However, hard empty nothingness (hard vacuum) cannot be bent, folded, or manipulated in any way, by any force, so have no fear the Aether is still here, lol.