Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Magnets, motion and measurement  (Read 172535 times)

citfta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: Magnets, motion and measurement
« Reply #285 on: August 16, 2019, 04:56:29 PM »
A short video of my progress so far.  I had hoped to get more done by now but other things keep coming up that need to be taken care of.  This video does show some proof of what Floor has been telling us in his videos and PDFs.

https://youtu.be/wHHVrQRby9A


Carroll
« Last Edit: August 16, 2019, 09:27:09 PM by citfta »

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Magnets, motion and measurement
« Reply #286 on: August 16, 2019, 08:28:41 PM »
@ citfta

thanks for the latest update !

       floor

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Magnets, motion and measurement
« Reply #287 on: August 19, 2019, 10:07:41 PM »
Hi CITFTA

I didn't notice any video of the       https://overunity.com/16954/magnets-motion-and-measurement/dlattach/attach/172888/
version of the device.   

This is the design that I originally asked that you modify your misinterpretation / build into.  Did you do that mod. and then not present a
video of it ?

                  floor

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Magnets, motion and measurement
« Reply #288 on: August 19, 2019, 10:38:33 PM »
TO ALL READERS

          Just for clarity...

               Pleased as CITFTA has been with his builds / results and I would agree that they are pretty skilfully built.
               A nice innovation in the use of the glued down toothed belt as a rack gear and so on........
                            But once again.
              NOT A SINGLE ONE of the 3 videos CITFTA has present, is of a design which I had presented.

              Each video has some similarity to one of the designs, but IS NOT ONE OF THOSE DESIGNS.
             
              Not a single one of them is a correct representation of ANY of the designs I had presented.
                   
            What do you think the odds are of 3 misinterpretations in a row, like that.
           
            Bad run of luck for CITFTA I'd guess.  I agree with CITFTA's statement that he should maybe give
            his self a break from the builds for now.

                   best wishes

                floor

citfta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: Magnets, motion and measurement
« Reply #289 on: August 19, 2019, 10:40:23 PM »
Hi CITFTA

I didn't notice any video of the       https://overunity.com/16954/magnets-motion-and-measurement/dlattach/attach/172888/
version of the device.   

This is the design that I originally asked that you modify your misinterpretation / build into.  Did you do that mod. and then not present a
video of it ?

                  floor

Hi Floor,

No,  I have not done a build of the PDF device in your last post.  That will probably be my next design to test when I have finished testing the design I am working with now.  My wife is currently sick so I have some extra household duties for a while.  I want to test all the different designs you have made PDFs for.  Thanks again for all your efforts and being willing to share your results.

Take care,
Carroll

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Magnets, motion and measurement
« Reply #290 on: August 19, 2019, 10:46:06 PM »
At CITFTA

Hope your wife is better soon.


          floor


Floor

  • Guest
Re: Magnets, motion and measurement
« Reply #291 on: August 25, 2019, 05:37:15 PM »
@CITFTA  All READERS

This is the cyber world, where so often people and things are not as they appear to be.

I have seen too many "replications" on the forum that were similar to, but not nearly identical
to a design as presented.

At a certain point (its been a while" I myself was asking for replication of some of the
"twist drive" interactions.   

Two different O.U. forum users, did some builds. 

One user, in particular spent a  GREAT DEAL OF TIME (weeks) AND ENERGY (several videos)
doing GREAT BUILDS and presenting results.  However, he opted to use neodymium magnets, and almost unbelievably......   for all that large amount of time, effort he gave and all the attention he drew to (actually away from ) the twist drive design...............

                                                              NEVER....
AT ANY POINT.... DID HE ACTUALLY DO A REPLICATION OF THE TWITS DRIVE NTERACTIONS. 

                                              Not once.  Not at all. 

He did however carry the topic away for those few months. It's dead now.
 
The other user presented 4 or 5 photos, some graphs and computer simulations, then concluded, that one could accomplish the same thing if using springs instead of magnets ?  GOOD LUCK WITH THAT !

The more recent topic, "Newtons magnets" was being dragged into directions / misinterpretations
innovations and so on, all during my repeated requests and inistance that that topic was for
a very narrow and specific point.  I received no response to those requests, nor any acknowledgments of them, by certain users.


Simultaneously, CITFTA you are presenting GREAT BUILDS, but not replications.
.........          ............         ............     ............
CITFTA, You seem like a nice person.  So did that other GREAT BUILD "replicator"

I hope you understand my concerns / point of view.  I am put into the position
of seeming to be disingenuous and ungrateful of the GREAT efforts this kindly older
gentleman (you) has enthusiastically given to these designs.

What do I expect ?  I expect of your most recent build...  it will fail to shield the output
magnet's repulsion.  Why ?  Because the shielding magnets are too weak and because they
are joined together, in a constant repulsion to one another, are only getting weaker by the day.

This is the cyber world, where so often people and things are not as they appear to be.

 best wishes
   floor

Floor

  • Guest
Re: Magnets, motion and measurement
« Reply #292 on: August 30, 2019, 10:28:06 PM »
          These videos demonstrate magnet interactions which are Over Unity

                                                    BUT ONLY WHEN
      EACH MOVEMENT IS COMPLETED BEFORE THE NEXT MOTION IS ALLOWED TO BEGIN.

                                 OUTPUT ACTIONS ARE LATCHED / PREVENTED
                                                                AND
         DO NOT OCCUR  UNTIL AFTER THE SHIELDING HAS BEEN COMPLETELY REMOVED.

                              THERE IS NO CONTINUOUS MOTION AND
                   ARE NO CONTINUOUS MOTIONS IN THESE ACTION SETS.
                   EACH MOTION ENDS BEFORE THE NEXT MOTION BEGINS.

video, titled "amazeing"  @
                                            https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6gzr2q
video titled "shield # 2 actions" @
                                                   https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6ijgy1

                                         AND

video titled "Floor's balancing neutralization"  @
                                                                            https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7f0i61
                                                                                         

video titled "Floor's balancing neutralization 2"  @
                                                                               https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7ffco0
                                                                                       
                                        AND

video titled "magnetshield 1" @
                                                 https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x728wd9

          floor

shylo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 540
Re: Magnets, motion and measurement
« Reply #293 on: August 31, 2019, 11:02:23 AM »
No over unity, no neutralization, and no shielding.artv 

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: Magnets, motion and measurement
« Reply #294 on: August 31, 2019, 01:55:09 PM »
https://www.physlink.com/education/askexperts/ae512.cfm

There is no passive way to shield against magnetic fields that would produce useable force from just magnet. Ask on quora.

This is extremely debunked, this forest has been razed to the ground, not a single shrub remains, I have observed since 2008.

Your video is lame.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You must now concentrate your life on the design rakarsky is saying about, Carl J LUTTMER.

He, Carl J LUTTMER, knew the secret, not you, you are misguided, forever lost, now you must enter in the light.

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/20267-motor-generators-13.html
« Last Edit: August 31, 2019, 08:12:34 PM by ARMCORTEX »

alextecmen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: Magnets, motion and measurement
« Reply #295 on: September 01, 2019, 06:25:51 PM »
interesting information, which shows the page ARMCORTEX
it is detailed that the lines of the magnetic field of the magnet should always end at its opposite pole, nature is like that, when I start a magnet through the center to separate the north pole from the south, of course, an N and a Yes, the dipole is recreated.
what can be redirected the field lines with certain materials that have greater magnetic permeability, would trap the magnetic lines and redirect it but would return to the opposite pole.

well where I wanted to go, is that there are materials that achieve this purpose well, one of them is the nu-metal, when I have done some tests, it is surprising to see that on the side where the nu-metal is you can put another magnet and there is no attraction effect with the magnet that is on the other side.

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: Magnets, motion and measurement
« Reply #296 on: September 01, 2019, 07:34:27 PM »
The only thing that is interresting is the engine that Rakarsky is trying to build and the luttmer patents.

My first link is not that interresting, I am just not about to list the 100+ people on this site and thousand of man hours that Floor is trying to disprove.

If there was a way to get clever with these magnets by just moving them around I think we would have seen it, I have been observing since 2008.

Hype hype hype then deflate.... I have OU I have it.... Uhhh not I dont.

Let me explain how it works around here, quality people are rare, and there is alot of useless ASCI characters to scroll down.

So if you see somebody trying to prove something by moving around magnets with his hands, you can safely ignore him, but this is not the only criteria.

Ignore totally the following users, Nothing they say is important and is automatic scroll down: Floor, Cifta, and many many others...

There is many hints and clues on low/average intelligence and who to ignore... constant Bad punctuation, non-sensical rambling  to pose as something else, Zero proof of work, inexperience, ignorance, bad logic, speculation passed on as fact, being vague and not practical, "group think", overly joyful, abusive use of emoticons, etc...  Use these clues to better navitage the forums and estimate people's IQ. The goal is to extract knowledge that could be useful for a build, once you identify such knowledge, save it and organize it if possible.

I mix all of these and have become very fast and efficient reader, you can say that I have developped an "instinct".

Also, recognize that even with free energy the laws of economics always apply, only "BIG POWER" for small cost, has an impact on your life, choose your projects wisely, only power that can run many appliances, provide heat, is of any use. Chasing small things for the fun of it is a waste of time and money. For example... Milkovic pendulum, Joule thief, bedini... All the actions never payed for themselves in electrical saving even after successful. The only effort you should put, is into a finished and safe design that can be potentially placed in your basement and provide eletricity throughout the entire house.

shylo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 540
Re: Magnets, motion and measurement
« Reply #297 on: September 01, 2019, 10:56:45 PM »
Is there any way to levitate a magnetic rotor?
I've been trying, but keeping it aligned has proven impossible so far.
The more fields you add, the more complex it becomes.
Floor is merely observing some of the various interactions.
I thank him for his work, but they are incomplete.
I've searched but found nothing yet.
artv

alextecmen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: Magnets, motion and measurement
« Reply #298 on: September 01, 2019, 11:14:26 PM »
 author ARMCORTEX   "The only thing that is interesting is the engine that Rakarsky is trying to build and the luttmer patents."

regards
If Mr.’s   Rakarsky project is interesting, but he hasn’t done it, the creation of the nucleus didn’t come out, it means that it is not known if at the end of it he would have satisfactory results.
The important, interesting is trying, as well as many who show in this forum their projects and ideas, and their positive or negative advances, with their failures and successes.
There are already examples and tests of generators projects that worked.
Friend you have a message, check

alextecmen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: Magnets, motion and measurement
« Reply #299 on: September 03, 2019, 07:11:42 AM »
Mr. Rakarsky's experience and knowledge
shows that he will have a successful luttmer patent project