@Telecom

There are no measurements taken by me of that particular magnet interaction set ................
                                                and
if you are referring to this video ? ...... https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x728wd9
                                               and these drawings .......  https://overunity.com/16954/magnets-motion-and-measurement/dlattach/attach/171897/

The operating principles are very similar to these actions / function for the same kind of reasons.

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6va1an
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6gzr2q

                 floor

@Telecom

There is a lot of force between those two magnet stacks, and with only two magnets as the shield
it is working effectively.

The magnetic field of the shield becomes distorted when two main magnets are close by,
this causes resistance when the above shield is removed.
Floor just needs to measure the actual forces at his set up, to see if this arrangement is workable.

Found some interesting material related to the magnet force measurements.
https://freeenergycommunity.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/kedron_eden_project.pdf

There is an explanation there which says that magnet interaction  force is dependent
on the density of the magnetic field in the area.
This is actually similar to a TD drive concept and may explain it.

@Telecom

Thanks for posting the link.
        floor
             

When by" the law of momentum conservation" from action and reaction ever shall exist equivalence ( JLNaudins push&pull experiment shows asymmetry= no equivalence)

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/2magpup.htm
then it is the question where is to the Hildenbrand valve( doubling the flux lines) and Charles Flynn ( halfing the flux lines) force gain/loose reaction !?
doubling flux lines : 4 times the unit force
basic flux line: unit force
halfing the flux lines: 1/4 the unit force


doubling :  https://tesla3.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/zpe_hilden_brand_valve.gif
halfing : https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=2&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20020129&CC=US&NR=6342746B1&KC=B1#


That the input and output transformation process from conventional industrial machines can become improvedshow us this decriptions ( why and how !? explanation )

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Fred+miekka&IN=&CPC=&IC=
For all who are working in "surplus power generating machines" I would advice here " figure 10" study :
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20110097209A1/en

Hello floor,

at first I have to correct my " advice" : not figure 10 but " figure12 " the input / output should become studied :

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20110097209A1/en
From negative C.O.P. to positive C.O.P., min/ max/ average

What is by your work your intention/ motive/ target ?
For example :
apply a demonstration device for the " overunity.com prize award" ?
Satisfying yourself and resolve the  royal academy "axiom"and definition :                                         
                                      ppm is physically not possible ( by given and determed closed cycle-conditioning)
 by  own creativity and intuition- freedome ?
You deliver your work results here and on youtube, my opinion does not make matter !
Wishing you and your work success
OCWL

OCWL: my Name Oliver Christoph Waldhelm Lanca

The Solorzano- device is not off-topic following your first topic description.It shows increasing and decline from work to power ratio and positive and negative work performance.Based by magnetic machines, motor and generator.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sENgdSF8ppA
  1:50+ open coil.    2:23+ closed coil     "resistance". an open/ closed coil switch?

About Neodym : it is the science conflict to search for an alternative for Cobalt-content permanent magnets(AlNiCo)and the decision to use ( as same radioactive) Lanthaniden("rare earth")- Elements like Neodymium and Samarium ( based by Sumituomo Metalls and General Motors reseach and development).

The solution : weaker permanent ceramic ferrite magnets C5/C8 ( - but  later in magnets array configuration - )
Shkondin,  Flynn, Raser Tech development


or as same strong as Neodym magnets :
https://m.phys.org/news/2010-03-iron-nitrogen-compound-strongest-magnet.html
Or: capacitive surges using electro-magnets with Tesla-force range output.
Or/and : permanent magnets and electro- magnets and/ or electro- permanent magnets combination.

Is it possible the " open cycle" gain circuit ? Yes, cause the existent physical asymmetry.With mechanical ( rotative or linear) output or electrical or both.

When actually the price forecast for solar cell energy and batteries - beginning with 2030 is in the 2 cents/KWh range- it will become difficult for inventors and their commercial industrial partners to calculate with "high margin profits" in future !

Sincerely
Oliver CWL
p.s.: " humanity" : there will be no change without conflicts, we will see winning and loosing.
           petrol based economies will be in decline cause enviromental issues ( petrol engines prohibition)       

            and less petrol-based plastics use.( + plastics- recycling)


           Instead copper aluminium and graphene coils/foils use .

           The products in future less maintenance/service-dependent and with longer work- life.

           I do not see China or India as " industrial " conflict :

           it is the 4d-cnc printing technology which let production becomes human-workpower free,     

          no human social costs only material input and KWh- salary.           

          Mini-factories in container-box dimension,  (self-) transportable over land/ sea/air.

          And human- free production management,24/7, ex-/ in-cluded telemetric organisation.
          Wireless communication and wireless energy transmission gives many possibilities.

          No local fixation : for consumer and producer.