Luke, we don't always have to know the exact nature of these forces in order to make practical use of them.

True, and that's where science is at this point. I just have a problem with preaching that there can be nothing more when the best of physicists admit they cannot explain what these 3 effects are.

The effects of  electricity, gravity and magnetism are very well understood; that understanding is expressed as laws.

Their dynamics may be very well understood but that does not mean they know what they are.

If you want to challenge these laws, demonstrate where and when they don't apply.

That work is always in progress. The difference between you and I is confidence that not all is understood and from that fact I don't state nothing more is possible.

As far as I am concerned, the first LoT still stands, while second LoT is successfully challenged.

I guess it doesn't matter how weak I point out your foundation is, you'll just keep standing on it until it's been proven not to support you.
Your choice, just stop preaching it to those who are open to other possibilities.

Regards

Luc

Luc, you may call it preaching; I call it teaching.
Given the limited time that I have to live (probably < 30 years), I want to use it most effectively. That means not spending time on theories that have no evidence of possibility, such as gravity, buoyancy, resonance or zpf based devices
That does not include teaching basics over and over.

Why spend time on this forum which is all about "free energy" devices? I don't go wasting my time on things I know are rubbish. As you say - life is too short. If people wish to be taught the basics of electricity/phisics there are plenty of websites that do a pretty good job of that.

Luc, you may call it preaching; I call it teaching.
Given the limited time that I have to live (probably < 30 years), I want to use it most effectively. That means not spending time on theories that have no evidence of possibility, such as gravity, buoyancy, resonance or zpf based devices
That does not include teaching basics over and over.

You're deluding yourself into believing that. Lets check, is there anyone here today (in this topic) that has learned anything form memoryman?

Let's do another reality check.
This forum is called Overunity. Since you don't believe in OU then why are you here preaching and pestering people to accept your incomplete teachings?
Why not use the 30 years you have left and teach at physics and science forms?... I'm sure you could help a lot of youth with what you know!
Since we are on the subject, do you see individuals who are open to OU go to physics and science forums and try to convince others that OU should be considered?

I'm not saying you're a complete waste here at this forum. What i'm suggesting is to participate when someone is asking for help.
When tomd asked you "How can you be so sure of that?"  and you replied "An deep understanding of basic physics.."
That's a smart ass answer, you know dam well that's not teaching.

Get your act together and stop making excuses.

Sincerely

Luc

Guys, you take what you want from my musings. You can't see what goes on behind the scenes. Tesla never claimed OU an you can't point to any concrete evidence of OU either. I have learned from several posters and that's why I'm here. I also helped several people although I disagree with their premise.
This is becoming argument, not a discussion and that does not interest me.

memoryman


Tesla never claimed overunity from his method of single wire transmission or wireless. He said however about taking energy from ambient...

  http://innovatehno.eu/investors/

I tried to call all their 3 phone  numbers I have today again, but again no answer or only answering machine...

Now seeing that they will have an investor´s webpage soon on their website, it seems they want
to cash in money in advance....
So no 3rd party verification test yet and maybe they will just scam investors then ??

Regards, Stefan.

Something to ponder: http://revolution-green.com/some-energy-basics