Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: A PLACE FOR DEBATE  (Read 60066 times)

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: A PLACE FOR DEBATE
« Reply #15 on: November 13, 2006, 12:48:50 AM »
Sparkman and MrMAG are right, things are not what they seem...

lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: A PLACE FOR DEBATE
« Reply #16 on: November 13, 2006, 02:09:50 AM »
To Dave(ctglabs),
to replicate the SM concept will not be so difficult,
but to resolve his discovered problem,the overheating after an half hour work,
this will never become,under this conditions,a usefull concept !!!
Pardon,
but the Lambertson WIN-cell work,40 years of research,
shall give you a "time window" !

S
  dL

p.s.:Kucera((ex-)Yugoslawia),DE2644927. Monopolar Magnet
      Martinez(Spain),DE2249016,page 2/3
      can give more details about "earth/generator-relationship" !
« Last Edit: November 13, 2006, 02:46:01 AM by lancaIV »

dean_mcgowan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
Re: A PLACE FOR DEBATE
« Reply #17 on: November 13, 2006, 03:18:42 AM »
Yes, I would let Dave be right now otherwise he may just get snide and look down his nose at you poor simple minded fools that are no longer worthy of his presence...

Dave .. Fu*& Off



dean_mcgowan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
Re: A PLACE FOR DEBATE
« Reply #18 on: November 13, 2006, 03:38:12 AM »
And if anyone wants to read my initial opinions on this whole project ... they are still on the forum as I am not of the mind to remove them at a whim. As some petulant small minded people have.

If your in then your in .. if you aint .. then leave well enough alone.

Not once did any one of these guys who left show any credible results.

Now they just want their little egos rubbed a little, I say enough is enough, I originally kicked the tyres on this idea and got told that I shouldnt offend poor little stevie or mr fragile mannix so that we dont lose any further information these great wonders of the world might bestow on us. I say we have the videos .. we get the gist of whats involved.. there are many other examples out there that show similar concepts, with a lot more accompanying documentation and information.

Personally I call on Mannix (SM) whoever he is to ante up .. or bugger off.

I am actually convinced now that the person(s) supposedly representing these 2 identities are frauds and are just in it for some sick personal gratification. As I originally indicated.

This won't stop me endeavouring to create my own ideas, or attempt replications of others. But if someone wants to come along and play the hint game again I will not step back from calling a bullshitter a bullshitter ... its the australian way isnt it mr mannix.

regards,

Dean





lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: A PLACE FOR DEBATE
« Reply #19 on: November 13, 2006, 03:52:55 AM »
Hi Dean,
this had been my problem-more/less an half year before -
in a controversely discussion with Mr.Mannix !
But our "Moderator" wished a "cold war situation" ,a tactical-strategical "peace" !

S
  dL
 

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: A PLACE FOR DEBATE
« Reply #20 on: November 13, 2006, 05:29:14 AM »
Hmm.  Still having that problem with overheating(?!).   Would have thought SM would have licked that by now if it can be done.  Eddy currents and transients burned up many a device back in the old days. 

Wouldn't it be a kick in the teeth if some high school kids (secondary school) solved this problem?

I'l have to go back and check, did that "circuit" that alledgedly was patented, solve the overheating problem?  If not - it's like catching a lighting bolt - not worth a damn, but makes for a nice show!

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: A PLACE FOR DEBATE
« Reply #21 on: November 13, 2006, 05:41:52 AM »
I have a great idea. Since we all know Steven Marks personally, and he discussed his finding with us in great detail prior to the confidentiality agreement, We should really log into their secret builder only forums and tell them more about the kicks, heat, and Q issues that Steve discussed with us.

Well maybe not!

Dean & Grumpy,  love your posts!

Dingus Mungus

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 859
Re: A PLACE FOR DEBATE
« Reply #22 on: November 13, 2006, 07:18:39 AM »
-A message for the posters who are being less then diplomatic twards other users, stop acting like a bunch of kids. I thought this threads intent was for the stating our grevences and unanswered questions, but it has degraded in to pure shit talking. Just stop now, its entirely counter productive to a solution. To review this thread is not for name calling or ill manorisms for those or us who forgot where they where posting at. Each user is valuable and unique in knowlege, but the convesations I am observing daily are uncalled for in any thread.

-I must agree though, removing ones posts is really a poor way to treat those of us interested in studying it further. Its a damn shame, I hope Stefan can work his *best* admin magic with his attempted user restore. Why would you keep your information private? Why not share your findings and data? This world doesn't have a lot of time and this is a great example of how much needed technology gets lost in the shuffle.

-Newbs need to know there place. No offense, its about seniority and some of you are insulting what may be highly valued sources. Once again I must point out that each users actions here will effect our research. Stop it.

Just my two cents, but enough is enough already.

Mannix

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 564
Re: A PLACE FOR DEBATE
« Reply #23 on: November 13, 2006, 11:35:20 AM »
*.*

Dingus Mungus

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 859
Re: A PLACE FOR DEBATE
« Reply #24 on: November 13, 2006, 12:06:14 PM »

CTG Labs

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 397
Re: A PLACE FOR DEBATE
« Reply #25 on: November 13, 2006, 12:21:01 PM »
-
« Last Edit: November 30, 2006, 10:53:56 PM by X »

Dingus Mungus

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 859
Re: A PLACE FOR DEBATE
« Reply #26 on: November 13, 2006, 12:50:53 PM »
I dont think my missing posts will effect anyone, even new comers.  It just allows them to read other more important posts quicker rather than my brain dead ramblings.

Dave your input here was useful and it contained links and patents and pictures and diagrams that were useful too, it was wrong to take it all back over some silly people acting in a silly manner. (it is what they do after all) I do hope you'll at least let us non electronics engineers know how you and your crew do in your research. The most important thing to all of us is that this technology is made available to the consumers. If you feel this was the best way to accomplish that, so be it. Good luck to you in your future research, and please let us know how your builds go.

mflynn44

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: A PLACE FOR DEBATE
« Reply #27 on: November 13, 2006, 03:49:35 PM »
Dave's forum is only one of many groups interested in understanding and building the SM device. For whatever reasons, little progress was made here in replicating the device but that's not to say that progress won't be made. It's up to the people here. Anything of value in the deleted posts is still available; people quoted important points or saved the information in some other form. There really wasn't that much of value anyway. Many individuals are members of several different groups and no group is making progress that any interested person in any group doesn't know about.

dean_mcgowan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
Re: A PLACE FOR DEBATE
« Reply #28 on: November 14, 2006, 08:21:03 AM »
rm -r *.*

dean_mcgowan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
Re: A PLACE FOR DEBATE
« Reply #29 on: November 14, 2006, 08:26:29 AM »
if you are not thinking and sharing your thoughts then whats the point ....

i'm sure thats what all the great minds said as they conveyed their thoughts to those that were more equipped to build their visions ...

not laying claims to any great visions here .. but you may get the gist ....

stop being so god damn smug and totter off will ya ...