Is a "Net Zero Energy"-rotoverter realizeable ?
a generator-motor couple, "Powermax" :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=23&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20021121&CC=WO&NR=02093720A1&KC=A1similar " inventor Peter Rust" motor-generator object/function :
http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=3713965&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=de&TRGLANG=enthe Powermax consumes 100% motor-side,delivers 30% generator-side
The Imris displacement current converter works with a (pseudo-)C.O.P. 8 :
Powermax motor consume 100% / 8 = 12,5 % - 30% generator = 17,5% average surplus gain
Instead external amplifier/converter need :
Powermax/Peter Rust "rotoverter" as "net zero energy " drive :
motor efficiency/consume saving : from 100% to 66% or 50%
generator efficiency improving : from 30% to 50% or 66%
motor consume- generator output = net zero energy
motor :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?FT=D&date=20080812&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP&CC=US&NR=7411363B2&KC=B2&ND=4The present disclosure has evaluated numerous conventional motor-related circuits and identified new methods that realize power conservation that is approximately 150% to around 200% better than conventionally available motors.
or:
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=US&NR=2002175580A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=20021128&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP[0060] Further, when we suppose a reluctance motor to which the structure of the above-described comparison example is applied, the energy conversion efficiency thereof will be about 30%. However, if a reluctance motor utilizing the structure of the present invention requires an electrical energy of less than 30% as compared to the structure of the comparison example, an output exceeding the electrical input can be estimated and this fact shows that the energy of the permanent magnet element is being converted into a dynamic energy corresponding thereto.
generator :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=3&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19981222&CC=JP&NR=H10341560A&KC=ATo obtain a multipole conversion device and a conversion method by which the efficiency of more than 95% for converting a mechanical energy into an electrical energy can be realized in comparison with the efficiency of less then 50% with a conventional constitution, one apparatus can function both as a generator and a motor, a speed-up device is eliminated and the manufacturing cost can be reduced easily.
compareable :
https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2012093951 http://inventatori.ro/userfiles/image/GENERATOR%20RELUCTANTA.JPG+ Victor Arestov : generator double winding
+ David Yurth : Induction
Coil Coating Increases
Generator Output by One-Third
a virtual applying example :
https://newatlas.com/reva-electric-vehicle-concept/3944/37 KW AC motor
but 12 KWh per 100 Km average consume
- 3 KWh brake energy recuperation
9 KWh net per 100 Km consume 18 KWh battery capacity( 170 Wh/Kg) = 200 Km range
https://www.blogtalkradio.com/John-Craig/2019/02/17/could-electric-motor-w-revolutionary-new-kinds-of-magnet-fields-save-the-planethttps://www.voanews.com/silicon-valley-technology/can-better-electric-motor-save-planetfrom 12 KWh per 100 Km average consume to -less 50%-
= 6 KWh average consume
- 3 KWh brake energy recuperation - 4 KWh brake energy recuperation ( Yurth coil coating)
3 KWh net per 100 Km 2 KWh net per 100 Km
600 Km range 900 Km range
better brake energy recuperation converter/generator ? 170 Wh/Kg to 300/400/500/..... Wh/Kg ?
https://www.patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=15379 ?
some other ideas from this academical/professional inventor :
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=sr&tl=en&u=http://xn--j1aebtj.xn--90a3ac/dt_team/andreja-todorovic/https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=andreja+todorovic&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Searchhere the Dr. Pavel Imris technology becomes interestant,as battery cycle charger :
http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=abstract-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=102016008893&SRCLANG=DE&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&TRGLANG=ensimilar,not same :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=21&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20070201&CC=ES&NR=2265253A1&KC=A1the begin :
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair_C5 - level
small drive
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=4&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19951107&CC=US&NR=5463914A&KC=AIn general, for conventional motors of 1 HP and 3 HP, the power consumptions are 746 W/H and 2238 W/H. These motors can be operated at high speed with low output torque or operated at low speed with larger torque, no matter how it operates, the power consumptions thereof are respectively 746 W/H and 2238 W/H.In comparison, when a DC 12 V mini motor with full load capacity 25 g, 560 mA, running at 13340 rev./min is used, a plurality of such motors can be assembled and operated in association with a suitable number of down-speed gear sets so as to obtain proper operation speed. The power consumptions thereof in the same conditions as above, are compared with the conventional motors to conclude that
at most only one eleventh of the power consumed in above cited motors is required.
for common use
bigger drive :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=2&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20001020&CC=FR&NR=2792258A1&KC=A1Le couple de sortie à l'arbre 25 à 6000 tours minute,est le même que le couple de sortie du dispositif intérieur en mouvement,volant inerte. Ce dispositif équipé de quatre moteurs de 500 wats,soit 2000 wats, avec une gestion électronique,est susceptible des mêmes performances de couple et de puissance qu'un moteur thermique de 50 ch,tout en assurant les services annexes dont le chauffage et le préchauffage du véhicule.5 La consommation moyenne est de l'ordre de IOOO wats heure.
Trop economique ? 4x 500 W electric motor torque in ccw/cw formation equates 50 hp ic-motor torque performance ?!