Storing Cookies (See : ) help us to bring you our services at . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: An Electric-Motor Turning An Electric-Generator Which Powers The Same Motor ?  (Read 25650 times)


  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
First objective 'should' be to demonstrate the concept; this has never been done, suppression claims notwithstanding.


  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
If we do /not know the price of invention components we do /not know the later electricity production price !

The next solution is to deliver first a "fixed output power"- later a "variable output power"- system !
The second needs a input/output controller( more expensive) .
If we know the electricity production price we know the commercial system competivity !

Mass production let all components prices fall, conditioning: "no rare" materials used and
all technical product processes are commercial limitation-and license free .

After dis-/advantages avaliation :  Motor/Generator RPMs  6000 


  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
                 Let us -partial- translate this german text by google :

In a conventional generator the field strength B, the length of his head with L and the current flowing through is denoted I, the result is the size of the counter force F, which is exerted on the conductor and thus to the shaft to F = BLI.

If the field strength of the electrical device 2B, the length of its conductor L is and only one current durchfiiesst(flows), corresponds to the thickness of the half of the current flowing in the generator current, is the force exerted on the armature force F '= 2B x L x 1 = LI.

2 This shows that the force exerted on the armature of the electrical device and hence on the driving shaft power is equal to the counter force, which is exerted on the shaft from the conventional generator. The force is generated to act in a direction such that it compensates the reaction force. A stronger current flow provides the required torque to the shaft. Therefore, the shaft and thus the armature are moved on and generates electric power.

In order to flow current through these half the electrical device, half the generator voltage is required. So with is 1/4 of the power generated is lost to engegenzuwirken(compensate) the deceleration force. The remaining 3/4 of the energy generated or slightly less of them are for outdoor use are available.

If the field strength of the electrical device is a multiple of the field strength of the generator, for example, 5-fold, it is necessary that 1/5 of the current generated flows in the electrical device to generate the compensating force. 1/5 of the generated voltage is required for the current flow. Thus, 1/25 or 4% of the energy produced is consumed in the electrical device, while 96% or less of them are for outdoor use are available. In this way it is not necessary that any electrical energy is introduced from an external source in the generator according to the invention for generating electrical energy.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                             Peswiki         
                                                  Directory: Rotoverter

"Induction motors operate by locking the rotor to the rotating magnetic field of the stator. Most loads do not require the magnetic field to be at full strength to achieve the desired mechanical power output. Lowering the input voltage to the motor with a Variac is a simple test anyone can do to prove this principle. Most drill press motors will run quite well on 60 volts input. Cutting the Voltage in half also cuts the current in half, which cuts the Power input by 75%! Once the motor is Power Factor Corrected for this voltage, the motor will appear to run on NEARLY NOTHING!!!!
                                         And of course, that is the point.


          Now the important difference between the Mukherjee-invention and the rotoverter :
the rotoverter-concept has a rotating rotor/stator-motor coupled to a rotating stator/rotor alternator

Mukherjee described a rotating rotor/stator motor(=generator) and a non-self-rotating electrical device=Steuereinrichtung(~ Controller) coupled to the motor-shaft !


  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
An "Outlook 2025" : 
5 KW scooter DC motor( or AC alternator)

"active parts"

Copper 0,9 Kg :
alternatively :
                      cheaper aluminium-production process
Iron 1,4 Kg :
Researchers at Lund University (Sweden) have developed a technique for making magnetic components in electric motors from plastic bonded iron powder (PBIP) that can cut aggregate production cost in half and nearly double the output of the motor.
Molding melted plastic and iron particles also enables full freedom of form. Besides higher quality and greater freedom of form, the technique  reduces the number of production steps from about 60 to only a few

Magnets 0,29 Kg :
“A costing model puts neodymium–iron–boron used now at $60 per kilogram and our material at about $10 per kilogram,” said David Matthiesen, associate professor of materials science and engineering at Case Western Reserve and the project’s principal investigator.


  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
An "Outlook 2025" : 
5 KW scooter DC motor( or AC alternator)

"active parts"

Copper 0,9 Kg :
alternatively :
                      cheaper aluminium-production process
Iron 1,4 Kg :
Researchers at Lund University (Sweden) have developed a technique for making magnetic components in electric motors from plastic bonded iron powder (PBIP) that can cut aggregate production cost in half and nearly double the output of the motor.
Molding melted plastic and iron particles also enables full freedom of form. Besides higher quality and greater freedom of form, the technique  reduces the number of production steps from about 60 to only a few

Magnets 0,29 Kg :
“A costing model puts neodymium–iron–boron used now at $60 per kilogram and our material at about $10 per kilogram,” said David Matthiesen, associate professor of materials science and engineering at Case Western Reserve and the project’s principal investigator.

How fast the rotational system shall work ,which output-voltage : 6000 RPMs,12000 RPMs or 24000 RPMs ? DC , AC mono/polyphase

How high in costs are then voltage modifying transformer
The final thing to mention is the dreaded ‘C’ word: COST! For some time now planar transformers have been disregarded as being too expensive. Contrary to popular opinion, the costs have significantly reduced in recent years through cheaper material costs, as the market grows, and improved manufacturing techniques. It is common for a 5kW planar transformer to cost in the region of $23 nowadays, and in volumes of 100k+ prices below $10 per piece are easily achievable. Moreover, in the 2kW-30kW power range, the use of pre-formed copper ‘lead-frames’ in single and multi-turn forms can achieve virtually any desired turns ratio at low cost, allowing rapid design iteration and ultimately improved time to market.

Acceptable !

Untreated motor/generator bearings works 20000 hours (full load) by 3000 RPMs

motor/generator coil winding :
Although this embodiment has been described in relation to an exemplary device such as a transformer, the claimed invention may equally well be utilized in other types of electrical devices where internal heat is a problem, such as motors, modulation transformers, etc. The size of the transformer is not of concern, it may vary from a small transformer used in switching power supplies to power transformers used in electrical distribution systems. Further, the frequency of the electrical current within the devices to be cooled is irrelevant, e.g., 60 cycles to 400 cycles operate the same thermally. High frequency transformers have higher copper losses due to skin effects. This additional heat may also be removed by the thermally conductive strip as set forth in this invention.

    When applied to electrical motors 30, as shown in FIG. 5a, pieces of thermally conductive strip 16 are placed between windings of the motor 30 or interleaved into vertically stacked motor laminations 32, as shown in FIG. 5b. The internal heat from the motor laminations 32 and windings 36 is conducted from the interior of the motor 30 to the outer portions where the heat is then dissipated through the motor case 34 to ambient atmosphere.

system material weight (Schiller scooter motor 3000 RPMs 2KW/Kg based) for each 1 KW output
(linear calculation,ultra-low friction treatment  or similar and nanocoating )
and F1 motor/generator /F2 "controller unit" 1/2 magnetic field force relationship

  3000 RPMs :   ( 0,5       x 3 x  1,5 ) Kg /KW                  after 20000 h full load bearings change     or treated NUFM:  after 80000 h
  6000 RPMs :   ( 0,25     x 3 x  1,5 ) Kg /KW                           10000                                                                                                  40000
12000 RPMs :   ( 0,125   x 3 x  1,5 ) Kg /KW                             5000                                                                                                  20000
24000 RPMs :   ( 0,0625 x 3 x  1,5 ) Kg /KW                             2500                                                                                                  10000

Shall the system work permanent (8766 hours/year) or
 periodically and by fixed output power or variable output power :
winter permanent for heating and  rest periodically ;
 only some hours chargetime per day 
et cet ...?)

Some years later combination with
                                                                      (monoatomic or diatomic gold nanocoating ?)

At first the LAUNCHPOINT Halbach array motor numbers does impress ,but calculating down the 7hp/1,4 lbs and 8400/7800 RPMs teste results to 3000 RPMs let us reach 3KW/Kg,less more impressive !

                            I wrote some days before about a 6000 RPMs system dis/advantage avaliation:
                                                                  6000 RPMs :   ( 0,25     x 3 x  1,5 ) Kg        per KW-output

   and this f.e. are 2,5 Kg (~ 0,5 x 3 x 1,5 ~ Mukherjee 3000 RPMs version ) transformed material   
                                               and the industrial costs ea.



Clearly the system can also work under 48000/96000 RPMs conditioning,the wished work hours and bearings change are the only barrier !
Something like a "magnet battery",portable.
                                                                                       untreated                                                  treated NUFM GEO+
24000 RPMs :   ( 0,0625     x 3 x  1,5 ) Kg /KW                             2500                          hours full load                     10000
48000 RPMs :   ( 0,03125   x 3 x  1,5 ) Kg /KW                             1250                                                                       5000            12500
96000 RPMs :   ( 0,015625 x 3 x  1,5 ) Kg /KW                               625                                                                       2500              6250     

For comparision
Dr. Pavel Imris calculation of his electric generator (older version)weight :
 first KW 11 Kg,each KW more 3,5 Kg !   production costs: 32 Euros/Kg 

               Next step for the Mukherjee-generator development:
                    there is a need of a starter -soft or hard drive(r) ! 
Low RPMs = by hands/body                                                                               High RPMs: battery or flywheel +  electric motor /mechanic

Industrial Mukherjee-turbine range starter:

for portable devices ?

2016 power density limit :

Now it is to demonstrate the working principle of the Mukherjee-device !
A 100 W output generating assembly will be good enough to show the potential !

 first step to final TARGET :
                                   10 KW/5 Kg/100 US$ each motor/generator unit

  if                       6000 RPMs :   ( 0,25     x 3 x  1,5 ) Kg        per KW-output
and                   12000 RPMs :   ( 0,125   x 3 x  1,5 ) Kg /KW

                                       10 x ( 0,125 x 3 x 1,5)/10 KW
 to reach the 10KW/5 Kg:
Induction Coil Coating Increases Generator Output by One-Third
–Coating the induction coils of generators with a proprietary material increases their output by one-third using the same amount of fuel.

         the   10KW/5Kg/100 US$ motor/generator unit will be at first a 12000 RPM-system
                                           TARGET 2:    1 Watt for 1 Cent

12000 RPMs : untreated bearings full load work      5000  hours
              NUFM treated                       20000
              GEO+                                    50000            ~ 5 years permanent

 12000 RPMs  10KW/5Kg/ 1000 US$ motor/generator unit electricity production price:
                       with GEO+                   1 KWh < 1 US$ Cent
                       untreated                               < 1 US$ Cent   

12000 RPMs   10 KW/50 Kg/ 1000 US$ motor/generator unit electricity production price :
                             with GEO+                  1 KWh < 1 US$ Cent
                            untreated                                < 1 US$ Cent

12000 RPMs    1KW/5Kg/100 US$ motor/generator unit electricity production price :
                            with GEO+                   1KWh > 1 US$ Cent              +/-  2,5 US$ Cent
                            untreated                               > 1 US$ Cent             +/-   4,0 US$ Cent

 12000 RPMs  10 KW/5Kg/ 100 US$ motor/generator unit electricity production price :
                             untreated                    1 KWh < 1 US$ Cent (bearings change and costs included)

                                             TARGET 1:          1 KWh for 1 Cent

                  The "1 KWh for 1 Cent" is easier to reach than the "1 Watt for 1 Cent" !

 With or without Gurus :

Where is ultra-/super-precision needed,where not !
Rare-/special material or not !
High- down to low-/no-skills !
Patent-saved or "open source" the technology/materials(important for industrial mass production) !

Parts list,deliverer .                 3-D-CAD-plan ? Fee ? Free ? 3D CAD-2-CNC-2-CIM-Printer

                        "1 KWh for 1 Cent" competition(production price,not selling !):
« Last Edit: August 16, 2016, 08:02:26 PM by lancaIV »


  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
An Electric-Motor Turning An Electric-Generator Which Powers The Same Electric-Motor ?

   Could this create a self-running-device.
   SPECIFICALLY, what I’m wondering is, is there no combination of Electric-Motor and Electric-Generator that will result in the Generator,  outputting more electricity than was inputted into the Electric-Motor  ?

    And of course,  applying this principle to  Solid-State-Self-Running-Devices, I'm especially referring to the claim that the Figuera-Device  was self-running when it ran an  electric-motor.
    See my following post on the  Figuera thread :

   (  This also involves energy storage in spinning-electric-motors / spinning-electric-generators  )

       - What if you used an Unusually-Highly-Efficient  Electric-Motor,  to turn an  :

      ( 1 ) -  Unusually-Highly-Efficient  Electrostatic-Generator( like a Wimhurst-Generator )
      ( 2 ) - An Unusually-Highly-Efficient  Radially-Designed Electrophorus-Electrical-Generator
      ( 3 ) - An Unusually-Highly-Efficient  Homopolar-Disc-Electrical-Generator
   Different Subject
   - Could A Device Be Made,  That Would Output A Bigger Electromagnetic-Field Than The Electromagnetic-Field Inputted Into The Device  ?
      What about instead of measuring  the electrical-input of the device,  and it's electrical-output,   you measured it's input electromagnetic-field inputted into the device,  and the electromagnetic-field outputted from the device.
     Yes I Know,    that the electrical-input should be the exact equivalent of the  electromagnetic-field inputted,   but what if there is some sort of  anomaly occurring,  maybe due to different materials used in one part of the device, to that of another .
First of all, you can not use Readymade Electric Motors and Generators to achieve with ease overunity power generation.

You must at least make your Motor yourself.

And if you wanna get say 5000W of Horsepower equivalence using 100W or lower, then you must utilize Twisted Serial Connected Multifilar (NOT BIFILAR) to make your Air core High Voltage (minimum of 500v DC) Motor Coils.

Best is to arrange your coils in axial so as to use 2 sides of the coils. Neodymium Permanent Magnet is what must be on your rotor. Use N52 grade of neodimium P.M.

You must connect your coils in Series. This is the part of the Secrets.

You must use High Voltage because Lenz do not have high grip on a coil powered with high Voltage.

You must use thin gauge like 0.31mm AWG30 or SWG28 to make your twisted Multifilar Coils.

You do not need any power from the keep it going. Just simply harvest the amperage energised back emf using High Voltage High Frequency Fast Recovery or Fast Switch.or High Frequency  Diode like HER208

The rule is if iu supply 500V to a coil, you should expect 5000v kickback or back e.m.f voltage. And that means you will need a stepdown transformer and Additional high frequency diodes to get the back emf  at low voltage and return it back your battery or SuperCacitor Bank.

The Stepdown transformer Primary must be wound with Twisted Multifilar Wire as well to get the best results.

Best to use Very thick gauge in the secondary of the Stepdown Trafo to get low voltage as low as 9Vac but high amperage and use your high frequency diode to rectify it and then pass that 9VAC to a Powerful Step Up Converter which is being Sold here

Just add in series the 1KVDC diodes to match in 20 fold your supplied voltge to your coil because itnis good to have excess safe rannge.

You can additional apply Garry Stanley Lenzlesss Motor Coil connection style where he split one coil into 2 and wind both in Same direction and connect them in Parallel or Wind in each in opposite directions and connect them in series.

Serch for Gary Stanley Motor on Google to learn more.

Now as.for your Generator Coils or Alternator coils, make sure you use.very thich gauge to mke it coils and you must arrange them in axial too. Neodymium Permanent Magnet must be used here and N52 is the best grade to putnon your Rotors.

Here also, you can apply Chris Hykes Lenzless Generator Coil Configuration which he normally called "Bucking Coil"

What is done here is to split your Gen or.Alternator Coils into 2 and wind in Opposite directions and connect there leads in parallel as well.

However, two leads will be joined together and one High frequency diodes leads one of the remaining 2 leads to a dc capacitor.

Attached is a cercuit you need to link each coil in your Axial Gen or Dynamo or Alternator together.


  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
it is modular ! More discs = more power !

Small or bigger ,lever advantage included nr 26/ 27 /28 :
from 27. some sentences translated :
If, for example, one meter wide radius of the rotating plate, or an engine long lever arm, the effect of produced magnetic force is about ten times on the axis of rotation.  At two meters large radius or two meter long lever arms is the effect of the generated magnetic force to the rotational axis about twenty times larger.  acting on the axis of rotation forces are equal masses multiplied by the number of magnet groups, thirty magnet groups respectively three hundred times at( 1 meter disc), for example. six hundred times(2 mtr disc).  It may act on the same axis now more of these sets of magnets and magnetic extension several group rounds, so that the sample value of three or six hundred further reproduced.

1 mtr radius á 10 X magnetic force x 30 magnet groups = 300x force amplification
2 mtr radius á 20 X magnetic force x 30 magnet groups = 600x force amplification
                                                For 1 disc arrangement !
                                                More discs= more kinetic power
The "Secret":
The power requirements, whether for a pulse or attraction for many, remains constant even if the number of pulses up to several thousand attraction is minute because the attraction pulses occur in order in fractions of seconds. So it never occur more attraction pulses simultaneously. The power generator has therefore always to supply only the current for an electric magnet. 
 feedback circuit

This lever principle is also the reason why the wind power tower becomes so big !
Using your delivered e-magnet circuit which results should we expect ?

The e-magnets ( rotor or stator or rotor and stator) with capacitive windings :

But here now begins the hard work to combinate physics,engineering and technics to reach the wished result : save and cheap power production !
Which material,weight,hardness,new-used(scrabb),precision,tools, et cetera .... for the motor part.
Then the right generator DC,pulsed DC,AC - Voltage,RPMs ........ for permanent or only periodic use !
And there are motors which need starter help and also self-starter.

Many electricity user ( I probably too) whose want to get cheap energy would become "TILT!" if
they would have to translate this paper theory -by DIY manner- to a real working machine drive :
here -to see- the mechanism complex outside the motor-stator/rotor :

                                     Technical Standart : 1976  ???
             FUZZY or mad logic ? "neuronal learning software" controlled drive

Recitating :
You must use High Voltage because Lenz do not have high grip on a coil powered with high Voltage.
[0038]    To start the motor 28, ignition switch 55 causes battery 54 to supply electrical power to control module 56 to initiate the turning of rotors 30a-d. In one embodiment, the battery voltage is converted to a minimum of 10 kV through an ignition coil in order to start the motor 28. After motor 28 has started, electrical power generated by alternator 50 sustains the operation of the control module without an external power source. Alternator 50 also charges battery 54 as necessary. 

Garry Stanley related:
 his motor
and circuit
« Last Edit: August 17, 2016, 06:53:15 PM by lancaIV »


  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 326
    • The download link for the document containing my 'Inventions and Designs'
   Re: An Electric-Motor Turning An Electric-Generator Which Powers The Same Motor ?

      Are  'Charge-Separation'  based  electricity-generating  devices like  the  'Electrophorus' ,  'Leyden-Jar',  'Capacitors',  'Wimshurst-Machines',    more powerful  than  common-generators.
         For  example,   if you use  'x-amount'  of  energy  to drive  a   'ROTARY-Designed-Electrophorus' ,   and you use the same  'x-amount'  of  energy  to drive  a   common-generator,   which would produce more energy.

          On the other threads on this site it does seem as though SUCCESSFUL    Solid-State-Free-Energy-Generators(  'concepts' )  are now  being  successfully  regularly  replicated,  ones that  just use coils( and cores? ),  so I assume that because of that there would be little reason to try anything  non-solid-state  . 


  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
wow, so there a lot that should be said on this thread....
where to begin?

ok, lets start with the general concept.
Motor + Generator = Output
thermodynamics said this is impossible with 'closed systems'.
What about 'open systems'? Well, thermodynamics does not cover this area, such is free game.

What is the difference?  Well, the difference has been notably identified in the context above ^^^^

Let's look at a standard motor and generator.
The question came up about AC/DC.
Let me tell you now that ALL motors and Generators are A/C.
a DC motor or DC generator, is simply an A/C motor or generator with an added commutator to make it DC.
This knowledge comes from dissecting every motor and generator I have ever come across
as well as straight from the horses mouth: Said by Tesla - the man who INVENTED the MOTOR AND GENERATOR!!!

These are 'closed systems', no two conventional motor and generator combinations will produce more
than is required to keep the system running.
Ohm's law, and its' derivatives cover this extensively, with respect to low voltage induction.

The system becomes 'open' when voltage potentials exceed that of the system boundaries insulative potential maximum.
At this point, the system is directly connected to the environment around the machine.
Can the theory of Thermodynamics close this box? sure, if we had the ability to calculate the energy potential of
every atom or molecule within the radius of the electric field......
But if we did, what we would see is an energy potential well that exponentially exceeds the output of the machine.
thus, any such 'open system' can draw an amount of energy greater than that which initiated the process.

 There are several such systems already around us, (nuclear power keeps your lights on) but they are masked, and hidden in plain sight, while the indoctrinated educational system tells us such is "impossible".

As it pertains to electrostatic machines, These are inherently 'open systems', they rely on the ionization potential of two moving charges, and the capacitance of the atmosphere around them (which is comparably infinite)

The "input energy" of these machines is defined by a frictional coefficient.
and ONLY this frictional coefficient.

The frictional energy drain of moving the charges, in no way shape or discernible form, relates to the energy required to bring two OPPOSING charges together.
--- a process which is self propagating!!!
+ attracts -
if separated in motion:  + induces more -, and - induces more +!!!!
such induction does not ADD to the frictional coefficient, but SUBTACTS from it.

This occurs with any opposing force, but there is a distinction.
lets use magnetism as a closely related example -
north and south attract each other, but once there, there Is a potential energy barrier to overcome to separate the two forces.

An electrostatic machine avoids this negative 'attraction' (or repulsion from the other perspective) by placement of a Neutralizing Bar.
therefore, the gain in energy is only in a positive direction to the rotation.

Electrostatic machines are inherently 'overunity' with respect to a 'closed system' induction generator.

Is it truly a violation of Thermodynamic Theory? No. It simply does not apply in the way we use the theory.
or more accurately, we are not advanced enough to apply Thermodynamic Theory to an 'open system'.

The net result is the same, is requires less energy to induce electrostatic (ionic) charges than is gained from discharging them.

In the same manner that it requires More energy to induce electric charges, than is gained from discharging them.
This is because we are drawing from the atomic potential well of all the molecules involved. shortening their lifespan (decay rate).
E = mc^2
With a conventional Generator, we are forcing more electric charge onto the nucleus than naturally exists, thus lengthening the lifespan of the copper atoms in the coils.

electrostatic generators are indirect 'solar power'.
The stars evolve the atoms and molecules,
electrostatic induction unevolves them, resulting in high electric potentials.

So to compare the two types of machines, is like Apples and ....... their seeds...
How many seeds are in an Apple?  How many Apples are in those seeds?

Take a volume of space, add up all the potential energies of all the atoms and molecules in that space.
Then give that volume of your environment an 'electrical value'.
This is the size of your battery, the electrostatic machine simply drains that.

The electrophorus is basically the same thing, it just has an exponentially higher frictional coefficient.

because of the constant rubbing contact.

Note - that a properly designed electrostatic machine need not make frictional contact to induce the charges!

The "N-Machine", or Homopolar Motor/Generator, is more closely related in technology to its' cousin, the conventional electric generator.

Brute Force vs Natural Processes.

This distinction is very important.
Brute force will never = OU
Natural Process.... Already does


  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 326
    • The download link for the document containing my 'Inventions and Designs'
   The Following Relates To  Energy-Amplification  Via  Geometrical-Means,   For Example,  A Motor With A Large-Wheel On It's Axle,  And That Large-Wheel Turns A Small-Wheel Which Is On The Axle Of A Generator.

   Faraday's First Motors,  And Generators, Seem To Have No Points Of Electromagnetic-Friction,  So,  I'm Thinking If They Would be Ideal To Test Out The Theories Of  'Energy-Amplification'  Via Geometrical-Means/'Purely-Mechanical/Electrical'( Geometrical-Means, see above)  Designs,  Which Are Usually Discredited Due To Torque( I'm referring to torque from electromagnetic-friction, not to inertia/weight friction ).

    ( Although,  I assume that faraday's initial generators( and subsequent others) did in fact have problems with electromagnetic-friction( electromagnetic-eddies ) that they created )

   -  The question was asked on another thread on this website,  that if  when the speed of  faraday's-homopolar-generator  is increased,  whether or not it generates more voltage,   I think the only answer provided,   was that  faraday's-homopolar-generator  needs a very high rpm to generate any power.

    I posted some of my designs/ideas for electric-motors that could have no electromagnetic-friction on the following webpage,  and assumedly if any of those would function,  then they could also function as generators.


  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
I'm pretty sure this guy just demonstrated this



  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research
yes, that is a new Motor - Generator which seems to be Overunity...It is a modified is said to generate 228 Volts,but when they used the foot paddle machine with it is had only in the 20 to 30 Volts range... hmm...

I guess it is also a clickbaite scam,until they can show it running on a transparent base plate..
I guess they have a few Lithium batteries hidden there and an inverter circuit...or circuitry to make it look real...

Also the frist 2 videos on their channel was something about getting Bitcoin from some coils and a magnets plugged into an IPhone, which is totally bullshit and dioes not work and was just pure hype...

Regards, Stefan.


  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Hi there, very interested to find out what you think now there are more posts of the "liberty engine" with transparent base, taking engine apart at the end etc
all of which looks like a convincing demonstration that it could be real (along with the back story).

Do you know anyone else who has done the same thing? Maybe private message me if this is a sensitive area for posting publicly?
Was expecting to find more discussion on this topic on this forum...