Author Topic: Passive Power Amplifier Patent US8653903 (Read 17388 times)

ZL · « **on:** June 29, 2016, 01:16:00 PM »

During a recent patent search for free energy related microwave inventions I have stumbled across a patent, which is quite thought provoking, and perhaps some researchers on this forum may be interested to take a look at it. It is the United States Patent 8653903, titled: “Passive Amplifier” Publication Date: 02/18/2014, which will be attached to this post.

According to the inventors Kenneth J. Schlager and Jason Zehrung, the device is a passive circuit composed exclusively of resistors, capacitors, and inductors, employing a positive feedback. The circuit was originally developed to serve as a low noise passive amplifier for radio- and microwave frequencies, but they have allegedly also tested it at low frequencies of 60 Hz as well, with success.

If they would claim that it amplifies power in a passive way (which means it generates excess free energy) at microwave frequencies only, then I would get curious and examine it in detail. But they have gone too far by claiming that this circuit can generate free energy even at 60Hz, which would mean, that you could just plug it into the power outlet and connect your electrical appliances to the amplifier output. Then voila! You have the simplest, cheapest, and most efficient free energy generator in the world for a few bucks that every technically minded person could build at home from off-the-shelf components. Doesn’t this sound too good to be true? Well, it does to me.

If I am so skeptical about it, then why post it here at all? Well, because it is an excellent demonstration of the disinformation campaign perpetuated in the field of free energy by the energy cartel. They do everything they can to confuse free energy researchers (and people in general) by approving patents for alleged free energy devices, which don’t generate free energy in reality (like this one); while denying patents to devices that really generate excess energy in practice (like the invention of Janos Vajda). Then they spread hoax free energy inventions on forums, to lead the interested researchers into blind alleys, and in round circles, never arriving to success; away from any real free energy principle, which could really work in practice.

How do I know that this can not work at low frequencies? First of all, please note that the inventors did not even touch the subject about which principle generates excess energy in their circuit. Then note that the science of electronics (and its computerized simulations) of these passive components is advanced enough to know, that at low frequencies there is no way to amplify power and generate excess energy with such passive circuits. If you don’t believe me, then try it!

Why would I be inclined to check for any excess power at high frequencies? Because at high frequencies power is not conducted in the same way like at low frequencies. At low frequencies all linear components affect each other quasi-instantaneously in real time, and the reciprocal coupling between the components prevents the generation of any excess energy. At high frequencies the wave length is small enough that the power propagates in the circuit as a wave, and therefore the laws of wave propagation dominate. One of these laws is the law of superposition, which does not only allow the generation of free energy, but it also guarantees this to happen in properly designed circuits. I will write about this subject more in another thread that I will start now about free energy from wave fields.

So this patent is posted here as a contrast to the patent application of Janos Vajda which has been denied. The patent application of Mr. Vajda will be discussed in more detail in the mentioned other thread.

Despite my skeptical opinion, if anybody is interested to test this extremely simple circuit in a computer simulator or build it in practice, it will be interesting to see the results. Here are some excerpts from the patent below.

Zoltan Losonc

Abstract:
A passive amplifier for use with enhanced power supplies, signal preamplifiers and power amplifiers in communications systems particularly in mobile phones, laptop computers and other battery-powered and battery-limited devices. The passive amplifier can be used as an attachment to electric appliances or other power consuming equipment to significantly reduce the electric power requirements of such equipment. These passive amplifiers do not require an outside source of power and can be used to elevate battery power outputs and serve as either low noise signal preamplifiers or transmit power amplifiers for higher performance and extended battery life. Passive amplifier technology is either electromagnetic or dielectric in nature with component parts limited to inductive, capacitive and resistive components. Dielectric amplifier prototypes have gain values in the range of the 10 dB level so as to be useful in communications applications and power amplification.

BACKGROUND
…
Although the low power usage amplifier was initially proposed for communications applications as described above, a second major market exists in the electric power (energy) saving market. The same passive dielectric amplifier may be designed for operation in the 60 Hz frequency band and used to save energy through attachment to electric power consuming appliances, such as refrigerators, electric heaters and lighting fixtures. In an embodiment of an amplifier with demonstrated power gains of 4 to 1, a 500 watt appliance with an attached passive dielectric amplifier would consume only 125 watts.

SUMMARY

The present disclosure relates to passive amplifiers for application as energy saving power supplies, signal preamplifiers and power amplifiers in communications systems particularly in mobile phones, laptop computers and other battery-powered and battery-limited devices. The passive amplifiers also have application as an energy saving attachment to an electric appliance. These passive amplifiers do not require an outside source of power and can be used to elevate battery power outputs and serve as either low noise signal preamplifiers or transmit power amplifiers for higher performance and extended battery life.

Passive amplifier technology as proposed here is either electromagnetic or dielectric in nature with component parts limited to inductive, capacitive and resistive components. Dielectric passive amplifiers are particularly desirable because of their easier extension to higher frequency RF and microwave communications and their potential for miniaturization. The basic dielectric amplifier technology has been proven theoretically and by simulation and bench experimentation. The dielectric amplifier prototypes developed in accordance with the present disclosure are able to increase the gain of the amplifier to at least the 10 dB level so as to be useful in communications applications.

Currently, the basic dielectric amplifier function of the disclosure has been verified theoretically and by follow-on simulation and bench experimentation. Single stage prototypes were designed, constructed and tested at 60 Hz and 100 kHz. Simulation studies have been carried out at 100 kHz, 915 MHz and 2.4 GHz. Paper designs have been completed up to 5.8 GHz. In each case, the dielectric amplifier has demonstrated significant power gain without the need for an outside power source. The only requirement is an input signal in communications applications or a lower power input in electric appliance applications.

Various other features, objects and advantages of the invention will be made apparent from the following description taken together with the drawings.

lancaIV · « **Reply #1 on:** June 29, 2016, 01:31:20 PM »

The same passive dielectric amplifier may be designed for operation in the 60 Hz frequency band and used to save energy through attachment to electric power consuming appliances, such as refrigerators, electric heaters and lighting fixtures. In an embodiment of an amplifier with demonstrated power gains of 4 to 1, a 500 watt appliance with an attached passive dielectric amplifier would consume only 125 watts.

Really interestant ! Also for body e-cooling/warming clothes !

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=1&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20120524&CC=WO&NR=2012065719A2&KC=A2

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=US&NR=5356484A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=19941018&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP
By way of example, an input signal of 6 microwatts with a bandwidth of 1 gigahertz is applied to diode 20 either as thermal energy or electric energy, and thermal energy is applied to diode 10. A signal-to-noise ration of 60 dB is obtained for the input signal for a temperature Tc of the cold diode 20 of 300 DEG K. For a temperature Tr of hot electrons in diode 10 of 6000 DEG K., the amplification of the input signal is 26 dB, which gives an output signal of 2.4 milliwatts. The amplified output signal also has a 60 dB signal-to-noise ratio.

the conversion process,amplifying effect: 6 microwatts to 2,4 milliwatts

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=DD&NR=287597A5&KC=A5&FT=D&ND=3&date=19910228&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP

Probably in future there will be an heat-electric cycle in each home installed -off grid/intra-grid- based.

Gothic · « **Reply #2 on:** June 29, 2016, 08:15:16 PM »

Quote from: ZL on June 29, 2016, 01:16:00 PM

If I am so skeptical about it, then why post it here at all? Well, because it is an excellent demonstration of the disinformation campaign perpetuated in the field of free energy by the energy cartel. They do everything they can to confuse free energy researchers (and people in general) by approving patents for alleged free energy devices, which don’t generate free energy in reality (like this one); while denying patents to devices that really generate excess energy in practice (like the invention of Janos Vajda). Then they spread hoax free energy inventions on forums, to lead the interested researchers into blind alleys, and in round circles, never arriving to success; away from any real free energy principle, which could really work in practice.

And your here to save us from ourselves?

patent attorneys search the claims of the applied patent against previous
claims from other patents and decide if the claims don,t infringe...
It can take up to five years to get one plus numerous fees.

Usually if someone has a product they wish to produce while maintaining
a measure of protection they will pay a fee and file Patent Pending.
this type of person has something that works and wants to get the item
to market asap...

You can file a patent on almost anything, they look at, you pay and as long as
it is unique or a previous claim has expired it,s yours, working or not...

an example is this patent

US20030209636 BOBBIN ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD PROPULSION VEHICLE

Inventor: John Quincy St.Clair, San Juan, PR
Correspondence Address:
John St.Clair
Hyperspace Research Institute
52 Kings Court, 4A
San Juan, PR 00911 (US)
Appl. No.: 10/142,583
Filed: May 9, 2002
Publication Classi?cation

ABSTRACT
This invention relates to a spacecraft Which generates its
oWn magnetic moment and magnetic ?eld gradient in order
to produce lift on the hull. The magnetic moment is gener
ated by a large area solenoid located in the hull. A toroidal
core Wrapped With electrical bobbins at intervals along said
core produces a traveling magnetic Wave along its surface.
This magnetic Wave creates a spacetime curvature, similar to
a tilted plate, Which causes the formation of a magnetic ?eld
gradient. PoWer is not critical because the system uses a
magnetic vortex Wormhole generator to loWer the speed of
light in order to efficiently create highly relativistic ?elds
due to LorentZ transformation.

Now do you believe this guy has a wormhole generator...

http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/the-patent-process.html

ZL · « **Reply #3 on:** June 30, 2016, 01:22:57 PM »

Nice finds lancaIV, it could be worth taking a deeper look at these heat converting patents, if I would have time for that. Perhaps someone else will take the challenge.

Did you test any of these ideas and devices whether they really generate excess energy, or just efficiently convert heat into electricity? When the refrigerator was invented, people thought about that also, that it was a free energy generator, because the heat pump produced more output power than the required electrical input.

These inventions could slip through the patenting process either because they don't generate any real excess energy, or if they do, then it is not significant enough to threaten the interests of the energy cartel. The invention of Mr. Vajda could not get the patent, because that would have turned the present status quo of the energy industry upside down. He sued the patent office, and lost the case. He even had the balls to persevere and appeal to the Supreme Court to obtain justice, and get his patent, but as you would expect, it did not succeed. The real great FE players don't get any patent, no matter how well they present the invention, how much money they have for the process, or whatever they do.

The patent system has been established by the elite to serve their own interests, not that of the public. They just create a false appearance that its all there to serve the little people, to prevent opposition and rebellion.

lancaIV · « **Reply #4 on:** June 30, 2016, 01:41:28 PM »

Hello ZL,
no ! I never did realized a prototype based by the offered Yater,Reichelt publikations !
My interest has been and is the electromagnetic spectrum and the possibilities,macro and nano-universal !

http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/GraneauEditorial94.pdf about "inner energy",distance/time related and the observations !
also really inspiring:
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=1&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20140917&CC=CN&NR=104047814A&KC=A
To demonstrate the ratio between kinetic energy and internal energy we calculate these energies for a relatively strong wind of 25 meter/second (the maximum operable wind speed of the V80 2 Megawatt wind-turbine) having a temperature of T= 32<0>F, which is quite cold air in the populated northern hemisphere in the winter, where such air turbines are popular-
Using the British Unit System Cp=6000 FT x LB/Slug <0>R T= 460+32 =492[deg.]R V= 25/0.3048= 82.02 FT/SEC
The internal energy is: Cp T= 6000 x 492=2,952,000 FT x LB/Slug The kinetic energy is: V<2>/2= (82.02)<2>/2=3,201.6 FT x LB/Slug
Therefore the ratio between the air kinetic energy to the air internal energy in this case is: 3,201.6/2,952,000= 0.00108, i.e., the kinetic energy is about one thousandth of the air internal energy and this case is for the maximum operable air speed for the sophisticated 2 MW air turbine. Weaker winds yield even smaller energy ratios.

Since 2008 I am in contact with the slovacian physician Dr.Pavel Imris,Csc. ,working out the potential from electromagnetism !
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=pavel+imris&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search
One of his last trials:
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=3&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20150618&CC=DE&NR=102013021483A1&KC=A1
[0022] Zum Beispiel, in Reihe 3 sind 140 V Spannung und 6,66 Ampere Blindstrom. Bei 50 Hz Frequenz ist die Blindleistung 935 VA und die abgegebene Wirkleistung ist 850 W. Die aufgenommene Wirkleistung in den kapazitiven Wicklungen 3 , 25 , 26 ist24,31 W.
out: 850W in: 24,31W

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=2&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20091130&CC=PT&NR=104078A&KC=A
english:
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?FT=D&date=20091223&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP&CC=WO&NR=2009154492A2&KC=A2&ND=4&pageNumber=2
From the description you will see that the application is against the written laws ,consequence: new conditioning from the laws !

gsmsslsb · « **Reply #5 on:** June 30, 2016, 11:23:32 PM »

Lanca IV are you in contact with the Dr Pavel Imris that holds Patent for the Optical Electrostatic Generator.
US Patent # 3,781,601 Canadian Patent # 951836[/size]
Optical Generator of an Electrostatic Field having Longitudinal Oscillations at Light Frequencies for Use in an Electrical Circuit[/size]
7-23-1974[/size]
Pavel IMRIS[/size]
This is one of the projects I have thought of trying for a long time. I wasn't sure if he was still alive.

Gothic · « **Reply #6 on:** July 01, 2016, 02:01:34 AM »

Quote from: ZL on June 30, 2016, 01:22:57 PM

The patent system has been established by the elite to serve their own interests, not that of the public. They just create a false appearance that its all there to serve the little people, to prevent opposition and rebellion.

Here is a patent for the M.E.G https://www.google.com/patents/US6362718 Are you saying Tom Beardon is a gov shill?

http://www.realclearscience.com/lists/3_methods_of_mind_control/

ZL · « **Reply #7 on:** July 01, 2016, 10:12:52 AM »

Gothic,

I did not build the MEG, and the proper approach is not to give a debunking judgment about an alleged FE device, unless one has thoroughly studied, analyzed, and even better, built the device in question. Except, of course, if the hoax is as trivial as that of Keshe and Kapanadze, where one can immediately recognize all the hallmarks of deception.

Did you build the MEG yourself?

The acquisition of true information about FE can be expensive, and time consuming. I have built some devices after patents that claimed to produce FE, and reaction less trust, and they proved to be hoaxes. The MEG was not one of them, because I did not find it convincing enough to invest my time into its thorough examination.

Right now I am not interested in replicating such patents, because I have found something that is guaranteed to work. The theory has been meticulously and specklessly worked out, and practical measurements also prove it.

If you are convinced that the MEG really produces 5 times more energy than what it consumes (as claimed), why don’t you build it, and make a positive feedback to the input, and run it in self sustaining mode without any input power, while it powers a resistive load. No input power, but still power is dissipated on the resistive output load which is heated in a measurable way (temperature rises). No need for oscilloscopes to calculate the input and output powers. Just simply measure the temperature rise of the output resistor, and perhaps the current that goes through it. If you do that, then I will be all eyes and ears to check it out.

Berto3 · « **Reply #8 on:** July 01, 2016, 02:24:15 PM »

Well said ZL. We are a community who believes in more efficiency of existing technology and thereby save on energy. That energy is for free. I agree that FE claims outside this field need at least a extensive investigation the way you describe. No patents or experts on FE are trustworthy before they (or others) show in clear measurements their claim.

ZL · « **Reply #9 on:** July 01, 2016, 08:22:39 PM »

Berto3 wrote:

Quote

„No patents or experts on FE are trustworthy before they (or others) show in clear measurements their claim.”

Or alternatively, they should at least prove mathematically (using the established and proven laws of electromagnetic theory) that the main principle of operation of their invention, really generates excess energy even in theory (and how and why it does that). Mr. Vajda did this as well. You can download his paper for free and try to find error in it. There is no error in it!

Now that Gothic and you have picked the subject, I can not resist to add some more “inside” information to the comment about Bearden and his MEG in my last post. Generally I am trying to limit my criticism of FE “pop stars” and perceived “authority” figures on public forums, because I don’t want to get banned for this reason (well, at least not yet). I have more important task to do here, so it is better to focus on what I have to offer, instead of debunking the artificially created fake “idols” and fake “authority figures”.

Since I don’t know yet how far can I go in this direction on this forum, I gave an evasive answer about the subject of MEG. But in hindsight I realized that by doing so, and not presenting the complete negative truth, just perpetuates the confusion and ignorance that is being deliberately spread in FE communities. Therefore I have edited my last post, read it again.

The MEG is so simple, not very expensive, does not require much expertise in electronics to make it, and its inventor promises a COP of 5; which is so huge, that it should be a piece of cake to make it self-sustaining, and power your house with it. No heating bills ever again! If it is so attractive, then how can it be that I did not build it? Because I am a newbie? Well, on this forum it says “newbie” under my user name, but that is only because I joined this forum only recently, and not very active with posting. But otherwise I have been involved in FE research since about 1985 when I have met a German guy who had two fingers missing, because it was cut off by an exploding N generator.

The main reason for me not following Bearden, is his background, which is highly suspicious. A „retired Lieutenant Colonel of the U.S. Army”, hmmm, this just smells like paid, controlled opposition to me. Not to mention three letter agencies of USA… Also check out the extensive highly questionable literature and inventions he has created! Do you really think he alone has done all that (without getting paid to do so)? And the enormous personality and authority cult they have built around him. Do you really think all that came about spontaneously, without big money pumping it artificially? Ahhem, I don’t believe in fairy tales…

Their strategy is not too complicated: infiltrate the FE movement, establish your own puppet “authority” figures with intense advertisement, and mislead the herd into blind alleys. Channel their investments into waste bins, and make them fail over and over again by replicating the disinfo garbage “FE inventions” which should flood the internet. They should be so numerous, that the few real FE inventions should be lost in the heap of garbage, unrecognizable. This will lead the herd to utter frustration, and finally tired out and broke, they will become either idle passive watchers of the FE news, or just quit the research completely. Discredit the concept of FE by creating FE fads like Kapanadze, Keshe etc. and finally by busting them as hoaxes. Then people will finally associate all FE inventions with hoaxes, saying “… nahh! Here is another hoax, from another crackpot. Just ignore it!” And of course, the most important of all is to ignore and suppress the real guys, who invent real FE generators and/or spread the science about it. This is what has happened to Janos and me.

About the MEG: the electric current that gives usable power is induced in the conductors by the magnetic flux change. A permanent magnet provides a constant flux which can not induce current unless it is mechanically moved. In this case it is stationary, therefore it can not generate power. The only flux change through the output coils is generated by the input coils, therefore it is noting more than a fancy common transformer, which is not an FE generator. The presence of the permanent magnet can not generate excess power, no matter how fancy and convincing is the associated explanation of flux manipulation.

This is another reason why I have never spent time on its thorough investigation. But you don’t have to listen to my superficial opinion, since I have indeed not built the thing, so what do I know... Better you listen to the experience of those who have built it, and found it to be a hoax. Here are few links (but there is more literature about this on the net if you dig deep enough):

http://u2.lege.net/newebmasters.com__freeenergy/external_links_from_phact.org/z/bearden.htm
https://www.psiram.com/en/index.php/Thomas_E._Bearden
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Thomas_E._Bearden

Berto3 · « **Reply #10 on:** July 01, 2016, 10:29:42 PM »

Zl, thanks for your insights and presumptions. This and other OU or FE forums let me think at Becketts play:"Waiting for Godot". Comments at this forum could be the lines of that play for this time. While waiting for the messias bringing "endless" energy we waste or time and attention in a treadmill between hope and hoax.
This OU site is running for years now and I have to be honest; I am hooked at the 'waiting talks'.
Solar energy is today obtainable for many. Going off-grid is no problem. Solar cell's are becoming high efficient. The conventional energy suppliers are losing market share. There is one but.... when there is no sunlight (or wind) there is no 'free' energy to gain.
The holy grail will be an OU apparatus, giving always and everywhere abundance of energy. My estimation is that there are no signs this will be soon. Maybe someone finds an exotic source delivering a surplus. Thinking that only machines based on electromagnetic induction will be that free energy source is, after all this years 'waiting', highly doubtful.

Gothic · « **Reply #11 on:** July 02, 2016, 01:34:07 AM »

Quote from: ZL on July 01, 2016, 08:22:39 PM

This will lead the herd to utter frustration, and finally tired out and broke, they will become either idle passive watchers of the FE news, or just quit the research completely.

http://u2.lege.net/newebmasters.com__freeenergy/external_links_from_phact.org/z/bearden.htm
https://www.psiram.com/en/index.php/Thomas_E._Bearden
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Thomas_E._Bearden

I can relate to that...

You are very articulate with the written word, thorough, well thought out and I can see the passion you have on this subject.
I would say you are sincere. Thanks for the insightful response, You have my attention...

Thanks for the links

lancaIV · « **Reply #12 on:** July 02, 2016, 12:14:31 PM »

Quote from: gsmsslsb on June 30, 2016, 11:23:32 PM

Lanca IV are you in contact with the Dr Pavel Imris that holds Patent for the Optical Electrostatic Generator.
US Patent # 3,781,601 Canadian Patent # 951836[/size]
Optical Generator of an Electrostatic Field having Longitudinal Oscillations at Light Frequencies for Use in an Electrical Circuit[/size]
7-23-1974[/size]
Pavel IMRIS[/size]
This is one of the projects I have thought of trying for a long time. I wasn't sure if he was still alive.

I am sometimes in contact with Dr. Pavel Imris,who is living in Germany,Hassleben/Brandenburg.

How you can read and see Dr.Pavel Imris has been the inventor but never hold the patent,applicant and rights holder "Ecocontrol" !

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?CC=US&NR=3781601A&KC=A&FT=D

After 20 years,beginning with the priority day date, each awarded claims right expires !

lancaIV · « **Reply #13 on:** July 02, 2016, 12:20:19 PM »

About applied electro-magnetism: https://web.archive.org/web/20060617154351/http://flynnresearch.net/
About the M.E.G.:
https://web.archive.org/web/20051018154635/http://www.flynnresearch.net/parallel_path_magnetics_vs__similar_devices.htm

http://www.angelfire.com/ak5/energy21/magnetictechnology.htm figure 4, the simple flux experiment !

An invention from Keiichiro Asaoka similar to the M.E.G.,probably some details about the function principle:
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=25&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20030314&CC=JP&NR=2003079128A&KC=A

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19680206&CC=US&NR=3368141A&KC=A

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19990720&CC=US&NR=5926083A&KC=A
It was observed that the power level required was no more than 1/40 of that of the embodiment without a permanent magnet 1, depending on the test condition.
In a static magnet dynamo involved in this invention, therefore, Win2 can be made sufficiently smaller than Wp, so that the inventor considers it possible to make Wp/Win2 >1.

The question here ist the efficiency from a conventional transformator with an open air gap !?

The easiest kind for experiments :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=26&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20030110&CC=JP&NR=2003009558A&KC=A

Instead one permanent magnet a magnet array ?
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=3&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20130314&CC=US&NR=2013062983A1&KC=A1

The present disclosure relates generally to an apparatus, system and method for conserving energy in electromagnetic circuits that may include an inductor, motor, generator, and capacitor or condenser.
And applying on transformer ?
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=US&NR=7411363B2&KC=B2&FT=D&ND=4&date=20080812&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP

gsmsslsb · « **Reply #14 on:** July 04, 2016, 01:04:31 AM »

Quote from: lancaIV on July 02, 2016, 12:14:31 PM

I am sometimes in contact with Dr. Pavel Imris,who is living in Germany,Hassleben/Brandenburg.

How you can read and see Dr.Pavel Imris has been the inventor but never hold the patent,applicant and rights holder "Ecocontrol" !

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?CC=US&NR=3781601A&KC=A&FT=D

After 20 years,beginning with the priority day date, each awarded claims right expires !

The Date on the patent is 25-December-1973 so it should have Long expired by now.
This makes me Keener to give it a go.
Lanca IV I sent you a PM.

Cookie	Origin	Persistency	Information and Usage
ecl_auth	overunity.com	Expires after 30 days	This cookie contains the text "EU Cookie Law - LiPF cookies authorised". Without this cookie, the Forums' software is prevented from setting other cookies.
SMFCookie648	overunity.com	Expires according to user-chosen session duration	If you log-in as a member of this site, this cookie contains your user name, an encrypted hash of your password and the time you logged-in. It is used by the site software to ensure that features such as indicating new Forum and Private messages are indicated to you. This cookie is essential for the site software to work correctly.
PHPSESSID	overunity.com	Current session only	This cookie contains a unique Session Identification value. It is set for both members and non-members (guests) and it is essential for the site software to work correctly. This cookie is not persistent and should be automatically removed when you close the browser window.
pmx_upshr{NAME}	overunity.com	Current session only	These cookies are set to records your display preferences for the site's Portal page if a panel or individual block is collapsed or expanded
pmx_pgidx_blk{ID}	overunity.com	Current session only	These cookies are set to records the page number for the site's Portal page if the page for a individual block is changed.
pmx_cbtstat{ID}	overunity.com	Current session only	These cookies are set to records the expand/collapse state for a CBT Navigator block content.
pmx_poll{ID}	overunity.com	Current session only	These cookies are set to records the id for the current poll in a multiple Poll block.
pmx_{fadername}	overunity.com	Current session only	These cookies are set to records the state for a Opac-Fader block.
pmx_LSBsub{ID}	overunity.com	Current session only	These cookies are set to records the current category and the state for a static Category block.
pmx_shout{ID}	overunity.com	Current session only	These cookies are set to records the current state of a Shout box block.
pmx_php_ckeck	overunity.com	Page load time	This cookie will probably never see you. It is set, if a Syntax check on a PHP block is initiated and will be deleted if the function executed.
pmx_YOfs	overunity.com	Page load time	This cookie will probably never see you. It is set on portal actions like click on a page number. The cookie is evaluated on load the desired page and then deleted. It is used to restore the vertical screen position as before the click.

1	We are aware that Google uses additional cookies it stores on your PC and when you browse our site and all other sites. These are used to target advertising and Google currently does this without seeking your permission. Four of these cookies we know about are named "rememberme", "NID", "PREF" and "PP_TOS_ACK" and are stored in Google's cache on your computer.
2	If you are accessing this site using someone else's computer, please ask the owner's permission before accepting cookies.
3	Your browser provides you with the ability to inspect all cookies stored on your PC. In addition your browser is responsible for removing "current session only" cookies and those that have expired; if your browser is not doing this, you should report the matter to your browser's authors.
4	We regret and apologies for any inconvenience this causes to members and guests who are accessing our web site from outside the European Union. It is not currently possible for us to interrogate your browser and obtain geographic location information in order to decide whether or not to prompt you to accept cookies.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Passive Power Amplifier Patent US8653903 (Read 17388 times)

ZL

Passive Power Amplifier Patent US8653903

lancaIV

Re: Passive Power Amplifier Patent US8653903

Gothic

Re: Passive Power Amplifier Patent US8653903

ZL

Re: Passive Power Amplifier Patent US8653903

lancaIV

Re: Passive Power Amplifier Patent US8653903

gsmsslsb

Re: Passive Power Amplifier Patent US8653903

Gothic

Re: Passive Power Amplifier Patent US8653903

ZL

Re: Passive Power Amplifier Patent US8653903

Berto3

Re: Passive Power Amplifier Patent US8653903

ZL

Re: Passive Power Amplifier Patent US8653903

Berto3

Re: Passive Power Amplifier Patent US8653903

Gothic

Re: Passive Power Amplifier Patent US8653903

lancaIV

Re: Passive Power Amplifier Patent US8653903

lancaIV

Re: Passive Power Amplifier Patent US8653903

gsmsslsb

Re: Passive Power Amplifier Patent US8653903